web analytics

Tag: Priesthood of the sacred words

Categories
Third Reich

Subtitle

What this site looked like before WordPress censored it.

Yesterday I changed the subtitle of this site from “National Socialism after 1945” to “Priesthood of the Sacred Words.” I would like to explain why.

The thing is, a phrase in the email Ben sent me yesterday (“I don’t so much regret the Judeo-reductionist phase I went through, as it seems most NS go through that phase—and most WN indeed remain in it!”) catalysed a process in my mind that had been brewing for years.

It all has to do with wanting to rescue the ideals of Adolf Hitler to enlighten the darkest era for white men, which began in 1945. For some reason virtually all Aryans, after that year, entered into a psychosis against their ethnicity as aberrant as that of the self-harmers who have been committed to psychiatric wards.

What does that have to do with Judeo-reductionism: believing that all our ills are due to Jewry? This POV is relevant because it has failed after World War II (all of American white nationalism has been a comedy of failures!).

Let me explain.

It is true that Hitler, Himmler, Bormann and others were well aware of the Christian Question. However, that awareness definitely didn’t extend to realising that the Christian Question was a greater problem than the Jewish Question!

If Hitler had known this, he wouldn’t have launched Operation Barbarossa, much less a Jewish holocaust when the war reached its peak, since it would have been understood that the primary task was to educate the German people so that, step by step and over generations, this great nation would transvalue Christian values into pre-Christian values.

Did Hitler want to exterminate all the Jews in the world? No. Even the Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu, stated in a speech before the World Zionist Congress in 2015 that Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews, but only to expel them from Europe. In a world where Anglo-Americans hadn’t intervened, those mass deportations would have been done without the insane violence unleashed in World War II (for this very reason, I’d like to invert a famous phrase from Milton Himmelfarb’s 1984 essay in this way: No Churchill & Roosevelt, no Holocaust!).

I recently transferred the DVD containing the PDFs from the revisionist Holocaust Handbooks collection to my hard drive. I liked what Harry Elmer Barnes wrote in his 1962 pamphlet, Revisionism and Brainwashing. Barnes argued that there was “a failure to point out the atrocities of the Allies were more brutal, painful, mortal and numerous than the most extreme allegations made against the Germans” and that in order to justify the “horrors and evils of the Second World War” the Allies made the Nazis the “scapegoat” for their own misdeeds.

Very true! This is precisely what we have been saying on this site about the Hellstorm Holocaust perpetrated by the Allies against the Germans. Nevertheless, and despite the best attempts of the revisionists who, after Barnes, went much further than him and began to call the holocaust a “hoax,” it seems clear to me that approaching the subject objectively leads us to conclude that millions of Jews were murdered in World War II (as were millions of Germans, and millions of Russians, etc.).

Ironically, it is easier to rehabilitate Hitler’s image by accepting the historicity of the holocaust than by denying it, provided we also accept the historicity of the Holocaust of Germans committed from 1945 to 1947.

The reason I changed the subtitle is that, since my life was almost completely destroyed by my father’s Catholicism (see, for example, the first book of my trilogy), I gained a better understanding of what Christianity is than the anti-Christian consciousness of Hitler, Himmler and Bormann. Especially for Himmler, who was in charge of the holocaust machine according to David Irving, the Jewish problem was obviously much more urgent than the Christian problem.

I think the opposite: the Aryan collective unconscious is infected with Semitic malware (the New Testament). Removing this malware from the Aryan collective unconscious would solve the Jewish problem, since an Aryan without that malware in their head would no longer have moral scruples about solving not only the JP but also the Negro problem, the Spic problem, the Gook problem, etc.

In other words, in The West’s Darkest Hour I can no longer pretend that our point of view is identical to that of the National Socialists of the Third Reich because… it isn’t. It’s very similar to Hitler’s dinner table conversations, and to some of Himmler’s semi-secret conferences, true. But it’s not identical.

I believe that the primary task of the White Man is to rid his subconscious of the New Testament programming written precisely… by Jews for Gentile consumption! Jews are much smarter in this respect than white racialists and non-racialists alike. Let’s remember that Bibi himself invoked the biblical passage of Amalek (from Deuteronomy 25:17 and 1 Samuel 15:3) in a speech on October 28, 2023, where he urged the troops to remember “what Amalek did” (i.e., exterminate the Palestinians).

As I said, if Hitler had thought like me, he wouldn’t have invaded the Soviet Union, as the general population hadn’t yet cleansed itself of the programming of unconditional love for every wingless biped. Since the German people never ran antivirus programs on their collective unconscious, so to speak, Hitler never imagined that if he lost the war… that Christian infection would end up demoralising the defeated Germans to the point of accepting ethno-suicide.

The current subtitle better reflects our point of view than the one I used to use. Even so, I still believe Hitler was the greatest statesman in all of Western history.

Categories
Quotable quotes

“We …

must secure the existence
of our people and a future
for White children.”

Categories
Kali Yuga

Nazis

The fact that the western System is promoting the mass reproduction of females like those on the left, while simultaneously exterminating women like those on the right, should turn us into fanatical Nazis…

Categories
Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 10

This is the final episode of Joel Webbon’s interview with Nick Fuentes.

I’d like to report that these past few days I’ve spent my time watching a huge number of YouTube commentators, both English and Spanish speakers, discussing the war between the US and Israel against Iran.

They’re all normies, of course, and while I’ve been very critical of Fuentes in the previous nine instalments of this series, I think I should say that all YouTubers are normies (incidentally, Fuentes has been banned in YouTube). Although critical of Donald Trump’s blunder in Iran, YouTubers don’t understand the basics. Even those who think with the utmost clarity, like John Mearsheimer, co-author of the book that exposed the Jewish lobby, are still normies in that they fail to see the forest. So-called geopolitical commentators, like Pepe Escobar, are more ignorant than Mearsheimer, as they don’t even understand the Lobby’s huge influence in the US government.

Unlike all the normies whom the System allows to criticise on YouTube the blunder Trump committed by obeying Bibi, Fuentes does get the JQ. But even if we disregard the CQ, the difference between Fuentes and us is abysmal.

For example, Fuentes recommends that young people hide their POV because the System would ruin their carreers if they didn’t, and he suggests that young people silently march within institutions. Compare this advice with ours: to be inspired by The Turner’s Diaries to create a Fourth Reich in the future. Not to be violent for the moment, but to wait for the collapse of the System.

Alex Linder once said that our faith can only be preached after the collapse.

Neither Webbon nor Fuentes seem to know that their country will face the collapse of the dollar, and even less so the energy devolution that will unfold over about a century: something that Pepe Escobar, who so admires Asia, also doesn’t know. Pepe believes that international business will continue as usual for the rest of the century (in reality, the decline in oil will bleed the System dry).

My strategy is very different from Fuentes’s: to create a Syssitia where priests of the sacred words can live together to establish a healthy Männerbund, with rituals like the images I posted on “Neutron”, and wait for the collapse so that a very well-defined doctrine of our faith can be preached among the noblest Aryan men throught the internet.

Categories
Eschatology

Neutron

“It had to happen to someone. There is nothing exceptional about you, any more than there is about the first neutron that starts the chain reaction in an atomic bomb. It simply happens to be the first. Any other neutron would have served—just as Jeffrey might have been anybody in the world. We call it Total Breakthrough.”

― Arthur C. Clarke, Childhood’s End

I’d like to say something about my seemingly mysterious comment yesterday to Thomas (“if people like you and me could reactivate the Cro-Magnon teem…”).

I was inspired by the 1953 novel quoted above, where two mutant children unleash a chain reaction with apocalyptic consequences for the world.

Of course, the quote in Clarke’s fantastic novel refers to developing paranormal powers, and I’m referring to something quite different. But the metaphor is clear: two priests of the sacred words could potentially infect, with their newfound faith, dozens, hundreds or thousands of Aryan males in the future—a chain reaction—, and the consequences would also be eschatological.

For many years, Childhood’s End was my favourite novel. That ended when I awoke to the fact that the Aryan race is dying. But following the metaphor of the quote, it is possible to reactivate the Cro-Magnon teem (an exterminationist archetype): the goal of this site.

Regarding the person who developed teem theory, this morning I couldn’t let a comment criticising him because it’s clear he hasn’t read Them & Us. This commenter, who had already been banned, claimed that Neanderthals were capable of weaving clothes.

Let’s remember that just as neochristian anthropologists have massively projected their evolved selves in a quixotic undertaking to humanise their noble savages, many of whom were cannibalistic infanticides (cf. my book’s chapter here), neochristian paleoanthropologists do the same: they project their own psychoclass onto the prehistoric past so massively that it borders on psychosis: like putting diapers on a doll representing a supposed Neanderthal child in a museum. It’s crucial to understand how more serious scholars debunk things like Neanderthals weaving clothes or carrying flowers to their burials (a critic of that claim said that pollen found in a cave could have been carried there by an animal, not for ceremonial obituaries).

It’s a terrible mistake to believe that academics are lying about events like BLM (“the rioters cannot be infected by Covid viruses,” etc.), while believing that they are honest when writing their papers about the prehistoric past. They are the same usual suspects, and what motivates them is not objective science but anti-white hatred, the idealisation of non-whites and the defamation of the latter.

I’ve also received emails complaining about the author of the NP theory, which show that the correspondent hasn’t bothered to read Vendramini’s book. They remind me of another banned commenter who recently dismissed Tom Szasz’s critique of psychiatry because he had a Jewish ancestor, or Michel Foucault’s critique of the same profession because he was homosexual: perfect ad hominem arguments, very common in the racial right. One of the problems with the new generation of racialists is that they don’t read books, even though it’s impossible to think deeply about a subject without reading them. But all this is beside the point.

The point is creating a community of priests of the sacred words from where it’s possible to try to produce that chain reaction that would infect the white race with a Cro-Magnon-like exterminationist passion that ensures its survival.

In these communities we would have temples like the one pictured above and rituals to “baptize” newborns in the new faith that commemorate those who bravely, though unsuccessfully, tried to force the eschaton into history. Following Savitri Devi’s philosophy, Hitler was not the equivalent of Jeffrey Agnus Greggson in Clarke’s novel, only his precursor, although every ritual within the post-Christian temples would commemorate his official photograph and symbols.

Categories
Heinrich Himmler Quotable quotes

Himmler quote

“During the thousand years before you, your blood was purely preserved, so that you would be who you are. Now you must preserve your blood, so that all of the generations of the next thousand years will honour you and thank you.”

Categories
Arthur Schopenhauer Philosophy

Schopen quote

If you imagine, in so far as it is approximately possible, the sum total of distress, pain and suffering of every kind which the sun shines upon in its course, you will have to admit it would have been much better if the sun had been able to call up the phenomenon of life as little on the earth as on the moon; and if, here as there, the surface were still in a crystalline condition. [Schopenhauer, Essays and Aphorisms, page 479]

Schopenhauer lived in a time when it wasn’t yet known that, in the distant future, our sun will become a Red Giant: eliminating not only what we call unnecessary suffering, but also the necessary suffering that every creature that wants to live must endure.

As far as the commenters on this site are concerned, only Benjamin, Gaedhal, and I have rationally ventured into the subject of Schopenhauer’s pessimism. I don’t count Autisticus Spasticus because he suggests getting rid of a hundred per cent of humanity at once.

In contrast, I hope that only the Aryan race, in its Nordic version, will persist in the future and that some super-beautiful Nordids (I recently learned that actor Björn Andrésen from Death in Venice passed away this year) will become followers of the religion of the four words, and inhabit the paradise of girls on rocks painted by the American Maxfield Parrish. Spasticus’ solution isn’t rational because it would allow, say, killer whales to continue tormenting whale calves of other species once Homo sapiens became extinct. Instead, the priest of the sacred words suggests exterminating the killer whale gangs that are doing this.

With its trillions of galaxies, the universe is the mystery of mysteries. What seems to reign everywhere in the Milky Way is precisely this “crystalline condition”, to rephrase Schopenhauer, of the planets of all stars, except our own. Trying to conquer the universe for our religion seems impossible.

But modestly speaking, it is theoretically possible to try to implement the sacred words—Eliminad todo sufrimiento innecesario—at least on this planet. And for that, we need Hitlerites like Ben and me (remember that the first thing the Nazis did when they came to power was to ban vivisection).

Categories
Conservatism

Tort

vs. Walsh & Tucker

I can use this segment from Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Matt Walsh (both Christians) to show what the priest of the sacred words—an anti-Christian admirer of Nazi paganism—has in common with American conservatives. Let’s consider the values that, according to Walsh, those who share them are essentially on his side. According to Walsh, the first value is:

1) Objective truth

Here we seem to be in complete agreement.

But as commenter Gaedhal has said, when it comes to approaching the New Testament from the standpoint of objective truth, conservative Christians are more primitive than liberal Christians. Quite a few of the latter are aware of the historiographical problems that have been raised for centuries about 1st century Christian writings. In contrast, people like Walsh, Tucker, and racialist Christians generally ignore the issue, although it is evident that there is an objective truth regarding the historicity of the New Testament stories. If you ignore it, you are basically ignoring this first value.

If all these conservatives educated themselves honestly on the subject, they would realise that there is not even evidence for the existence of Jesus, and the same could be said about the existence of the Jewish god, whom both Walsh and Tucker worship.

Curiously, both recognise that everything stems from there: from objective truth. But if this pair and the Christians of the racial right don’t even dare to discuss the issue, we can assume that when it comes to Judeo-Christianity, they are not interested in such a thing as objective truth.

The next thing Walsh mentions is:

2) Preserving American identity in particular: the institution of the family (and therefore the institution of marriage), and Western civilisation in general.

Note that not for a second do these two Christians talk about preserving the white race, which is what the priest would mention as the priority. It is from the 14 words that one understands the need for the institution of marriage[1], which only makes sense if both husband and wife are whites. To the conservative question of what we are trying to conserve, my answer would be: the DNA of the Aryans.

It is precisely because of this omission that Walsh and Tucker later criticise multi-culturalism. The religion of this pair doesn’t allow them to criticise the multi-racial society that the US has become. (When an Aryan marries a coloured, for the priest of the sacred words s/he sins against the holy spirit of life.)

_________

[1] Remember that my favourite films are Sense & Sensibility (1995), and Pride & Prejudice (2005).

Categories
Painting

14 words

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Groyper

Yesterday I tried to communicate with a Groyper on “X” but it was useless.

These people don’t read, as Greg Johnson complained.

They fail to understand that the mere bravado of guru Nick Fuentes is certainly good, but it lacks the depth of thought that William Pierce on this side of the Atlantic, or Savitri Devi on the other, possessed.

I told this Groyper that Nick had recently said that his Christian scruples prevented him from expelling the millions of non-whites who have come to the US in recent decades. Fuentes added that white Americans now have to adapt to that reality. I told the Groyper that such scruples didn’t appear in Pierce’s novel, and the guy (who could be half a century younger than me) replied that it was an academic discussion. Then he spoke rudely, and I cut him off for good.

It’s not an academic matter, but rather what I’ve said several times about our friend Joseph Walsh, who is now serving a seven-year sentence in the UK for thought crime. Walsh told me privately that all white people, including racialists, are committing suicide.

Why? Recall Walsh’s words in the featured article, “1945 was the year of the total inversion of Aryan values into Christian values.”

The point is that before 1945, white people were capable of exterminating entire populations of inferior humans, as they did in Cuba, Tasmania, and as the Germans planned to do in the Master Plan East. The aftermath of that fateful year represented a psychotic regression toward the purest evangelical message: a folie en mass of the Aryan collective unconscious, leading them to love every wingless biped (a psychological affliction even Fuentes suffers from).

These callow Groypers are incapable of engaging in a simple discussion on the matter because, like some teenagers, they are too arrogant. They think they can reinvent the wheel. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Without an ethnostate, even with several Groyper dictators in the US over the course of a century, the white race would become extinct because miscegenation is inevitable.

Walsh was right: All white people commit suicide, even racialists with very rare exceptions (those we call priests of the sacred words). In short, a devout Christian—and the Groypers are Christians—will never be capable of ethnic cleansing, as the Gods command. Unlike the Nazis, a Groyper obeys the commandment to love one’s “neighbour”: a commandment of the god of the Jews who wants to exterminate him.

Ultimately, a Groyper will still be a loser even if he becomes President of the US.