web analytics

Tag: United States

Categories
War!

Mad

“Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first drive mad,” the ancient Greeks said.

Since 2011, I’ve been waiting for the fall of the American empire, primarily responsible for the defamation of Hitler’s Germany, but without knowing when its beloved dollar—the ultimate source of its power—would collapse.

I didn’t think Trump would be so mad as to obey Bibi and attack Iran. But since, as a result of today’s attack on Tehran by the US and Israel, Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz (disrupting the global oil supply), this war could very well become the pin that will burst the monetary bubble that the Federal Reserve has been inflating since 1971.

This is magnificent news for The West’s Darkest Hour! If things go as I imagine, this war will bring an end to the interregnum, a Pax Americana that began in 1945 by imposing an anti-Nazi Diktat on the entire West through propaganda monopolized by Jewry.

Although they are not Aryans, ¡vivan los iraníes!

Categories
American Revolutionary War Liberalism

Might is right, 19

by Ragnar Redbeard

The Declaration of Independence commences by proclaiming an unctuous falsehood, a black, degrading self-evident lie—a lie which no one could possibly believe but a born fool. With insolent effrontery it brazenly proclaims as ‘a self evident truth’ that ‘all men are created equal’ and that they are ‘endowed,’ by their ‘Creator’ with certain ‘inalienable’ rights—rights which it thereupon proceeds to define in canting phraseology, imbecile and florid as it is false.

Indeed the mock-heroic preamble of this rhetorical pronunciamento is but a cunningly constructed piece of blague deliberately intended to deceive and betray. It consists of a patchwork of plagiarized catchwords, annexed wholesale from the ravings of seventeenth-century Levellers, crazed puritanic Mattoids and eighteenth-century cretinous French Jacobins—all mixed up and jumbled together with a long rigmarole of semi-meaningless pretty phrases, culled mostly from an old time melodrama.

The Declaration of Independence has less real meaning for present conditions than a bottled-up Indian war-whoop of the same period would have, if uncorked now. It is a back-number, musty, high smelling, and worm-eaten: only fit for the walls of a museum or the brain-cells of a daft philosopher.

Its ethical and most of its political conclusions are shams, deceptions, and cold-blooded dishonesties—incandescent Lies—glorified, belauded, printed in letters of gold, but nevertheless—Lies.

Indeed it has always been considered a piece of amusing mockery by those who really understood the secret intent for which it was originally constructed: viz:—as a lasso for the bellowing Herds, that, about one hundred years ago were beginning to run wild, and escape from their herdsmen, and herdsmen’s stock-whip, in this (then) boundless New World.

To all contemporary demagogues, the high-sounding phraseology of the ‘Declaration’ is as honey from paradise. Everywhere its seductive abstractions are the Avatars of anarchism, communism, republicanism, and scores of other zymotic convulsionisms. Why then should sane men continue giving lip-service to this subtle deception? Why should they, by their silence, acquiesce in the malefic efforts of organic weaklings, a mythical airy being who roams about Eternity manufacturing things out of no-things—a fable (instigated by prattlers of a false philosophy) to enforce by electioneering mass-pressure an impossible and hideous Equality Ideal?

Every national appeal is now made, not to the noblest and the best, but to the riff-raff—the slave-hordes—who possess less intelligence than night-owls. All that is brave, honourable, heroic, is ignored tacitly, for fear of offending the deified Herd—‘the Majority’. ‘Equality of conditions’ is its debasing shibboleth and verily he who has temerity enough to spit upon Equality is liable to be horned to death.

The ‘Voice of the People’ can only be compared to the fearsome shrieks of agony that may now and then be heard, issuing forth from the barred windows of a roadside madhouse. ‘The voice of God!’ Alas! Alas!

There are two methods whereby masterful ambitious men may hold any population in a state of ordered subjectivity. The first and by far the most honourable method is through an irresistible and highly-trained standing army, ready to deploy anywhere; with mechanical precision at a telegraphic nod in order to lay down the Law at the cannon’s mouth and sweep away all dangerous opposition.

The second and cheaper method is, first of all to inoculate those intended to be exploited with some poisonous political soporific, superstition [emphasis by Ed.], or theoria; something that operating insidiously, hypodermically, may render them laborious, meek, and tractable.

The latter plan has ever proved itself most effective because Aryan populations that would fight to the last gasp against undisguised military despotism, may be induced to passively submit to any indignity or extortion, if their brains are first carefully soaked in some abstract lie.

At the period of the war of Independence, North America was far too wide, far too sparsely settled, and far too poor in concentrated wealth to be effectively ruled and plundered upon the standing army principle: either by King George or the successful Junta of power-wielding revolutionists.

Hamilton, Hancock, Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Henry, and all the vested material interests that stood a solid phalanx behind those voluble patriots cast about for some safer method of ruling the minds of the uninformed but extremely valorous yeomanry, backwoodsmen and mountaineers.

After mature consideration they determined to lull and lure the armed peasantry back again into a condition of blissful somnolence, by instilling into their newly aroused minds, false but seductive political Idealisms, as subtle supplements to the fallacious, and equally delusive, (but pre-existent) religionisms and moralisms. This cunning plot worked like a charm, for Equity of Rights seemed to puritanic minds the logical outcome of that other hoary old lie—‘Equality before God’. [emphasis by Ed.]

Thereupon the sword of power, that conquered on the battlefield, was carefully hidden away out of sight and ‘constitutionalism’ invoked to aid in the re-harnessing of the conquerors of Cornwallis, by their new masters. The old systems of jurisprudence and government (founded on naked force) were cleverly retained even amplified and at the same time the white skinned populations were cunningly proclaimed ‘free and equal.’ Never having enjoyed genuine personal freedom (except on the Indian border) being for the most part descendants of hunted-out European starvelings and fanatics, (defeated battlers) they now stupidly thought that they had won freedom at last by the patent device of selecting a complete outfit of new tax-gatherers every fourth year.

When we look back upon the childlike faith in constitutionalism, displayed by our revolutionary Fathers together with their infantile republican specifics for the redemption of mankind, we cannot help smiling. At every general election, since 1776, Americans have voted solidly for increasing the despotic authority of their elective rulers and task-masters. Personal liberty is very nearly unknown (except in the newspaper) and any citizen who dares to think in direct opposition to the dogma of the Majority does so at the risk of his life, if he thinks too loudly.

Despotism, if it is to be overthrown, must be fought with its own weapons, and the vilest of Despotisms are ever founded upon Majority Votes.

Many years after the ‘Declaration’ was issued, our written Constitution was constructed with much voluble sophistry and mimic strife. That document, considered as a whole, is the most cunningly worded and at the same time most terrible instrument of Government and Mastership that any Anglo-Teutonic tribe has ever yoked itself up under. Pretending to ‘grant’ liberty and self-government, it practically annihilates both. Under the show of ‘guaranteeing’ personal independence and civil rights, it has organized an elective tyranny; wherein the mob-monarch possesses more arbitrary authority than any dynastic despot since the days of Darius or Balschazzar.

Under the hypnotic spell of a ‘free and equal’ dream, Americans have been hustled into a convict-prison of laboriousness to piratical masters a thousand times more terrible and more unyielding than any history can describe.

Even should America’s servile multitudes appeal to the arbitrement of physical force, they cannot possibly win. Possessing neither the strength, courage, brains, arms, money, nor leaders: they must be blown into eternal fragments by their master’s highly trained artillerists, and scientific destroyers.

The citadel of Power is now consolidated and prepared with the most improved armaments to repel any assault, no matter how well sustained. The nation is intersected in all directions, with iron highroads and splendid waterways, whereon armies and navies may be moved from city to city, with facility and dread effect. The War of Secession (or rather the war for the annihilation of self-government) demonstrated conclusively that a centralized authority, resting on herd-votes of the vulgar and fanatic is (in practice) military absolutism. There is no other Power in the land that can effectively hold it in check. The Czar of Russia possesses less actual authority than our Federal Government. With a standing army in the hollow of its hand, it can do exactly as it pleases, i.e. if it can collect enough revenue to purchase ‘statesmen’ and pay the salaries of its praetorian cohorts.

Most Americans are only now beginning to perceive these things, but they were foreseen, (and also foretold in part) by clear-sighted individuals before the Constitution itself was formally Enthroned.

What is viler than a government of slaves and usurious Jews? What is grander than a government of the Noblest and the Best—who have proved their fitness on the plains of death?

Cromwell and his Ironsides—Cæsar and his Legions shall be born again; and the thunderous tread of Sulla’s fierce destroyers shall roll and rumble amid the fire and glare and smoke of crumbling constitutionalisms: ‘as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be’—warfare without end.

Yawping politicians may harangue base city mobs of hirelings and Christlings with ‘Alas, poor Yorick!’ rhapsody, as if struggle and strife were the evil of all evils. Figures of speech, however, cannot breathe the breath of life into feline philosophies that never have had the slightest foundation in Fact. The survival of the Fittest—the Toughest is the logic of events and of all time. They who declare otherwise are blind. The chief point is this: that Fitness must honestly demonstrate itself not by ignoble theft and theory but by open conflict as per Darwin’s law of battle.

Categories
American Revolutionary War Philosophy of history

Might is right, 18

Chapter III: The spinning of the web

Just as the spider weaves his silky web, to lure flies into the larder of his banqueting hall in order that he may at his leisure, pick the flesh off their bones, so deceitful ideals are cunningly woven by dexterous, political spiders, to capture and exploit swarms of human flies.

The 1823 facsimile of the Declaration of Independence.

What are the grandiose paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence, but the weft and woof of a dazing spider-web? And what are the American People but the flies that have been cleverly entangled in its gossamer meshes? For over a century this ‘Declaration’ has been the parchment divinity or all public orators, from the curbstone dervish at the street corner, to our Elective Monarch in the White House. Every 4th of July, Americans habitually scream themselves hoarse over its sounding generalities: making the welkin ring with tin-horns, giant fire-crackers, flag-idolatry, brass bands, toy pistols and herd- bellowing generally. Although the great majority of them are mental and physical dwindlings, poverty-stricken, and property-less yet how insanely they delight in amusing a sardonic world with their loquacious flamboyant charlatanry. ‘We are sovereigns and equals’ is their everlasting Barmecide chorus. ‘Sovereigns and Equals!’

In all lunatic asylums may be found inmates who fancy themselves kings and queens, and lords of the earth. These sorrowful creatures, if only permitted to wear imaginary crowns and issue imaginary commands, are the most docile and harmless of all maniacs.

As for the American People of today, Is not their written constitution but a cunningly constructed straight-jacket—their moral codes, padded prison-cells: their statute laws handcuffs and leg-irons—their Captains of Industry keepers and turnkeys in clever disguise? One hundred years ago they ostensibly commenced ‘independent’ operations with the richest continent on earth as their private property—their subscribed capital; and during the whole of that period, have they not been as busy as so many relays of draught beasts-of-burden, pumping the tremendous natural wealth out of their home soil, and pouring it over-sea, into the cess-pools of Europe?

Is not that the work of lunatics? They smashed and splintered the wooden political yoke of an English king and then proceeded to rivet around their necks a brand new yoke of bolted steel, which they forged especially to fit themselves: and which they dignified under the name of ‘Constitutional Freedom’.

Is not that also the work of lunatics? Cursed indeed are the harnessed ones! Cursed are they even though their harness be home-made—even though it tinkle musically with silver bells—aye! even though every buckle and link and rivet thereof is made of solid gold.

How absurd of men to hurrah over their ‘glorious political liberty’ who have not even been able to retain possession of the substantial products of their own laboriousness. After a century of ‘constitutional progress,’ ten per cent of the population are absolute owners of ninety-two per cent of all the property.

Now, O reader, Are not these things the outward and visible sign of organic dementia?

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Rick & Nick

Four days ago, Richard Spencer interviewed Nick Fuentes again. In sharp contrast to my post this morning, after minute 24 Nick says he lives in a racially diverse city and prefers to live there rather than in a small town populated exclusively by white people—because it would be boring, Rick adds!

Around minute 27 Rick mentions WW2 without saying a word about the Hellstorm Holocaust, or that the bad guys won the war. But he is right at the 30-minute mark that in the previous century there was a window for fascism or communism to escape the System, but now everyone is a slave to capitalism and material comfort.

When they talk about Russia around the 50-minute mark, this pair doesn’t seem to distinguish between the American state (which is in fact anti-white) and the white American nation, which is dwindling every day. That doesn’t mean I’m a Russophile in the last, just that they don’t express themselves like 14-word priests.

Half a minute before the hour, Nick seems to like the universalist “compassion”—he used this word—of today’s woke Europeans (note the difference with us, who propose exterminationist hatred). Nick then goes on to say that he likes the European Union, omitting that it is an exterminationist entity, yes: but of the white man!

More than half an hour later, when they talk about Christian Nationalism, they fail to note that the racial factor should be our #1 priority (Christian Nationalism is not National Socialism with its Nuremberg laws, mass deportations, concentration camps, etc.).

When it was time for wrap-up questions, the first person to ask Nick a question noted that the Catholic Church is browning. Nick acknowledged this harsh reality but failed to suggest any cure, even saying that he liked both the current Pope and Pope Francis.

Rick then spoke about Greco-Roman religion, but he doesn’t seem to have read William Pierce’s history of the white race, Who We Are. Both admire the Roman Empire but are completely ignorant of how the empire’s miscegenation caused Rome to decline and fall (see e.g., this paper of a Swedish scholar).

At 1:50, it is clear that Nick follows Christian ethics. He is asked about the outcome of the Aryan dilemma in the future and responds that ethnic cleansing will not be practical in the US (i.e., expelling them to “Aztlán” as in Harold Covington’s futuristic novels) and Rick nods because, although he isn’t a Christian, he shares the Christian ethics of the Catholic Nick.

Compare all this with the Third Reich, which was determined to solve the problem of miscegenation (i.e., the destruction of the Aryan race) at any cost. I confess that after watching this friendly chat between Rick and Nick, it seems obvious to me that America, as an idea, must die in order to save the Aryan DNA north of the Rio Grande.

At 1:57, Nick voices the official Americanist POV on the war in Ukraine—nothing like what someone like John Mearsheimer would say on the subject! It’s incredible, and it’s the same POV as Rick’s. I say incredible because we need to humiliate NATO, the European Union and the US: the greatest enemies of the white race (remember that, during the US bombing of Serbia in 1999, the American who headed NATO declared that Europe no longer had any right to ethnostates).

I am by no means a Russophile, but Russia is certainly not the greatest enemy of the white man, rather this Western Leviathan. Given that Ukraine will certainly lose the war next year, it will be magnificent to see how this pair of blind Americans, who believe the official version of this war, react when the humiliating defeat for NATO, the European Union, the US and Ukraine finally comes.

From this angle, the American Michael O’Meara was much wiser than this pair. O’Meara published an article in Counter-Currents on 7 October 2013 entitled “Too Much Putin?”, in which he said:

US hegemony may be approaching its end. Once the world refuses to acknowledge the imperial authority of its humanitarian missiles [e.g., what Bill Clinton’s military forces did in Serbia because the Serbs were expelling the Muslims from Kosovo—Ed.], and thus stops paying tribute to its predatory model of the universe, then American power inevitably starts to decline—and not simply on the world stage, but also domestically, among the empire’s subjects, who in the course of the long descent will be forced to discover new ways to assert themselves.

But at 2:10 Nick said something humorous: that he can’t run for president because he’s too short “and not white enough.” At least I find that honest (I could say something analogous about me).

At any event, I believe that the future fall of the dollar will create the necessary gravitas for other American racialists not to get stuck halfway across the Rubicon, as this pair are. In the end of the video, both speculate about what we need without mentioning National Socialism (NS is the other side of the Rubicon, following my metaphor). Instead, Nick ended his speech by saying that what we need is “the Hellenised Jew, who is Christ, I suppose.”

The Hellenised Jew, right?

America delenda est!

Categories
Liberalism Newspeak Nick Fuentes

Glitch in the Matrix

A Spanish speaker posted the following on X, which I will now translate:

Piers Morgan (pure Boomer) vs. Nick Fuentes (radical Zoomer): the interview is a surgical X-ray of the generation gap. These guys speak completely incomprehensible languages and are driven by entirely opposing ideas.

One grew up in the era when the labels “Nazi,” “anti-Semitic,” “homophobic,” or “racist” functioned as an instant social guillotine: simply uttering them was enough to make the accused kneel, beg for forgiveness, and disappear off the face of the earth.

The other grew up in the era when those same words became badges of honour, war trophies, visible proof that you don’t kneel before the official religion of globalist progressivism. The Boomer tries to use them as a method of control; the Zoomer wipes his ass with them.

The Boomer tries, time and again, to activate the old control mechanism: he raises an eyebrow, raises his voice, launches the sacred accusation, expecting automatic submission.

The Zoomer smiles, shrugs, and basically replies, “Yeah, so what? Is that all you’ve got?” “Yes, I’m a Nazi, think what you want.”

There’s no shame, no withdrawal, no fear. Only defiance and mockery. The slightest conventionality has been eradicated from the dialogue.

And that, exactly that, is what drives the old-school boomers crazy: discovering that their moral nuclear weapon, which they wielded for decades, is now a wet firecracker. That they, who were the servile lapdogs of Zionism, can’t leave their ideological sperm in the next generation, and that, at best, they’ll receive a: “Take your cheap ideology and die with it, leave us alone, boomer.”

The average person hasn’t processed it yet, but the message has been sent: the spell is broken. The fracture will be total and extremely painful.

The words “nazi” and “racist” are equivalent to “pagan” in the Early Middle Ages or “witch” in the Late Middle Ages. Compared to the old Greco-Roman world, these Christian words—the Newspeak of the time—only had power when the Church had its secular arm that destroyed the dissenter. What Europeans don’t seem to realize is that in the land of the First Amendment, a 27-year-old can say these things and get away with it because there isn’t a secular arm to remove the infected sheep so he doesn’t infect the flock, to use the language of the inquisitors of old (always remember that two former commenters on this site are serving sentences of eight and seven years in the UK for “thought crimes”!).

It must have been around 2010 that Greg Johnson said in his fledgling webzine that a heretical statement from a notable figure could cause “a glitch in the Matrix”. Nick Fuentes’ ignorance regarding the Hellstorm Holocaust (what Stalin’s Asian hordes did in Germany) may disgust me big time, but despite his ignorance the glitch has occurred.

Now, new voices must emerge online, more mature than Nick’s, to continue this tactic of accepting labels (which in the Middle Ages led to the stake and today to European prisons) as badges of honour.

Categories
Joseph Stalin Nick Fuentes

Greenhorn

After posting this entry, I will delete the previous one, which I had titled “Groyped!”, and move it to the comments section of this post.

The reason for this change is what Nick Fuentes said yesterday: that he admired Stalin much more than Hitler because he had won the war.

That line of reasoning is as stupid as saying we should admire the House of Constantine because it won the war against pagan Rome. I realised this twisted way of thinking ever since I read William Pierce’s history of the white race: We admire the figures of Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar without realising the immense damage they did to the white race. Except Emperor Julian, the same could be said of the emperors of the House of Constantine, who destroyed the Aryan Gods to impose the god of the Jews on us: something that literally transvalued our values to the values of the Jews.

Nick Fuentes is a greenhorn, and his perpetual immaturity reflects the fact that Americans haven’t suffered the way Revilo Oliver said they should before a true paradigm shift takes place. That gravitas, like that of the Republican Romans before Caesar’s actions started the Melting Pot empire, can only develop years after the dollar collapses and American society descends into utter chaos. We badly need the fall of this new Rome.

Until that happens, we will continue defending the Hitlerian faith on this site, even though very few people listen to me in the desert where I preach.

Categories
Racial right

Goner

by Dr. Robert Morgan

Heart of America: The Blessings of Repentance, painted at the “Crossroads of America” event at Goshen, Indiana.

Trying to imagine America without Christianity is like trying to imagine Nazi Germany without Hitler.

Just as did Pierce and Rockwell, Linder wanted an America with Americans other than they are. This attempt to reform people who don’t want to be reformed—to save people who don’t want to be saved—is the strategic weakness that caused all three of them to fail [emphasis by Ed.].

No amount of clever typing is ever going to work. In the current environment, building a mass movement like NSDAP is impossible.

That’s why I say that inducing a permanent collapse of the technological system is a better way to achieve the goal of saving the white race. It’s something that could be accomplished by only a small group of fanatics, or maybe even a lone genius. The system is vulnerable to attack in thousands of ways. I sketched out one possible way [elsewhere].

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Fuentes

Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson.

Listen to another Nick Fuentes interview just for 50 seconds starting from this moment.

It is clear that, due to Christian universalism, which drives Nick to love all humans including Neanderthals (compare it to our exterminationism), Fuentes will never be the American Führer who saves whites from extinction. He, with his million followers, is a man of his time (the Christian Era). I, with Ben, am a man against our time (the Hitlerian Era).

Categories
G.L. Rockwell Videos

Rockwell

A normie sums up George Lincoln Rockwell’s life in 17 minutes (YouTube would never allow one of us to summarise it from our POV). Despite the bias, it’s worth watching.

Categories
Egalitarianism

Founders

What white nationalists of the patriotard variety will never accept is that their nation was born with the wrong ideals: the ultimate aetiology of Aryan decline, which I have been calling neochristianity. (The JQ has been merely an opportunistic infection arising from the primary infection: the Christian ethics shared by the deist founders of the US.) Let us listen to what Robert Barnes has to say, interviewed by Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris:

Slavery abolition was on the clock the moment the American Revolution went forward. Because once you say, “All men are created equal”, sooner or later all men have to be… treated equal.

The last question for Barnes is especially noteworthy (click here).