web analytics

Category: Film

Categories
Degenerate art Film Kali Yuga

Netflix, etc.

Since my sister lent me her Netflix account so I could watch Breaking Bad, I decided to watch the first few minutes of other series and movies filmed during the darkest period in Western history.

Seriously, anyone who watches that stuff regularly as if it were legitimate entertainment is a person with a xenomorph in their brain, so I had a daring idea that I won’t carry out: to start reviewing each of those things and, at the first subversive message, stop watching.

For example: there’s a series about Latin American drug traffickers that begins with a scene of the drug lord Pepe Escobar. I barely watched the first few minutes and I thought to myself: “Those lands should be conquered by pure Nordics. Since the writers don’t propose turning Latin America into New Scandinavia, the series’ message is bad”, and I stopped watching it in the first scene of the first episode.

Something similar happened to me with one of the most famous Batman instalments: a film that even some white nationalists love (that’s why I said yesterday that they too have the xenomorph amalgamated in their brains). The moment I saw that they want to prosecute a gang of criminals through the American legal system I interrupted because, in a sane world, they would simply be executed like the Nazis would (the American Constitution, its laws and legal institutions are, naturally, xenomorphic).

I could say something similar about other films or series, of which I only tolerated watching a few minutes of each. But with what I’ve said, it’s clear what my reviews would be like for 100% of what’s shown on Netflix, HBO, in theaters, on free or pay television channels, not to mention the millions of accounts on various social media platforms.

Do you finally understand what I’m saying in the featured post?

The aspirant to the priesthood of the sacred words will find it hard to swallow, but only the day after tomorrow belongs to us, as Nietzsche would say; some of us will only be born posthumously…

Yes: we priests are premature births of a future yet to be verified: a future whose arrival is uncertain, but which I will strive to bring about through my work (that’s why I named the publishing house I hope to found Daybreak).

Categories
Film Racial right

Breaking

Bad, 3

Tucker Carlson asks a beautiful blonde who is behind the destruction of the white race through mass migration. Neither of them knows the answer.

The typical white nationalist would say it is the Jews, but that doesn’t explain things like white suicide in the Roman Empire through gradual miscegenation that culminated in Constantinople, or what the Spanish and Portuguese did in the Americas since the 16th century. Nor does it take into account the beginning of the repudiation of anti-miscegenation laws in some US states long before the Jews took over the country.

As I have already said, to understand what archetype has taken hold of the Aryan collective unconscious, it is necessary to look at the cultural aspect, specifically bestsellers. Ivanhoe in the 19th century idealised Jewry; Ben-Hur portrayed the Romans as the bad guys and the Jew as the good guy, and Uncle Tom’s Cabin portrayed the black man as the good guy and the Dixie landowners as the bad guys. These super-bestselling novels have something in common: they weren’t authored under Jewish influence but by Christians who vehemently subscribed to Christian ethics.

In our century, the above-mentioned novels have lost their power to X-ray the soul of the contemporary white man. But now we can do so with the television hits that the white masses loved: the zeitgeist of our century.

Yesterday I finished watching, skipping what I already remembered from the first time I saw the series, Breaking Bad including the sequel movie, El Camino: where Jesse Pinkman is the main character (Walter White had died at the end of Breaking Bad). I don’t want to dwell much on my repetitions but, like the novels mentioned (one European and the other two American), the good guy in the film perfectly portrays what I have called neochristianity on this site.

The scenes that bothered me the most were when Jesse, in a fit of St Francis-like madness (Francis gave away the clothes his father made to the poor of Assisi), gave away to the people on the street the millions of dollars that Walter had worked so hard to earn. But worst of all is that, prior to that neo-Franciscan fit, half of Jesse’s millions were destined, as he asked his lawyer Saul, for a Hispanic woman and her mestizo son…

There’s the answer to Tucker’s question!

As I said, regarding Tucker’s question a white nationalist would automatically blame Jewry, exonerating the white man. From our POV, one must take into account the great hits of Western culture as X-rays that portray the particular archetype that has taken hold of the Aryan psyche. And it is clear that this archetype is Christian ethics, which, although authored by rabbis in the form of the New Testament, has been internalised by the Aryan to the very core of his being (which is why I recently used the image of the xenomorph stuck deep in the throat of a white man).

This is what white nationalists don’t want to see. But if they don’t see it they will become extinct.

There is no point in criticising Jewry if one doesn’t perform a radical operation on one’s own soul to remove the xenomorph (the Bible in a nutshell: “Old Testament exterminationism for me; universal love for thee”). And this is done, of course, by transvaluing all Christian values including things like raping the Sabine women to create not a New Jerusalem but a New Rome; genociding the people of Jerusalem without Titus’ contemporaries feeling the slightest remorse, and even the (occasional, not normative) recreation with ephebes for centurions who haven’t seen their wives for years and want to take certain liberties with their cupbearers before battle.

All of this—mass rape of women to found Rome, occasional acceptance of pederasty, or having feelings opposite to those of Jesse Pinkman in a genocidal campaign—is completely alien to white nationalists precisely because they have the xenomorph embedded in their brains.

For Americans, who unlike Europeans were born into Christianity, it will be very difficult to transvaluate Xtian values.

But it is the only path to salvation.

Categories
Feminism Film

Breaking

Bad, 2

I had promised a critical review of the series, but the YouTuber who reviewed it on his channel, which Mauricio transcribed and linked to in my midnight post, already covered the essentials. So, aside from this one, I won’t be posting any more articles: I’ll limit myself to saying a few things about some episodes from the first and second seasons of Breaking Bad.
 

Episode 2

In the first subversive message against Aryan sanity, we see Walter having breakfast with his family, who judge him with their stares. Remember that the right path would be to share meals in a Syssitia, not a nuclear family, but rather an extended family. Without the proper Männerbund restoring Aryan culture is impossible (women aren’t creators of great civilisations).

This lack of manliness, stemming from eating with a woman and a disabled lad instead of soldiers, is reflected in Walter having to kill a dangerous Hispanic man in Jesse’s basement. Walter first sees a knife, a hammer, the guns and a plastic bag but he doesn’t dare do anything because, like the rest of Western men, he’s feminized (compare Walter to Earl Turner from William Pierce’s novel).

Then there’s a funny scene. Walter tells Jesse that, to put the body of another dangerous non-white in two plastic containers to dissolve it with chemicals, they have to put the limbs in one container and the torso in the other: dark humour!

But in the second subversive message we see that Walter was expecting a baby girl, according to the ultrasound. What an idiot given that Walter Jr. is disabled and, in a normal world, the father should yearn for a male heir to replace the idiot (those values no longer exist in the degenerate West). Skyler, pregnant, confronts Walter and scolds him for smoking marijuana at Jesse’s house (remember that Walter dies of cancer). That probably wouldn’t happen in a Spartan home.

It was hilarious to see that when Jesse drags the already smelly corpse of the gook guy who tried to kill him, the body bangs its head on the steps as it’s carried down, and the ultimate dark humour came when the bathtub melted as the body dissolved because Jesse didn’t follow Walter’s chemical instructions. It made me laugh big time! But before that Jesse told Walter, “It’s obvious [Walter’s wife] wears the pants in the family.”
 

Episode 3

“Murder is wrong,” Walter writes during his internal struggle because he doesn’t dare kill the dangerous spic, who is tied up in Jesse’s basement. Is it possible to reclaim the Old US with such Christian morality? Then, Walter calls his wife to check in because it’s late and he hasn’t arrived, as if implying that she’s the one in charge. It’s inconceivable to become a Nazi with Americans like that. Of course, Walter coughs because cancer is eating him alive, but there are countless husbands who behave like that, even without cancer.

But then Walter regains his manhood and commits his first direct murder: he finally kills the Hispanic guy. How many of those who blog on racialist forums would commit such an act?
 

Episode 4

In the first scene after the episode’s introduction Walter is eating with his wife, his brother-in-law Hank, and Walter Jr. Part of the feminization of men—and this must be iterated—is the absence of a Männerbund. In a virile culture, there would be something similar to the laws of Lycurgus: forcing warriors to eat together to build the martial patriarchy. Instead, this bourgeois meal between two couples and a disabled son can only diminish the man’s warrior potential. Of course, the US has long been beholden to Judaism, and the only martial act permitted in that culture is defending Israel’s interests, but that is diametrically opposed to an Aryan culture and already changing among zoomers.

Watching the family scene in the Albuquerque, New Mexico, poolside on what appeared to be a relaxing Sunday, I thought to myself: What would the diners of a Spartan Syssitia (or its SS incarnation in Germany) be discussing at a table? Surely they’d be joking in the crudest way possible! Remember that Lycurgus ordered an effigy of the god of laughter to be placed in the dining halls of every Syssitia: coarse humour among warriors that would scandalize any little woman who dared approach such a place! Walter’s family is the opposite, and what’s worse is that white nationalists don’t even want to live together to create the necessary bonding within a small community of warriors (each Greek Syssitia consisted of relatively few men so that the bonds of friendship would be quite strong).

In contrast, upon hearing Walter and his brother-in-law talking on that family Sunday with their wives, the priest, preoccupied with the sacred words, can’t help but think that those families are talking rubbish—precisely because there are women present! (Remember that women infantilize everything because, psychologically, they are “between man and child” as Schopenhauer said.)

After revealing to his family that he has cancer, in the next scene we see Walter Jr. listening to degenerate music in his bedroom with headphones. After his family comforts Walter, in the following scene we see Jesse with two of his buddies: pure white trash. The priest has no interest in preserving people like that, but this white trash seems to be the current norm unlike, say, Norman Rockwell’s paintings (the image of Americans I was left with as a child watching old movies with my family).

The next toxic scene is that the oncologist, who charges five thousand dollars for a consultation and is one of the top ten in the country, is Black: typical of Hollywood, Netflix and HBO subversion.
 

Episode 5

There’s only one good scene when we see Walter with his family and Hank’s, saying he prefers quality of life to the misery of chemotherapy which would only prolong his life with terrible side effects.

Then comes a toxic scene, almost at the end: Gretchen, the Jewess wife of another Jew, Elliot Schwartz, takes pity on Walter and wants to help him financially. Walter, who needs a lot of money for his treatment, goes back to Jesse’s house and asks him, “Do you want to cook?”
 

Episode 6

Walter’s chosen alias for dealing with drug traffickers is mentioned for the first time: Heisenberg, in honour of the German who should have built the atomic bomb for the Third Reich. Now bald from chemotherapy, Walter has lost his fear of death and dares to go after the most dangerous Mexican distributor in town.
 

Episode 7

For the first time we see what would become the iconic blue methamphetamine that would make “Heisenberg” famous in the drug world.
 

Episode 8

Skyler scolds Walter for suddenly wanting to make love to her in the kitchen. On the other hand, Walter is becoming a man by dealing with tough thugs like Tuco, from the Juárez Cartel. But the screenwriter makes it clear that around his wife Walter behaves like a child: something that reflects today’s culture. Then there’s a scene with Hank and his own wife that also shows the crazy extremes of today’s feminism (I wouldn’t let a woman treat me the way this DEA agent did).
 

Episode 9

Walter and Jesse aren’t men yet. For a minute, they had Tuco Salamanca and the disabled Hector Salamanca, ruthless drug lords, at their mercy and they didn’t pull the trigger. This pair of white “heroes” wouldn’t work in the revolutionary times to come.
 

Episode 10

Nothing to report here except that feminism continues in the final scene, with Walter and Skyler in bed, Skyler not even letting Walter kiss her (compare it with the rape of the Sabine women: the foundation of Rome).
 

Episode 11

The episode begins with a subversive message: Walter tells Jesse in a small supermarket that he can’t cook right now because his wife worries if he’s gone for more than twenty minutes. Then there’s another subversive message in Walter’s breakfast scene with Skyler: the same old pandering! A great humiliation for the man.

What we see on Netflix are anti-role models par excellence, a true inversion of values: secular neochristianity taken to its apotheosis. Throughout the episode, the pregnant Skyler mistreats her husband. After Tuco’s death, all these family scenes are a tremendous anti-climax to Walter’s previous bravery with the Mexicans. And the heterosexual fag still apologizes! Can you imagine these anti-Spartans reclaiming all the territories occupied by non-Aryans in the US? “I love you,” Walter tells his wife: something we should never say to a woman.

 

Episode 12

Tough cop Hank has similar problems with his wife but l am fed up with these family dynamics and must stop here.

Categories
Degenerate art Feminism Film

Breaking

Bad, 1

What I said in yesterday’s post means that, from now on, I must take off the gloves on this site and start throwing hard punches at those to the left of the Nazi: whites in general and white nationalists in particular.

I’ve been looking at ratings pages for the most popular television series. Breaking Bad came out on top in several of the lists.

If Breaking Bad has the reputation of being the best series, that means it is a portrait of the American psyche of the 21st century, as novels such as Ben Hur and Uncle Tom’s Cabin were in the past (I was one year old when the movie Ben Hur, starring Charlton Heston, hit the big screen). Just as these novels completely sold out to Christian ethics were supertoxic to the Aryan DNA of Americans of yesteryear, so are all the Netflix and HBO series today. But let’s focus on just one, presumably the best.

Remember that in the final essay of On Beth’s Cute Tits I critically reviewed each of the 73 episodes of Game of Thrones (GoT) because of the crazy feminism of that famous series. Although I had already written an article about Breaking Bad in September 2022, I will now do the same thing I did with GoT with each of the 62 episodes of Breaking Bad. I am doing this because I have realised that only the punches of hatred in my writings cure me of depression (remember the words of Colin Ross, who coined the expression trauma model: “The best antidepressant on the market is anger”).

The first episode of the first season of Breaking Bad is titled:
 

Pilot

The first toxic message appears at the beginning of “Pilot”. Walter White, the main character, tells his wife Skyler White in a video he records that she is the love of his life. Remember that Savitri Devi said she would despise a man who put her before him. A real man shouldn’t idolise his wife. It was precisely unconditional love that made my father believe the slander my mother spread about me (eventually, because he believed those lies, he murdered my soul). A real man can love his wife, but never idolise her. A true man loves his race, and his primary bond should be with other men—Männerbund—and his firstborn son, who should inherit his worldview, scale of values and property.

Walter White’s only child, Walter Jr. (“Flynn”), who was born with cerebral palsy, would have been euthanised in Sparta. In the first episode, in addition to his wife, Walter also addresses a message to his son in the opening scene of the video, as before committing suicide he planned to send his family a video as a posthumous farewell message. That is the second toxic message of the episode: to love defective offspring because Christian ethics prevent us from performing the most basic euthanasia, something that the pagan Hitler wanted to transvalue with his Aktion T4 programme.

The following family scene shows that Walter Jr. is even a little shit. If Christianity prevented me from euthanising him as a baby, I would disown such a creature and let the female raise him without a penny from me. But of course: Americans, including the misnamed white nationalists, live under a culture, government and laws inspired by Judeo-Christianity, not the pagan Greco-Roman world.

Authorisation drafted and signed in October 1939 by Hitler for the euthanasia programme. The Spartans would be proud!

In the following toxic message, we see Walter White teaching a mixed class: boys with girls. This is a modern aberration: Boys should be educated to wage war (exterminate Neanderthals) and girls to procreate warriors. The reason American racialists don’t want to see the obvious is that, in reality, they don’t care about their race (see the book linked above that includes my critical essay on feminism).

We see the following toxic message at Walter White’s birthday party, where women and men are mixed. This didn’t happen in more civilised times, when men and women only mixed liberally at balls intended for finding a partner to comply with the 14 words (as in Jane Austen’s England). All the women at the party at White’s house have been empowered in the ethnosuicidal American society of our century (one or no children per woman, etc.), when in a normal world it is the man who chooses how many children he will have.

Hank Schrader is Walter’s brother-in-law and a member of the DEA. We see the next toxic message at the same party, where we see for the first time that Gomey, Hank’s right-hand man, is Hispanic: someone who should never have been an American citizen; and if there are millions of Gomeys in the US we owe it to the damn Christians.

In the next toxic message, we see Skyler masturbating her husband Walter in their marital bed while Skyler is busy on her laptop: a distraction. In a normal world, serious instruments would only be used by adult males, say, the heads of households of ancient Greece with the right to vote.

In the next toxic message, after Walter is diagnosed with terminal lung cancer, we see Skyler scolding him because her husband used a credit card, presumably, for lab tests (the woman ignores he has cancer). In a normal world, only men would be in charge of family finances.

We see the next toxic message when Walter White and Jesse Pinkman, the second most important character in the series, begin cooking methamphetamine for the first time in the desert, far from the madding crowd. But the director chose degenerate music for the scene, inspired by the anti-music of blacks. That anti-music perfectly represents the corrupt soul of contemporary white men: not just gringos. When Walter flees in the van after chemically knocking out a gook and a spic who wanted to kill him, we hear niggers’ rap as background music. In the final scene Walter makes love to his wife with degenerate music, but this time apparently composed and played by white people.

It’s truly incredible how overt anger heals a depressed soul (something that applies not only to the fictional Walter White, but also to the author of these lines)!

Categories
Aryan beauty Film Marriage

A question…

I recently mentioned the film The Village, and yesterday I watched the most exquisite scenes.

What impressed me most were the shots of the lead actress, and how she acted, perfectly imitating 19th-century mannerisms: how American women used to behave. I kept telling myself, awestruck, that this woman was absolutely beautiful, and I imagined what it would be like to marry such a creature and constantly gaze upon her! The story is simply a fairy tale, but what’s worthwhile is that only white people appear in the film, and the director’s artistic virtuosity is evident in quite a few shots.

In the end, I was surprised that the director—an Indian man!—was also the producer and writer of that 2004 film. It’s true that one of my two favourite films for the sacred words, P&P (2005) and S&S (1995), both based on Jane Austen novels, was also filmed in this century. But both were filmed in England. As for LOTR, it was filmed in New Zealand.

Aside from The Village, written, produced, and directed by an Indian man, is there an American film from this century that stars a young woman whose mannerisms overwhelmingly inspire a man to marry someone like her, but filmed by a white man? It’s not about beautiful women appearing on the big screen. It’s about any movie inspiring a white man to marry someone like that heavenly creature.

Does such 21st century American film exist…?

Categories
Degenerate art Film Jane Austen

Blade Runner

Yesterday and the day before yesterday, I was watching a few clips on YouTube of Ridley Scott’s final cuts of Blade Runner. I saw the original one on the big screen in 1982 at the old Cine Tlalpan (there are almost no white people in Tlalpan, but I distinctly remember that the day I watched the film, a young, blond woman had gone to that theatre alone).

I was never a fan of that film.

Recently, in the comments section, I said that Sense & Sensibility (1995) and Pride & Prejudice (2005) should be the favourite films of us priests of the sacred words, because that’s the world we should be fighting for: the world that enthrones Aryan heterosexuality in the sense of culminating the plots of those films with marriages that would breed white kids: a patriarchal world in the sense that the power to reproduce rests with men. (In the crazy feminist world we live in, that power rests with women, which is why Aryans are becoming extinct around the globe.)

Those films based on Jane Austen’s novels, written before the psychosis of feminism began, could very well have been filmed in a world where Hitler had won the war.

The abysmal difference between us priests and the American racial right is that the latter, as I said a couple of days ago, are incapable of fully crossing the psychological Rubicon. In fact, many of them love films that repel the priest, as can be seen in the comment threads on Counter-Currents when they comment on movie articles by Trevor Lynch.

Blade Runner should repel National Socialists because, like thousands of films, it is the antithesis of Austen’s worlds. All of contemporary Hollywood, Netflix, and even so-called European art cinema reflect the dystopia of Kali Yuga in its purest form. And don’t tell me that filming dystopias is good for preventing them since Ridley Scott, in one of the Alien prequels, featured a pure Nordid woman fornicating with a Negro, in addition to the sacrilege of using the soundtrack of the aforementioned P&P version for grotesque sex scenes in his recent film about Napoleon.

The vast majority of Hollywood film producers should be executed on the Day of the Rope: passages from Pierce’s novel that I recently quoted on this site. In fact, I’d like to execute even those who like these films, but as Pierce’s character said in the novel, we couldn’t do it because we’d run out of Aryan males! (males who have to impregnate nymphs as cute as Rachael in the film, pictured above). That’s the priest’s dilemma: he wants to exterminate them all, but at the same time he needs their DNA for a renewed, Austen-like world.

Having said all that, I confess there’s a line I love from Blade Runner. The actor played by Harrison Ford invites Rachael to a bar and she, a very refined nymph, tells him “It’s not my kind of place.”

I’d say that about all theatres where movies are shown.

Categories
Civil war Film Racial right

The Order

For the first time today, I watched the 2024 film The Order, which six times mentions my favourite novel, The Turner Diaries and even mentions “The Day of the Rope”: the day I most long to experience, although I don’t think my dream will come true…

Surprisingly, on June 13 Counter-Currents published a good review of the movie that shows that not all is lost in that webzine: there is still a residue of revolutionary thought although, like reviewer Ondrej Mann, I believe that for now any jihad must be internal (since the conditions for an armed revolution will still be a long way off in the US).

I don’t have much to add to Mann’s review. But of the eighty-four comments in the discussion thread—which, as I said, surprise me since revolutionary thought still persists, albeit without a call to arms—I’d like to quote a passage from one of the latest threaded comments:

Here’s the thing about the movie The Order. It’s blatant propaganda, it is full of factual inaccuracies, it horribly mixes up the history, it exaggerates the violence, but this movie in the final analysis is good for us. It functions as what Greg the other day called a kind of social proof; meaning that the mainstream media takes us seriously, so seriously that they made a relatively big budget film, with big name stars [e.g., Jude Law—Ed.] and so inescapably they spread the gospel of William Pierce. Also, the movie is really well made and well-acted, it has thrilling scenes in it and is a pleasure to watch. All in all it constitutes a Victory for our side.

The truth is that I didn’t feel pleasure because of the propaganda.

And I think you are also correct too that eventually RJM [Bob Matthews] will become a folk hero if he already is not one. Shades of Paul Bunyan etc. His story has an almost mythological and legendary character to it right down the fiery Wagnerian ending. He held them at bay for 30 hours after all in his final redoubt, one man against many many more!

Indeed, but in a certain sense Bob Matthews and I—a sort of post-Nietzschean philosopher who like Friedrich’s Zarathustra wants to start a new religion—are antipodes. I believe that, for the moment, any jihad must be internal in order to purge ourselves of Judeo-Christian ethics. On the other hand, like most white nationalists today, Matthews apparently knew nothing about the Christian Question. (I understand that of The Order, not Hollywood but historical, only David Lane understood what we call here the CQ.)

Categories
Child abuse Film

Consumption, 12

Regarding the sixth chapter (five pages) of the second book of Consumption, I would like to quote this passage:

Mum was patient with me in her response, a brief irritation crossing her face as she considered Dad’s encouragement of atheism in me. She paused for a second, thought hard, and then replied, “you can believe whatever you want, Benjamin. I’m not stopping you. But I’d say to pray tonight and ask God to help you come to terms with things.”

“He’ll [his father] hate me, Mum.”

“No, no, it’ll be ok, son, he’s a patient person, and he loves you boundlessly; I think he’ll listen to you, provided you’re polite and respectful. Just see if this helps, ok?”

The big problem with “poisonous pedagogy” is that it idealises the figure of the father to the point of considering him a kind of God the Father in his relationship with his son. The quoted paragraph reminds me of a scene from LOTR, which also appears in Peter Jackson’s movie, in which Gandalf lies to Faramir, claiming that his father loves him when in fact he wants him dead (five years ago I talked about the lie of the “sage” Gandalf here).

In real life, unlike in fairy tales some parents not only love but hate their children at the same time: that’s why they have broken minds. As Ronald Laing once said, despite the claims of biological psychiatry, those who are labelled schizophrenic do have broken minds: their psyches are divided by this Jekyll-Hyde behaviour of the abusive parent.

What I have been quoting from Consumption gives an idea of the nightmare Benjamin lived through.

But for those looking for Hollywood-style entertainment, I would suggest watching Shine, which Ben and I saw yesterday (albeit separated by the Atlantic). Like Consumption, that film, which won an Oscar for Best Actor, gives a fairly good idea of how an abusive father can schizophrenise the son he loves most!

Categories
Axiology Film

Iceberg

by Gaedhal

I watched the 2014 film, Still Alice, yesterday.

One of the things that I liked about it was its treatment of the stages of grief. The denial stage is well treated. Alec Baldwin just openly denies that Alice has Alzheimer’s. Alice is quick, almost immediate, to acknowledge verbally that she has Alzheimer’s, but she still lives in denial. She still believes that she can go running, go on holiday, lecture Linguistics at college etc. And also, we kinda get a subtle hint from a neurologist who looks uncannily like Lawrence Krauss that Alice was late in seeking a diagnosis. It was only really when Alice could no longer disguise her memory problems that she sought a diagnosis.

Alice has familial early-onset Alzheimer’s. This is caused by a mutation in the genome.

I remember, in the grand old days of yore, I used to install television satellite dishes with my father. The set-top box, for to decode and unencrypt the digital television signal had a forward error correction rate. The set top box had an algorithm that could correct some errors received from the Satellite. Do not ask me about the engineering wizardry behind this. To me, digital satellite television is a technology sufficiently advanced to be indistinguishable from magic.

However, where is the forward error correction in our genome? Unintelligent design strikes again. This is why, in my view, Paley’s watchmaker argument fails in our day. In Paley’s day, technology was still, very much, in a crude and primitive state. However, in our day, the process of technological manufacturing is so refined that the organs—organum in Latin means: ‘tool’ or ‘instrument’—produced by nature are wholly deficient when compared to the tools, and instruments produced by humans. We humans can contrive forward error correction, whereas biology and nature, thus far, cannot.

And this, incidentally, is why I am pro-abortion.

One of Alice’s children has the gene for early-onset Alzheimers. She swiftly conceives twins by IVF. The embryos in the petri dish are screened for the familial-Alzheimer’s disease, and the embryos containing this gene are destroyed, and only the healthy embryos are implanted. In essence, a woman’s uterus does the same thing: it screens sperm and embryos for nasty genetic material, and if it discovers any such nasty genetic material, then it either kills the sperm, or it kills the embryo or foetus. Thus, naturally, a woman’s uterus has its own contraception and abortion mechanisms. Contraception and abortion is merely the augmentation of a natural process. And if you believe in God, then God ultimately designed these contraceptive and abortifacient faculties that a woman contains in her uterus.

Evolution explains this. Evolution wants a woman to give birth to offspring that will reach adulthood, such that they too will either give birth to or sire offspring. Evolution does not want a woman to either accept defective sperm or to incubate defective embryos. Thus, evolutionarily speaking, the contraceptive and abortifacient faculties that a woman already possesses makes sense. And if you want to defy Ockham’s razor and add a god to the mix, then go ahead. If you do so, then contraception and abortion become divine.

Anyhow, another pro-death position that I hold is euthanasia. There is a scene where Alice tries to commit suicide by ingesting an overdose of Rohypnol. I, of course, was cheering her on, because Alzheimer’s is a fate worse than death. At this point of the film, she was only ½ Alice, by my reckoning. Unfortunately, Consuela from Family Guy, her nurse and housekeeper, gives her a jump-scare, knocking the tablets out of her hand, dooming her to become a human vegetable.

If I ever get diagnosed with dementia, I will book a trip to Switzerland and ingest some Pentobarbital at a Dignitas facility. However, such a service, ideally, ought to be available in Ireland. Evangelical Protestantism prevents euthanasia from being a reality in the North—although it is becoming a reality on the British mainland—and the vestiges of a Catholic theocracy prevent euthanasia from becoming a reality in the South. Again, why I am an antitheist. On the Island of Ireland, Roman Catholicism and Calvinism—the two biggest brands of Christianity, on this island—still have way, way, way too much power. There are no good secular arguments against euthanasia, just as there are no good secular arguments against abortion. Which is why the atheist British mainland is far in advance of Ireland, North and South on these issues.

My grandmother was not still my grandmother after about a year and a half of dementia. However, she lived on as a human potted plant—a mockery of her former form—for about two years after. I was glad, for her sake, when she died. In the words of Saint Thomas More, in his Utopia she outlived herself. Annie Bessant quotes the Utopia in her essay in favour of euthanasia.

 

______ 卐 ______
 

Editor’s 2 ¢

Since I studied the fraudulent profession called psychiatry in-depth, I realised, in reviewing its 19th-century origins, that psychiatrists were simply pathologizing behaviour such as suicide, a ‘sin’ considered lèse majesté divine, dogmatically declaring it to be a disease of unknown biomedical aetiology (and the same with the other diagnostic categories ‘of unknown aetiology’!).

Like me, Benjamin has spotted a tremendous error in the racial right, for example, in the comments sections where hundreds of commenters opine in The Unz Review. None of them seem to notice the pseudo-scientificity of psychiatry. Neochristianity, as we understand it on this site, means that the axiological tail of Christian morality persists, foolishly, in today’s secular world. What Gaedhal mentions above is only one example.

I would add that the negrolatry (BLM, mixed couples, etc.) that so afflicts today’s mad West is another example of Christian morality exponentially exacerbated in the secular world (from this site’s seminal essay, ‘The Red Giant’, a Swede noted that secularism exacerbates Christian morality big time).

White nationalists shouldn’t ignore us. They should realise that rather than our paradigm (CQ) competing with theirs (JQ), our POV expands the latter as with the iceberg metaphor. They only see the iceberg’s tip but we know that the Jewish Problem is supported by the huge mass of Christian ethics that lies underneath. Dr Robert Morgan agrees with us in the post from a couple of days ago.

Categories
Film Literature Videos

Turning the other cheek

In the excellent Russian film I saw based on this Dostoevsky novel, what stuck with me most was the slap given to the idiot prince (watch it here).