interview – 6
By discussing “cultural Christianity” almost from the beginning of the interview, Nick Fuentes and Joel Webbon seem to be getting closer to what we’ve been saying: that there is such a thing as secular Christianity (liberalism, or what we call “neochristianity”).
By minute 38, they both agree that to live in the new Christian Republic they envision in the US, you have to be a Christian. They ignore the fact that this very thing was already implemented in Constantinople, the so-called Second Rome. In a few centuries that town ended up as a melting pot of all the Mediterranean races! (Needless to say, for us in the new republic to be formed the requirement is that the citizen be of pure Aryan descent.)
Shortly after, Webbon says that Christianity is not a religion exclusive to white people, but for all people. That this pair’s thinking is medieval is evident when, after minute 52, they begin to discuss theologically who goes to hell.
6 replies on “Webbon’s”
Regarding Constantinople—a topic that can only be understood with a panoramic view of the hazardous history of the white race—I am dismayed that people like Nick, and thousands of white nationalists, are unaware of the book written on the subject by the best mind that the US has produced.
What is your opinion on the fact that most people involved in the issue of preserving the Aryan race are, in most cases, non-Aryan people, such as Andrew Tate and Candace Owens? How will their fate be after the dominance of the Aryan race? Because most of us aspire to live with the Aryans even if we get tenth-degree rights due to the extent of our awareness, how much easier life will be under their wing..
Secondly, what is your view on how the world will be after Aryan dominance? Is it just Vikings living in villages or like the theocracy of great Rome?
And do we have a chosen one who speaks about our cause like Nick Fuentes but in our own version or not? All these questions are very important, and I kindly ask you to answer them please and thank you César.
I don’t know who Andrew Tate is, and the negress Candace Owens is doing nothing to save whites.
Who are you, exactly…?
I am an admirer of 14 words mediterranean,
Apologies if my questions weren’t to your liking.
Warm regards
Dear Robert, sorry to interrupt, but I’m just curious. What do you personally feel Candace Owens, Andrew Tate, or indeed Nick Fuentes are doing for our cause?
As far as I can see there is only one cause, and this site’s Post-1945 NS isn’t a ‘version’ of it, as much as the cause itself (14 words + 4 words, sustained by a total transvaluation of Christian values). Fuentes’ mangled Catholic interpretation doesn’t speak for the Aryan race, only the Christian religion ultimately.
I don’t know Andrew Tate myself either as a commenter (much as I don’t know Candace Owens), but I was vaguely under the impression that he was a non-white (and Islamic) Manosphere personality whose biggest audience these days was non-whites.
Does he in any fashion defend against miscegenation, or encourage Aryan with Aryan births under stable conditions? I don’t know, so I’m curious. The site discussed the futility and femininity of the disorganised, individualistic Manosphere movement already recently, compared with the kind of real-life revolutionary Syssitia/organization/cells initiative.
I gather no matter what non-whites, even the more noble of them, may aspire to do, or what ‘rights’ they feel they would like to have (and if they had any sense, I imagine they wouldn’t waste time and sacrifice their own in-group loyalty by trying to be friends with us), the dominance of the Aryan race requires the complete 100% physical extermination of all non-whites from the surface of the planet.
I don’t see it as personal (not in all cases), and I find it genuinely very sad in some instances (hence why, with some races, I advocate for painless slaughter, say, gassing or whatever, as opposed to strict bloody warfare), but I feel it’s necessary for evolutionary progress reasons, as much as a cleansing ‘full stop’ motion to eliminate all conscious suffering in the process, forever on from that, to the degree that that can/should be done, i.e. that unnecessary suffering (of other animals and of Aryan – and indeed non-Aryan – children).
I won’t interrupt any more. I was just curious on my own questions to you.
Most non-whites use the excuse of saving the white race to corrupt it.
The mixed-race population of America harbors a terrible hatred for the Creole (white). Basically, mixed-race people act like the Jews did in Germany.
The saddest thing you’ll see is that the supposed racists aren’t even white like us.
White people lack racial perception.