web analytics
Categories
Madison Grant Nordicism Racial right

Different animal

“The cross between a white man and an Indian is an Indian; the cross between a white man and a negro is a negro; the cross between a white man and a Hindu is a Hindu; and the cross between any of the three European races and a Jew is a Jew”.

Madison Grant regarding the one-drop rule
in The Passing of The Great Race, 1916

In the discussion thread for “WN [white nationalism] is dead”, Robiul Hoque said today:

WN is basically a reactionary movement which only exists in opposition to Non-European peoples. It has no connection to any previous racialist movement, especially the Nordic Movement which was founded by university professors which not only focused on race but also heritage, culture, history, and morality. It is more accurate to say they were an ethno-cultural movement similar to Jews; the only difference was their demand to be left alone and be allowed to express their own standards of beauty, culture and racial selection.

White nationalists just demand White nations without any of the cultural and moral substance that the Nordic Movement had and they are quick to dismiss whatever knowledge they could offer to them. The Nordic movement fell through no fault of their own; it only fell because the Jewish newspapers and media heavily associated them with the Nazis even though this movement was founded by a French noble [Arthur de Gobineau], not the Austrian painter [Hitler].

For many years I’ve noticed that the so-called WN was born in the 1990s as a conservative way of distancing itself from the legacy of true racists, and true men. I’m not just referring to the German National Socialists murdered by Anglo-Americans and Stalin’s willing executioners, but also to those Americans who crossed what I call The Wall: people like William Pierce and Alex Linder (I put the latter name in bold because I’ve been honouring his memory since I learned of his passing). These WNsts who have remained stuck on the south side of the Wall have also repudiated the Nordicism of stellar figures like Madison Grant, whose pic we see above. On June 15, 2021, the anti-white establishment removed a monument to Madison Grant from Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park, a monument that had stood there since 1948. But since the 1990s, WNsts had already removed Grant from their worldview…

In the past few days, I have complained about the failure of the major WN webzines to publish obituaries about Linder. To understand this phenomenon, one must remember that on April 20, these conservative webzines have also failed to pay tribute to the Austrian painter. To my way of seeing it, it’s as clear as an oasis in a clear summer that the so-called WN is a movement of rupture not only with the Germans of the last century; not only with the American and European eugenicists who flourished before World War II (Grant was just one of them), but even with real men like Rockwell, Pierce, and Linder who flourished after WWII.

This site, The West’s Darkest Hour, became a ghost town when I began harshly criticising WNsts for these reasons. But it must be understood that I did so out of love for the fourteen words, while these de facto conservatives don’t seem to truly honour them. Here’s an excerpt from one of Benjamin’s recent emails to me:

It will forever piss me off how you, for example, contribute such vital content, succinct and to the point, and off the beaten track from the mainstream of WN, and yet c-c (just for one example) in contrast churn out a slew of neo-bohemian crowd-pleasing articles fit only for modern literature pedants and pretentious pseuds and manage to rake in huge donations. And all this time, they’re not planning a revolution – if anything, they are settled in a comfortable enough business model! How long can it go on like this for? Until what level of darkness closes in? Oh, it frustrates me.

The problem is that starting a movement completely parallel to WN that reclaims the manliness of Rockwell, Pierce, and Linder (the latter two were, like us and the Nazis, exterminationists), and the Nordicism of Grant and the other eugenicists forgotten after WWII, is an arduous task. The only thing I can think of is to follow Linder’s advice to attack conservatives, but with an unusual twist: attacking on podcasts the de facto conservatives, the pretenders, the WNsts (Linder limited himself to attacking paleoconservatives like Pat Buchanan or racial realists like Jared Taylor, who, due to the Christian ethics of his parents, never wanted to understand the JQ as it should be understood).

I can’t do that because my native language is not English, and a successful podcast requires two or more people whose native language is the same, speaking to each other from the same point of view.

That sort of condemns me to The West’s Darkest Hour being a purely text-based blog, although if a Spanish speaker would be willing to help me resurrect the WDH Radio Show and then translate our critical dialogues about what’s happening on the WN quarters into English using recent AI technology, that would be great!

For now, I can only point out that it is time for the racial vanguard to realise that WN is a very different animal not only from NS, but also from the noblest racism that was still heard last century in the voices of the aforementioned Americans.

Categories
Conservatism Racial right

WN is dead

by Benjamin

Thank you for sharing these key posts by the late Alex Linder. I’ve now read them all…

It leaves me asking the question, given that (as I think he also recalls somewhere in the posts) most of the latter-day—and indeed historical—converts to White Nationalism, and from that to National Socialism, come from those already affiliated to a greater or lesser degree with (Anglo-American) conservatism, how are we to gather new members who are suitably radical, seeing as standard bourgeois conservatives, whether bog-standard racialists, with all the trappings of the individualist WASP work ethic, or worse evangelicals, simply will not do (for a number of reasons covered a myriad times on this site and elsewhere)? Did it make any sense before when I inquired as to the practicalities of trying to ‘turn’ leftists?

I’m just hoping for your new generations—the zoomers—currently. It’s clear White Nationalism, at least in any mainstream capacity, is dead, and those remaining big-name gatekeepers are holding tightly onto too many of the stragglers who have yet to to realise all of this. Dead in that there is no real-world progress and it has become a stilted money-maker, akin to a relaxed social club. Until exterminationism, in a practical sense, is assimilated psychologically, I don’t think any progress can be made.

It infuriates me that people aren’t angrier. I hate just having to hang around impotently, as what could be the rest of the decade or more wears on.

Categories
Racial right

A thorn

by Benjamin

A boy extracting a thorn from his foot.

It’s interesting that no one [among mainstream racialist forums] acknowledged Alex Linder’s death properly on those sites. I wasn’t aware until now [click on the above link]. I find it quite disrespectful and petty of them actually… we’re meant to be on the same side! But the second he’s dead and OD is criticising him…

I take it they saw him the way I assume they see you/us, as a thorn in their side—as opposed to the truth: a better source of information and inspiration on Aryan survival.

By their own stubborn, head in the sand cowardice, these supposedly pro-White sites have made themselves our enemies (they’re a lot more unreasonable with you than you are with them). It’s good that you’re starting a radio show again, albeit solo. It will give you greater reach (against them).

Categories
Racial right Real men

Linder’s

featured posts

“Why so hard!”—said to the diamond one day the charcoal; “are we then not near relatives?”—

Why so soft? O my brethren; thus do I ask you: are ye then not—my brethren?

Why so soft, so submissive and yielding? Why is there so much negation and abnegation in your hearts? Why is there so little fate in your looks?

And if ye will not be fates and inexorable ones, how can ye one day—conquer with me?

And if your hardness will not glance and cut and chip to pieces, how can ye one day—create with me?

For the creators are hard. And blessedness must it seem to you to press your hand upon millenniums as upon wax,—

—Blessedness to write upon the will of millenniums as upon brass,—harder than brass, nobler than brass. Entirely hard is only the noblest.

This new table, O my brethren, put I up over you: Become hard!—

As I recently said in the comments section of my latest posts, I would never have been so abrasive in my criticism of white nationalists—mere charcoal—if they had behaved like Alex Linder: a true diamond. In a very unique way, throughout my blogging career I have interpreted Linder’s advice, “Attack the conservatives!” to mean that today’s racial right ideology is basically conservative, not revolutionary; Christian, not anti-Christian; feminized, not truly Aryan. Therefore, they must be attacked.

Here are the articles on this site in which I tried to choose Linder’s words that best reflect his thinking, which evoke my favourite passage from Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, quoted above as an epigraph to this small tribute to the now deceased Man:

On Breivik

“I’m not a Nazi”

Linder’s Weltanschauung

Alex Linder on Christianity

Guessedworker exchange

On conservatism

On The Turner Diaries

Hunter Wallace exchange

On Kevin MacDonald

Bitchute audios on Christianity

Categories
Racial right

A visit

A Visit to the House of Cézanne in Aix.

A reader of this site has visited me in Mexico and is leaving this country today. One of the things we discussed was the chasm that separates us from the white nationalists (WNsts).

Having breakfast in a restaurant, I told him that when I discovered WN in 2009, people were still talking about the ethnostate, and sometimes it seemed to imply that a revolutionary process would be necessary to achieve such a noble goal. Now, we don’t hear about the ethnostate because it implies violence, blood, and iron; and today’s WNsts are like ladies hiding in a castle room during an invasion, praying for their men to triumph over the invaders.

In the current context, a real man wouldn’t be fighting alone, but rather practising what Muslims call an internal jihad so that, when the West’s fiat currencies collapse, an “Order” of the kind William Pierce imagined in his novel would attempt to seize political power. But there’s none of that in the contemporary racial right: just more stupidity as Michael O’Meara rightly pointed out when he wrote that the greatest betrayal is trying to use the System’s anti-white institutions to infiltrate the spheres of power (such as voting for Trump, etc.).

The visitor who will soon be heading to the international airport agrees with me that WN is a lost cause. But he added something I didn’t know: the Zoomers, those born between 2000 and 2020, may be our only hope as their mantra is “No Bread [i.e., inflation: no one can afford now a house], No Bros [friends], No Hos [wives], No Hope.”

But of course: even with these teenagers and kids in their early twenties, we need the dollar to collapse so that this generation of incels can fully enter what I call “angry mode” (a preamble to “combat mode” and eventually the government-toppling “killing mode”). Meanwhile, those of us in the trenches will have to suffer horrors of maddening patience because we cannot, and will not be able to for a few years, fire a single shot! But that’s reality, and although horrifying, we must stoically accept it.

The world is ruled by the law of the jungle. Those who believe in liberalism (i.e., Christian ethics) or men who take refuge in a castle like ladies who don’t want to be raped by invaders violate natural law: they are doomed to extinction. As the Führer said, “He who wants to live should fight, and he who does not want to battle in this world of eternal struggle does not deserve to be alive”.

To my knowledge, no WN site promotes a revolutionary ideology for the near or distant future. In general, WNsts seem to still believe in democracy, Christianity (or its bastard child: neochristian atheism) and the project of their nations (the US or UK, for example).

All of that has to be thrown out to create an ethostate! The heads of Washington, Jefferson, Thomas Roosevelt and Lincoln on Mount Rushmore must be blown up and replaced with the heads of Leonidas, Hermann, Hitler and the warrior who will play the role of Kalki. Since the WNsts have failed us, the big question is whether a revolutionary ideology will truly emerge among these Zoomers and take power…

Categories
Holocaust Racial right

No reply

from Greg Johnson

At the time of posting this entry, the heated discussion thread on the Holocaust on Counter-Currents already has 267 comments. I tried to post six comments, only half of which were approved. Regarding what I said a couple of days ago—:

I tried to leave a comment on Counter-Currents linking to this article, but it seems—not sure yet; still waiting for Greg Johnson to reply to my email—that Greg sent it straight to the spam filter.

—Johnson has neither approved my comment nor responded to my last four emails. While Johnson approved three of my comments, the other three disappeared because now even the message “your comment is being moderated” no longer appears.

I am surprised that Johnson is capable of banning someone like me from his webzine because I was always respectful in all of his discussions threads, even when I used to comment on Counter-Currents under the pen name of “Chechar” or in the three “vaporised” comments of the ongoing discussion. Furthermore, like Johnson I am also a critic of revisionists because I am an “Holocaust affirmer”.

But here’s the thing: unlike the revisionists, I do not condemn exterminationism. So Johnson can ban me while allowing rude comments against him in that same discussion thread—as long as they come from Holocaust deniers who subscribe to Christian ethics, where the life of every Negro, Gook or Jew is invaluable.

My very recent banning on Counter-Currents is symptomatic of the fact that, even when speaking in a very cordial tone on their forums, it is impossible to argue with those who haven’t re-evaluated their values. They simply shun me. They’ve been using the “death by silence” tactic on me for years. So The West’s Darkest Hour will continue to be practically a ghost town…

Categories
Holocaust Racial right

Holocaust

Revisionist Scott Smith recently wrote the following in the vigorous discussion about the Holocaust now taking place on Counter-Currents:

I conceded a long time ago that [Raul] Hilberg’s 5.1 Jewish million mortality figure could be true.

Wow! I think it’s very healthy that the issue is being aired on Counter-Currents. I very rarely comment on that webzine, but this time I did so given the importance of breaking the taboo that exists in certain quarters of the racial right, and the only way to achieve consensus is to start talking to each other.

In my opinion, even if the official figure of six million Jews killed in the Holocaust is true (which I highly doubt), that shouldn’t weaken our faith. As a Swede commented quite a few years ago on the previous incarnation of this site:

What is certain is that the Holocaust would not have produced any debilitating psychological effect on non-Christian whites. (By Christianity I mean ‘Christian morality.’ Most atheists in the West are still Christian, even if they don’t believe in God or Jesus.) Being emotionally affected by the Holocaust presupposes that you think: (1) Victims and losers have intrinsically more moral value than conquerors and winners, (2) Killing is the most horrendous thing a human can do, (3) Killing children and women is even more horrendous and (4) Every human life has the same value.

None of these statements ring true to a man who has rejected Christian morality. Even if the Holocaust happened, I would not pity the victims or sympathise with them. If you told the Vikings that they needed to accept Jews on their lands or give them gold coins because six million of them were exterminated in an obscure war, they would have laughed at you.

This passage was included on page 83 of my anthology On Exterminationism. I believe that the commenters on Counter-Currents, whether Holocaust deniers or Holocaust affirmers, have not reached the level of the Swede because of their Christian programming.

Categories
Holocaust Racial right

Ghost town

As an holocaust affirmer, I agree with Greg Johnson in his article yesterday about the so-called Holocaust. But I am referring only to historical facts, not to a putative ethical assessment. For example, in the comment thread holocaust denier Scott said that zero Jews had been gassed: something that contradicts what, over time, revisionist Mark Weber acknowledged about Treblinka.

As far as an ethical assessment is concerned, my position is peculiar.

I would disagree with Hitler if the German chancellor’s mindset is accurately portrayed in Johnson’s article, in that I don’t believe that Jews alone caused the fatidic WW2. Now I blame the Anglo-Saxons more, especially the US, after having assimilated not only Brendan Simms’ biography of Hitler (quotes from its first chapters here), but also John Mearsheimer’s realism.

On the other hand, for reasons of transvaluation of values I like Mauricio’s words, “We need more Holocaust Affirmers”: something that is still not noticeable in healthy quantities in discussion threads on racialist forums such as Counter-Currents, or even on the ghost town that my website has become—precisely because I have shifted paradigms! (JQ => CQ).

Categories
Michael O'Meara Racial right

A final

comment on the silence of the last few weeks before resuming my common activities on this site (which will be postponed anyway because the day after tomorrow I begin moving from a Mexican Indian village, where I live, to the capital where there are still some white Iberians).

I suppose the reason for the silence is that my neighbours north of the Rio Grande cannot conceive of someone south of the river speaking truths that, for American racialists, are still taboo. Therefore, I want to remind you that a few years ago, an American—although not a National Socialist—made critical comments about his nation’s project that, in some ways, converge with our approach. I am referring to the retired writer Michael O’Meara, whose articles we have summarised on this site. I will give just one example.

Michael O’Meara (1946-)

The white nationalist I respect the most is Kevin MacDonald. But MacDonald recently wrote in his webzine that he was disappointed with Trump for behaving like Bibi Netanyahu’s bitch, by declaring war on Iran with his bombings. Naturally, MacDonald used much more polite language than I did, but he confessed: “And on a personal note, I feel betrayed given that I have strongly supported Trump since he first ran”.

This would be inconceivable to Michael O’Meara! for the simple fact that, unlike the reactionaries on the American racial right, O’Meara is a revolutionary (the kind of revolutionarie I like: it’s not yet time for violence but our ideology must be revolutionary). What distinguishes O’Meara’s thinking from that of virtually every notable figure on today’s racial right is that, for Michael, “the greatest treason” consists precisely of hoping to use Establishment institutions to try to bring about substantial change. From this perspective, those in the American racial right who believe in democracy and capitalism (I would add the Christian churches) find themselves inadvertently betraying their goal: racial preservation.

While I won’t complain any further about the racialists who don’t comment on this site, I do suggest that those who remain silent reread some of O’Meara’s writing. And I’d love for someone who knows him personally to let me know what this man is up to these days, or if he’s still alive…

Categories
Racial right War!

Jew obeyer

A recent plea addressed to US President Donald Trump reads, “Mr. President, Finish the job” in Tel Aviv, Israel.

A few years ago, I wrote “On Jew Obeyers”. I wish that expression would start spreading like wildfire because of things like what the US president did yesterday: directly attacking Iran by bombing uranium enrichment facilities because the Jews asked him to. Trump has been, as has every American president since Judea declared war on the Third Reich, a “Jew obeyer”.

American racists, mostly Christians, are wrong. The Jew Ron Unz, for example, just republished an article by Andrew Anglin in which he calls notable philo-Semitic figures in American politics, such as Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz, “Satanic”.

Anglin and company don’t want to understand that the Spanish inquisitor Torquemada, who sent Jews to the stake, was just as Christian as St Francis who, following the word of the Gospel more literally, preached universal love. It’s no coincidence that the Church hasn’t canonised Torquemada, but rather that Francis has perhaps become the most beloved saint among Catholics.

Reread how Benjamin summarised the POV of this site. Since the Judeo-Christian archetype possesses the Western collective unconscious—this includes today’s racialists—it shouldn’t surprise us that at the time of writing, the discussion thread on Anglin’s article reposted on The Unz Review already has 265 comments, while recently on The West’s Darkest Hour I was left talking alone with Ben. The difference is that, like Hitler, he and I are already possessed by the other collective unconscious, the Aryan one.

My prediction is that Christians on the racial right will not only continue to ignore us and obey the Jew—if you preach universal love, genocide à la Heydrich must be wrong—, but they will remain in their echo chambers feeding off each other with positive feedback to avoid the cognitive dissonance we provide. Sad to say, as I concluded one of my posts late last month, “The malignant psychosis of today’s white man is such that only an apocalypse could reset the button of his collective unconscious so that the few survivors may regain a primal Lebenskraft”.

Could the conflict in the Middle East escalate to the point of a third world war, this time using nukes?