web analytics

Category: Racial right

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Groyper

Yesterday I tried to communicate with a Groyper on “X” but it was useless.

These people don’t read, as Greg Johnson complained.

They fail to understand that the mere bravado of guru Nick Fuentes is certainly good, but it lacks the depth of thought that William Pierce on this side of the Atlantic, or Savitri Devi on the other, possessed.

I told this Groyper that Nick had recently said that his Christian scruples prevented him from expelling the millions of non-whites who have come to the US in recent decades. Fuentes added that white Americans now have to adapt to that reality. I told the Groyper that such scruples didn’t appear in Pierce’s novel, and the guy (who could be half a century younger than me) replied that it was an academic discussion. Then he spoke rudely, and I cut him off for good.

It’s not an academic matter, but rather what I’ve said several times about our friend Joseph Walsh, who is now serving a seven-year sentence in the UK for thought crime. Walsh told me privately that all white people, including racialists, are committing suicide.

Why? Recall Walsh’s words in the featured article, “1945 was the year of the total inversion of Aryan values into Christian values.”

The point is that before 1945, white people were capable of exterminating entire populations of inferior humans, as they did in Cuba, Tasmania, and as the Germans planned to do in the Master Plan East. The aftermath of that fateful year represented a psychotic regression toward the purest evangelical message: a folie en mass of the Aryan collective unconscious, leading them to love every wingless biped (a psychological affliction even Fuentes suffers from).

These callow Groypers are incapable of engaging in a simple discussion on the matter because, like some teenagers, they are too arrogant. They think they can reinvent the wheel. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Without an ethnostate, even with several Groyper dictators in the US over the course of a century, the white race would become extinct because miscegenation is inevitable.

Walsh was right: All white people commit suicide, even racialists with very rare exceptions (those we call priests of the sacred words). In short, a devout Christian—and the Groypers are Christians—will never be capable of ethnic cleansing, as the Gods command. Unlike the Nazis, a Groyper obeys the commandment to love one’s “neighbour”: a commandment of the god of the Jews who wants to exterminate him.

Ultimately, a Groyper will still be a loser even if he becomes President of the US.

Categories
Christian art Racial right

Tweet on X

Editor’s Note: Below I quote (and rephrase slightly) a recent tweet from The Hellenist. I do so because a Groyper jumped into the conversation, and I believe we have a duty to educate him on this matter.

 

______ 卐 ______

 

Christianity did not collapse the West directly. It reprogrammed us to be incapable of survival by:

• universalizing guilt
• moralizing weakness
• teaching enemy-love
• demonizing hierarchy
• sacralizing the oppressed
• institutionalizing ressentiment
• decoupling morality from nature
• declaring natural instincts sinful
• encouraging indiscriminate altruism
• dismantling aristocratic virtue ethics

Christianity is the greatest existential threat to Aryans. If Christian ethics are not overturned, a global mass extinction event of whites is guaranteed.

Stop the madness!

End Christianity!

Categories
Racial right Welfare of animals

Neonormies

Targeting normies with non-NS-related material is actually a very smart step. Many white nationalists and neo-nazis lack any kind of decency, and the ideological similarities we have with them are very superficial. I would very much rather put time and effort into educating someone who has similar morals to me but lacks the crucial information on the race issue than arguing with someone self-identifying as NS who thinks animal cruelty is “based”.

—Heinrich (a European)

Categories
Blacks Racial right Videos

A little black lady

who serves our cause!

In sharp contrast to the first ten minutes, the end of the video shows some awful anti-music played by niggers. This said, I love that the ZOG concept is becoming mainstream! Without realising it, this black lady is helping our cause. As I said in previous days regarding edgy podcasters, what we need now is for at least one Groyper to read a Hellstorm review as a prelude to drinking from this site’s wellspring.

In the video above, it’s clear how even Gentiles in the US Congress are guilty of the excessive empowerment of Jews. Sooner or later, racialists will have to confront the CQ. Sooner or later, the ideas of The West’s Darkest Hour (21st Century NS) will have to sink into the collective unconscious of the Aryan.

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Groypers

This Monday I continue writing about what I said yesterday.

I have been watching my autobiographical videos that I recorded in Spain sixteen years ago about the devastating abuse I suffered at the hands of my parents as a teenager, and I realise that I don’t look so bad on camera. True, I am not white in the American sense of the word, which refers to Anglo-Germans north of the Rio Grande, but by Mediterranean standards I couldn’t say I looked too bad at fifty, when those videos were recorded. However, since I don’t know anything about software that can translate me into English, I will continue using text today.

The idea behind creating a channel is simply so that the Groypers can see me on Rumble, because I very much doubt they visit The West’s Darkest Hour. The urgent message I would like to convey to these young people so that they finish crossing the Rubicon towards NS is not hard to understand. But first of all, I would like to reiterate why I think it is a good idea to try to communicate with them.

If visitors remember what I said about my trip to Europe this year, which I recently linked to with a picture of me in Dachau, they will see that if Europeans are emasculated, it is simply because they aren’t allowed to speak. Giving my friends Chris and Joseph eight and seven years in prison for Thought Crime in the UK for what they said on Black Wolf Radio seems excessive even by the standards of Europe’s so-called soft totalitarianism! (and Canada and Australia are no much better when it comes to freedom of speech). Americans have a huge advantage: they are allowed to speak. That is why racialist webzine forums have flourished although, as Hitler well knew, that intellectual phase only fertilises the soil for the seed to germinate, whereas only the power of oratory can catapult a racialist to power.

From this angle, only Nick Fuentes is using oratory for this purpose, as seen in this YouTube video uploaded yesterday.

The reason I would like the message of this site to reach the ears of at least some Groypers is that, although I admire young Nick as the only orator at the moment, his message is contradictory due to his Catholicism.

Please understand me correctly. An American politician cannot be openly anti-Christian, as he would lose the votes of Christians if he wanted to come to power as Hitler did (and upon reaching it, eliminate superstitions such as parliamentarianism, etc., as Savitri Devi rightly said).

However, the new Führer must be aware of the Christian Question. And this, even though Hitler only spoke out about the CQ to his inner circle.

In Tucker’s interview with Fuentes, he asked him if he would ever run for president. Fuentes said maybe. But it is not the same for a Catholic like Fuentes to become president as it would be for a Groyper who thinks like Hitler: show yourself to the masses as a devout Christian, but reveal to your friends your true colours as a pantheist. And from this angle, it is necessary to criticise Fuentes.

Yesterday I saw a video uploaded a couple of days ago to YouTube. It shows part of Candace Owens’ interview with Fuentes, and I was struck by the fact that from the outset Fuentes admitted that, as a Catholic, he couldn’t oppose interracial marriage. Fuentes then spoke about Jared Taylor-like race realism, a point on which Owens is as ignorant as most Westerners. But even in that cordial segment of the interview—as cordial as the interview with Tucker—the contradiction between Fuentes’ Christian ethics and his racial realism is more than evident.

Considering what I recently said to my interlocutor Benjamin in the comments section, that crossing the psychological Rubicon is done step by step (even I took time to cross it since I recorded those videos about child abuse in Spain), the ideal situation would be for someone like Fuentes to become president. We can already imagine the difference between a Fuentes presidency and Trump’s abject international politics!

But what would happen to the country’s laws? Fuentes has said that power should not be relinquished (just what Hitler did when he became chancellor). Is it possible that in the future Fuentes, or someone like him, could become the first dictator of the US? Even in this fantastical scenario I see serious problems due to Fuentes’ Catholicism, and that is what I want to communicate to the Groypers.

Let’s suppose that Fuentes is the dictator of the US. If we take into account what he said to the negress Owens, will there be Nuremberg Laws in his dictatorship? And the thorniest question: what about the 100 million non-Aryans living in the US? A true Christian cannot expel them, right?

If I, a true Hitlerist, were in power, it is clear what I would do—as any reader of William Pierce’s first novel can imagine. But the dictator Fuentes, because he constantly says that in the US he imagines the first thing is “Christ King,” would never dare to take that step… and over the centuries, with other Christian dictators, white Americans would become extinct. The dictator Fuentes and his successors would only have delayed the process that the Jewish zeitgeist is now accelerating: a boiling frog that doesn’t know it’s being slowly killed because of Xtian ethics.

This is what the Groypers who continue to take baby steps towards our side should know.

Categories
Axiology Nick Fuentes Racial right Real men

On Nick Fuentes

Something that strikes me about mornings is that it’s the time when inspiration strikes. For example, I went to bed and woke up planning to spend the morning reviewing the chapter against Sigmund Freud in my Hojas Susurrantes, which I’m translating into English. But inspiration struck while I was getting ready, so I decided to write this post instead.
 

______ 卐 ______

 
I’d like to clarify what I have said in my two previous posts, about the movie The Village and Nick Fuentes (here and here). The crucial phrase doesn’t appear in the articles, not even in the question I posed in the last one (“Does such 21st century American film exist…?”), but rather in the comments section and even in parentheses: “Who needs Jews when we have white nationalists?”

I will explain it in this entry.

I’ve been reading the recent articles about Fuentes published on Counter-Currents. I think we’re all missing the main point.

Fuentes is like the kid who says the emperor has no clothes. At 27, he doesn’t have my maturity, or the erudition of the authors of C-C. Compared to me or my mentors William Pierce and Savitri Devi, Fuentes seems like a child. But it’s important to remember that it’s precisely that naive cry to a cowardly public—that the emperor has no clothes—that’s the first step in making them see the obvious.

In racialist forums I’m ignored for taking the message of white nationalism to its logical conclusion: violent revolution à la Third Reich. And I’m not just referring to the question I asked yesterday, which was left hanging (although I admit that only a film expert could answer it). I’m referring to the fact that regarding those crucial words conflating my last posts (“Who needs Jews when we have white nationalists?”) I haven’t received any response on X either, where I tweeted them a day ago. Of my 259 followers on X, nobody has said a word yet. As I was told in an email yesterday, they leave me talking to myself “because increasingly—silently, clandestinely—their egos are bruised by the scolding truth brings, and they are otherwise in distaste, having disagreed silently in the background but without the balls to add more.”

But let’s return to Fuentes, who, unlike my followers in X and here, is always willing to discuss important issues with great frankness. He’s like the kid in the story because he speaks the truth—as far as he understands it—about the ethnocidal levels of migration and feminist ethnosuicide: the cancer in the Aryan collective unconscious of our times (cf. what I said yesterday about The Village).

In fact, young Fuentes is far more mature than the veterans Jared Taylor and those of VDARE, insofar as he has already awakened to the JQ (see this clip). On the other hand, by obeying the Christian mandate to love all human beings (remember that from our POV most are exterminable Neanderthals), Fuentes falls into a great contradiction (see, for example, this other clip).

At the end of Tucker’s interview, he asked Fuentes if he would run for president in the future, and Fuentes said perhaps. Tucker asked him what he would do in power, and Fuentes replied that, since the Left wants to crush us (remember that if Harris had won, the First Amendment would have been at her mercy), the Right should crush the Left as a prophylactic measure.

Fuentes is right. Trump promised a Wall in his first term, and there’s nothing of the sort. In his second term he has promised to destroy Antifa, and the same thing happened: there aren’t thousands upon thousands imprisoned like Nayib Bukele is doing in El Salvador, or much better: what Hitler asked Himmler to do in Dachau, a place I love with all my heart and which I visited this very year!

César Tort, the Editor of The West’s Darkest Hour in Dachau Camp, Germany (see my report on that trip here).

Fuentes’s humanitarian sentiments in the second clip are that American whites must resign themselves to the fact that 100 million non-whites will be residing in the US, even though the Enemy imported them without any plebiscite. This represents a major contradiction with what he told Tucker, the same contradiction as Trump’s unfulfilled promises. Tellingly, both Tucker and Fuentes concede in that interview that it is precisely Christian scruples that compel them not to solve the problem (as Himmler was solving it before the deluded Anglo-Americans intervened).

This said, the adolescent way in which Fuentes speaks, shattering post-WWII taboos, is the right one. He speaks out in a crude manner, like an innocent child with no self-consciousness surrounded by adults under the delusion that the emperor has clothes. It doesn’t matter that compared to us, the 21st-century National Socialists, Fuentes seems like a kid. He uses the exact tone that the Aryan collective unconscious needs to awaken!

Let’s compare Fuentes’s most controversial statements in the clips the Left has been circulating with the boring C-C articles or those published by Jared Taylor and VDARE. Alex Linder compared them to those gatherings of posh people who eat crustless sandwiches and speak in politely low voices. With those bourgeois types we’re not going to get anywhere! We need classy thugs. We need an archipelago of Dachau camps throughout the West! Linder spoke with the right tone—the way potential revolutionaries speak.

Since Linder is no longer with us, I think that for the American collective unconscious, a voice like Fuentes’s is the first baby step across the psychological Rubicon in our direction.

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Fuentes

Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson.

Listen to another Nick Fuentes interview just for 50 seconds starting from this moment.

It is clear that, due to Christian universalism, which drives Nick to love all humans including Neanderthals (compare it to our exterminationism), Fuentes will never be the American Führer who saves whites from extinction. He, with his million followers, is a man of his time (the Christian Era). I, with Ben, am a man against our time (the Hitlerian Era).

Categories
Civil war Film Racial right

The Order

For the first time today, I watched the 2024 film The Order, which six times mentions my favourite novel, The Turner Diaries and even mentions “The Day of the Rope”: the day I most long to experience, although I don’t think my dream will come true…

Surprisingly, on June 13 Counter-Currents published a good review of the movie that shows that not all is lost in that webzine: there is still a residue of revolutionary thought although, like reviewer Ondrej Mann, I believe that for now any jihad must be internal (since the conditions for an armed revolution will still be a long way off in the US).

I don’t have much to add to Mann’s review. But of the eighty-four comments in the discussion thread—which, as I said, surprise me since revolutionary thought still persists, albeit without a call to arms—I’d like to quote a passage from one of the latest threaded comments:

Here’s the thing about the movie The Order. It’s blatant propaganda, it is full of factual inaccuracies, it horribly mixes up the history, it exaggerates the violence, but this movie in the final analysis is good for us. It functions as what Greg the other day called a kind of social proof; meaning that the mainstream media takes us seriously, so seriously that they made a relatively big budget film, with big name stars [e.g., Jude Law—Ed.] and so inescapably they spread the gospel of William Pierce. Also, the movie is really well made and well-acted, it has thrilling scenes in it and is a pleasure to watch. All in all it constitutes a Victory for our side.

The truth is that I didn’t feel pleasure because of the propaganda.

And I think you are also correct too that eventually RJM [Bob Matthews] will become a folk hero if he already is not one. Shades of Paul Bunyan etc. His story has an almost mythological and legendary character to it right down the fiery Wagnerian ending. He held them at bay for 30 hours after all in his final redoubt, one man against many many more!

Indeed, but in a certain sense Bob Matthews and I—a sort of post-Nietzschean philosopher who like Friedrich’s Zarathustra wants to start a new religion—are antipodes. I believe that, for the moment, any jihad must be internal in order to purge ourselves of Judeo-Christian ethics. On the other hand, like most white nationalists today, Matthews apparently knew nothing about the Christian Question. (I understand that of The Order, not Hollywood but historical, only David Lane understood what we call here the CQ.)

Categories
Racial right

JQ v. CQ

I agree that organized Jewry is the chief enemy of our people…

—Counter-Currents today.

Nope! It’s Xtian ethics.

Categories
Kali Yuga Racial right

Honour

As I have said many times, when it comes to Americans, I feel much more comfortable with the racists of the 20th century (Rockwell, Oliver, Pierce) than with the racialists of the 21st century, whom I call neonormies. In the last century, American racists didn’t yet make ubiquitous use of the internet because it only began to be used by the end of the century, and even before the internet they were men of honour. With the miracle of the internet, one might expect racism to improve in the present century. But it is much worse, as I have been saying recently in my comments on quotes from online articles I read sixteen years ago, when I discovered white nationalism.

How is that possible?

In these times, and thanks to the internet, the most relevant piece of information for transvaluing values is that the Allies committed a Holocaust against Germans even after 1945: the greatest secret in recent history because the victors write history—and lie by omission by not talking about it. That’s why in my featured article the first thing I recommend is Goodrich’s Hellstorm.

The greatest pathology of white nationalism in our century is that this true Holocaust of defenceless Germans is not constantly mentioned. We can expect normies like Judge Napolitano and Col. Douglas Macgregor to be able to concede that if Hitler had won the war, the Allies would have been put in the dock for war crimes at Nuremberg (as they said today). But they cite the American bombing of Japan as an example of an holocaust, not Germany!

They are normies but what about racialists? Since Counter-Currents published a review of Goodrich’s book in 2010, there is no excuse for white nationalists, as after that year the subject is no longer mentioned in their forums. That is a sin, a voluntary surrender to evil (the anti-Christian that I am sometimes likes to use Christian vocabulary!). It is neither more nor less than the greatest of sins, pride in the form of patriotardism as Canadian Sebastian Ronin pointed out years ago when talking about them.

Few racialists comment constantly here because the Holocaust perpetrated by Americans of the best Europeans that the West has ever produced is hard to swallow. Better to repress it all! In other words, they induce a neurosis, or rather a psychosis, similar to the liberal folie en masse of the normies throughout the entire West.

All this has to do with honour, as I say in “All is about valour and honesty” (pages 46-51 of Daybreak). Honour is a word that today seems like a swear word because there are no longer any honourable Aryan men, only lobotomized eunuchs with zero Lebenskraft. In Kali Yuga, as the Indo-Aryans would call it, this word, honour, is no longer heard because all white people have degenerated. Otherwise, thousands of websites would mention the Hellstorm Holocaust, where the victims were not Jews, but Germans.

Le Serment des Horaces depicts the honour of the hard Roman ethos.

The 21st century will be a century of iron and storms. It will not resemble those harmonious futures predicted up to the 1970s. It will not be the global village prophesied by Marshall McLuhan in 1966, or Bill Gates’ planetary network, or Francis Fukuyama’s end of history: a liberal global civilisation directed by a universal state.

The third age of European civilisation commences, in a tragic acceleration of the historical process, with the Treaty of Versailles and the end of the civil war of 1914-18: the catastrophic 20th century. Four generations were enough to undo the labour of more than forty.

Europe fell victim to its own tragic prometheanism, its own opening to the world and universalism, oblivious of all ethnic solidarity. 

The fourth age of European civilisation begins today. It will be the age of rebirth or perdition. The 21st century will be for this civilisation, the fateful century, the century of Life or Death.



Let us cultivate the pessimistic optimism of Nietzsche. “There is no more order to conserve; it is necessary to create a new one.” Will the beginning of the 21st century be difficult? Are all the indicators in the red? So much the better. They predicted the end of history after the collapse of the USSR? We wish to speed its return: thunderous, bellicose, and archaic. Islam resumes its wars of conquest. China and India wish to become superpowers. And so forth.

The 21st century will be placed under the double sign of Mars, the God of war, and of Hephaestus, the God who forges swords, the master of technology and the chthonic fires. This century will be that of the metamorphic rebirth of Europe, like the phoenix, or of its disappearance as a historical civilisation and its transformation into a cosmopolitan and sterile Luna Park.



The beginning of the 21st century will be the despairing midnight of the world of which Hölderlin spoke. But it is always darkest before the dawn. Let us prepare our children for war. Let us educate our youth, be it only a minority, as a new aristocracy

 [emphasis added by Ed!]. Today we need more than morality. We need hypermorality, the Nietzschean ethics of difficult times.

When one defends one’s people, i.e., one’s own children, one defends the essential. Then one follows the rule of Agamemnon and Leonidas but also of Charles Martel: what prevails is the law of the sword, whose bronze or steel reflects the glare of the sun.

—Guillaume Faye