web analytics

Category: Conservatism

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 4

After the eighth minute Nick begins to talk about his ideology: “America First.”

Right away there’s the problem, because “America” isn’t just made up of white people, but millions of people of colour.

But of course: Fuentes is a Christian. Compare that to the priest with the 14 words, “The Aryan comes first,” which leaves no room for misunderstanding. But that’s not Nick’s starting point.

Some time later Fuentes said he might vote for a black man running for president.

Do you see why all that “America First” is rubbish, if not outright treason?

Shortly after, Webbon says that abortion is wicked, even for blacks; and before that he said there would be 25 million more Negroes in the US if abortion were prohibited! Nick agreed.

Compare this treacherous bullshit to the Nuremberg Laws.

In the rest of the conversation they said pertinent things about the JQ, but what was indicated shows that Christians aren’t useful for preserving the Aryan race from ongoing extinction.

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 3

Nick Fuentes says that, for St Paul, the “concession” was to marry in the sense that celibacy is better.

See the inferiority of Christianity to Judaism: the stars promised to Abraham were his future kike descendants without demonising sex. But in Judeo-Christianity sex is sinful for gentiles (i.e., white people from the Mediterranean). The god of the Jews “concedes” us marriage so that we don’t burn with lust, but the highest state is non-reproductive celibacy, and Fuentes even talks about monasteries.

Then Nick confuses marital masculinity with a feminised husband. Since I’ve been talking about Breaking Bad, let’s say that Nick confuses masculinity with a character like Walter White: a “man” who put his family above everything else. On the other hand, we see true masculinity in Sparta, pre-imperial Rome, the Goths, the Vikings and National Socialism where there is Männerbund, unlike the decadent 21st-century America so well represented in the gynocentric scenes of Breaking Bad.

In practice, Nick’s Catholic recipe is perfect for the dysgenics that has been perpetrated in Europe since Christianity was imposed on whites. This dysgenics (“Are you smart? Go to the monastery and don’t reproduce!”) caused the IQ of Jews to rise over the centuries while the IQ of whites dropped. This perverse eugenics / dysgenics reached the point where Jews now have the highest IQ: a genetic courtesy of Christianity that Nick and other racialists stupidly cling. Just look at Nick’s statement in his interview with Joel Webbon: “The priesthood, the monastic life is the most masculine thing that a guy can do…”

Above, Ascyltos, and Giton playing the role of Ganymede, in Fellini Satyricon. Zeus was capable of countless love affairs not only with goddesses but with women. On one occasion, he even fancied Ganymede and abducted him to see what the androgynous ephebe tasted like. But for Nick the masculine man is not represented by Zeus but by the Aryan humiliated with a ton of guilt—the monk—if he fails to love the Jewish god.

In sharp contrast to the Greco-Roman ethos, above we see Franciscan and Benedictine monks in the film The Name of the Rose.

Webbon then quotes Paul’s epistle to the Corinthians; he says that celibacy is a gift, and talks to Nick about “fleshy appetites” in the Christian sense. Compare this with the Greco-Romans. Their Gods were openly rapists; it was Christianity that made us feel guilty about that. Fuentes, incidentally, is a virgin as he recently confessed to Piers Morgan: something inconceivable to the ancient Greeks and Romans of his age.

Are you beginning to understand what the Judeo-Christian inversion of values was? For kikes sexuality isn’t sinful but Paul preaches something else to us, and these idiots—not just Nick but Christian racialists in general—are incapable of seeing the Jewish psyop!

A little later in the interview, Nick says that many put family above God (that is, above the Semitic god with his double standard for Jews and gentiles). That’s why Fuentes goes on to say that the pinnacle of masculinity is the celibate monk.

At minute 40, Nick says that since women are ultimate conformists to the System, they can betray you if you marry in this anti-white male era. Let’s illustrate this with Skyler who, in an episode of Breaking Bad, goes to a female psychotherapist who suggests Skyler to report her husband Walter to the police for drug trafficking. Walter had been foolish enough to confess everything to his wife in private, when you should never tell women anything about serious matters, such as committing illegal acts or having an affair with Ganymede: they are incapable of understanding the male drives.

Do you see why we should only have lunches and dinners with heterosexual soldiers? Even after the Spartans were married they didn’t eat with their wives but with other tough guys where they could talk as rudely as I do on this site.

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 2

Nick Fuentes explains the history of Israel and how the neocons emerged; how their competitors, the paleoconservatives, were defamed and destroyed by the philo-Semitic American system, and how the myth of the post-WW2 consensus was created. Despite the nonsense Nick recently spouted on his podcast about another subject, unlike many racialists, both interviewee and interviewer concede that Hitler wasn’t a Christian.

It is a pity that neither of them seems to know anything about the Hellstorm Holocaust committed by the Allies from 1944 to 1947. However, interviewer Joel Webbon hit the nail on the head when he said that Western religion had changed from “pro-Christ” to “anti-Hitler.”

The West’s Darkest Hour attempts to transvalue the values of the Christian religion in favour of Hitlerism. It is no longer possible to incorporate Christianity for the reasons I will be explaining in my new series on Third Reich booklets.

My dream would be to have a podcast with a background like Webbon’s studio, featuring similar furniture and even similar clothing (I share all this with Webbon, except for the canteen), but not from the perspective of Christian nationalism but rather post-1945 National Socialism.

For example, in this other interview Nick says he is against violent revolution because he subscribes to Christian ethics. Fuentes is not only ignorant of the history of the first millennium of Christianity. He inverts it, claiming that the martyrs convinced the Roman Empire to convert to Christianity through peaceful means: a pious myth (and by the way, most of the apostles were unhistorical).

Remember that, according to Origen (185-253 c.e.), a prolific writer who wrote approximately 2,000 treatises on multiple branches of theology, there were only about thirty historical martyrs. Christians not only invented countless hagiographies of unhistorical saints and martyrs. They themselves perpetrated veritable Holocausts in which millions of whites were slain! (for example, the exterminationist campaign of the Arian Vandals and Ostrogoths by Justinian I—see our abridged translation of Karlheinz Deschner’s Christianity’s Criminal History here and here).

Deschner’s ten thick volumes contain thousands of bibliographic references that support this secular reading of the first millenium of Christendom. As good Christians, Fuentes and Webbon grossly ignore the origins of their religion.

We can already imagine a National Socialist podcast with real historians discussing how Judeo-Christians seized power ever since Constantine handed the empire over to his Semitic bishops…

Categories
Conservatism

Tort

vs. Walsh & Tucker

I can use this segment from Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Matt Walsh (both Christians) to show what the priest of the sacred words—an anti-Christian admirer of Nazi paganism—has in common with American conservatives. Let’s consider the values that, according to Walsh, those who share them are essentially on his side. According to Walsh, the first value is:

1) Objective truth

Here we seem to be in complete agreement.

But as commenter Gaedhal has said, when it comes to approaching the New Testament from the standpoint of objective truth, conservative Christians are more primitive than liberal Christians. Quite a few of the latter are aware of the historiographical problems that have been raised for centuries about 1st century Christian writings. In contrast, people like Walsh, Tucker, and racialist Christians generally ignore the issue, although it is evident that there is an objective truth regarding the historicity of the New Testament stories. If you ignore it, you are basically ignoring this first value.

If all these conservatives educated themselves honestly on the subject, they would realise that there is not even evidence for the existence of Jesus, and the same could be said about the existence of the Jewish god, whom both Walsh and Tucker worship.

Curiously, both recognise that everything stems from there: from objective truth. But if this pair and the Christians of the racial right don’t even dare to discuss the issue, we can assume that when it comes to Judeo-Christianity, they are not interested in such a thing as objective truth.

The next thing Walsh mentions is:

2) Preserving American identity in particular: the institution of the family (and therefore the institution of marriage), and Western civilisation in general.

Note that not for a second do these two Christians talk about preserving the white race, which is what the priest would mention as the priority. It is from the 14 words that one understands the need for the institution of marriage[1], which only makes sense if both husband and wife are whites. To the conservative question of what we are trying to conserve, my answer would be: the DNA of the Aryans.

It is precisely because of this omission that Walsh and Tucker later criticise multi-culturalism. The religion of this pair doesn’t allow them to criticise the multi-racial society that the US has become. (When an Aryan marries a coloured, for the priest of the sacred words s/he sins against the holy spirit of life.)

_________

[1] Remember that my favourite films are Sense & Sensibility (1995), and Pride & Prejudice (2005).

Categories
Conservatism Israel / Palestine

Thanks, Bibi!

Regarding what’s been happening these past few days following Tucker’s interview with Nick, I’m astonished. Of course, the primary cause of this uproar isn’t due to this pair, but to Bibi Netanyahu’s blunder and his genocidal campaign in Gaza. In the days following October 7, 2023, almost all of American public opinion was in favour of Israel. As a result of Bibi’s blunder, for the first time in US history, the majority of Americans are on the side of Palestine!

Think about that.

What’s happening in the American collective unconscious is similar to a tectonic plate readjustment, with natural earthquakes and potential tsunamis producing geological changes: a huge opportunity that Tucker, Nick and many other podcasters have been able to seize.

Although this is a step in our direction, and although R.G. and Jamie are right that Americans aren’t ready for National Socialism, we must always keep in mind that Christianity is connected to the power of Jews in the West. I invite visitors to watch just ten seconds of this clip of Charlie Kirk from March 14, 2025 (“But I think you can acknowledge that we as Christians have to honor the Jews. You believe that?”). Ted Cruz, senator from Texas said similar things in his heated argument with Tucker earlier this year, and millions of evangelical Christians in North America think, or used to think, the same.

Jamie is right. Taking Christianity away from Americans is going to be a hard sell! That’s why I love the economists who predict the collapse of the dollar (a few months ago the ounce of gold was below $3,000 and now it has surpassed $4,000—it has to reach $27,000 or more for us to be talking about hyperinflation). But that won’t be enough, not barely enough to kill Christianity. What will really be apocalyptic is energy devolution thanks to peak oil (alas, unlike the collapse of the dollar, this process could take a century to unfold…).

Anyway, and reiterating what I told the Groypers in my previous post: if we are to save the Aryan from extinction we must reject Christian ethics.

Categories
Conservatism Solitude

Erika’s speech

During the tribute to Charlie Kirk in Arizona, the widow Erika Kirk forgave the murderer because, she said, that’s what Christ did hanging on the cross. It was truly amazing to see and hear the number of references to Jesus and Christianity during today’s tribute from the panelists!

Donald Trump also spoke. If we remember his “no follow-through” record (for example, he never built the Wall across the Rio Grande), I wonder if he’s really going to destroy Antifa as he threatened this week.

To inaugurate Dachau II and truly annihilate the enemy, Americans would have to repudiate the New Testament, including que above gospel quote, and become Nazis. Alas, as Jack Frost said ten years ago in the comments section of The Occidental Observer:

Although it might be possible to develop a racist interpretation of Christianity (e.g., what the Nazis tried), I’ve never seen a convincing theological justification of it. The fact that all major churches and 99%+ of all who today call themselves Christians reject racism ought to tell you something… You probably want to hang on to most of Christianity as it has been “traditionally” practiced in relatively modern times, while discarding only the anti-racism. Everyone who ever tried that has failed, but I guess you don’t see that as a problem.

Then again, the cognitive dissonance issue is nearly as problematic. In order to accept being called a racist or a Nazi with equanimity, normal American whites would have to reconcile that with their country’s history of being violently opposed to racism of any kind, from the Civil War forward. They would have to admit to themselves and to others that all of that blood shed in trying to stamp out racism had been shed in vain, and in fact, worse than in vain, in an evil cause. They would have to admit that their ancestors were evil, and that they themselves had also been evil before they saw the light and became racists.

The likelihood of even white nationalists making this change on a massive scale within their ranks is zero. These neo-normies, like the thousands of normies who attended Charlie’s memorial, still obey New Testament morality. That is to say, they are obedient to the ethical mandates of the Jews who wrote the gospel, not to the mandates of the Aryan who wrote Mein Kampf.

Does it become clear once again what it means to be a man against his time fighting with the men of their time? If much of my library was soaked in the downpour that flooded the room where the boxes of my books were, it was only because a man against his time never receives the juicy donations that Erika and the Christian organisation his late husband left behind have been receiving.

Hearken white men!

The Aryan Race needs a religion of war, not a religion of peace!

The Aryan Race needs a religion of hate, not a religion of love!

The Aryan Race needs a religion of boldness, not a religion of meekness!

The Aryan Race needs a religion of anger, not a religion of sorrow!

The Aryan Race needs a religion of severity, not a religion of mercy!

The Aryan Race needs a religion of revenge, not a religion of forgiveness!

Umwertuung aller Werte!

Categories
Conservatism Racial right

WN is dead

by Benjamin

Thank you for sharing these key posts by the late Alex Linder. I’ve now read them all…

It leaves me asking the question, given that (as I think he also recalls somewhere in the posts) most of the latter-day—and indeed historical—converts to White Nationalism, and from that to National Socialism, come from those already affiliated to a greater or lesser degree with (Anglo-American) conservatism, how are we to gather new members who are suitably radical, seeing as standard bourgeois conservatives, whether bog-standard racialists, with all the trappings of the individualist WASP work ethic, or worse evangelicals, simply will not do (for a number of reasons covered a myriad times on this site and elsewhere)? Did it make any sense before when I inquired as to the practicalities of trying to ‘turn’ leftists?

I’m just hoping for your new generations—the zoomers—currently. It’s clear White Nationalism, at least in any mainstream capacity, is dead, and those remaining big-name gatekeepers are holding tightly onto too many of the stragglers who have yet to to realise all of this. Dead in that there is no real-world progress and it has become a stilted money-maker, akin to a relaxed social club. Until exterminationism, in a practical sense, is assimilated psychologically, I don’t think any progress can be made.

It infuriates me that people aren’t angrier. I hate just having to hang around impotently, as what could be the rest of the decade or more wears on.

Categories
Conservatism Film

Wokism

Why aren’t the racial right forums commenting on the blockbuster film Am I Racist? Matt Walsh’s movie is a mockery of the most radical wing of anti-racism and was released this month in the US and Canada (though not in the country where I live).

Another Christian who harshly criticises the excesses of Wokism, albeit in the Spanish-speaking world, is Agustín Laje. It is worth watching this conference which Laje begins by talking about John Stuart Mill and freedom of expression.

Categories
Conservatism Revilo Oliver

Oliver

Damon T. Berry, in his book Blood and Faith: Christianity and American White Nationalism (Syracuse University Press, 2017), devotes a chapter to Revilo Oliver, concluding that ‘Oliver hated both conservativism and Christianity… because they equally represented to him an ideological poison that was alien to the best instincts of the white race to defend its existence’.

Categories
Conservatism

Overton

In political theory, the Overton window represents an ideology acceptable to the public. Yesterday watching the interview of Colonel Douglas McGregor by Judge Napolitano, I was impressed that the colonel said that the Israeli lobby controls Western politics, the media and the financial sector because both the colonel and the judge are normies. I used to watch the judge on Fox News and the colonel worked in Donald Trump’s cabinet—in other words, they are both normies.

It’s amazing how the window has expanded as far as the JQ is concerned thanks to Bibi’s genocide in Palestine. While it is more accurate to say that Jews control the aforementioned sectors, clearly the window has expanded. I wonder if, when the Middle East conflict escalates into a regional war, the window of acceptable discourse will expand even further and the JQ will be openly discussed (no longer needing to say that it is just the Israeli lobby)?

It seems that at last, the pendulum of history is beginning to swing to our side. But its inertia is insufficient because the racial right still doesn’t have Uncle Adolf as its guiding star. There are still no leaders with whom the ordinary dissident could identify. Perhaps tomorrow I should resume my comments on Simms’ book.