web analytics
Categories
Catholic religious orders Correspondence Racial right

Marcial Maciel

— my antipode —

When I read William Pierce’s Who We Are years ago, I was struck by Pierce’s assertion that forming a society requires people deeply committed to the cause—what we here call the priesthood of the sacred words. Without such committed individuals, he argued, a lasting society cannot be formed.

That is very true: and the only way to form it would be, as Lycurgus ordered, for the meals of that religious-military order that was the Spartans to be communal in order to achieve adequate bonding between men.

No one now follows the precepts of Lycurgus, although it is more than obvious that there should be a group of us living very close together, always eating together, to get to know each other better. As Benjamin said in his email today, “It’s the same with all the rest of them online! None of them seem to want to get to know each other on a more personal basis, so all proper male bonding is out the window, and thus an organization can’t form”. He added:

It’s been ages since someone said something substantial in the comments on The West’s Darkest Hour! (I’d say, just out of politeness to make an exception for Jamie, Jorge and Vinster though). There’s a reason I privately call them the hyenas. The lions have all decamped, or been killed off spiritually, and now it’s just these asinine feminine predators, circling, in a more distant lurker/helicopter visit crowd of what might as well be f**king flamingos.

As soon as it can ever be achieved, in desperate need, I think one of the first steps of a real revolution would be to send every current dissident right leader and popular ‘far-right’ website grifter the way of those university professors I mentioned in a recent comment. There’s no other way to upend the current order all across the right. At least rough them up; make them worried.

Ditto!

Yesterday and today I watched selected passages from the LOTR trilogy by Peter Jackson. While my featured article used an image from Game of Thrones (John Snow and Sam), the analogy of Frodo and Sam is actually more accurate for my argument. Alas, unlike LOTR Benjamin and I find ourselves completely alone in pursuing the goal of destroying the “One Ring”—i.e., gold and Christian ethics—that corrupted the Aryan spirit. Our effort lacks a “Fellowship of the Ring” because it was destroyed during the Hellstorm Holocaust (see my post this morning).

In the following century after the Hellstorm Holocaust, except us there is no one like Frodo and Sam, determined to walk for days in that horrible, rocky and volcanic landscape. No one I know wants to put the ring into the lava as resolutely as Ben and I: which obviously means working intellectually every day (on the other hand if an aspiring priest is employed by the System, he could still donate to the cause).

Today, I also watched the recently released HBO Max series Marcial Maciel: The Wolf of God. I find it odd that there is still no article about this miniseries on Wikipedia. Incidentally, I have sat down several times to talk with one of the interviewees in Marcial Maciel: The Wolf of God. I am referring to Don José Barba, who still lives in Mexico City.

As my earlier points in the featured article suggest, Ben and I are men against our time. It will be tough to find another man willing to take vows for our cause. By contrast, Marcial Maciel thrived as a man of his time: he drew thousands of children to his Catholic schools and amassed tremendous institutional power. Notably, his Legion of Christ at one point generated annually double the Vatican’s income: $600,000,000 dollars!

What an eloquent way to distinguish someone who trained priests in a multimillion-dollar fraternity that worships the god of the Jews and I, who aspire to the modest Aryan temple of which I posted an image yesterday. And the temple would be a luxury. I’m missing the most basic of all. In recent months, I have been suffering agonies since my siblings sold the house where I lived!

Behold a man against his time—that is, against the Christian era—and a man of his time like Maciel, so perfectly integrated into the calendar that begins with the mythical birth of J.C. Perhaps because of all this, we can understand Benjamin’s words in his email today:

I’d like a list in my head: what requires one person [committed to the sacred words]; what requires two people; what requires three people to achieve, etc. —currently I’m stumped.

I too am perplexed that there are only two of us who believe that the “ring” is what is worth destroying (the JQ is just the consequence of the kings of the West wielding the slave rings to the One Ring).

Metaphors aside, even a single person with a modest job could do us a favour with a modest monthly donation. Someone who is unemployed and aspires to the priesthood of the temple could also contribute greatly (for example, by dedicating himself to preaching our philosophy in the comments section of other racialist forums). But for the moment, there are only two of us priests.

It is curious that Maciel—who created a fabulous empire—and I—who now even suffer from terrible anxiety at the possibility of becoming homeless—have lived most of our lives in Mexico. Although the paedophile is now dead, we were, and spiritually are, perfect antipodes.

Categories
Audios Eugenics Racial right

Henrik Palmgren

I recently complained that the racial right had forgotten the eugenicists of the past, but David Skrbina, who wrote a book about how Jews wrote the New Testament to deceive the Romans, recently refreshed their memory about eugenics: something I think is magnificent. The article was originally published in The Occidental Observer (here), although The Unz Review has reposted it (here).

As for our topic, the extermination of prehistoric Neanderthals, it is taboo for the liberal mindset because the point is that Aryans shouldn’t learn about their past (“he who controls the past controls the future”). For atheist neochristians, who preach Christian love for all hominids as if they were the noble savages of prehistory, Neanderthals were our cousins if not our brothers.

Fortunately, one of us, Henrik Palmgren of Red Ice Radio, interviewed Danny Vendramini four years after Vendramini published Them & Us on the Neanderthal Predation Theory (blurb of the book here). Although the usual suspects have censored Palmgren (do you remember what happened to him that fateful day in Charlottesville?), Palmgren’s interview can still be heard here.

Categories
Racial right

Linder quote

“It’s not [the Jew Larry] Auster worth worrying about. Jared Taylor is the one to watch. It was his type that lost this country in the first place…”

—Alex Linder

Categories
Racial right

Linder quote

“Because WN has been led by intellectually limited religious conservatives, or, more accurately, by those appealing to them, it has never been able to get beyond the bugbear of respectability.”

— Alex Linder

Categories
Madison Grant Nordicism Racial right

Different animal

“The cross between a white man and an Indian is an Indian; the cross between a white man and a negro is a negro; the cross between a white man and a Hindu is a Hindu; and the cross between any of the three European races and a Jew is a Jew”.

Madison Grant regarding the one-drop rule
in The Passing of The Great Race, 1916

In the discussion thread for “WN [white nationalism] is dead”, Robiul Hoque said today:

WN is basically a reactionary movement which only exists in opposition to Non-European peoples. It has no connection to any previous racialist movement, especially the Nordic Movement which was founded by university professors which not only focused on race but also heritage, culture, history, and morality. It is more accurate to say they were an ethno-cultural movement similar to Jews; the only difference was their demand to be left alone and be allowed to express their own standards of beauty, culture and racial selection.

White nationalists just demand White nations without any of the cultural and moral substance that the Nordic Movement had and they are quick to dismiss whatever knowledge they could offer to them. The Nordic movement fell through no fault of their own; it only fell because the Jewish newspapers and media heavily associated them with the Nazis even though this movement was founded by a French noble [Arthur de Gobineau], not the Austrian painter [Hitler].

For many years I’ve noticed that the so-called WN was born in the 1990s as a conservative way of distancing itself from the legacy of true racists, and true men. I’m not just referring to the German National Socialists murdered by Anglo-Americans and Stalin’s willing executioners, but also to those Americans who crossed what I call The Wall: people like William Pierce and Alex Linder (I put the latter name in bold because I’ve been honouring his memory since I learned of his passing). These WNsts who have remained stuck on the south side of the Wall have also repudiated the Nordicism of stellar figures like Madison Grant, whose pic we see above. On June 15, 2021, the anti-white establishment removed a monument to Madison Grant from Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park, a monument that had stood there since 1948. But since the 1990s, WNsts had already removed Grant from their worldview…

In the past few days, I have complained about the failure of the major WN webzines to publish obituaries about Linder. To understand this phenomenon, one must remember that on April 20, these conservative webzines have also failed to pay tribute to the Austrian painter. To my way of seeing it, it’s as clear as an oasis in a clear summer that the so-called WN is a movement of rupture not only with the Germans of the last century; not only with the American and European eugenicists who flourished before World War II (Grant was just one of them), but even with real men like Rockwell, Pierce, and Linder who flourished after WWII.

This site, The West’s Darkest Hour, became a ghost town when I began harshly criticising WNsts for these reasons. But it must be understood that I did so out of love for the fourteen words, while these de facto conservatives don’t seem to truly honour them. Here’s an excerpt from one of Benjamin’s recent emails to me:

It will forever piss me off how you, for example, contribute such vital content, succinct and to the point, and off the beaten track from the mainstream of WN, and yet c-c (just for one example) in contrast churn out a slew of neo-bohemian crowd-pleasing articles fit only for modern literature pedants and pretentious pseuds and manage to rake in huge donations. And all this time, they’re not planning a revolution – if anything, they are settled in a comfortable enough business model! How long can it go on like this for? Until what level of darkness closes in? Oh, it frustrates me.

The problem is that starting a movement completely parallel to WN that reclaims the manliness of Rockwell, Pierce, and Linder (the latter two were, like us and the Nazis, exterminationists), and the Nordicism of Grant and the other eugenicists forgotten after WWII, is an arduous task. The only thing I can think of is to follow Linder’s advice to attack conservatives, but with an unusual twist: attacking on podcasts the de facto conservatives, the pretenders, the WNsts (Linder limited himself to attacking paleoconservatives like Pat Buchanan or racial realists like Jared Taylor, who, due to the Christian ethics of his parents, never wanted to understand the JQ as it should be understood).

I can’t do that because my native language is not English, and a successful podcast requires two or more people whose native language is the same, speaking to each other from the same point of view.

That sort of condemns me to The West’s Darkest Hour being a purely text-based blog, although if a Spanish speaker would be willing to help me resurrect the WDH Radio Show and then translate our critical dialogues about what’s happening on the WN quarters into English using recent AI technology, that would be great!

For now, I can only point out that it is time for the racial vanguard to realise that WN is a very different animal not only from NS, but also from the noblest racism that was still heard last century in the voices of the aforementioned Americans.

Categories
Conservatism Racial right

WN is dead

by Benjamin

Thank you for sharing these key posts by the late Alex Linder. I’ve now read them all…

It leaves me asking the question, given that (as I think he also recalls somewhere in the posts) most of the latter-day—and indeed historical—converts to White Nationalism, and from that to National Socialism, come from those already affiliated to a greater or lesser degree with (Anglo-American) conservatism, how are we to gather new members who are suitably radical, seeing as standard bourgeois conservatives, whether bog-standard racialists, with all the trappings of the individualist WASP work ethic, or worse evangelicals, simply will not do (for a number of reasons covered a myriad times on this site and elsewhere)? Did it make any sense before when I inquired as to the practicalities of trying to ‘turn’ leftists?

I’m just hoping for your new generations—the zoomers—currently. It’s clear White Nationalism, at least in any mainstream capacity, is dead, and those remaining big-name gatekeepers are holding tightly onto too many of the stragglers who have yet to to realise all of this. Dead in that there is no real-world progress and it has become a stilted money-maker, akin to a relaxed social club. Until exterminationism, in a practical sense, is assimilated psychologically, I don’t think any progress can be made.

It infuriates me that people aren’t angrier. I hate just having to hang around impotently, as what could be the rest of the decade or more wears on.

Categories
Racial right

A thorn

by Benjamin

A boy extracting a thorn from his foot.

It’s interesting that no one [among mainstream racialist forums] acknowledged Alex Linder’s death properly on those sites. I wasn’t aware until now [click on the above link]. I find it quite disrespectful and petty of them actually… we’re meant to be on the same side! But the second he’s dead and OD is criticising him…

I take it they saw him the way I assume they see you/us, as a thorn in their side—as opposed to the truth: a better source of information and inspiration on Aryan survival.

By their own stubborn, head in the sand cowardice, these supposedly pro-White sites have made themselves our enemies (they’re a lot more unreasonable with you than you are with them). It’s good that you’re starting a radio show again, albeit solo. It will give you greater reach (against them).

Categories
Racial right Real men

Linder’s

featured posts

“Why so hard!”—said to the diamond one day the charcoal; “are we then not near relatives?”—

Why so soft? O my brethren; thus do I ask you: are ye then not—my brethren?

Why so soft, so submissive and yielding? Why is there so much negation and abnegation in your hearts? Why is there so little fate in your looks?

And if ye will not be fates and inexorable ones, how can ye one day—conquer with me?

And if your hardness will not glance and cut and chip to pieces, how can ye one day—create with me?

For the creators are hard. And blessedness must it seem to you to press your hand upon millenniums as upon wax,—

—Blessedness to write upon the will of millenniums as upon brass,—harder than brass, nobler than brass. Entirely hard is only the noblest.

This new table, O my brethren, put I up over you: Become hard!—

As I recently said in the comments section of my latest posts, I would never have been so abrasive in my criticism of white nationalists—mere charcoal—if they had behaved like Alex Linder: a true diamond. In a very unique way, throughout my blogging career I have interpreted Linder’s advice, “Attack the conservatives!” to mean that today’s racial right ideology is basically conservative, not revolutionary; Christian, not anti-Christian; feminized, not truly Aryan. Therefore, they must be attacked.

Here are the articles on this site in which I tried to choose Linder’s words that best reflect his thinking, which evoke my favourite passage from Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, quoted above as an epigraph to this small tribute to the now deceased Man:

On Breivik

“I’m not a Nazi”

Linder’s Weltanschauung

Alex Linder on Christianity

Guessedworker exchange

On conservatism

On The Turner Diaries

Hunter Wallace exchange

On Kevin MacDonald

Bitchute audios on Christianity

Categories
Racial right

A visit

A Visit to the House of Cézanne in Aix.

A reader of this site has visited me in Mexico and is leaving this country today. One of the things we discussed was the chasm that separates us from the white nationalists (WNsts).

Having breakfast in a restaurant, I told him that when I discovered WN in 2009, people were still talking about the ethnostate, and sometimes it seemed to imply that a revolutionary process would be necessary to achieve such a noble goal. Now, we don’t hear about the ethnostate because it implies violence, blood, and iron; and today’s WNsts are like ladies hiding in a castle room during an invasion, praying for their men to triumph over the invaders.

In the current context, a real man wouldn’t be fighting alone, but rather practising what Muslims call an internal jihad so that, when the West’s fiat currencies collapse, an “Order” of the kind William Pierce imagined in his novel would attempt to seize political power. But there’s none of that in the contemporary racial right: just more stupidity as Michael O’Meara rightly pointed out when he wrote that the greatest betrayal is trying to use the System’s anti-white institutions to infiltrate the spheres of power (such as voting for Trump, etc.).

The visitor who will soon be heading to the international airport agrees with me that WN is a lost cause. But he added something I didn’t know: the Zoomers, those born between 2000 and 2020, may be our only hope as their mantra is “No Bread [i.e., inflation: no one can afford now a house], No Bros [friends], No Hos [wives], No Hope.”

But of course: even with these teenagers and kids in their early twenties, we need the dollar to collapse so that this generation of incels can fully enter what I call “angry mode” (a preamble to “combat mode” and eventually the government-toppling “killing mode”). Meanwhile, those of us in the trenches will have to suffer horrors of maddening patience because we cannot, and will not be able to for a few years, fire a single shot! But that’s reality, and although horrifying, we must stoically accept it.

The world is ruled by the law of the jungle. Those who believe in liberalism (i.e., Christian ethics) or men who take refuge in a castle like ladies who don’t want to be raped by invaders violate natural law: they are doomed to extinction. As the Führer said, “He who wants to live should fight, and he who does not want to battle in this world of eternal struggle does not deserve to be alive”.

To my knowledge, no WN site promotes a revolutionary ideology for the near or distant future. In general, WNsts seem to still believe in democracy, Christianity (or its bastard child: neochristian atheism) and the project of their nations (the US or UK, for example).

All of that has to be thrown out to create an ethostate! The heads of Washington, Jefferson, Thomas Roosevelt and Lincoln on Mount Rushmore must be blown up and replaced with the heads of Leonidas, Hermann, Hitler and the warrior who will play the role of Kalki. Since the WNsts have failed us, the big question is whether a revolutionary ideology will truly emerge among these Zoomers and take power…

Categories
Holocaust Racial right

No reply

from Greg Johnson

Update of August 24: Finally, he replied—in the comments section of this site, here.

At the time of posting this entry, the heated discussion thread on the Holocaust on Counter-Currents already has 267 comments. I tried to post six comments, only half of which were approved. Regarding what I said a couple of days ago—:

I tried to leave a comment on Counter-Currents linking to this article, but it seems—not sure yet; still waiting for Greg Johnson to reply to my email—that Greg sent it straight to the spam filter.

—Johnson has neither approved my comment nor responded to my last four emails. While Johnson approved three of my comments, the other three disappeared because now even the message “your comment is being moderated” no longer appears.

I am surprised that Johnson is capable of banning someone like me from his webzine because I was always respectful in all of his discussions threads, even when I used to comment on Counter-Currents under the pen name of “Chechar” or in the three “vaporised” comments of the ongoing discussion. Furthermore, like Johnson I am also a critic of revisionists because I am an “Holocaust affirmer”.

But here’s the thing: unlike the revisionists, I do not condemn exterminationism. So Johnson can ban me while allowing rude comments against him in that same discussion thread—as long as they come from Holocaust deniers who subscribe to Christian ethics, where the life of every Negro, Gook or Jew is invaluable.

My very recent banning on Counter-Currents is symptomatic of the fact that, even when speaking in a very cordial tone on their forums, it is impossible to argue with those who haven’t re-evaluated their values. They simply shun me. They’ve been using the “death by silence” tactic on me for years. So The West’s Darkest Hour will continue to be practically a ghost town…