video
Could a German who likes this video translate it with AI to see if it makes his compatriots grow some balls? (unlike Nick, all the white men I know behave like eunuchs!).
Greg Johnson says Nick doesn’t read. I am poor but could someone send Nick a copy of Hellstorm, and once he has assimilated it, a copy of Who We Are by Pierce?
The moment he incorporates this knowledge, with his balls he will take our message to another level…
5 replies on “Nick’s latest”
This post should be read in the context of what I’ve said about Fuentes recently: I see the whole thing as the start of a white awakening after 1945, and only oratory is capable of such a feat (cf. Hitler’s speeches).
If we already had a Syssitia, I’d organise a task force to translate these rants of Nick’s not only into German but also into Swedish, using AI.
But the question arises: Why is an orator like this, while he’s moving the minds of American kids, not yet moving the British? Perhaps it’s because they haven’t discovered him yet (the one above is the first Fuentes video I’ve seen on Rumble, for example).
As I’ve said in previous posts, I don’t care that he claims to be a Christian. Unlike Tucker and company—true Xtians who preach love (only hate can save us)—, Nick is openly racist and anti-Semitic.
Step by step to reach our side as young Aryans cross the Rubicon! And Fuentes’ steps indicate to me that, unlike that group of frozen statues in the middle of the river that most racialists have become, this kid continues to move towards a version of Christianity that the Nazis called “positive Christianity”.
As I said, a baby step towards the real thing…
Thank you, that makes full sense now. I trust your evaluation. What I put in my diary, I think addressed to others more than him, is (sorry you’ve read a bit of this before):
Western values do indeed need to die. Fuentes is one of us in the making. His principle is Aryan.
I say ‘I want Israel to genocide Palestine’. It’s not simply that I don’t like Palestinians and follow exterminationist principles, it’s that the more they dawdle, and try other things (as opposed to wading in and doing it), like weaponized expatriation, the more Palestinians turn up in this country (the UK), as Europe’s number 1 dumping ground for foreign scum (at at the behest of the state system obviously as well), and we already have more than a mere Muslim ‘problem’: it’s a full on active stage 2/3 takeover.
We do not need any more. I hope Fuentes-types, if they could take power, would consider that in their foreign policy with regard to this country, otherwise they’re throwing the white people here under the bus. Sympathy has passed us by, for desert primitives.
Also, it gives more weight to the left-wingers here, to continue to defy/deny the basic survival of their race. I don’t mind if the US/AF alone weaponises Palestinian forced migration for themselves, as long as it sends them to a non-European nation to desecrate.
Since Israel insists on using these people on us like a handy spare army, I’d really rather they didn’t have their cake and eat it on this front, and just shot them all down (or indeed starved them out if needs be – though not to death; that’s too cruel). I think this makes sense.
I’m extremely anti-Palestinian, but I’m no way pro-Jew. The enemies just function in different racial-cultural ways when they move on us. Palestinians are cruel and cunning, abhorrent, yet simple; blunt. Jews seem to win the sneakiness award.
I wish people would consider the knock-on effects on this island. Surely they want us to be able to at least fight. It’s worse over here than it is there (in the States).
It’s certainly not his fault. It could be in future though, and the lamps are already out all over this island at the edge of Europe.
America first, but after that it would mean, surely – please, no sympathy from whites for Palestine at the expense of other, fairly similar Anglo-Saxon whites with some type of historic racial bond!
This is my problem with Christian mindsets down to a tee. There’s a worse genocide here than those raggedy f**kers suffer.
You’re right, but given the “mid-river” status—to use my metaphor—of these normies trying to cross the Rubicon, it’s shrewd to use Christian morality regarding the Palestinians to awaken young people to the realities of the Jewish Problem. Those of us already on this side don’t need that crutch: it’s a crutch for those who haven’t yet crossed it.
It would be a political mistake for Fuentes to speak the way I do to those already on solid ground, on this side of the river (NS). Andrew Anglin once told me by email, “This blog [Daily Stormer] is for normies.” Ours, on the other hand, can’t appeal to them because open extermination scares them away.
Nick is the Pied Piper who, without realising it, is leading them to our side—which is why all the faces in the image above are now hysterical: they intuitively know, especially the Jews, where all this will lead…
CT,
I have a question that I can’t fully answer. Conservative Swede stated that there are two types of patriotism that are allowed in the West: American patriotism and Israeli patriotism. However, the nature of each of those is different. Israeli patriotism is ethnic patriotism, its ethno-particularist. American patriotism is race blind propositionalism; its “liberty” or “the Constitution”, etc.
Now, the question I can’t answer is why the Jews are allowed this type of patriotism when it clearly goes against the thrust of both Christian universalism and liberal universalism. The hard left is more consistent on the subject of Israel than is the right. They are opposed to Zionism and their ultimate solution would be the “One State solution”, which would mean the ultimate racial blending of the Ashkenazis out of existence. The way the Left wants to blend White gentiles out of existence, they want to blend White Jews out of existence. In fact, their “3rd Worldist” philosophy sees Jews as evil White oppressors of the oppressed brown Arabs. So there exists this tension on the left between establishment Leftists and dissident Leftists over the subject of Israel.
There is something similar on the right with the establishment right being insane Zionists (ie Trump) and the dissident right being not only anti-Zionist but anti-Semitic (ie Fuentes). OK but here is my question. Why has the establishment right given such an exception to the Jews? They allow White Jews (Ashkenazis) to violate the current liberal rules of war (like them or not) and slaughter brown people without mercy, actually not just the men but also brown women and babies. The Jews are allowed a degree of racially motivated violence towards browns that no White group would ever be allowed. But Israel is not a race blind proposition nation. It is a nation that is based on blood defended by a people that are motivated by racial hatred towards gentiles. It is not a Universalist phenomenon. I don’t understand how modern Whites defend it. And I mean why do they defend violent ethno-nationalism for Jews but punish it for White Gentiles? I don’t understand the psychology of this. How can they not see that the Jews are not fighting for the same universalist principles of the Euro-American world? Israel is not the 51st American state. If it was, it would never be allowed to be ethno-nationalist!
This confounds me. Like Benjamin, I have no love of the Palestinians. If there were no Jews in the Levant and it was two groups of Arabs killing each other I could care less. The less Arabs on the planet the better. But I have an intense hatred of Israel. I would love to see Iran break the back of the state of Israel and end that parasitical, treacherous country. But there is some connection between the state of Israel and the modern American mindset that I’m missing. Tomislav Sunic wrote of the connection being that both Jews and Americans see themselves as chosen people. Is it that simple? I can’t see that. I think it goes deeper.
I think it all comes down to the fact that the collective unconscious of evangelical Americans was conquered by the Old Testament in the sense that the Jews are the chosen people. (Even die-hard anti-Semites like E. Michael Jones concede that the Jews are the chosen people.)
On the other hand, there’s the ethical message of the New Testament, also present in the collective unconscious of white men, including secularists (look at how Napoleon emancipated the Jews).
This produces doublethink, as Orwell would say.
That’s why, like Nietzsche, I believe we have to rid ourselves of all that Semitic malware we have installed in our unconscious to stop this axiological schizophrenia.