As returning visitors know, our seminal essay, published since The West’s Darkest Hour was hosted by Blogger, is “The Red Giant” which collects comments from a blogger who used to comment under the pen name Conservative Swede (Eric).
In 2009, before discovering white nationalism, I used to argue with Eric on Gates of Vienna: a pro-Western, anti-jihadist forum. One of the things Eric said stuck with me. This “Nietzschean of the North”, as Larry Auster who also used to comment on Gates of Vienna called him, said that he would transvalue some of the values of the 21st-century West to the values of the 1950s; others, to the 19th century; but still others ought to be transvalued to the times of ancient Rome.
As we can see even now, sixteen years after my interactions with Eric, the American racial right only wants to transvalue the decadent values of our century back to the 1950s: these racialists are de facto conservatives. Eric realised that some other values should be reversed to before the 50s. For example, the interaction between men and women was infinitely healthier in the world of Jane Austen, before the first wave of feminism took hold of the Aryan collective unconscious. However, as Eric believed that the primary cause of white decline was Christian axiology (after all, over time that axiology would give rise to feminism), other values would have to be reversed to pre-Christian times, Nietzsche’s ideal.
All of this seemed very logical to me when I discussed it with Eric in July and August 2009. Now that I have discovered a great book about our prehistoric past, I would add something to it.
Since reading Danny Vendramini’s Them and Us changed my worldview, as to re-evaluating some things back to the 1950s, others back to Austen’s time, and others back to the values of the Greco-Roman world, I would now add a final touch. In our interaction with the Other, it is not enough to behave like tough citizens of the Roman Empire. Let us remember that they committed the sin against the holy spirit of life: mixing their blood with mudbloods. We must re-evaluate much further back in time: to the values of prehistory, when our Cro-Magnon ancestors exterminated the ape-like Neanderthals.
This transvaluation of all values perfectly portrays the subtitle of this site: “National Socialism after 1945”, and contrasts dramatically with those who remain stuck on Mein Kampf as if it were similar to the Christian Bible. In reality, NS is a living philosophy that, over the years, has developed and rediscovered itself.
Eric would disagree with me that some aspects of our notion of good and evil need to be re-evaluated back to prehistoric times. Despite the nickname Auster gave him, “Nietzschean of the North”, he still subscribed somehow to Christian ethics, which forbids us from fantasising about genocide, let alone exterminationism, as if it were something good and noble.
Our Cro-Magnon ancestors would not agree with the Swede. Nor with Auster. Nor with white nationalists. Either our ancestors exterminated the evolved apes, or the genetic foundations for the Nordic race to flourish wouldn’t have been laid.
Umwertuung aller Werte!
12 replies on “All values”
From our point of view, the most important films of all are Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility.
Re: Cro-Magon vs. Neanderthal: At it’s birth, our race was baptized with a splash of genocidal bloodshed. That is our racial heritage, no matter how uncomfortable it makes some people feel!
Ditto!
I don’t know if it counts as a ‘value’ per se, or just a piece of sense, but I gather that the Cro-Magnons won for their cooperative hyper-aggressive ferocity, not as ferocious and unmerciful individuals (much as they certainly became those at base), so, I hope it makes sense for me to suggest that I think of paramount importance as these weeks and months close in is for white men to subsume their pettier grievances, and actually make the effort (and it does take a little) to get on with other white men, whether in real-life – which often feels impossible with strangers over here – or online – which is merely suspect, especially from long months of monitoring this blog (though common to a lesser degree on all others across the orthodox dissident sphere too).
I am worried by the atomisation, very much by default sadly, that scattering of lone wolves (no matter how competent they are), not a pack of coordinated and interpersonally loyal fighters. As I say, I don’t know what the value would be exactly for racial loyalty, but whatever it is, it needs to be switched back to as neatly as possible, for reasons greater than the individual smugness and/or personal satisfaction of the devastated, ego-driven racial right, about as brutalised, I fear, by mere criticism as the worst malignant narcissists are when confronted with their own error.
As I always tell myself, thinking back to Plutarch’s On Listening:
Incidentally, I gave my girlfriend the money to purchase the correct Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensability film editions tonight, from her internet movies service, as by your recent recommendation César. I look forward to watching the first with her tomorrow, by agreement, and the second soon after, when she has the time. Thank you for picking them.
That quote from Plutarch seems to portray white nationalists who don’t want to answer our arguments on the Christian question.
Exactly, yes, I was wondering that. I wonder if it could be presented to them… in the context of something better than my own castigating yet verbose prose-style. I’d be too overwrought to convey it properly. it would be nice to bring it up periodically from then on, as more little quips/short quotations of sense were put to them. I’d still rather all unrepentant Christians were crucified as racial traitors, but to be honest I’ve run out of initiatives on how to approach them, that particular possible eventuality being a long way off. I tell myself ‘they can’t be that cowardly and that wretched, surely…’, but I know I’m just making excuses for them then, so refrain.
The experience I had in the past with my Catholic parents, with my leftist schoolmates, with the members of a cult and later with the counter-jihadists I mentioned above, and finally with the white nationalists, is that they are a Wall: it’s like talking to a wall. As Nietzsche said: what people have not learned through reason cannot be taken away from them through reason.
We need real National Socialists. Perhaps Martin Kerr could help us…
I am certain that the West is done. Nationalism won’t help because what nationalism is, politically, the massification of people as a dominating force, one which the mentally free and self-judging Nordic race refuses to take part in.
The Nordic race itself has and will naturally disappear when massification and urbanization takes root and right now the West is urbanized and massified beyond recognition. Immigrants contribute to the masses, WN are aiming to have thrir countries back as a mass. Other ethnic racial groups are competing for their mass to become the dominant one. It’s a world where the fair race dies and there is no changing it in a way which respects the freedom amd respect of people like the Nordics aim for.
Are you speaking for every Nordic person, having consulted with all of them, when you say that? I would have thought non-Nordic National Socialists, subhuman as they are, were fighting in what you see as a mass (I gather an evil) – it’s a very small mass too – for your preservation. And it will be a temporary evil. Lets not be defeatist here for the sake of an ideology above a race. The West can be done. The race; your race, not so likely.
There was a man, during Hitler’s time, who did consult with Nordic racial peoples; he was a part of those people. They saw patterns in their behavior and patterns of racial consistency despite the mixture of all peoples in Europe. This guy was well-aware of the decline of the West; he was aware that Hitler was not the savior of Europe and he was well aware the German masses were a product of a declining age. But unlike myself he didn’t generalize; he saw the potential of Europe to turn this things around first and foremost by having the mixture of races in Europe consciously select for a greater proportion or predominance of North racial blood in their populations because that blood was favorable for the life of people in Europe but he also understood such selection would not be possible if Europe continued with urbanization where the mixture of races is inevitable.
He did not consider Non-Nordics as subhuman; he simply saw them as unfit peoples who do not naturally carry the legacy, culture, and spirituality that the Nordic race had and their predominance would change Europe into something spiritually alien; something which cannot be called the West in all but name.
That man has Hans F. K. Guenther the most misunderstood scholar of racial studies both in the racial right and anti-white Left. hell I often misunderstand what this man wrote about and the more you read about him the less he appears as an racial supremacist and more like a guy showing human understanding and mutual respect for racial differences and boundaries. A true nobleman.
Today is the 125th birthday of Heinrich Himmler. Now there was a man who really reevaluated all values.
Heil Himmler!