“During the thousand years before you, your blood was purely preserved, so that you would be who you are. Now you must preserve your blood, so that all of the generations of the next thousand years will honour you and thank you.”
If you imagine, in so far as it is approximately possible, the sum total of distress, pain and suffering of every kind which the sun shines upon in its course, you will have to admit it would have been much better if the sun had been able to call up the phenomenon of life as little on the earth as on the moon; and if, here as there, the surface were still in a crystalline condition. [Schopenhauer, Essays and Aphorisms, page 479]
Schopenhauer lived in a time when it wasn’t yet known that, in the distant future, our sun will become a Red Giant: eliminating not only what we call unnecessary suffering, but also the necessary suffering that every creature that wants to live must endure.
As far as the commenters on this site are concerned, only Benjamin, Gaedhal, and I have rationally ventured into the subject of Schopenhauer’s pessimism. I don’t count Autisticus Spasticus because he suggests getting rid of a hundred per cent of humanity at once.
In contrast, I hope that only the Aryan race, in its Nordic version, will persist in the future and that some super-beautiful Nordids (I recently learned that actor Björn Andrésen from Death in Venice passed away this year) will become followers of the religion of the four words, and inhabit the paradise of girls on rocks painted by the American Maxfield Parrish. Spasticus’ solution isn’t rational because it would allow, say, killer whales to continue tormenting whale calves of other species once Homo sapiens became extinct. Instead, the priest of the sacred words suggests exterminating the killer whale gangs that are doing this.
With its trillions of galaxies, the universe is the mystery of mysteries. What seems to reign everywhere in the Milky Way is precisely this “crystalline condition”, to rephrase Schopenhauer, of the planets of all stars, except our own. Trying to conquer the universe for our religion seems impossible.
But modestly speaking, it is theoretically possible to try to implement the sacred words—Eliminad todo sufrimiento innecesario—at least on this planet. And for that, we need Hitlerites like Ben and me (remember that the first thing the Nazis did when they came to power was to ban vivisection).
vs. Walsh & Tucker
I can use this segment from Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Matt Walsh (both Christians) to show what the priest of the sacred words—an anti-Christian admirer of Nazi paganism—has in common with American conservatives. Let’s consider the values that, according to Walsh, those who share them are essentially on his side. According to Walsh, the first value is:
1) Objective truth
Here we seem to be in complete agreement.
But as commenter Gaedhal has said, when it comes to approaching the New Testament from the standpoint of objective truth, conservative Christians are more primitive than liberal Christians. Quite a few of the latter are aware of the historiographical problems that have been raised for centuries about 1st century Christian writings. In contrast, people like Walsh, Tucker, and racialist Christians generally ignore the issue, although it is evident that there is an objective truth regarding the historicity of the New Testament stories. If you ignore it, you are basically ignoring this first value.
If all these conservatives educated themselves honestly on the subject, they would realise that there is not even evidence for the existence of Jesus, and the same could be said about the existence of the Jewish god, whom both Walsh and Tucker worship.
Curiously, both recognise that everything stems from there: from objective truth. But if this pair and the Christians of the racial right don’t even dare to discuss the issue, we can assume that when it comes to Judeo-Christianity, they are not interested in such a thing as objective truth.
The next thing Walsh mentions is:
2) Preserving American identity in particular: the institution of the family (and therefore the institution of marriage), and Western civilisation in general.
Note that not for a second do these two Christians talk about preserving the white race, which is what the priest would mention as the priority. It is from the 14 words that one understands the need for the institution of marriage[1], which only makes sense if both husband and wife are whites. To the conservative question of what we are trying to conserve, my answer would be: the DNA of the Aryans.
It is precisely because of this omission that Walsh and Tucker later criticise multi-culturalism. The religion of this pair doesn’t allow them to criticise the multi-racial society that the US has become. (When an Aryan marries a coloured, for the priest of the sacred words s/he sins against the holy spirit of life.)
_________
[1] Remember that my favourite films are Sense & Sensibility (1995), and Pride & Prejudice (2005).
Yesterday I tried to communicate with a Groyper on “X” but it was useless.
These people don’t read, as Greg Johnson complained.
They fail to understand that the mere bravado of guru Nick Fuentes is certainly good, but it lacks the depth of thought that William Pierce on this side of the Atlantic, or Savitri Devi on the other, possessed.
I told this Groyper that Nick had recently said that his Christian scruples prevented him from expelling the millions of non-whites who have come to the US in recent decades. Fuentes added that white Americans now have to adapt to that reality. I told the Groyper that such scruples didn’t appear in Pierce’s novel, and the guy (who could be half a century younger than me) replied that it was an academic discussion. Then he spoke rudely, and I cut him off for good.
It’s not an academic matter, but rather what I’ve said several times about our friend Joseph Walsh, who is now serving a seven-year sentence in the UK for thought crime. Walsh told me privately that all white people, including racialists, are committing suicide.
Why? Recall Walsh’s words in the featured article, “1945 was the year of the total inversion of Aryan values into Christian values.”
The point is that before 1945, white people were capable of exterminating entire populations of inferior humans, as they did in Cuba, Tasmania, and as the Germans planned to do in the Master Plan East. The aftermath of that fateful year represented a psychotic regression toward the purest evangelical message: a folie en mass of the Aryan collective unconscious, leading them to love every wingless biped (a psychological affliction even Fuentes suffers from).
These callow Groypers are incapable of engaging in a simple discussion on the matter because, like some teenagers, they are too arrogant. They think they can reinvent the wheel. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Without an ethnostate, even with several Groyper dictators in the US over the course of a century, the white race would become extinct because miscegenation is inevitable.
Walsh was right: All white people commit suicide, even racialists with very rare exceptions (those we call priests of the sacred words). In short, a devout Christian—and the Groypers are Christians—will never be capable of ethnic cleansing, as the Gods command. Unlike the Nazis, a Groyper obeys the commandment to love one’s “neighbour”: a commandment of the god of the Jews who wants to exterminate him.
Ultimately, a Groyper will still be a loser even if he becomes President of the US.
(primary slogan)
“We must secure the existence of our people
and a future for white children..”
(secondary slogan)
“…because the beauty of the White Aryan woman shall not perish from the Earth.”
Catalina, the crown of the
evolution, a girl I met in 1980.
The 4 words (ethics)
Eliminate all unnecessary suffering
These words are my invention and could only be fully understood after reading the autobiographical trilogy I wrote in my mother tongue. However, here I can illustrate what I mean with a couple of examples. The first thing the Nazis did when they took power was to ban cruelty to animals. And for those aware of how abusive parents murder the souls of their children, the Hitler Youth offered them a window of escape. So eliminating the unnecessary suffering of children and animals is the priority in my fight against human Neanderthalism.
The 14 words (aesthetics)
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children
These are the words of David Lane (1938-2007), evoking an 88-word paragraph from Mein Kampf (it is always good for a cause to have a slogan with few words). The American anti-white establishment put Dave Lane in jail, where he died. Although his words are self-explanatory here we could over-explain them as follows.
Unless Aryans wake up, due to mass immigration throughout the West, white North Americans, Europeans, Australians and New Zealanders will become a minority in their own countries, facing subsequent extinction.
had won WW2…
…instead of the imbecile Western presidents supporting Israel in the war with Iran, this is what we would see on the streets of Europe.
Or:
On Old and New Tablets
A passage in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, ‘On Old and New Tablets’, inspires me for this post. But before I continue with the routine of this site (perhaps my next post will be one more passage from Irving’s book on Himmler), I would like to clarify something about today’s previous post.
The pair of four words, Gens alba conservanda est (White people must be preserved) and ¡Eliminad todo sufrimiento innecesario! (Let us eliminate all unnecessary suffering!), define the two commandments, or new conception of right and wrong, in our new Tablets of the Law.
The second commandment is given because of the colossal hells that some abusive humans inflict on their children, or the defenceless animals at their mercy.
That doesn’t mean that only those who already have these two commandments as their religion can be my comrades. Although Hitler was surprised when Himmler confessed to him that he still practised hunting with other Nazis, Uncle Adolf couldn’t have formed a political movement if he repudiated them. But it is obvious that a priest of the holy words has already taken his vows to fulfil both commandments (vows that non-priests aren’t yet capable of fulfilling because they lack the compassion we have developed).
Another thing I would like to say today is something else about my eternal quarrel with the American racial right. Yesterday I saw a video by Jared Taylor about the recent attacks in Germany perpetrated by a sandnigger. Taylor mocks the fact that the Eurocrats have been ‘speechless’ and ‘stunned’ after the massacre of civilian Germans. However, as a good Christian or secular neochristian (Taylor has never confessed whether he still believes in the religion of his parents) he fails to realise that these Eurocrats have taken Christian morality to its ultimate consequences (forgive your enemies, never allow yourself to hate them, turn the other cheek if they attack you, etc.).
While I watched the entire Taylor video, I didn’t read the recent Counter-Currents article on the massacre. I merely read the first two comments in that thread, where the first thing a couple of commenters did was say ‘Merry Christmas’.
Apparently, neither the commenters nor the author of that article are aware that it was precisely that Christianity that they still celebrate at Christmas that caused not only the massacre, but the previous massacres perpetrated by the jihadis that Taylor mentions in his video, and the massacres that other sandniggers will perpetrate in the future! Just as George Washington and the other Founding Cucks enabled Jewish infection in their brand new country, so the religion that conquered the Aryan soul has imposed on whites Semitic commandments diametrically opposed to the two commandments of our Tablets of the Law.
No, there was no point in reading either C-C’s article or the rest of the comments. The only thing to reiterate is that those on the racial right are neo-normies, not 21st-century National Socialists who have woken up to the real world.
