Thank you for sharing these key posts by the late Alex Linder. I’ve now read them all…
It leaves me asking the question, given that (as I think he also recalls somewhere in the posts) most of the latter-day—and indeed historical—converts to White Nationalism, and from that to National Socialism, come from those already affiliated to a greater or lesser degree with (Anglo-American) conservatism, how are we to gather new members who are suitably radical, seeing as standard bourgeois conservatives, whether bog-standard racialists, with all the trappings of the individualist WASP work ethic, or worse evangelicals, simply will not do (for a number of reasons covered a myriad times on this site and elsewhere)? Did it make any sense before when I inquired as to the practicalities of trying to ‘turn’ leftists?
I’m just hoping for your new generations—the zoomers—currently. It’s clear White Nationalism, at least in any mainstream capacity, is dead, and those remaining big-name gatekeepers are holding tightly onto too many of the stragglers who have yet to to realise all of this. Dead in that there is no real-world progress and it has become a stilted money-maker, akin to a relaxed social club. Until exterminationism, in a practical sense, is assimilated psychologically, I don’t think any progress can be made.
It infuriates me that people aren’t angrier. I hate just having to hang around impotently, as what could be the rest of the decade or more wears on.
5 replies on “WN is dead”
The silence about Linder’s death in the main “WN” forums only confirms what we already knew: they are de facto conservatives, not authentic Aryans who want to fight for the creation of an Aryan nation.
As for the exterminationism Benjamin refers to, new visitors can see this PDF.
WN = the wish to have White Nations (14)
NS = organise to get White Power (88)
8/9 Nationalist protesters parade through Melbourne chanting ‘White man fight back’
noticer.news
WN is basically a reactionary movement which only exists in opposition to Non-European peoples. It has no cnnection to any previous racialist movement especially the Nordic Movement which was founded by university professors which not only focused on race but also heritage, culture, history, and morality; its more accurate to say they were an ethno-cultural movement similar to Jews the only difference with them with Jews was their demand to be left alone and be allowed to express their own standards of beauty, culture and racial selection.
White nationalists just demand White nations without any of the cultural and moral substance that the Nordic Movement had and they are quick to dismiss whatever knowledge they could offer to them. The Nordic movement also fell through no fault of their own; its only fell because the the Jewish newspapers and media heavily associated them with the Nazis even though this movement was founded by a French noble not the Austrian painter.
This is important, and I’ll quote you in my next post.
WN turned into (or always was) an effete conservative response to the problem. That the whole WN movement has failed is a good thing as it never had a path to change things anyhow.