web analytics

8 Replies on ““Chemical imbalance” myth

  1. Couldn’t find an email for you and comments on older articles not possible, but off topic w/ this thread, I wanted to post one of my favorite Nietzsche quotes:

    “Independence is for the very few; it is a privilege of the strong. And whoever attempts it even with the best right but without inner constraint proves that he is probably not only strong, but also daring to the point of recklessness. He enters into a labyrinth, he multiplies a thousandfold dangers which life brings with it in any case, not the least of which is that no one can see how and where he loses his way, becomes lonely, and is torn piecemeal by some minotaur of conscience. Supposing one like that comes to grief, this happens so far from the comprehension of men that they neither feel it nor sympathize. And he cannot go back any longer.”

    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, Beyond Good and Evil

    To escape the metaphysical trap constructed centuries ago, it is necessary to first have the endless-war worldview epiphany, or as Heraclitus described “war is the father and king of us all” From this endless war realization, then it is possible to deconstruct every single thought the jews have programmed into the environment in which the new minds are born and raised. Once you have this key, then you will see the raw truths the jews have stolen from us, leaving us blind, atomized and philosophically disarmed.

    1. “The good book says that he who lives by the sword shall perish by the sword…”

      “What right man would have it any other way?” said the Judge.

      “The good book does indeed count war an evil, yet there’s many a bloody tale of war inside it.”

      “It makes no difference what men think of war. War endures. As well ask men what they think of stone. War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner.”

      Judge Holden on war, from McCarthy’s “Blood Meridian”.

  2. It’s certainly true that Big Pharma lied to its consumers (and most probably not only them) about the mechanisms of action and general efficacy of their mental health products (antidepressants, anti-anxiety drugs, stimulants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers), but that is, I’d wager, rather old news, at least for anyone properly informed on the dissident side.

    However, I’m rather amazed that C.T. is still staying silent on the new—and, at least prima facie, critical—issue of Big Pharma’s newest line of vaccines and their impact on the reproductive health of the vaccinees! Since a large number of them (possibly the majority even) is of the fair race that C.T. emphatically states wanting to preserve, I’d expect him to care about their actual ability to beget and bear the Blond Beasts of the future. As keen analysts however observe, the birth rates in such fair countries as Sweden, Germany, and Hungary (with their highly vaccinated populaces) is now in steep decline. Incidentally, this significant decline since January this year is in perfect accord with the start of the vaccination campaigns of young people in those countries some nine months earlier.

    Now, wouldn’t that give a self-proclaimed priest of the sacred words some pause? After all, where shall all the nymphets so charmingly pictured and evoked on this site spring from in the future if the fair ladies of today shoud become barren and their gallants practically neutered themselves?

    E.g., in the US, according to the CDC, 70.1 % of 12–17 year-olds and 79.1 % of 18–24 year-olds have already received at least one dose of Big Pharma’s shiniest new product as of today. And that’s only taking the official numbers into account, without looking at the—uncertain—effects of vaccine-shedding on the fertility of the ones who so far declined the recommended a/o mandated injections.

    Well, as I’ve said, I’m amazed that apparently C.T. has nothing to say on this issue!

    1. You have not been reading this site on Covid!

      And regarding psychiatric drugs, I see in the comments section of racialist forums that most of them are still buying the myths of biological psychiatry.

      1. Well, as I pointed out above, then these racialist have not been properly informed—which wouldn’t be all too surprising after all, considering the widespread ignorance about the fatal role of their Christian predilections, right?

        Still, your most recent post on Covid dates back from January—and since then there have been many new insights and findings come to light. Hence my amazement that you apparently have nothing to say on these even though they directly touch upon what you are supposedly most concerned with—the preservation of the fair race!

        However, now there is evidence that precisely this preservation might be endangered not merely because of neochristian beliefs, transgenderism, or similar psyops, but directly because of messing with the reproductive systems of our young. And since females are in general more agreeable and less resistant, what are the resistant young males of the fair race to do when—in the worst case—only every fifth female (or even fewer!) of their race should be able to bear them any (healthy) progeny in the future? How could, under these circumstances, any ethnostate (that you picture yourself in the paintings of Maxfield Parrish) stabilize? Wouldn’t the competition for (healthy) females simply tear the fragile band between the remaining (male) members of the fair race apart?

          1. Well, but that’s still rather sci-fi (no human as ever been successfully cloned, and it took 277 tries for the scientists to clone Dolly, a sheep, in the 1990s), isn’t it? Moreover, how to make sure that this technology isn’t lost in the—apparently—inevitable collapse of the West? Since it will be warriors who will survive then, not scientists, the “trick” you suppose might very well not work out!