In this video uploaded today, Megyn Kelly appears accompanied by Tucker Carlson at a public event to talk about his decision to interview Nick Fuentes.
Tucker proves the whole point of this blogsite, The West’s Darkest Hour! He used the term “Christian ethics” to explain why he isn’t an anti-Semite; said that a Jew, Paul the Apostle is “my personal hero” and regarding neochristianity he added: “That’s where the idea of human rights comes from”!
He also explains that when such Xtian ethics are removed from the Aryan collective unconscious, exterminationism arises (which he calls “genocide”).
Unlike the envious racialists I have been mentioning these days, Kevin MacDonald has written an objective article about Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Nick Fuentes.
“I know there are some people in Germany who become sick when they see these black uniforms. We understand the reason for this, and do not expect we shall be loved by all that number of people; those who come to fear us in any way or at any time must have a bad conscience towards the Führer and the nation. For these persons, we have established an organisation called the Security Service.”
Several WN pundits are feeling very envious that Nick Fuentes is the voice that has caused a crisis in the Republican party, to the point that a schism is beginning to appear among conservatives: Israel first or the US?
When I started posting a series about Game of Thrones years ago, everyone ignored me on this site. What I was trying to figure out was the reason for the show’s popularity. In my opinion, it was because, despite the Jewish directors, there were many shots that artistically showcased not only Aryan beauty, but also the beauty of an idealized medieval Aryan world based on fantasy novels: just what the white race needs but with NS directors.
Now we have the same phenomenon among very young people who follow Fuentes. This year, by the way, a European (not Benjamin) visited me and told me that the fate of the Aryan race rests on the shoulders of the Zoomers, and that we must appeal to them.
I think it’s true.
This site has been highly critical of the American racial right precisely because they don’t speak with the brutal frankness that Nick does. Alex Linder spoke like that, but it’s obvious that his exterminationism made him—as it makes me—a premature birth of a future that hasn’t yet materialized.
In contrast, Fuentes’s voice appeals to the current overtone window of white American Zoomers. That’s magnificent, and it’s something white nationalists have been unable to do because they’ve stagnated in mere essay writing without the power of oratory.
I recently reminded my visitors that Linder compared the “lite” racialists to middle-class little bourgeois eating crustless sandwiches, but yesterday I remembered that Linder added that they did so with their pinky fingers raised while holding their sandwiches at their meetings. That’s the diametrical opposite of what Nick does!
The Jews are panicking because if this kid’s voice becomes mainstream, it’s game over for them, and not just for their little wars for a Greater Israel in the Middle East. That’s why a couple of days ago Ben Shapiro did something unprecedented: a special program against Fuentes in which he didn’t even allow the commercials from his previous podcasts (see also Nick’s own hilarious response).
It’s true that Fuentes has gone so far as to say he wants to establish a Christian theocracy in the US where anti-Christians (like me, for example) wouldn’t be allowed to live. But that doesn’t matter to me. What matters is that the collective unconscious of white Americans, at least that of Nick’s countless followers, is moving in our direction for the first time since the fateful year of 1945!
It’s the same thing I detected with the Game of Thrones phenomenon, the most popular TV series. Since intuitive psychology is my forte, I see the first signs (with Nick, not with Game of Thrones) that the white collective unconscious might awaken after its long, long slumber.
So I’ll support Fuentes if he runs for president.
In the unlikely event that he does win (if there were attacks against Trump, we can already imagine what would happen), I’d probably start criticizing him once he’s inaugurated because, given his Christian ethics, he might not fulfil his campaign promises: crushing the left, something that can only be done by staging a coup—becoming a dictator—in order to open two or three Dachau-style concentration camps in the US: my dream come true (as I said recently, that’s why I visited Dachau outside Munich this very year: a solo pilgrimage!).
But for now, I support Nick Fuentes. I don’t care that he’s a Christian. Crossing the psychological Rubicon can only be done step by step, sometimes even baby steps. This is how the Aryan collective unconscious operates, seeking to rid itself of the Jewish collective unconscious that currently imprisons it.
And if we’re talking about racialism and being aware of the JQ, and that only the power of oratory can galvanize the masses, Nick could become what Hegel wrote about Napoleon even though, as a patriotic German, he disliked Napo: “I see the spirit of the world seated upon a horse.”
It seems that not even Hitler had the full picture of the world and of how rotten the English were which might have cost him the war. Céline perhaps had the better understanding of how far gone the other Aryans were, he even blamed the Germans for their relaxed behaviour in Paris, instead of fomenting a revolution they were indulging themselves in bars. What should we make of Hitler failing to blame Christianity in his Testament?
I have seen The Village, it is quite curious that an Indian made films with mostly a white cast for a long time. Should we put the Aryan woman on such a pedestal? Didn’t David Lane regret later the second variation on the 14 words? Shouldn’t we simply want to survive because that’s what life is? Struggle? Will? Power? I am an incel myself, but I cannot care that much to put a woman on a pedestal. And women today are as traitorous as men if we care to give them agency, which I don’t think we should but still. Sure, some are beautiful, but what if they were uglier?
Our race is our race, and our race shall outlive the other races, especially the Nordic, or exclusively so—I am a Nordicist myself. Fuentes will never be a radical, that’s why he can be in the open, unlike us. His purpose will be to make other whites self-castrate. The truth is out there, we can look around us and look at History and we will get to Adolf Hitler! No man more noble, he who doesn’t get to Hitler alone will never get to him! Germany had a gold population back then, National Socialism being born in the trenches of the First World War.
Meanwhile, the Amerikwans went to war for a government that allowed niggers to roam in millions their territory, absolutely insane people for which no politics can be possible, every Amerikwan should scream daily in forgiveness to the murder of Germania and of our continent which is the only real treasure of this failed human species!
Heil Hitler. May the convergence of catastrophes save us from extinction, whites on their own are too far gone to wake up!
Something that strikes me about mornings is that it’s the time when inspiration strikes. For example, I went to bed and woke up planning to spend the morning reviewing the chapter against Sigmund Freud in my Hojas Susurrantes, which I’m translating into English. But inspiration struck while I was getting ready, so I decided to write this post instead.
______ 卐 ______
I’d like to clarify what I have said in my two previous posts, about the movie The Village and Nick Fuentes (here and here). The crucial phrase doesn’t appear in the articles, not even in the question I posed in the last one (“Does such 21st century American film exist…?”), but rather in the comments section and even in parentheses: “Who needs Jews when we have white nationalists?”
I will explain it in this entry.
I’ve been reading the recent articles about Fuentes published on Counter-Currents. I think we’re all missing the main point.
Fuentes is like the kid who says the emperor has no clothes. At 27, he doesn’t have my maturity, or the erudition of the authors of C-C. Compared to me or my mentors William Pierce and Savitri Devi, Fuentes seems like a child. But it’s important to remember that it’s precisely that naive cry to a cowardly public—that the emperor has no clothes—that’s the first step in making them see the obvious.
In racialist forums I’m ignored for taking the message of white nationalism to its logical conclusion: violent revolution à la Third Reich. And I’m not just referring to the question I asked yesterday, which was left hanging (although I admit that only a film expert could answer it). I’m referring to the fact that regarding those crucial words conflating my last posts (“Who needs Jews when we have white nationalists?”) I haven’t received any response on X either, where I tweeted them a day ago. Of my 259 followers on X, nobody has said a word yet. As I was told in an email yesterday, they leave me talking to myself “because increasingly—silently, clandestinely—their egos are bruised by the scolding truth brings, and they are otherwise in distaste, having disagreed silently in the background but without the balls to add more.”
But let’s return to Fuentes, who, unlike my followers in X and here, is always willing to discuss important issues with great frankness. He’s like the kid in the story because he speaks the truth—as far as he understands it—about the ethnocidal levels of migration and feminist ethnosuicide: the cancer in the Aryan collective unconscious of our times (cf. what I said yesterday about The Village).
In fact, young Fuentes is far more mature than the veterans Jared Taylor and those of VDARE, insofar as he has already awakened to the JQ (see this clip). On the other hand, by obeying the Christian mandate to love all human beings (remember that from our POV most are exterminable Neanderthals), Fuentes falls into a great contradiction (see, for example, this other clip).
At the end of Tucker’s interview, he asked Fuentes if he would run for president in the future, and Fuentes said perhaps. Tucker asked him what he would do in power, and Fuentes replied that, since the Left wants to crush us (remember that if Harris had won, the First Amendment would have been at her mercy), the Right should crush the Left as a prophylactic measure.
Fuentes is right. Trump promised a Wall in his first term, and there’s nothing of the sort. In his second term he has promised to destroy Antifa, and the same thing happened: there aren’t thousands upon thousands imprisoned like Nayib Bukele is doing in El Salvador, or much better: what Hitler asked Himmler to do in Dachau, a place I love with all my heart and which I visited this very year!
César Tort, the Editor of The West’s Darkest Hour in Dachau Camp, Germany (see my report on that trip here).
Fuentes’s humanitarian sentiments in the second clip are that American whites must resign themselves to the fact that 100 million non-whites will be residing in the US, even though the Enemy imported them without any plebiscite. This represents a major contradiction with what he told Tucker, the same contradiction as Trump’s unfulfilled promises. Tellingly, both Tucker and Fuentes concede in that interview that it is precisely Christian scruples that compel them not to solve the problem (as Himmler was solving it before the deluded Anglo-Americans intervened).
This said, the adolescent way in which Fuentes speaks, shattering post-WWII taboos, is the right one. He speaks out in a crude manner, like an innocent child with no self-consciousness surrounded by adults under the delusion that the emperor has clothes. It doesn’t matter that compared to us, the 21st-century National Socialists, Fuentes seems like a kid. He uses the exact tone that the Aryan collective unconscious needs to awaken!
Let’s compare Fuentes’s most controversial statements in the clips the Left has been circulating with the boring C-C articles or those published by Jared Taylor and VDARE. Alex Linder compared them to those gatherings of posh people who eat crustless sandwiches and speak in politely low voices. With those bourgeois types we’re not going to get anywhere! We need classy thugs. We need an archipelago of Dachau camps throughout the West! Linder spoke with the right tone—the way potential revolutionaries speak.
Since Linder is no longer with us, I think that for the American collective unconscious, a voice like Fuentes’s is the first baby step across the psychological Rubicon in our direction.
I recently mentioned the film The Village, and yesterday I watched the most exquisite scenes.
What impressed me most were the shots of the lead actress, and how she acted, perfectly imitating 19th-century mannerisms: how American women used to behave. I kept telling myself, awestruck, that this woman was absolutely beautiful, and I imagined what it would be like to marry such a creature and constantly gaze upon her! The story is simply a fairy tale, but what’s worthwhile is that only white people appear in the film, and the director’s artistic virtuosity is evident in quite a few shots.
In the end, I was surprised that the director—an Indian man!—was also the producer and writer of that 2004 film. It’s true that one of my two favourite films for the sacred words, P&P (2005) and S&S (1995), both based on Jane Austen novels, was also filmed in this century. But both were filmed in England. As for LOTR, it was filmed in New Zealand.
Aside from The Village, written, produced, and directed by an Indian man, is there an American film from this century that stars a young woman whose mannerisms overwhelmingly inspire a man to marry someone like her, but filmed by a white man? It’s not about beautiful women appearing on the big screen. It’s about any movie inspiring a white man to marry someone like that heavenly creature.
Listen to another Nick Fuentes interview just for 50 seconds starting from this moment.
It is clear that, due to Christian universalism, which drives Nick to love all humans including Neanderthals (compare it to our exterminationism), Fuentes will never be the American Führer who saves whites from extinction. He, with his million followers, is a man of his time (the Christian Era). I, with Ben, am a man against our time (the Hitlerian Era).
Sorry to bother you. I just thought I’d write again. Being a ‘lazy day’ for me, I’ve spent a lot of it (bar my reading hours, generally in the bath) online, just scanning back and forth between my inbox, your site, and benighted forays across to YouTube and Telegram, desperately trying to see if anyone else is ‘out there’, so to speak, and worth paying attention to. As usual, the latter two came up empty. I don’t know a single decent UK-centric Nationalist or NS Telegram channel, and YouTube delayed me with a few minutes of current affairs courtesy of the channel of Connor Tomlinson (a ‘revolutionary’ Catholic zoomer with a certain weary intelligence, but a lot of normie hang-ups and a conservative mindset).
I wish someone else would comment on your site too. It’s been too many days now, and it’s a complete pain. I like chatting with you on there, but, as always, it’s back to the wondering why no one else has a mind/ideals/a spine. I think they’re a disgrace, after a while, a very big let down, considering what I had thought the radical end of the dissident spectrum could provide. I check periodically every day, just refreshing multiple times in between reading your profound new content, and it’s tiresome, like waiting for paint to dry, or a pot to boil. I like having multiple people to play off, and engage with—even if on the whole they do simply resent me and want to prove me wrong or put me down, or simply express more cold shoulder indifference, perhaps in the hope I myself will give up and go away.
I’m hoping René is still reading Consumption, and gets back to me when he’s read it. I could do with some honest feedback from a novel/additional mind. It’s just that no one really keeps in touch with me (bar you). I emailed an online acquaintance with some vegan stuff yesterday, filling him in on some old WDH discussions, and included a copy of your new Dominion refresher article to boot, but he’s ignored me. Do you still get a lot of correspondence daily from regular long term commenters and such? If so, do they have interesting things to say? I was wondering if the new Romanian you had highlighted to me had got back to you now also.
I think I’ll continue to scan your site periodically for the rest of the evening until bed, and keep my inbox tab open also in the hope the other guy eventually responds. I expect it will be a long wait, and perhaps not a worthwhile one, but I’m too tired now to embark on any more evening book reads. There’s so little to do in this tiny house in the winter bar general tidy-ups, mindless minutiae, endless daily diary & publishing edits, and scanning your site, the only real site online I pay any attention to.
To repeat, yeah, it’s disheartening that they’ve all dispersed… really disappointing. This is by far too regular an occurrence. I know I often speak of whites as a collective disappointing me, usually thinking of all the massed demographic compartments of various breeds of normies, and leftists, and Christians, and bourgeoisie. It annoys me that I have to widen the net on that, up to and including real (whatever that means) radicals. It doesn’t bode well for the future. If they can’t even abstractly talk about it, just vaguely, or philosophically… how on earth would they ever, when pressed, carry it out? I know we say the circumstances would leave them no option but to. It’s just a shame that no one has that whim voluntarily in them as of the present. Two or three people, maybe. And a huge heap of confident showboaters, tailored very much to their own time and needs primarily. I always hope I’m wrong.
If we see Christianity and the French Revolution’s human rights as two sides of the same axiological coin, let us venture to say that the perfect symbol of our counter-revolution would be for thousands of blonde beasts starting to wear T-shirts emblazoned with Himmler’s face while burning churches, crucifying all those who tried to destroy their race and wiping their asses with the remains of the pages of the now destroyed Bibles all over the West, but especially in the US. And the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, which symbolises the historic inauguration of Neo-Christianity, must be razed to the ground as well.
If I were to publish it as a printed book, I would use the final scene of Stanley Kubrick’s Spartacus as its cover: the Appian Way, a Roman road used as a military supply route for the conquest of southern Italy and to improve communications. As Tom Holland says, crucifying the rebels in this way was a billboard to let people know what happens to those who raise their hand against the empire.
Following what I said in my previous post about The Turner Diaries and what Uncle Adolf allowed H & H to perpetrate—a relative power in contrast to the absolute power over earthlings of Hugo Drake in his exterminationist ship—, obviously in a realist revolution we would never have the powers of someone like the fictional Drake. Therefore, we have no choice but scare the degenerate whites like in Pierce’s Day of the Rope.
That, I insist, doesn’t mean we’re unnecessarily cruel. I would crucify the child psychiatrists, yes: but not for unnecessary cruelty. I would do it because only with tremendous power, like that of the “bad guy” in the 007 movie, would it be possible to exterminate in the cleanest way possible, practically without the Neanderthals suffering.
All this stuff about the Appian Way or the Day of the Rope is nothing more than lack of absolute technological power. Lacking it, we revolutionaries have to scare the shit out of the degenerate whites (and non-whites, obviously). Only fear, the age of terror that always follows a bloody Revolution, does the psyop to dominate the rabble. Remember Voltaire’s letter to the Marquis de Condorcet: “Il y a une autre canaille à laquelle on sacrifie tout, et cette canaille est le peuple.”
All this is very sad, because I don’t want those I wish to exterminate to suffer unnecessarily. But white people today are like spoiled children, and the difference between fiction, like that James Bond movie with Roger Moore, and the sordid real world is precisely that, lacking power, we have to put on a little show to, as I tell myself in my silent soliloquies, asustar a los venaditos (scare the little deer); that is, the naive/spoiled humans.
