Rockwell

Finally, in part, I think I agree with you. I too yearn for the rural (and despise the dislocation of motorways, urbanised areas, and personal vehicles). But I also understand dominance in a difference sense from the plain (hence my expression ‘prudent dominance’ in my other post), in that I am aware now of the 4-words to its fullest capacity, and feel it a genuine moral responsibility to wipe them out – not to enslave them, or hold the whip hand by any other means, certainly not the sadistic, merely to remove them altogether, and thus the idea of a mass of people driven by hate, the purest of emotions, and the closest to our natural state (much as love must always be nurtured also, even though it requires more effort), is not alien to me, or feral, or indeed an urban desire.

I would very much like a return to Agrarianism, were I a person that could dictate a future state’s methodology (which I am not, much as site visitors will by now be well aware of my perspectives on veganism, let alone hunting/blood sports, or animal husbandry itself, and which I do not wish to discuss currently, as with most there is no end to that brutal, reflex-inducing conversation).

Perhaps from a conceptual metaphor perspective ‘dominance’ is the wrong word (although ‘mastery’ seems to fit that too) in that it implies coming down from above, and engulfing, or crushing, as if to a cowering slave, as if they were innocent on account of that very serfdom, but I am also aware now of the Overman concept with the understanding that a Master morality does just that regardless, and yet does not lose a sense of care of noble compassion in the process – it is refined, and refining. Not for barbarism, or even particular cruelty beyond remit, just natural hate really, for the objectively and empirically hateable.

Aside from that, given his visionary progress, as much as the rationale of the above, I have no problem with Adolf Hitler’s city-centric statist renovations. I had thought, perhaps in error, that the naturalist in him retained a deep wonder and respect for ‘the great outdoors’, as I think was documented by his close childhood friend.

Does every individual as you would say deserve freedom regardless of what they do, and the morality they operate under? I wasn’t sure if racial integrity implied spiritual or biological integrity, or whether you were making the distinction (if present). I thought then of Kali Yuga, present perhaps for far longer even than one could readily reflect on, and the sad, wrenching acknowledgment that even the biologically sound – the epitome of man; the Nordic type – have been spotted as degenerate in character in the dead age, as was confirmed to me recently in private.

These are just some thoughts anyway. On the subject of G. L. Rockwell, despite the loaded slander-seeking of the biased video, I could certainly see the showmanship feeling coming out, which as far as I remember from it was a part of his upbringing also. I think his is a lesson in how far one can try with politics. I’ve always been fonder of W. L. Pierce (despite a few of his own errors – plus that scandal of his abusive private life), much as I respect what the former did, and his unrelenting ingenuity and attitude in testing the limits of the System’s patience, and what one can do with the broader public, let alone his shrewd, cunning manipulation of the Western media for his own ends. The manner of his death at the hands of a traitor is tragic.