Unlike the envious racialists I have been mentioning these days, Kevin MacDonald has written an objective article about Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Nick Fuentes.
Categories
Unlike the envious racialists I have been mentioning these days, Kevin MacDonald has written an objective article about Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Nick Fuentes.
6 replies on “KMac on Nick”
By the way, I hope it’s removed now, but I just wanted to reiterate in public that Morales (and who else could it be? I certainly don’t think it was Adunai, although I can see the former might wish that erroneous connection pondered) has been trolling you again on OD.
You’re right long-term, it is useful to understand the potentially vindictive psychology of the self-conscious Latin American.
In my experience an autist is blunt-as-f**k, surely, having no real filter for that aspect of conversation. They may self-deceive on the whole, as everyone else does, but the prime suspects I can think of aren’t liars, aren’t sneaky cowards. He calls you an autist. But he’s no good at anything, bar experiencing being laughed at.
You’re the most empathetic and considerate person I know! Is his that far up his arse?
Gosh, he’s certainly pissed off (in a bratty way) isn’t he? This is a great example of the tone I mean by ‘triggered’. You’re right… he just can’t let it go. It would be darkly amusing – highly risible – were it not for the fact that, much as you’re used to it, I’m sure it’s still very hurtful. It’s like when the only person contacting me is the woke guy. It’s hard when there’s a lurking asshole and one has no daily backup. I’m glad we can spot him. There’s only so much subtlety the thick mudblood mind can appreciate.
You’re driven – he’s petty-grade obsessive, that the difference. You re-using your long term inspirational tropes and metaphors and philosophical explanations isn’t autism on your part.
Pah, and as usual he’s tacks me on as ‘the mentally ill guy’. Considering what I say when not in my discrete (never long lasting – not permanent – or has he lost all his faculties?!) ‘ill’ points overlaps with what all the other commenters – in a way, himself included – say, doesn’t that suggest I’m actually quite sane?
Either that or we’re all mad together, but I think that’s grand paranoia on his part if really so (a little presumptuous, maybe?), as that would drag down every single other writer of the absolutely thousands in agreement with you/me that you’ve used in your sources. Um… not probabilistically likely, somehow.
I’d love him to define my ‘inherent mental illness’ from the words I write, taken as a whole, not just cherry picking the real madness that, surprise, surprise, I can spot myself – other than supporting you of course, which is the only thing he really has to (wrongly) pathologise me with currently. He won’t like your new article on OD one bit then. What a thorough sh*t that makes him. Suited to the block.
I’d love to find him in real-life. I imagine that would be slightly easier from the Mexican side, and the opportunities for a scouting trip across the continent to go and have a brief chat would be more facilitating. We can but dream.
What part of this will be hastily cherry-picked and re-arranged now I wonder? Does he realise he’s digging his own grave?
Occidental Dissent (OD) or you mean Occidental Observer?
If OD, please provide the link.
Sorry, I meant Occidental Observer – I never read either usually – so I get mixed up with the acronyms. Hope I didn’t surprise you. Oh yes, and I meant ‘head’ in the remark about it being up his arse, but I wasn’t sure if that was necessary given that one would hope his ‘psychology’ was contained therein. He probably trolls you a lot on OD too as Brad lets him. I hope Kevin is adult about this, as I expect he will be.
For the moment, Morales’ comments impersonating me are still there, but surely the moderator of that thread will take measures to make visitors realise that that “Cesar Tort” isn’t me (I never use my full name in racialist forums unless they publish an article of mine).
I don’t think ‘trolling’ cuts it, not by now. It’s full on adult amateur – almost professional-tier – defamation. It’s not an accolade to be that dedicated at that. Yeah, I hope they could deal with it in a real professional human way and just delete them. I’m sure they’d delete me if I stormed in and wrote something trashy. You’d just hope somehow that… they’d be less polite officially. I know – sense – that they respect good standards there, though I admit I don’t usually read them (but am going to be).
I usually tell because he misses off the diacritical mark on your ‘e’. Or puts ‘the real’ in the commenter name. Or, as you say, extends it from the initials at all (or misses off the dots).
The tone speaks for itself. It’s like a literary art project for him almost it’s so backwards and crass. One knows there’s no humour there. No, he’s not laughing.
Morales has been obsessed with me for years. Originally–several years ago—, he only posted direct insults. Then he started using dozens upon dozens (!) of sockpuppets, forcing me to implement such a strict filter that some legit comments from other commenters sometimes fail to get through (as has surely happened with some of yours).
You’re right: Greg Johnson used a euphemism (“troll”) to describe Morales’s obsession with me. “Stalker” or “character assassin” is more accurate, in the sense that he obsessively tries to defame me in racialist forums.
This is exactly the same method Jews are currently using against Tucker Carlson for daring to invite Nick Fuentes to his show: many Jews from the MSM, from the recent Republican Jewish Congress (including Mark Levin), and famous podcasters like Ben Shapiro, are horribly defaming Tucker these days.
Fortunately, non-Jew podcasters have already noticed this, and even a decent Jewish guy like Ben Smith, who has a very good YouTube following, has already noticed this character assassination.