web analytics
Categories
Axiology

“Souls”

Alex Linder

was right: the equality of souls
courtesy of Christian ethics
really does pave the way
for the equality craze
we see in the Neo-
Xtian West today.

Categories
Racial right

A thorn

by Benjamin

A boy extracting a thorn from his foot.

It’s interesting that no one [among mainstream racialist forums] acknowledged Alex Linder’s death properly on those sites. I wasn’t aware until now [click on the above link]. I find it quite disrespectful and petty of them actually… we’re meant to be on the same side! But the second he’s dead and OD is criticising him…

I take it they saw him the way I assume they see you/us, as a thorn in their side—as opposed to the truth: a better source of information and inspiration on Aryan survival.

By their own stubborn, head in the sand cowardice, these supposedly pro-White sites have made themselves our enemies (they’re a lot more unreasonable with you than you are with them). It’s good that you’re starting a radio show again, albeit solo. It will give you greater reach (against them).

Categories
Real men

Obituary

by Full Verity

Alex Linder, scourge of the synagogue, scribe of the damned, last true witness to the clarity of fire in an age of smiling decay, has passed into shadow.

Before there were podcasts, before dissident Twitter threads, before the algorithm played gatekeeper to speech, there was VNNForum: ugly, unfiltered, untamed. It was not polite, it was not hopeful, and it was not safe. It was a clearing in the poisoned woods, where men came to speak aloud the truths that shattered their lives.

It was was on VNNForum, among threads black with rage and bright with forbidden logos, that some of us saw the world as it truly is. It was there, two decades past, that I first glimpsed the contours of the void. Names like @KarlRadl flickered like dark sentinels in that space, cutting through illusion with diamond-bladed contempt.

Through it all, Linder held the center like a pyromancer. He was not there to comfort; he was there to burn. He built a pyre, and on it, he incinerated the lies of the Levant with a clarity so severe it scorched the eyes of a generation raised on half-truths. For that, he was demonized, harassed, exiled from society; and yet he never stopped. There was no grift, no “rebrand,” no pivot to YouTube monetization.

He published The Aryan Alternative when it meant something to print heresy. He quoted Mencken not to sound clever, but because he meant it; because like Mencken, he saw through the American delusion: its Puritan moralism, its democratic fraudulence, its saccharine pieties masking a merchant’s rot. Linder stripped it bare.

And the cost was everything.

The enemy erased him from polite memory. They will not mourn him. They will not speak his name.

But we will.

Because he stood when others knelt; because he told the truth when it had no market value; because he said “Jew” when the rabble huddled behind the euphemism of “globalist.” He chose to be hated rather than be false.

He dies like so many of our prophets: poor, mocked, defiled. He will be cited by no think tank, footnoted by no historian; yet he will live longer than the whole parade of conservative cowards who called him “too much.”

He was too much: too sharp, too clear, too honest for this age.

So let this be sung in the ruins:

Alex Linder stood alone.
Alex Linder named the Enemy.
Alex Linder never knelt.

And for that, may his name be etched in iron while the world of lies rots beneath its own weight.

Categories
Racial right Real men

Linder’s

featured posts

“Why so hard!”—said to the diamond one day the charcoal; “are we then not near relatives?”—

Why so soft? O my brethren; thus do I ask you: are ye then not—my brethren?

Why so soft, so submissive and yielding? Why is there so much negation and abnegation in your hearts? Why is there so little fate in your looks?

And if ye will not be fates and inexorable ones, how can ye one day—conquer with me?

And if your hardness will not glance and cut and chip to pieces, how can ye one day—create with me?

For the creators are hard. And blessedness must it seem to you to press your hand upon millenniums as upon wax,—

—Blessedness to write upon the will of millenniums as upon brass,—harder than brass, nobler than brass. Entirely hard is only the noblest.

This new table, O my brethren, put I up over you: Become hard!—

As I recently said in the comments section of my latest posts, I would never have been so abrasive in my criticism of white nationalists—mere charcoal—if they had behaved like Alex Linder: a true diamond. In a very unique way, throughout my blogging career I have interpreted Linder’s advice, “Attack the conservatives!” to mean that today’s racial right ideology is basically conservative, not revolutionary; Christian, not anti-Christian; feminized, not truly Aryan. Therefore, they must be attacked.

Here are the articles on this site in which I tried to choose Linder’s words that best reflect his thinking, which evoke my favourite passage from Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, quoted above as an epigraph to this small tribute to the now deceased Man:

On Breivik

“I’m not a Nazi”

Linder’s Weltanschauung

Alex Linder on Christianity

Guessedworker exchange

On conservatism

On The Turner Diaries

Hunter Wallace exchange

On Kevin MacDonald

Bitchute audios on Christianity

Categories
Obituaries Real men

Alex Linder

(1966-2025)

I was informed that Alex Linder has passed away (see an eponymous site here and the sad news on X here).

If our friend Jake has a backup of the WDH Radio Show from June 2, 2017 when Joseph Walsh, Jake and I spoke with Linder about the Christian Problem, it would be great to link it in this obituary. It’s the only recording that features Alex Linder, Jake and yours truly in a podcast (remember: the 2017 recording was gone when SoundCloud deplatformed us).



Update:
Link to the backup of that episode of the WDH Radio Show is here! (see first comment below). Also, like us Linder was an exterminationist.

Categories
Racial right

A visit

A Visit to the House of Cézanne in Aix.

A reader of this site has visited me in Mexico and is leaving this country today. One of the things we discussed was the chasm that separates us from the white nationalists (WNsts).

Having breakfast in a restaurant, I told him that when I discovered WN in 2009, people were still talking about the ethnostate, and sometimes it seemed to imply that a revolutionary process would be necessary to achieve such a noble goal. Now, we don’t hear about the ethnostate because it implies violence, blood, and iron; and today’s WNsts are like ladies hiding in a castle room during an invasion, praying for their men to triumph over the invaders.

In the current context, a real man wouldn’t be fighting alone, but rather practising what Muslims call an internal jihad so that, when the West’s fiat currencies collapse, an “Order” of the kind William Pierce imagined in his novel would attempt to seize political power. But there’s none of that in the contemporary racial right: just more stupidity as Michael O’Meara rightly pointed out when he wrote that the greatest betrayal is trying to use the System’s anti-white institutions to infiltrate the spheres of power (such as voting for Trump, etc.).

The visitor who will soon be heading to the international airport agrees with me that WN is a lost cause. But he added something I didn’t know: the Zoomers, those born between 2000 and 2020, may be our only hope as their mantra is “No Bread [i.e., inflation: no one can afford now a house], No Bros [friends], No Hos [wives], No Hope.”

But of course: even with these teenagers and kids in their early twenties, we need the dollar to collapse so that this generation of incels can fully enter what I call “angry mode” (a preamble to “combat mode” and eventually the government-toppling “killing mode”). Meanwhile, those of us in the trenches will have to suffer horrors of maddening patience because we cannot, and will not be able to for a few years, fire a single shot! But that’s reality, and although horrifying, we must stoically accept it.

The world is ruled by the law of the jungle. Those who believe in liberalism (i.e., Christian ethics) or men who take refuge in a castle like ladies who don’t want to be raped by invaders violate natural law: they are doomed to extinction. As the Führer said, “He who wants to live should fight, and he who does not want to battle in this world of eternal struggle does not deserve to be alive”.

To my knowledge, no WN site promotes a revolutionary ideology for the near or distant future. In general, WNsts seem to still believe in democracy, Christianity (or its bastard child: neochristian atheism) and the project of their nations (the US or UK, for example).

All of that has to be thrown out to create an ethostate! The heads of Washington, Jefferson, Thomas Roosevelt and Lincoln on Mount Rushmore must be blown up and replaced with the heads of Leonidas, Hermann, Hitler and the warrior who will play the role of Kalki. Since the WNsts have failed us, the big question is whether a revolutionary ideology will truly emerge among these Zoomers and take power…

Categories
Audios

Podcast

Regarding post-1945 National Socialism, I’ve previously recommended the site of Martin Kerr, the heir to the old guard: George Lincoln Rockwell and Matt Koehl. Now I would also like to recommend the new guard: the Volkish podcast Manifest Destiny.

Categories
Psychohistory

Three-eyed

On the ethnosuicide of the white man, in my post two weeks ago I wrote:

Although it is universal and not individual, the psychosis that currently covers the West… can only be understood through a psychohistorical variant of the trauma model of mental disorders.

Then I added:

Anyone who assimilates the content of Day of Wrath—and even better, its more detailed expansion in my trilogy—will understand not only the self-harming Aztecs but also the… disorders that contemporary Aryans suffer from.

The case of Benjamin, a self-harmer, whose autobiographical book I recently summarised—:

Consumption, 0
Consumption, 1
Consumption, 2
Consumption, 3
Consumption, 4
Consumption, 5
Consumption, 6
Consumption, 7
Consumption, 8
Consumption, 9
Consumption, 10
Consumption, 11
Consumption, 12
Consumption, 13
Consumption, 14
Consumption, 15
Consumption, 16

—is, in individual psychosis, analogous to the mass psychosis that the West has suffered since 1945: horrible self-harming! And just as Benjamin had to confront his past in his attempts to heal himself, Westerners will have to confront their historical past, specifically their unacknowledged traumas: the criminal history of Christianity and, more recently, the Hellstorm Holocaust (see the featured post).

Without this basic psychoanalysis—unlike William Pierce’s Who We Are I don’t see this analysis in the contemporary racial right—the Aryans will never heal. They will remain as psychotic as Benjamin was before he began to digest his extremely painful past. Both the criminal history of Christianity and the Holocaust of Germans in WW2 are as buried in the Aryan collective unconscious as Benjamin’s hellish past was before he began his healing process.

In other words, for the Aryan to stop ethno-suiciding he must face his past, and the best way to do that is to start digesting didactic essays on how the Judeo-Christians murdered the Greco-Roman world, such as Eduardo Velasco’s essay and Tom Goodrich’s books on the Hellstorm genocide.

Just as it helped Benjamin to discover his past through a profound retrospection and introspection into where the trauma causing his symptoms lay, the Aryan won’t regain his sanity unless he goes, like Bran the Broken, into the cave of the three-eyed raven to see the historical past of Westeros—not as the System tells us the story but as it really happened…

The three eyed raven

Categories
Mein Kampf (book) Miscegenation

Mein Kampf, 5

“Blood mixture and the resultant drop in the racial level is the sole cause of the dying out of old cultures; for men do not perish as a result of lost wars, but by the loss of that force of resistance which is contained only in pure blood”.

Categories
Autobiography Child abuse

Consumption, 16

Editor’s 2 cents:

In chapter 14, we read that the father said the following to his son:

“I don’t know what you have to complain about, Benjamin; you’ve never suffered!” He has repeated this mantra several other times over the years. It was the final nail in the coffin.

This sentence perfectly portrays what a “schizogenic” father is: he who “schizophrenises” his son. The father’s repeated statement—which reminds me of what my mother used to say to me after my parents and a psychoanalyst crucified me at seventeen (and I could no longer pursue a career)—not only denotes a colossal lack of empathy towards his son, but also a complete reversal of the facts (in real life Ben suffered a maddening hell)!

Anyone who wants to understand why narcissistic parents are capable of these maddening inversions of reality could watch Richard Grannon’s videos on narcissism. However, Grannon, like other YouTubers, focuses on adults who have a narcissistic partner. In my opinion, all these channels are cowardly because the adult can easily cut off the narcissistic partner. On the other hand, as Alice Miller tells us, the child doesn’t have that option! He (or she) has to stay at home and put up with the schizogenic behaviour of the narcissistic parent (who, due to his infinite sin of pride, is unable to see the beam in his eye) until the abusive behaviour blows the child’s mind, as happened to Benjamin.

I am currently in a serious predicament because, after my siblings sold our parents’ mansion, my financial situation has become precarious. Even so, I believe I must continue translating my work on this subject although of course, instead of using Benjamin’s life as the basis for my explanation, I use my own.