The concept of transvaluation is not fully understood. I doubt that even the Christian and neochristian (i.e., atheist) racialists who visit this site understand it.
If we take into consideration what I recently said in my previous post in the context of Greco-Roman pederasty, we could educate visitors with this reasoning:
During Rome’s wars against Judea, Titus was given the responsibility of putting an end to the rebellious kikes, a task he carried out successfully after besieging and conquering Jerusalem in 70 c.e., whose temple was looted and destroyed by his troops in the burning of the city. His victory was rewarded with a triumph and commemorated with the construction of the Arch of Titus.
They even made a statue of him modelled on Polykleitos’ Doryphoros (79-81 c.e.), which is in the Vatican Museum. As can be seen in the statue, a pope didn’t tolerate penises and ordered all the statues in the Church’s custody to be “castrated”.
The Nazis didn’t finish revaluing all values. It was a process that in the 1930s was just beginning. If National Socialism had developed over the last eighty years, there might already have been attempts to sculpt the Aryan warriors of our century inspired by Polykleitos or other classic sculptors. But at the time, national socialists still carried the shame or guilt inherited from Judeo-Christianity: it would have been inconceivable to sculpt statues of Hitler naked even if, like Titus, he had won the war against the Judea of our times.
Transvaluing includes putting naked statues of every Aryan hero in public squares, as the Greeks and Romans did, and not having them hidden and “castrated” by deranged popes in Judeo-Christian enclosures.
Sometimes I wonder, besides myself, who has transvalued all Judeo-Christian values?