Read our featured article here!
We depend on the support of our readers. Please donate today. Monthly donations are particularly helpful. If, to protect your privacy, you can’t use PayPal, we can receive funds by mail. Contact us: ([email protected] – or – [email protected] – or [email protected]).
Greetings once more Mr. Tort.
I am sending you this e-mail regarding Benjamin’s Survey and wish to display my answers. I wanted to send this earlier but I had some personal matters to attend to including the passing away of my grandmother. Despite being a devout Orthodox Christian she was a kind and good-hearted woman, maybe not always perfect, and sometimes quite stubborn, but she was a good woman nonetheless. Dunno if it was necessarily Christianity the cause of her upstanding nature or was it more her own inner character and the way her parents raised her. I have met Christians who were utter narcissistic scumbags, their belief in the Jewish god fueling their narcissism.
Now regarding Benjamin’s Survey here are my answers:
1. The Nordic Race represents the peak of White humanity and humans in general, possessing both a beautiful appearance and a noble behavior, love for trust, order, kinship and high ideals. As a Romanian I remember the first time I went to Sweden, back when it was still a decent country. I was deeply impressed by the order and cleanliness and hospitality of it’s Nordic people, a different contrast to the more bleak, cynical post-Communist Eastern Europe. As a 6 ft. tall blue eyed dark blonde man I feel a deeper resonance with Northern/Germanic Europeans rather than Balkanoids.
2. Miscegenation is indeed a crime against life and the Judeo-Christian run system is promoting this whether it’s Christians preachers talking about how all humans are children of the Hebrew god or Jewish producers who depict movies with interracial couples. In your articles Mr. Tort you have pointed several times how the Spanish Conquistadores destroyed the future of Latin America by race mixing with the Christianized natives rather than exterminating them to make room for white colonists. Miscegenation is also the cause why parts of Southern and Eastern Europe are corrupt and poor. I will use my native Romania as an example. The ancient Dacians who lived here were described as being tall, blue eyed, with blonde-red hair. After Trajan’s Dacian Wars (101-102, 105-106 AD) Roman colonists where brought here and I doubt many of them where pure Whites. Things became ever worse with the migrations of Oriental populations during the early Middle Ages and the later Orientalization and Balkanization which occurred through the Ottoman Empire, not to mention the presence of Gypsies. Many Romanians now, especially in the south, look more like Levantines than Northern Europeans. Had my country maintained it’s natural homogeneity, reinforced by the presence of migratory Germanic and Slavic populations Romania would have probably looked more like Germany or Sweden. I wouldn’t say that all non-Nordic Aryans are sub-humans, but the Nordic Human must be the ideal we strive for, even if that means forbidding some non-Nordic Whites from producing offsprings.
3. The Hebrew cult of Christianity has been the greatest disaster in Aryan history and sadly we also have a blame. Figures such as Constantine or Celto-Germanic Chieftains who thought that the acceptance of Christianity would bring them power and wealth come to my mind. Such fools failed to realize the harm such a cult would bring to us, our culture and our mental wellbeing. Our parents are also to blame because they never stopped and questioned their own Christian upbringing and proceeded to carry on the Jewish virus and mess us up. Today Christianity has metamorphosized into a secular doctrine of liberal, humanist, democratic and progressive values promoted by a crowd of guilt ridden whites, victimized envious feminists and non-white minorities, sexual freaks, and all types of fools and weirdos who act as fanatical as the Early Christians, and these Neo-Christian zealots are hellbent on destroying the White race and the West. Christianity and Liberalism/Communism have identical doctrines: vilification of the strong and beautiful, victimhood (original sin and white guilt), the exaltation of the weak, the outcast, the deviant, the simpleminded, the promotion of universal equality (“We are all Children of God” and “We are all humans”), the demonization of those who oppose such doctrines (If you disagree with me you are a Heretic/Witch/Nazi/Fascist etc.)
4. I would argue most of psychiatry is indeed a pseudoscience, fake as Christianity and many psychiatrists and therapists don’t truly understand their patients. Some exceptions exist. One time when I was still a Christian struggling with my religious anxiety and neurosis I met a therapist on a train who suggested to me to stop believing in the aspects of Christianity which caused me mental harm. Sadly I didn’t listen to her as I was too afraid of the “eternal damnation” doctrine for questioning faith. I firmly agree that parents and families are indeed the main reason why we have so many mentally messed up children and adults. My parents themselves where often overbearing and I strongly believe they had a contribution to my anxiety and self esteem issues. Parental abuse has existed since the beginning of the human race, present in every culture across the world. Recently I have been reading your Day of Wrath and the way those psychopathic murderous Aztecs treated their children is absolutely disturbing and stomach churning. Sadly in our Neo-Christian PC age you aren’t allowed to criticize indigenous populations. It’s always the fault of the “big bad colonial White man”.
5. Vegetarianism and Veganism are a good solution to prevent pain on animals. While I do enjoy meat I wish there where more ethical ways to sacrifice animals and slaughterhouses ought to be abolished. Meat should only be procured from local upstanding farmers who treat their animals well and only sacrifice them out of necessity in a painless manner. The Christian religion has warped our perception of man’s status in nature and has permitted the abuse of animals on the precept that “animals don’t have souls and don’t think and feel like humans therefore humans are masters over them”. Anyone who deliberately wants to harm an animal should be put to the wall and shot.
6. Considering the state of modern women, all thanks to Feminism and Christian slave morality, the only solution is indeed for the system to fall and re-conquer our women like how the Romans conquered the Sabines. We aren’t going to get our world back until Aryan men put their feet down and put women in their place.
7. Re-migration is the stupidest, cringiest and most effeminate solution ever. Let’s not forget that huge chunks of the Ancient World belonged to the White man. Why should we send the third world savages back to their shit countries where they will continue to live like shit when we can wipe them out and colonise their countries and turn them into a paradise. Apart from some Asian populations which in my opinion could be left alone and perhaps pressured to accept National Socialist doctrines, Sub Saharan Africans, Indians, Dark skinned Hispanics, Arabs, Gypsies, Chinese and Korean Communists, and Jews must be EXTERMINATED so we can establish a global lebensraum.
8. The British and Americans must be held accountable for the injustices and crimes they committed in WW2 and the fact that they supported the Soviet Union. My own Romanian town had been bombed by US airplanes during the war. Matter of fact, during a private conversation a university professor told me that the largest numbers of rapes on the Western front had been committed by American soldiers. And after the war the Americans had the hypocritical audacity to complain about Marxist liberals ruining their self-righteous Protestant Bourgeoisie middle class 1950s utopic dream. Well who enabled them in the first place? Saying all of this I can’t help but sympathize with the Civil War Southerners who had a culture more similar to European Aristocrats. But today, thanks to the Anglo-American betrayal, instead of having Southern Belles like in Gone with the Wind we have a generation of corrupt white girls who date negroes and many start doing OnlyFans when they turn eighteen.
9. The Jewish Holocaust is nothing but a big scam. And even if 6 million Jews died, why should we Aryans care. To be honest the whole gas chamber thing sounds more like something that was born in the sick twisted mind of a Jewish producer. In my opinion most conspiracy theories are a distraction from the elephant in the room: That Jews have gained lots of power thanks to brainwashing the White race with Christianity.
10. There is no political solution. Our enemies will not be defeated by podcasts, debates, peaceful protests and re-migration marches. Feminism won’t be abolished by nice guys who believe in gender equality. Immigrant negroe and Arab rape gangs won’t be stopped with a polite “No”. The solution is blood fire and death. Swift Aryan vengeance. Let’s just hope the system will collapse sooner before it is too late to exact the said vengeance.
Thank you once more for you time and patience Mr. Tort. Stay safe.
V.P.
Revaluing all values also means returning to classical architecture, creating new cities and destroying the old ones…
On Saturday, a commenter said:
While we aren’t ideologically identical to the German National Socialists we are their ideological descendants. We are what they had to become. Because now the enemy is not the alien. The enemy is your friend, your neighbour; every white who refuses to come to terms with our reality and instead persists in their Semitic delusion.
That is absolutely true. And no matter what I wrote in the article linked above, Hitler and his Reich will always be the paradigm from which we must form our worldview and eventual movement after the impending collapse.
I say “after the collapse” because since I recently conducted my brief survey, I have received communications from continental Europe telling me about the horrors suffered there by those who identify with National Socialism. We have discussed on this site how one of the regular commenters on The West’s Darkest Hour, Tyrone Joseph Walsh whom I visited in London in 2014, is now serving a seven-year prison sentence in the UK. But in some countries of continental Europe things seem to be even worse!
Thanks to these personal communications, I now understand those silent Europeans who don’t even dare comment on this site, much less speak on podcasts like the one where our friend Joseph expressed his opinions.
But it pains me that Americans, who have their First Amendment, don’t make full use of it as I do on this site, where I even go so far as to say that I don’t condemn the genocidal campaign committed by Himmler and Heydrich. On the contrary: I praise their Master Plan East, in which many more non-Aryans would have been genocided or at least deported to Siberia (nothing infuriates me more than the May 9th celebrations in Moscow: where the swastika should now reign, along with a race less contaminated by mudbloods than the Soviet one)!
However, the Europeans who tell me that nothing can be done, are wrong. If the government has them gagged, something can be done—internal jihad.
I speak as an expert on this matter of internal jihad because since 1976, when my parents and a psychiatrist plunged me into a downward spiral that destroyed my life (no career, no job, no partner), I’ve had to become something I never wanted to be: a philosopher. That’s why I’ve made a somewhat apocryphal use of Martin’s novels, in which the child Bran isn’t crippled by Jamie. It’s his father who pushes him from the tower, leaving him disabled. Having had all his dreams of chivalry shattered by his own dad, Bran the Broken now has no choice but to cross the Wall and be initiated by the Three-Eyed Raven to see the past retrocognitively: a sad fate, but very useful for Westeros.
Well, in real life, from the age of seventeen, I had no choice but to spend my time philosophising, trying to discover why the tragedy that happened in my family had occurred. Eventually, my two sisters lost their minds from parental abuse; one, the kindest of the whole family and the one I loved most, has already died (I now have no one in the non-white country where I live…).
By becoming a true philosopher, I eventually began to learn things I would never have known if I had lived a normal life. For example, since I had to analyse my abusive father’s Catholicism, over decades I read a lot of critical exegesis on the New Testament until culminating those studies in 2018, when I realised that there wasn’t even evidence that Jesus existed (my quote yesterday from Adam Green’s 2026 book shows what the goal of the rabbis who wrote the gospels was rather).
But that’s not all. Unable to study at university, work, have a partner, or procreate, I spent the vast amount of free time I had in the raven’s cave thinking about things like transvaluing the values that had destroyed the teenager I once was. One of the facets of this transvaluation is becoming a “Holocaust affirmer,” which completely reverses the neochristian values that prevail on the racial right. What ultimately motivates Holocaust deniers is Christian ethics, a crude form of revisionism, like saying, “Himmler and his henchmen were good Christians, and a good Christian never, ever commits genocide.”
An Aryan who practices a severe internal jihad reads the writings of National Socialist sympathisers like David Irving and Mark Weber and wonders: why, if these historians were Holocaust deniers, did they eventually become Holocaust affirmers?
It’s no use trying to psychoanalyse them: that’s precisely what Jews do to us when they can no longer argue. The point is to investigate the trajectory of these two historians sympathetic to the Third Reich and ask why, although they never ceased to sympathise with Hitler, they changed their minds regarding the historicity of the Holocaust. I repeat: it’s not enough to say they were threatened, cowered, or whatever. Those are cheap psychoanalyses unworthy of an Aryan. It is imperative to read their texts or videotaped interviews to understand why they changed their minds.
That is the internal jihad that those Europeans who cannot speak out because the State imprisons them must practice. If they cannot do anything in the real world for fear of the Thought Police, let them do what I did: cross the Wall, let them seek the Raven’s Cave and let them paranormally learn to see the past as it happened: retrocognition that contrasts drastically with the myths of Westeros.
The serious problem I see with being a denier is that it prevents us from behaving like the heroes of The Turner Diaries when the system collapses and we have our chance for revolution. Years ago, an American Twitter user put it this way—tweets that, incidentally, Joseph himself brought to my attention:
• The WN meme that the Nazis dindu nuffin and dindu mass grave killings is ridiculous and goes against the violent attitude we need to have!
• 100 Dylan Roofs and the JewSA would crumble. 100,000 peaceful whiners and enemies are still laughing at us!
• Nearly every White Nationalist info source is cleverly scripted towards re-pacifying Whites into the Christian, pro “justice system” fold.
• So sick of the whining and aggrandizement of Jews like they’re supermen! It’s White traitors and our own weakness that’s the main problem!
• There’s enough WNs right now to take down the system if they had balls, not blogs.
• White people won’t be saved by YouTube videos. It’s going to take White men who kill enemies and cause more ppl to fear them than the gov’t.
• If WNs operated more like ISIS instead of complaining about them, we’d be noteworthy, and not a pathetic bunch of politicking wannabes.
• “Wahhh, you support genocide, you’re anti-White and bad”—said the WN fag pussy. Whites won’t survive if they don’t genocide non-Whites!
Remember that for militant Islam, internal jihad is far more important than external jihad. In fact, there can be no external jihad without internal jihad: something that today’s racists should already know.
Below, selected quotes from Adam Green’s 2026 book The Jesus Deception: A Mystical Midrashic Myth:
______ 卐 ______
Judaism for Gentiles
There was a dilemma inherent in Jewish prophetic expectation: all nations were to worship the God of Israel, but they were not expected to become Jews or follow the full set of commandments given to Israel alone. God had established a covenant with His people, commanding them to keep a distinct law. Yet the scriptures also envisioned a future where Gentiles would turn to the God of Israel and be gathered into His dominion. The resolution to this theological problem ultimately manifested as Christianity, a new religious path that allowed Gentiles to honor the God of Israel without becoming Jews. This new faith evangelized to the Gentile world, but without requiring circumcision, a kosher diet, or Sabbath observance.
A pivotal turning point in legitimizing Gentile inclusion can be found in Acts 15, where James publicly approved Paul’s mission to the Gentiles. James declared that Gentile converts did not need to fully adopt Jewish law, but should instead follow a simplified set of commands: abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from meat of strangled animals, and from sexual immorality. This decision allowed Christianity to spread beyond ethnic Judaism while maintaining a theological link to Jewish tradition.
It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols. from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. For the law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath. —Acts 15:19-21
Scholars and theologians have often noted that these requirements closely mirror the Noahide laws found in rabbinic literature. By establishing a shared moral baseline, the early church fashioned a form of Gentile adherence that echoed Jewish ethics without requiring full Torah observance.
Paul reminded the Jerusalem Council that Gentiles were turning to the God of Israel, and this had been God’s plan from the beginning:
Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. —Acts 15: 7
The apostles themselves testified that God confirmed this mission by signs and wonders among the nations:
The whole assembly became silent as they listened to Barnabas and Paul telling about the signs and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them. —Acts 15:12
The Gospels, too, record Gentiles praising the God of Israel directly:
The people were amazed when they saw the mute speaking, the crippled made well, the lame walking and the blind seeing. And they praised the God of Israel. —Matthew 15:31
The earliest New Testament author, Paul, made his entire identity about being the apostle to the Gentiles. He repeatedly claimed this special mission had been entrusted to him by God: “I am talking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles, I take pride in my ministry” (Romans 11:13). He insists, “God, who set me apart from my mother’s womb and called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles” (Galatians 1:15-16), and again, When they saw that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised… they gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me” (Galatians 2:7, 9). Paul’s focus on the gentiles continued in the Gospels with the Great Commission: “go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19). The Gospels even symbolized this worldwide mission by sending out seventy disciples (Luke 10:1), echoing the traditional Jewish reckoning of seventy nations of the world (Genesis 10). In every strand of early Christian thought, the endgame was the same: to bring the Gentiles into acknowledgment of the God of Israel and his Messiah.
Judaism did not defeat Rome with armies, it subdued Rome with Jesus [emphasis by Ed.]. Jerusalem could not defeat Rome with a political Messiah in this world, but they could falsify a ‘prophecy fulfilling’ myth of a crucified messiah with a spiritual victory over Satan in the celestial world. Christianity was not the miracle of divine revelation, it was the natural product of a people oppressed, divided, and desperate. The scriptures had the ingredients. The times demanded a solution. And theology became the chosen tool.
It took three centuries of incremental theological infiltration and slow growth before the Jesus cult took root, and Constantine adopted Christianity as the religion of Rome, supposedly to unify the empire. At that point, Christians made up only about ten percent of the population, and the shift was an unpopular, top-down decision. Yet within a few decades, paganism was outlawed, Christianity was enshrined as the state religion, and the Jewish Messiah had triumphed over the pagan pantheon of Rome.
What began as a Jewish sect proclaiming a messiah went on to spread Torah based messianic Judaism across the world. Today, nearly half of humanity bows to the God of Israel. Jesus was a Jewish solution to the Pagan problem.
I recently understood why Europeans who, according to my statistics page, visit this site, don’t dare to comment. For this reason, I just changed my email address from Gmail to Tuta ([email protected]). See also the sticky post for the Proton Mail address I will now be using with those whose countries lack the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.
What this site looked like before WordPress censored it.
Yesterday I changed the subtitle of this site from “National Socialism after 1945” to “Priesthood of the Sacred Words.” I would like to explain why.
The thing is, a phrase in the email Ben sent me yesterday (“I don’t so much regret the Judeo-reductionist phase I went through, as it seems most NS go through that phase—and most WN indeed remain in it!”) catalysed a process in my mind that had been brewing for years.
It all has to do with wanting to rescue the ideals of Adolf Hitler to enlighten the darkest era for white men, which began in 1945. For some reason virtually all Aryans, after that year, entered into a psychosis against their ethnicity as aberrant as that of the self-harmers who have been committed to psychiatric wards.
What does that have to do with Judeo-reductionism: believing that all our ills are due to Jewry? This POV is relevant because it has failed after World War II (all of American white nationalism has been a comedy of failures!).
Let me explain.
It is true that Hitler, Himmler, Bormann and others were well aware of the Christian Question. However, that awareness definitely didn’t extend to realising that the Christian Question was a greater problem than the Jewish Question!
If Hitler had known this, he wouldn’t have launched Operation Barbarossa, much less a Jewish holocaust when the war reached its peak, since it would have been understood that the primary task was to educate the German people so that, step by step and over generations, this great nation would transvalue Christian values into pre-Christian values.
Did Hitler want to exterminate all the Jews in the world? No. Even the Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu, stated in a speech before the World Zionist Congress in 2015 that Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews, but only to expel them from Europe. In a world where Anglo-Americans hadn’t intervened, those mass deportations would have been done without the insane violence unleashed in World War II (for this very reason, I’d like to invert a famous phrase from Milton Himmelfarb’s 1984 essay in this way: No Churchill & Roosevelt, no Holocaust!).
I recently transferred the DVD containing the PDFs from the revisionist Holocaust Handbooks collection to my hard drive. I liked what Harry Elmer Barnes wrote in his 1962 pamphlet, Revisionism and Brainwashing. Barnes argued that there was “a failure to point out the atrocities of the Allies were more brutal, painful, mortal and numerous than the most extreme allegations made against the Germans” and that in order to justify the “horrors and evils of the Second World War” the Allies made the Nazis the “scapegoat” for their own misdeeds.
Very true! This is precisely what we have been saying on this site about the Hellstorm Holocaust perpetrated by the Allies against the Germans. Nevertheless, and despite the best attempts of the revisionists who, after Barnes, went much further than him and began to call the holocaust a “hoax,” it seems clear to me that approaching the subject objectively leads us to conclude that millions of Jews were murdered in World War II (as were millions of Germans, and millions of Russians, etc.).
Ironically, it is easier to rehabilitate Hitler’s image by accepting the historicity of the holocaust than by denying it, provided we also accept the historicity of the Holocaust of Germans committed from 1945 to 1947.
The reason I changed the subtitle is that, since my life was almost completely destroyed by my father’s Catholicism (see, for example, the first book of my trilogy), I gained a better understanding of what Christianity is than the anti-Christian consciousness of Hitler, Himmler and Bormann. Especially for Himmler, who was in charge of the holocaust machine according to David Irving, the Jewish problem was obviously much more urgent than the Christian problem.
I think the opposite: the Aryan collective unconscious is infected with Semitic malware (the New Testament). Removing this malware from the Aryan collective unconscious would solve the Jewish problem, since an Aryan without that malware in their head would no longer have moral scruples about solving not only the JP but also the Negro problem, the Spic problem, the Gook problem, etc.
In other words, in The West’s Darkest Hour I can no longer pretend that our point of view is identical to that of the National Socialists of the Third Reich because… it isn’t. It’s very similar to Hitler’s dinner table conversations, and to some of Himmler’s semi-secret conferences, true. But it’s not identical.
I believe that the primary task of the White Man is to rid his subconscious of the New Testament programming written precisely… by Jews for Gentile consumption! Jews are much smarter in this respect than white racialists and non-racialists alike. Let’s remember that Bibi himself invoked the biblical passage of Amalek (from Deuteronomy 25:17 and 1 Samuel 15:3) in a speech on October 28, 2023, where he urged the troops to remember “what Amalek did” (i.e., exterminate the Palestinians).
As I said, if Hitler had thought like me, he wouldn’t have invaded the Soviet Union, as the general population hadn’t yet cleansed itself of the programming of unconditional love for every wingless biped. Since the German people never ran antivirus programs on their collective unconscious, so to speak, Hitler never imagined that if he lost the war… that Christian infection would end up demoralising the defeated Germans to the point of accepting ethno-suicide.
The current subtitle better reflects our point of view than the one I used to use. Even so, I still believe Hitler was the greatest statesman in all of Western history.
nalgas
It’s been a few days since I posted “Survey” and I’d like to say a few things.
First, thank you to the commenters who have replied so far.
Since Stefan Molyneux’s YouTube account was taken down several years ago, Molyneux confessed on another platform that only a small fraction of his YouTube audience subscribed to the new one. I realised that of those five hundred million visits his channel had accumulated, the vast majority were mere voyeurs! They weren’t even folk like the half-Jew Molyneux, whom some at the time called “Alt Lite.”
Forget this guy… Without the proper Männerbund the Aryan will perish. And I see no other way to prepare, even decades before armed revolution, than for some of the men who believe in the sacred words to share meals under the same roof. If our Syssitia had a wealthy sponsor—I very much doubt he will appear!—, it would display sculptures of this kind:
It would be something like an intellectual vanguard of priests who could serve as a guide for the surviving young Aryans after the impending social collapse. But only after an armed revolution and the consequent transvaluation could the survivors have daily access to such exquisite buttocks, and millions of Aryan children would be born with this return to traditional patriarchy.
This is my dream: Sabine women will be abducted, but men who don’t want to participate in the struggle shall be excluded from the liberated zones. Yes: there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth for those who refuse to contribute to the Organisation’s fighting force.
Unfortunately, it’s just a dream. Since Harold Covington died in 2018, no one is thinking about revolution anymore (and Covington himself was a despicable person who slandered his colleagues believing that by slandering them, he would remain as the sole leader!).
Today’s racialists seem to have suffered, through their lack of manliness, a regression towards the Alt Lite. Therefore, there’s no reason to be optimistic. Only a dollar collapse and the consequences of peak oil (energy devolution), if they actually happen, could offer a chance to begin shifting the all-feminised mindset of today’s white man back to the warriors of old. But it’s not even clear that if these two catastrophes converge the white man will, finally, wake up…
I see that no one else has responded to Benjamin’s survey. This motivates me to conduct an even shorter survey about what bothers visitors to this site, to the point that they frequently leave me talking to myself. What exactly bothers you—?:
– that I criticise white nationalists because, in general, they haven’t awakened to the CQ, much less transvalued their Judeo-Christian values (which includes atheists)?
– that I was born in Mexico and therefore my native language is Spanish, and that it seems a bit surreal that a Latin American would dare criticise his northern neighbours? (Actually, since adolescence I’ve felt very different from the average Mexicans, as shown in the Metapedia photo of the lad I was.)
– that, according to the visitors’ POV, I don’t pay enough attention to the JQ? If this is the case, last week Nick Fuentes uploaded a video in which he spoke about, in his words, the “low IQ anti-Semites” whom we on this site have called monocausalists: those who see only subversives Jews under every stone!
– that I criticise the very foundations of the US as a nation? The truth is that I criticise the entire continent, since it was founded on the Christian religion (I don’t count the great pre-Hispanic cultures because they are extinct). Furthermore, south of the Rio Grande, the process of racial mixing began centuries before the Anglo-Germans of the north began to mix on a large scale, so I am far more critical of Latin America than of the US and Canada.
What bothers the visitors? Why are there so many visitors, according to my statistics page, who never comment? Are Europeans perhaps afraid of the draconian laws against freedom of expression in their countries? But if you fully agree with what we say here but don’t want to commit in writing, why not email me to make a donation (which doesn’t even require revealing your real name, as you can see in the sticky post)?
What bothers you, my open contempt for normies and neo-normies (those racialists who haven’t crossed the psychological Rubicon into National Socialism)?
If that’s the case, note that since I began my writing career speaking out about the hellish environment in my family that destroyed several people, I had no mercy in pointing out the perpetrators (my parents and their hired psychiatrist). If I’m capable of criticising my now-deceased parents like this, why expect a less critical or incisive spirit when I see similar shortcomings in other people?
What bothers you exactly (please tell me)…?
to undemonize Hitler
Today I edited and expanded one of our featured articles, “On the Need to Undemonize Hitler,” and it’s worth reading its links this fateful May when the Russian idiots have celebrated the defeat of the Third Reich (something that, in their own way, Western idiots—whose incredibly nasty secular religion seems to be the extinction of the white race—also celebrate).
I added the following passages to the article:
“In almost any war one side can be dishonestly demonized even by a truthful enumeration of its crimes, if the crimes of its adversaries are suppressed.” —Irmin Vinson, writing about the Third Reich.
How can we stop seeing Hitler as a demon? Simple: the Allies killed more German civilians—millions between May 1945 and 1947!—than the Germans killed Jews in the Second World War.
Westerners ignore this because, as the Croatian intellectual Tomislav Sunić says, World War II is not over yet: We remain immersed in an omnipresent propaganda war—especially lying by omission (cf. Vinson’s epigraph above)—, even in the year I am reviewing this article: 2026.
In his video today, Alexander Mercouris said:
This is a huge event and it is an event which Russians and others within the territory of the former Soviet Union take great pride in, and which by the way we in the West should be grateful to them for, though in truth and in fact we never are.
Mercouris is an idiot. Virtually all westerners are. Here’s a quote from another source:
Confirmation bias is not a quirk. It is not a bad habit you can fix with a motivational quote. It is a deeply embedded cognitive architecture that runs under every thought you believe is rational, every conclusion you believe is objective, and every opinion you believe you arrived at through careful consideration. The mechanism is simple and devastating: the brain actively seeks information that confirms what it already believes, and actively discounts, ignores, or attacks information that challenges it. Not occasionally. Constantly.
When a person holds a belief about their own competence—when they have decided, consciously or not, that they are smart, capable, and correct, the confirmation bias engine turns fully toward protecting that identity. Every piece of evidence that supports their self-image gets amplified. Every compliment lands with weight. Every small success becomes proof of their larger narrative. And every challenge, every contradiction, every piece of evidence that might suggest they are wrong gets filtered, reframed, or rejected entirely. Not through deliberate dishonesty, through an automatic process they never even see it happening.
This is how intelligent-sounding people hold profoundly wrong beliefs for decades without ever feeling the friction of being wrong. They are not stupid. They are not lying. They are running a program that the human brain runs in every single person—but they have never been handed the tools to interrupt it. And so the program runs unchecked. The beliefs compound. The blind spots deepen, and the confidence grows—not because the evidence supports it, but because the brain has been quietly curating a reality that does. Now layer on top of this the modern echo chamber, and you have one of the most powerful reinforcement systems ever constructed.
Content that confirms your existing beliefs triggers dopamine. Content that challenges your beliefs triggers cortisol… The social dimension of this goes even deeper. Human beings are tribal by design.
Challenging the beliefs of your group meant rejection—and rejection once meant death. That threat is no longer physical, but the brain hasn’t received the update.
When someone challenges a belief that is tied to your group identity—your political tribe, your professional community, your cultural circle—the brain processes it as a threat to survival. The rational mind goes offline. The defensive mind takes over. And suddenly a conversation about facts becomes a battle about identity, about loyalty, about who you are and which side you’re on.
This is why expertise doesn’t automatically win arguments. This is why data doesn’t automatically change minds. This is why you can show someone evidence that directly contradicts their position, and watch them walk away more convinced than before—a phenomenon researchers call the backfire effect.
I really hate normies…