web analytics

Tag: Christian question (CQ)

Categories
Conservatism Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 3

Nick Fuentes says that, for St Paul, the “concession” was to marry in the sense that celibacy is better.

See the inferiority of Christianity to Judaism: the stars promised to Abraham were his future kike descendants without demonising sex. But in Judeo-Christianity sex is sinful for gentiles (i.e., white people from the Mediterranean). The god of the Jews “concedes” us marriage so that we don’t burn with lust, but the highest state is non-reproductive celibacy, and Fuentes even talks about monasteries.

Then Nick confuses marital masculinity with a feminised husband. Since I’ve been talking about Breaking Bad, let’s say that Nick confuses masculinity with a character like Walter White: a “man” who put his family above everything else. On the other hand, we see true masculinity in Sparta, pre-imperial Rome, the Goths, the Vikings and National Socialism where there is Männerbund, unlike the decadent 21st-century America so well represented in the gynocentric scenes of Breaking Bad.

In practice, Nick’s Catholic recipe is perfect for the dysgenics that has been perpetrated in Europe since Christianity was imposed on whites. This dysgenics (“Are you smart? Go to the monastery and don’t reproduce!”) caused the IQ of Jews to rise over the centuries while the IQ of whites dropped. This perverse eugenics / dysgenics reached the point where Jews now have the highest IQ: a genetic courtesy of Christianity that Nick and other racialists stupidly cling. Just look at Nick’s statement in his interview with Joel Webbon: “The priesthood, the monastic life is the most masculine thing that a guy can do…”

Above, Ascyltos, and Giton playing the role of Ganymede, in Fellini Satyricon. Zeus was capable of countless love affairs not only with goddesses but with women. On one occasion, he even fancied Ganymede and abducted him to see what the androgynous ephebe tasted like. But for Nick the masculine man is not represented by Zeus but by the Aryan humiliated with a ton of guilt—the monk—if he fails to love the Jewish god.

In sharp contrast to the Greco-Roman ethos, above we see Franciscan and Benedictine monks in the film The Name of the Rose.

Webbon then quotes Paul’s epistle to the Corinthians; he says that celibacy is a gift, and talks to Nick about “fleshy appetites” in the Christian sense. Compare this with the Greco-Romans. Their Gods were openly rapists; it was Christianity that made us feel guilty about that. Fuentes, incidentally, is a virgin as he recently confessed to Piers Morgan: something inconceivable to the ancient Greeks and Romans of his age.

Are you beginning to understand what the Judeo-Christian inversion of values was? For kikes sexuality isn’t sinful but Paul preaches something else to us, and these idiots—not just Nick but Christian racialists in general—are incapable of seeing the Jewish psyop!

A little later in the interview, Nick says that many put family above God (that is, above the Semitic god with his double standard for Jews and gentiles). That’s why Fuentes goes on to say that the pinnacle of masculinity is the celibate monk.

At minute 40, Nick says that since women are ultimate conformists to the System, they can betray you if you marry in this anti-white male era. Let’s illustrate this with Skyler who, in an episode of Breaking Bad, goes to a female psychotherapist who suggests Skyler to report her husband Walter to the police for drug trafficking. Walter had been foolish enough to confess everything to his wife in private, when you should never tell women anything about serious matters, such as committing illegal acts or having an affair with Ganymede: they are incapable of understanding the male drives.

Do you see why we should only have lunches and dinners with heterosexual soldiers? Even after the Spartans were married they didn’t eat with their wives but with other tough guys where they could talk as rudely as I do on this site.

Categories
Adam Green Axiology

Damn

Christians!

White nationalists are completely nuts: they have the enemy right in front of them, the big elephant in the room, and out of sheer pride they refuse to see it: they are wicked people.

Adam Green has demonstrated this forcefully in this video.

I’ve been talking about Joel Webbon because of his interview with Nick Fuentes. Green’s video begins with Webbon saying that he would give his daughters away to a black and a hispanic as long as they are Christians!

Then Green shows clips of other notable Christians…

After watching Green’s video, do you understand why I feel alone among so-called American “racialists”? Who among them has a blog like mine that openly says that the Christian Problem is the primary cause of white decline (the JQ is merely a secondary infection, as it is Christians who worship the god of the Jews)?

At the end of Green’s video, we also see some rabbis. But what really matters are the whites who have a xenomorphic parasite attached to their faces—Christianity—and don’t want to tear it off. On the contrary: they have amalgamated their psyche with the xenomorph!

From this angle, anyone who doesn’t reject Christian ethics—and I mean both atheists and Christians—is a subject who has allowed the Jew to stick his dick down his throat and doesn’t even realise that he has an alien creature at the core of his being!

Forget the forums of the “dissident” right!

Down with white nationalism, the scam of scams!

Down with Judeo-Christianity!

Let’s implement Nietzsche’s Law against Christianity!

Only Hitler—or rather Kalki—saves!
 

Categories
NS booklets Racial right

Booklets, 1

German: Dich ruft die SS!

The darkest hour of the West is due to the extreme degeneration of white men, especially those Europeans who swallowed the propaganda of the American Diktat after World War II.

On the other side of the Atlantic, what “white nationalists” are incapable of understanding is that, as Matt Koehl said, a race that rejects Hitler will perish.

Among the noblest civilisations that defended their race—the Aryans who conquered India, Greece, and eventually Rome; the Vikings; and the Visigoths who killed those who dared to intermarry—, after the Judeo-Christian infection only the National Socialists intellectually developed a model of nationhood that fulfilled the sacred words. The others fell so short that they eventually Christianized like the Norsemen, or a thousand times worse: they intermarried.

Although Koehl’s eight words (“A race that rejects Him will surely perish”) should be displayed in every home of the brotherhood we wish to create, that doesn’t mean I share Koehl’s faithful orthodoxy, as we will see in this series on NS booklets translated into English.

On July 22, 2021, when I read the booklet pictured above, originally published in German by Himmler, I wrote on its blank pages:

Upon reading page 7, I can’t help but think that I shouldn’t visit the WN websites again, which are garbage compared to this fighting spirit.

It is precisely because the US is founded on that materialistic phrase containing the deceptive word “happiness” that it makes Americans the antithesis of the Aryan hero. But there’s a problem.

The problem I was referring to was page 10, where the author of the booklet, whether Himmler or one of his associates, wrote “…so help me God!”

The problem with imagining the deity in the singular is that it’s done under the umbrella of Jewish monotheism. An Aryan who wants to refer to providence would have to do so in the plural, “Gods,” inspired, let’s say, by the inscription of the Oracle of Delphi. Although the National Socialists, especially the pagan SS, were transitioning from Christianity to Germanic paganism, there were Jewish remnants in pronouncements like this one.

Given that after 1945 Christian ethics exploded in a secular way like a red giant star burning Aryan DNA around the globe, it’s necessary to recognise that this evil persisted, albeit to a minuscule degree, in translated booklets like this one.

Had the Nazi leadership realised this, they wouldn’t have launched insane wars of conquest (like Operation Barbarossa) but would have instead dedicated all their power to educating the masses in a kind of neo-Nietzschean racism, beginning with essays similar to Eduardo Velasco’s on Judea and Rome. They didn’t because, unlike us, the Nazis failed to grasp that the JQ wasn’t the primary cause of the Aryan decline but rather the CQ.

That said, there are many things I appreciate about the booklet, such as the fact that there was a group of SS members who were professional musicians. And by music, we obviously mean non-degenerate music (one of the enormous failings of the American racial right is their inability to make this distinction): music that inspires the highest ideals, like what I recently said about the Eroica Symphony.

Page 66 of the booklet begins with these words: “German parents! Sooner or later your son will become a soldier.” Reading this in 2021 reminded me that even the most radical of American white nationalists, the late Alex Linder, opposed National Socialism because he subscribed to individualistic libertarianism.

Let’s respond to Linder.

One of the greatest damages caused by “introducing spiritual terror” (Hitler’s words) to the Aryan collective unconscious is precisely that it atomized it: from a collective, whites became atomized particles, “souls” whose main purpose was to avoid eternal torment in hell. The spiritual terror finished off the racial solidarity that had already declined in Imperial Rome.

Even anti-Christians like Linder never understood that it wasn’t enough to repudiate the dogmatic part of Christianity, but rather the axiological part as well: like this transition from collectivist societies like Sparta and Republican Rome to imperial degeneration. One of the most notable features of the decadent religions that arose in the Mediterranean is that, unlike their ancient predecessors, they were religions of personal salvation—and I’m not referring only to Christianity (cf. Richard Carrier’s work on the plethora of Mediterranean religions in the Roman Empire).

On page 87 of the booklet, which mentions many colours of Waffen-SS insignia, I learned that the colour used in concentration camps was light brown. As several visitors know, last year I visited Dachau outside Munich: a place I love because unlike, say, the feminized Groypers, the goal there was to eliminate internal opposition including rebellious Christians. Recall the words of a Christian I quoted last month:

He [Hitler] filled Dachau with Catholic clergy; hundreds were worked to death or died under medical experiments.

Bishops who preached against euthanasia faced arrest.

The Gestapo dissolved every independent Catholic youth organisation in Germany. Catholic newspapers were banned, publishing houses seized, and confessional schools closed or converted to state use.

The Concordat he signed in 1933 was violated before the ink dried.

In his own recorded words, he called Christianity “an invention of the Jew” and “the heaviest blow that ever struck humanity,” declaring that the Church would be eradicated once the war was won. His inner circle confirmed the plan was total.

Pius XI answered with Mit brennender Sorge, the only encyclical in history smuggled into a country and read from every Catholic pulpit on the same Sunday, condemning the idolatry of race and blood, and National Socialism itself, by name.

Condemning “the idolatry of race and blood”! Actually, it was magnificent to have condemned the worshipers of the god of the Jews, those rebellious Christians, the true idolaters. Loving your blond sons and blue-eyed daughters isn’t idolatry!

Do we finally understand what Nietzsche meant when he said that Christianity had inverted the values of the Greco-Roman world? If I were the dictator of the US and an insolent disciple of Nick Fuentes rebelled publicly against these types of measures, I would undoubtedly send him to the American incarnation of Dachau.

Categories
Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 1

“For me, the overall result is the visible and systematic poisoning of the youth of our people through Christian education…” —Himmler to Bormann (see the bibliographic source for this letter in my article from yesterday).

Yesterday, the first hour of a ten-hour series of Nick Fuentes’ interview with Christian nationalist Joel Webbon was uploaded on YouTube.

At the beginning of the interview, we see that Nick is infinitely closer to Christian nationalism than to white nationalism (recall that in his interview with Tucker, Nick said he was a white nationalist but not at the level of William Pierce’s WN, his words). Obviously, neither Fuentes nor Webbon are National Socialists.

Shortly after, Nick says that the US should have a Christian government. Compare this to what Richard Weikart says about Hitler’s esoteric anti-Christianity, in contrast to the Führer’s exoteric image (prolefeed for the German proles).

Soon after, both say things that go against the US Constitution, such as that the government should not pass laws regarding the establishment of a religion. Then Nick mildly approves of the interviewer’s crazy idea of implementing blasphemy laws in the US: something that would overturn the First Amendment. Interestingly, as a gospel follower, Nick doesn’t want the death penalty for most murderers, but he does want it for those who desecrate the consecrated host or wine.

Only at this point does Nick speak about secular racialism, and they even briefly touch on the topic of our worldview, which we might call anti-Christian racism. Nick confesses that his Groyper movement was precisely a reaction against that secularized racialism: a step back towards American traditionalism.

The interview ends with Nick expressing his desire for an alliance between his America First ideology and his interviewer’s Christian nationalism. Their movement represents, in my humble opinion, the last-ditch effort of American Christianity.

Categories
Christian art

César,

by Gaedhal

I am not a Randian Libertarian, but one thing that she got right is that we are at home upon the earth. The Orthodox anchorite is not at home upon the earth, which is why he is climbing a ladder to “Heaven” to escape it. Take a look at some of these Orthodox icons. They can be really trippy:

The earth is presented as a sterile desert… because Christianity was, originally, a desert religion.

As we discussed on your blog, César, there is probably a Schopenhauerian, Pessimistic, Benetarian, Antinatalist, EFIL-ist interpretation to these icons: better to have never been, and second best is to deny the will to live, and to annihilate oneself, through ascesis and chastity/celibacy, so as not to burden another generation with the “pain and boredom” of life, as pessimists put it. As Jesus himself said: let he who can take castration, take it. One of the things that Antinatalists often do is get vasectomies. Richard Carrier has gotten a vasectomy, which is why I suspect his being an Antinatalist.

In my view, “Jesus”, is merely Nirvana, the “breathed-out state”, as Alan Watts put it, i.e. the “all-sufficient void” as Schopenhauer put it. It is conjectured by the likes of Richard Carrier that there was an adept Christianity, that is now lost to us, wherein the obviously fictional life of Jesus was understood as a parable. The Christian adepts understood that deceased Jewish carpenters do not respawn and float off into the sky. Dominic Crossan, my fellow Ulsterman from the lost county of Donegal, also believed that Jesus’s entire life, as recounted by the gospels, and especially the original gospel, the gospel of Mark, is a parable.

But a parable for what? Who knows? But given that we know that there were Antinatalist Buddhist preachers/missionaries in the Levant, since around 100 BCE—see mythicist papers for more on this—perhaps Christianity is a parable for the various forms of Pessimism, listed above.

If John of Patmos had an IQ north of 80, then he too would have understood that Jesus’s life was a parable. Again, virgins don’t give birth, and dead Jewish carpenters never respawn and levitate into the sky… there are no exceptions to this. I am putting money on the fact that the Jewish con-artists who wrote the New Testament understood this as well. Thus, the true end to the Book of Revelation would be the earth melting in fervent heat—as pseudo-Peter sayeth in an epistle—and the sky being rolled up as a scroll. The sky was a physical thing in those days, preventing the primordial waters from drowning us all. Thus, the Revelation is an EFIL-ist parable where the ideal state is the destruction of the planet. Revelation is a 2nd-Century C.E. version of the Red-button EFIL-ist thought experiment. The “New Heavens and the New Earth” is merely for the non-adepts, for the profane.

As Schopenhauer says: he is practising true Christianity, and in my view it could actually be the original version of Christianity.

And here is the website where Salm explores the link, perhaps direct, between Buddhism and Christianity. We know that there were Buddhist proselytizers from India in the region, at about the turn of the era, in about 1 CE.

However, it could just be a case of independent convergence. This is a hell-planet where living things must kill and eat other living things to survive. This is the Darwinian problem of evil [emphasis added by Ed.]. No sensible or ethical god would have created a system like this. This is why I view “theistic evolution”, such as that promoted by Biologos, to be every bit as delusional as creationism. To me, Pete Enns is every bit as delusional as Ken Ham. Once we introduce gods to evolution, then it becomes intelligent design. Theistic Evolution is an oxymoron to me.

Given that this is a hell planet for most sentient beings, then the thought often independently arises that it were better to have never been. The Jesus movement need not have had a formal connection to Buddhism to come up with Pessimism and Antinatalism—let he who can receive [castration] receive it—on their own.

Categories
Conservatism

Tort

vs. Walsh & Tucker

I can use this segment from Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Matt Walsh (both Christians) to show what the priest of the sacred words—an anti-Christian admirer of Nazi paganism—has in common with American conservatives. Let’s consider the values that, according to Walsh, those who share them are essentially on his side. According to Walsh, the first value is:

1) Objective truth

Here we seem to be in complete agreement.

But as commenter Gaedhal has said, when it comes to approaching the New Testament from the standpoint of objective truth, conservative Christians are more primitive than liberal Christians. Quite a few of the latter are aware of the historiographical problems that have been raised for centuries about 1st century Christian writings. In contrast, people like Walsh, Tucker, and racialist Christians generally ignore the issue, although it is evident that there is an objective truth regarding the historicity of the New Testament stories. If you ignore it, you are basically ignoring this first value.

If all these conservatives educated themselves honestly on the subject, they would realise that there is not even evidence for the existence of Jesus, and the same could be said about the existence of the Jewish god, whom both Walsh and Tucker worship.

Curiously, both recognise that everything stems from there: from objective truth. But if this pair and the Christians of the racial right don’t even dare to discuss the issue, we can assume that when it comes to Judeo-Christianity, they are not interested in such a thing as objective truth.

The next thing Walsh mentions is:

2) Preserving American identity in particular: the institution of the family (and therefore the institution of marriage), and Western civilisation in general.

Note that not for a second do these two Christians talk about preserving the white race, which is what the priest would mention as the priority. It is from the 14 words that one understands the need for the institution of marriage[1], which only makes sense if both husband and wife are whites. To the conservative question of what we are trying to conserve, my answer would be: the DNA of the Aryans.

It is precisely because of this omission that Walsh and Tucker later criticise multi-culturalism. The religion of this pair doesn’t allow them to criticise the multi-racial society that the US has become. (When an Aryan marries a coloured, for the priest of the sacred words s/he sins against the holy spirit of life.)

_________

[1] Remember that my favourite films are Sense & Sensibility (1995), and Pride & Prejudice (2005).

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Rick & Nick

Four days ago, Richard Spencer interviewed Nick Fuentes again. In sharp contrast to my post this morning, after minute 24 Nick says he lives in a racially diverse city and prefers to live there rather than in a small town populated exclusively by white people—because it would be boring, Rick adds!

Around minute 27 Rick mentions WW2 without saying a word about the Hellstorm Holocaust, or that the bad guys won the war. But he is right at the 30-minute mark that in the previous century there was a window for fascism or communism to escape the System, but now everyone is a slave to capitalism and material comfort.

When they talk about Russia around the 50-minute mark, this pair doesn’t seem to distinguish between the American state (which is in fact anti-white) and the white American nation, which is dwindling every day. That doesn’t mean I’m a Russophile in the last, just that they don’t express themselves like 14-word priests.

Half a minute before the hour, Nick seems to like the universalist “compassion”—he used this word—of today’s woke Europeans (note the difference with us, who propose exterminationist hatred). Nick then goes on to say that he likes the European Union, omitting that it is an exterminationist entity, yes: but of the white man!

More than half an hour later, when they talk about Christian Nationalism, they fail to note that the racial factor should be our #1 priority (Christian Nationalism is not National Socialism with its Nuremberg laws, mass deportations, concentration camps, etc.).

When it was time for wrap-up questions, the first person to ask Nick a question noted that the Catholic Church is browning. Nick acknowledged this harsh reality but failed to suggest any cure, even saying that he liked both the current Pope and Pope Francis.

Rick then spoke about Greco-Roman religion, but he doesn’t seem to have read William Pierce’s history of the white race, Who We Are. Both admire the Roman Empire but are completely ignorant of how the empire’s miscegenation caused Rome to decline and fall (see e.g., this paper of a Swedish scholar).

At 1:50, it is clear that Nick follows Christian ethics. He is asked about the outcome of the Aryan dilemma in the future and responds that ethnic cleansing will not be practical in the US (i.e., expelling them to “Aztlán” as in Harold Covington’s futuristic novels) and Rick nods because, although he isn’t a Christian, he shares the Christian ethics of the Catholic Nick.

Compare all this with the Third Reich, which was determined to solve the problem of miscegenation (i.e., the destruction of the Aryan race) at any cost. I confess that after watching this friendly chat between Rick and Nick, it seems obvious to me that America, as an idea, must die in order to save the Aryan DNA north of the Rio Grande.

At 1:57, Nick voices the official Americanist POV on the war in Ukraine—nothing like what someone like John Mearsheimer would say on the subject! It’s incredible, and it’s the same POV as Rick’s. I say incredible because we need to humiliate NATO, the European Union and the US: the greatest enemies of the white race (remember that, during the US bombing of Serbia in 1999, the American who headed NATO declared that Europe no longer had any right to ethnostates).

I am by no means a Russophile, but Russia is certainly not the greatest enemy of the white man, rather this Western Leviathan. Given that Ukraine will certainly lose the war next year, it will be magnificent to see how this pair of blind Americans, who believe the official version of this war, react when the humiliating defeat for NATO, the European Union, the US and Ukraine finally comes.

From this angle, the American Michael O’Meara was much wiser than this pair. O’Meara published an article in Counter-Currents on 7 October 2013 entitled “Too Much Putin?”, in which he said:

US hegemony may be approaching its end. Once the world refuses to acknowledge the imperial authority of its humanitarian missiles [e.g., what Bill Clinton’s military forces did in Serbia because the Serbs were expelling the Muslims from Kosovo—Ed.], and thus stops paying tribute to its predatory model of the universe, then American power inevitably starts to decline—and not simply on the world stage, but also domestically, among the empire’s subjects, who in the course of the long descent will be forced to discover new ways to assert themselves.

But at 2:10 Nick said something humorous: that he can’t run for president because he’s too short “and not white enough.” At least I find that honest (I could say something analogous about me).

At any event, I believe that the future fall of the dollar will create the necessary gravitas for other American racialists not to get stuck halfway across the Rubicon, as this pair are. In the end of the video, both speculate about what we need without mentioning National Socialism (NS is the other side of the Rubicon, following my metaphor). Instead, Nick ended his speech by saying that what we need is “the Hellenised Jew, who is Christ, I suppose.”

The Hellenised Jew, right?

America delenda est!

Categories
Correspondence

A New

Christian Dark Ages?

by Vladimir

Salutations once again, Mr Tort. I hope you are doing well despite life’s challenges and your splendid work on The West’s Darkest Hour. I am really enjoying your videos regarding family trauma and family dynamics. The email I am sending you addresses the Christian Question.

Here in Romania, a couple of months ago, the inauguration of a building called the National Cathedral of Romania, a Judeo-Christian monument, took place. It cost almost 300 million euros. Over the years, we have seen a rise of Christian nationalists in the Western world. These people who worship Charlie Kirk as a martyr or see Donald Trump as the literal Second Coming of Jesus think they are making progress and standing up to Jewish globalism, but the priests of the 14 words know the truth.

These Christcuck Nationalists are still the slaves of the Jews and their Hebrew god. These people don’t want actual change. They just want to live in their Christian bourgeoisie echo chamber and keep feeding the sick system that is destroying us both in body and spirit. I am deeply concerned that with the rise of Christian nationalism we will not see a revival of the West but rather we are entering a new Dark Ages. The vast majority of Christians are a stupid lot. I just don’t understand them. They never ask questions or take time to actually reflect on their faith and how damaging it is.

Furthermore, Eastern Europe, while less toxic than the Woke West, is not the traditionalist Christian paradise with trad-wives as many western conservatives and passport bros naively think. We have many issues including corruption, alcoholism, low IQ white trash, child and animal abuse and disloyal money-hungry women. I have had my fair share of toxic people who surprisingly still believe in god; their faith only fueling their narcissism. Most don’t actually practice Christianity but use it to gain social brownie points or to simply feel good about themselves. As a teenager I took Christianity very seriously and it did not elevate me; it only gave me trauma, anxiety and depression with its doctrines of Judgement and eternal Hell. Even now at thirty-two I feel pain because this sick Jewish faith destroyed my teen years and early adult life.

Of course there have been voices who protested the building of such a ridiculous and costly cathedral, but those aren’t our friends either. Their critique comes from a secular Christian / humanist standpoint. They wished for the money to be spent on infrastructure, schools and hospitals. Fair point, but a priest of the 14 words would also use such money for eugenics programs, improving the white man so he would not be dependent on so many hospitals, fund Hitler Youth associations, allowing children an escape from abusive families, build weapons to wipe out sub-humans, encourage the Lebensraum and of course erect monuments dedicated to the Führer and National Socialism.

What the secular Christian normies and post-Soviet boomers here don’t understand is that we need monuments and buildings to cultivate the Aryan spirit—food for the soul.

Many Romanian elders here praise Ceaușescu for building numerous communist flats and providing people with jobs and food. When I go outside and see those flats, it makes me sick, and I want to demolish them. Those are buildings meant to cultivate obedient soulless slaves with no sense of high culture. The Capitalist West is no different. So many old impressive cities are now suffocated by modern architecture. For an Aryan, a picturesque Norwegian village at the shores of a fjord or an old medieval German town are worth more than New York, Los Angeles or Bucharest combined.

Going back to the Cathedral, I also want to add that Orthodox art is very ugly and morbid. Most of the time Orthodox art is flat, 2-D, symbolic and non-naturalistic, expressing detachment from the real world. I will give a small credit to Catholics. They did a good job embracing naturalist Greco-Roman art during the Renaissance. From an objective perspective, Renaissance and Baroque Catholic artwork is impressive. But in an ideal Aryan world, we would have towering monuments and temples dedicated to European Gods and heroes. Imagine a basilica full of nude sculptures and paintings portraying Achilles and Hercules instead of sickly, weeping Christian martyrs. Now, that’s what I would call a real transvaluation of values!

That is all I have to say, Mr Tort. I wish you good luck in all your endeavours, and I will end this e-mail with a quote from the 1979 Vlad Țepes movie and a quote from Alfred Rosenberg:

Vlad Țepeș – It is not the love of God that brings people to Church, but fear, the fear of Hell’s torments.

Alfred Rosenberg – The German people are not marked by original sin, but by original nobility.

Categories
Bible Judaism New Testament

Might is right, 17

Jewish books are for the Jews, And Jew Messiahs too.

But if you’re not of Jewish blood, How can they be for you?

To make an Idol of a book, Is poison for the brain;

A dying God upon a cross

Is reason gone insane.

Beware of all the Holy books And all the creeds and schools,

And every law that man has made And all the golden rules.

‘Laws’ and ‘rules’ imposed on you From days of old renown,

Are not intended for your ‘good’ But for your crushing down.

Then dare to rend the chains that bind And to yourself be true,

Dare to liberate your mind, From all things, old and new.

Categories
Adam Green

C Q

“The Christian Question, definitively: I think it’s the most central issue of our time right now…” said Adam Green, and Richard Spencer agrees (video from three months ago).

That is precisely why I find it magnificent that The Fair Race is available again in print.

The tragedy of National Socialism is that Hitler couldn’t write a manifesto because he couldn’t criticise Christianity as openly as Himmler did in private.

In other words, there is no public National Socialist manifesto, only private ones like the article for the SS published in The Fair Race (Main Kampf was written for neo-normies).

That wouldn’t have mattered if Hitler had won the war. But since he lost, we can no longer disguise ourselves publicly as Hitler did (to paraphrase the New Testament, he spoke to the masses in parables but explained everything to his apostles). The time has come for the esoteric aspect of National Socialism to become exoteric. This is the only way to replace the Jewish archetype that has seized the collective unconscious of white men with the Aryan archetype.

In this, Richard Spencer is wrong. Using the caduceus metaphor he used in the video, I would modify it by claiming that one serpent of the caduceus is heading towards the wings (the Aryan), but the other wants to take us down to the earth (the Jewish one): that is, to say goodbye to our recently acquired feathers!