web analytics
Categories
Abortion New Testament

Matthew

by Gaedhal

Christianity, as I said before, is about breeding up “the least of these”, because, as I said before, only “the least of these” have ever, historically found Christianity attractive.

Minus coercion, as Captain Cassidy points out, the best of these have no interest in Christianity. The best of these only pretended to be Christian when Christianity had the power of the sword. Today, when Christianity no longer has the sword, the best of these, the scientists and the philosophers and the otherwise well educated, are atheists, overwhelmingly.

Christianity is abroad in the world breeding up the future generations of the least of these.

Abortion is usually argued for in Liberal—i.e. axiologically Christian—terms. Liberal Atheism, or Humanism, is just an aggressive and obnoxious form of godless Christianity. As Revilo P. Oliver correctly put it: it is merely a non-theistic sect of Christianity; the non-theistic Christianity of the Marxian Reformation. Atheistic Hyperchristians still subconsciously believe in some sort of a magical force that magically makes us all equal; all equally adapted to living in a modern technological world. In a technical sense, the term “equal” or “superior” is meaningless in evolution. However, an organism can be better or worse adapted to a Given environment—in this case a technological Western Civilization. In a godless universe, such as what presents itself to us, we would not expect all humans to be equally adapted to living in a Western technological civilization. Indeed, the people best adapted to a modern Western technological civilization would likely be those who invented it, i.e. White Europeans.

Abortion is usually argued for in Liberal, i.e. Neo-christian terms… however it could also be argued for in right-wing terms… whatever works, right?

Even the antichristian radical right is usually pro-life… even though, as this book The Fall of Roe puts it, more poor non-white women get abortions in America than white women. Abortion appeared to be operating in a eugenic way in America, one of the few statistics that were positive, as regards maintaining White demographics in America… and then Christians killed Roe, first with the Hyde amendment, which stopped the government from federally funding abortion in its donations to Planned Parenthood, and with getting rid of Roe itself.

Abortion was one of the few phenomena, in this world, actually working in favour of White demographics, and the Christians got rid of it.

Every. Single. Time.

As César points out: the Christians are doing more to harm us whites than the Jews.

The podcast whence this book emanates, incidentally, is what changed my mind on the abortion issue. Pro-lifery was one of the last Christian vestiges that I deconstructed / deconverted from.

12 replies on “Matthew”

How horrible. Crime rates will go sky high!

Perhaps, just perhaps, the “Christians” want America overrun by Blacks!

I too have used to be pro-life (albeit with medical exceptions), until this same debate came up a few years ago (I think it was on counter currents). I remember having an argument with my partner about it actually, with me in favour of allowing abortions (and my partner someone who very much takes the ‘all [black] life is sacred’ position). I can understand it having been a eugenics boost in America… after all, if an enemy race is finishing themselves off of their own accord, why intercede, but I was interested on how that translates in the UK.

I see from 2021/22 government statistics that 77% of UK abortion recipients are white, 9% are Asian, 8% are black, 5% are mixed, and 1% are Chinese/other, and that 82% of those are from single women.

I would make the argument that though in general we’re pushing for the survival of white children:

1. the sort of people going for abortions in the first place are not going to make the best, most nurturing parents, and will not be able to provide the most wholesome environment.
2. why are they left single at all; why are their men not stepping up to marry them, and raise children together in a proper setting, so as to perhaps avoid this situation?

Does this arise do you think out of vacuous, degenerate ‘hook-up’ culture at the expense of couples even wanting to form families, a situation where any pregnancy is literally an inconvenience? It was either that or the impact of career-centric pressure on women, until they throw all other natural instincts under the bus, or indeed feminism in general, but I want to put the blame onto men as well, for encouraging (or at least not defying) this matriarchal death culture.

I don’t really know enough about this issue though. I’ve never met anyone who’s had an abortion, so I can’t ask them their motivations.

Generally speaking, although with exceptions for schizogenic parents, I am guided by the precepts of the Third Reich: abortion is permitted only for non-Aryans.

I was hoping you’d clarify that for me, thank you. I think, ultimately then, that’s where I’d rest my own position (rather than putting the cart before the horse, I should really have specified acutely schizogenic white potential parents, not smeared everyone getting away with their abortions as being them). I had to take back my ‘not knowing anyone’ remark. I had a think, and did vaguely know one white girl who was pregnant (albeit unplanned) and wanted her new child. Her idiot boyfriend encouraged her to abort though, for his sake, so he could continue his lifestyle with her.

Also, I would have been interested to find the statistics (or deduce them) for how many of the white mothers were aborting black offspring arising from miscegenated couplings, and similar figures, but, though the UK government gives the rough racial identify of the mother (though never the father), I don’t think they’ll be divulging that any time soon.

I’m not sure, for psychological reasons, if biological mothers should raise rape babies either, although they could be put up for adoption certainly (provided they were white – not that white rapes seem as particularly prevalent these days, at least in comparison).

Generally, yeah, it saddens me very much when whites choose it. I think it’s a hideous, ghastly process, increasingly so as the months go on. They shouldn’t possibly be allowed that much ridiculous ‘freedom’. I’m not even so sure about contraception anymore, as opposed to, say, abstinence, and proper planning. It just seems mindless hedonism otherwise (back to our puritan discussion on pornography and onanism some months back). All ultimately not life-affirming otherwise.

If I recall correctly, contraceptives for Aryan use were also prohibited in the Third Reich.

In Sparta and Republican Rome, it was a duty to procreate to produce white soldiers for the state.

In this era, whites are like the experimental mouse with electrodes in its brain, masturbating itself to death by pressing the pleasure centre button!

It infuriates me that those who want to reduce everything to the JQ refuse to see that this is the worst generation of whites since prehistory.

Sorry to move it slightly off topic in a short extrapolation. I was considering the last thing you wrote there on us being the worst generation of whites since prehistory. By coincidence, I was mulling over my diaries tonight, all my past correspondence, etc., and came across those animal rights/veganism discussions from earlier in the year. That’s what I was trying to articulate at the time but couldn’t put across as clearly as I wanted before invariably tempers flared (I anticipate those distant, gathering torches and raised pitchforks every time I bring up this topic).

Yeah, we eat meat on the whole. So f**king what though? Has continued consumption of it bred better humans of us, in a latter-day world – or humans at all in most cases? Better in psychoclass? Better in nature? No. Outside of all the blatant, perennially disregarded animal cruelty points already raised, what are we in general:

Narcissistic down to a tee, soft, smug, cowardly, bourgeois, backstabbing, conformist, hedonistic, insensate & anti-aesthetic, degenerate, feminized, individualistic, dispassionate… the list goes on, and one can add to it what they like.

I wasn’t arguing that vegans cannot be those qualities so much as meat eaters also can surely possess them, and in practice do (although personally I find the indignant excuse-making, ostrich effects, and cognitive dissonance over the cruelty involved in the animal products industries to tick more of those boxes, and have put so before enough times).

I twigged immediately when I read the comment you made recently on slaughterhouses, talking about one of the key reasons for modern Neanderthal extermination. Yes, very much as I said before… these lazy, slovenly mental invalids and simpletons and arguers-in-bad-faith – these unyielding rocks sinking to the bottom of the Rubicon – certainly have their meat still (as much as all the ‘trademark leftist phenotype’ meat-eaters do), but they remain the worst generation… the ugliest, most abject generation of exterminable useless eaters and traitors yet to taint and shame our race, for all their reverent dedication to their hallowed, addictive dietary convenience fad.

Until Aryans can recognise themselves in all their shabby disgrace and all the smug anthropocentricism of lingering Christian malware, and start to come to terms with their myriad faults and defects, and stupid self-serving errors, as much as any, so far ill-placed, pride, I don’t have much hope for us. I gave up on spotting everyday humility quite some time back.

I certainly can’t boil it all down to the JQ either. I hate it so much when that buck is passed by default. Just another convenient excuse to paper over honest self-reflection, all acting as our own indefatigable defence lawyers for impeccable moral hyenine and infallibility of character. It drives me mad.

So yes, I share your infuriation. Beyond my private idealism for what we should be, I remember you sharing quite some while back that practically all whites too are your enemies these days. I can understand what you mean by that, surely. The aftermath of the war really has left its nigh-on indelible mark.

Pardon my detour from the original conversation. This anger builds up in me now and again.

Sometimes only those who have had psychotic breakdowns see reality in its full light.

In 2014, I still believed there were good white people (in reality, in Kali Yuga there are practically none). When I spent a few days at our friend Joseph Walsh’s London flat, he surprised me one day by telling me that ALL white people are working toward their extinction.

It was a shock to hear this, and remember that Joseph spent time in a psychiatric hospital as a teenager. But in the days, weeks, months, and years that followed I discovered he was right.

I don’t want to go into a long list of why even American racialists commit ethnosuicide. Suffice it to recall that Greg Johnson, for example, considers some brown-skinned Europeans “white” and that he hates Nordicism. Suffice it to recall that Jared Taylor subscribes to the Christian morality of loving these non-whites because he never rejected the religion of his very pious parents (and the same can be said of Christians like Brad/Hunter, Matt Parrott and James Edwards). Suffice it to recall that KevinMac believes that conservative Christianity, his base, is a good force for white preservation. And let’s not even mention Andrew Anglin, who went from a popular blog that featured swastikas to one that now features Christian crosses (I’m not counting Ron Unz because he’s Jewish).

EVERYONE obeys the Jew who wrote the New Testament, even atheists inside and outside the American racial right (cf. what Tom Holland says about so-called apostates in Dominion: How the Christian Revolution Remade the World).

Among the very notable racists, the exceptions are Pierce and Savitri. But the latter died in 1982 and the former in 2002. The new generation is ethnosuicidal in one way or another, as only Joseph saw when he was cured of his psychosis and revealed this to me in his apartment’s study.

The same thing happened with my sister Corina. She had her nervous breakdowns, yes: but when she wasn’t having them, her mind was the greatest reflector of light in my family.

Alas, the System destroys good people…! My sister died after I returned from London, and the UK’s Thought Police put our friend Joseph in jail, where he now rots…

“Abortion was one of the few phenomena, in this world, actually working in favour of White demographics, and the Christians got rid of it.
Every. Single. Time.”
Well said. christianity is 100% a jew weapon and 100% anti-white. It takes a reasonable amount of logic to understand this. Catholics, like their arch enemy the Roman, are also against birth control as a machiavellian technique to build larger armies and tithing slaves…

If you don’t mind me asking,
I want to know whether I should raise my children to take care of me when I grow old.
The world today no longer raises children on the principle of loyalty and obedience to the family.
In the past, taking care of one’s parents in old age was seen as a moral and even national duty, a sign of loyalty to one’s blood and lineage.
What do you think?

Despite her terrible abuse during my adolescence, I took care of my mother as an adult until she died a couple of years ago.

If I ever have the financial means, the first thing I’ll do is adopt a boy and a girl to raise them well…

Thank you for sharing your experience, César, but can you make your answer more clear please 🙂 , should we raise our children to take care of us when we grow old?

Of course!

The government has usurped that role by giving money to single women, etc., and with pensions that the government will be unable to continue after the dollar collapses. This whole system is a Ponzi scheme and will crash in the not-too-distant future. We will return to the old ways of life: raising children to take care of us in our old age.

Comments are closed.