web analytics

Category: Racial right

Categories
Racial right

Frost

I think I’ve finally figured out why this site gets so few comments compared to a dozen years ago when it got quite a few. It has to do with my criticism of white nationalists, whom I contrast with the National Socialists of the last century. Because I’ve been so abrasive in my prose, visitors don’t like it, as they’re under the impression that American white nationalism is more or less immaculate.

I realised this because on Twitter I’ve been commenting on white nationalism without being so abrasive, and sometimes I get a lot of likes. What am I doing wrong here? Should I stop speaking ill of American white nationalism the way I didn’t a dozen years ago?

The problem is that even back then, there were Americans who were aware of the contradictions within American white nationalism. For example, in 2015 Jack Frost said something that really caught my attention in the comments section of The Occidental Observer, so much so that I quoted him in a post titled “On turning Americans into Nazis.” Frost commented:

In order to accept being called a racist or a Nazi with equanimity, normal American whites would have to reconcile that with their country’s history of being violently opposed to racism of any kind, from the Civil War forward. They would have to admit to themselves and to others that all of that bloodshed in trying to stamp out racism had been shed in vain, and in fact, worse than in vain, in an evil cause. They would have to admit that their ancestors were evil, and that they themselves had also been evil [emphasis added] before they saw the light and became racists.

It’s safe to say the chances of that happening on a mass scale are almost zero.

Bingo. If you realise you have to hate your culture to save your race, where will you get the quorum? What webzines like Counter-Currents do is not go for the jugular of American culture, but rather publish articles that don’t offend sensibilities: articles that a conservative can tolerate.

But that’s not what I do—I call a spade a spade! That means money will flow to sites like Counter-Currents, a webzine whose ideology I highly doubt will save the Anglo-Germans of the North (I live in Mexico) from their impending extinction, and that I count on few donations even though my ideology potentially could save them…

That’s why Michael O’Meara caught my attention so much, a revolutionary writer on Counter-Currents, unlike the merely reactionary ones who comment there and on other racialist forums (O’Meara may already be dead since nothing has been heard from him in several years).

Frost hit the nail on the head. Sometimes a single comment on a racialist webzine is worth more than the “serious” articles being published on those forums. And if Frost is right, for The West’s Darkest Hour to receive more donations and comments, visitors would have to realise that their grandpas were actually the bad guys, and that they themselves are bad for not honouring Hitler (despite his mistakes).

Changing the subject, since I’ve mentioned the American historian Mark Weber more than once this month, I’d like to link to one of his articles in which Weber disagrees with the consensus on the Second World War, here.

Categories
Racial right Sword

No sword

Regarding what the racial right is doing, among other things Benjamin observed yesterday:

…a kind of interesting academic matter to be debated, where people can have ‘opinions’.

One of the sites that shocks me most is Counter-Currents. Both the writers and commenters talk as if the whole thing were academic because the water hasn’t reached up to their necks.

It’s incredible the feeling I get reading that site (and the other white nationalist forums). It’s something like: “These guys aren’t doing anything and they think they’re doing something.”

I think they recently held a meeting in Rome, but it never occurs to them that what they’re doing only makes sense by forming a Nazi party that wants to seize power.

What can be done with these “men” who only complain about what the jews and the niggers and the spics do without lifting a finger in the real world?

If there’s anything that depresses me immensely, it’s the mere existence of these people. But the saddest thing is that the true Aryan man, symbolised by his sword, no longer exists.

Aragorn picks up the broken sword Andúril from the floor after Boromir drops it.

You can’t find him anywhere! It is truly the darkest hour for the fair race, and were it not for what comes after the collapse of the dollar—and perhaps peak oil—I would say that this entire website, to quote David Lane, is an “open letter to a dead race”.

Categories
Racial right

White

nationalists:

When will you stop sinning?
When will you renounce the Judeo-Christian ethics
that have been destroying the Aryan race
since Constantine seized power
—and return to our true Gods?

Categories
Adolf Hitler Racial right

Hans

November 1941, Cracow, Hans Frank and world champion Alexander Alekhine.

“Our Constitution,” said Hans Frank, “is the will of the Führer.” Compare this to the political vision of American white nationalists, who still refuse to repudiate their Founding Cucks (remember that Washington boasted of not being anti-Semitic).

As I was discussing with Benjamin in the comments section the other day, English or American racialists won’t be able to prosper unless they repudiate the founding principles of their nations. In the case of the US this would be somewhat easier, since an American Hitler would be a mixture of G.L. Rockwell’s nobility and William Pierce’s intelligence.

Categories
Psychohistory Racial right Tom Sunic

Fertile ground

by Tomislav Sunic

Contrary to widespread belief [in the American racial right], political sycophancy toward Israel—including its fellow travelers among millions of fervent Christians awaiting the coming Apparition of Jesus—is not the result of a violent ideology imposed by a handful of Jewish conspirators.

Rather, long-standing, Bible-inspired guilt feelings had already created fertile ground for the erosion of freedom of thought. Coupled with the illusion of endless capitalist growth, alongside Christian “love thy non-White neighbor” ecumenism, a belief has taken hold that everything will somehow sort itself out.

It won’t. At its core, the spirit of Christian-inspired self-denial amounts to a loss of Spirit itself.

____________

The above is just an excerpt from a recent article:
“U.S. Political Theology: Weaponizing the Bible” (here).

Categories
Racial right

Flaming

I’d like to say something about my friend Benjamin’s flaming response to Sebastian C. regarding the hypothesis that David Irving’s abuse caused his daughter to develop schizophrenia.

With a computer trick, I just checked and confirmed that the region Sebastian was is indeed the same region, Rio Grande do Sul, where a Brazilian troll started insulting us on The West’s Darkest Hour in 2018. If Sebastian is this troll who has been defaming the commenters of this site with accusations of homosexuality on other forums for eight years now (to the point of impersonating me), then Ben’s response is appropriate.

As for Irving, he himself confessed to having a “schizophrenic” daughter, using the term he himself employed in one of his interviews.

Since we here don’t subscribe to the medical model of mental disorders, but rather to the trauma model (see my trilogy of books in Spanish, totalling approximately 1,800 pages), we might assume that Irving mistreated his daughter. Of course, the evidence is merely circumstantial. For example, the last time I visited England, a respected figure in the racialist community told me that, of all the employees Irving had, he didn’t know a single one whom the renowned historian had treated well. If this were true, we can only imagine how Irving and/or his wife would have treated his/their daughter.

And this is the crux of the matter.

Until the age of 50, I focused solely on the trauma model. As we have stated here, my work is related to the fourteen words, insofar as if such notable figures in our cause as William Pierce, David Irving, and Don Black had treated their children well, those children would now be champions of their parents’ cause. Instead, we have Pierce and Black’s children becoming anti-racist as revenge for the mistreatment they suffered at home, and Irving’s daughter losing her mind altogether for the same reasons.

As long-time visitors to this site know, the American I admire most for his intelligence is William Pierce, and it pains and frustrates me greatly that his most important non-fiction book, Who We Are (which we could subtitle The Story of the White Race), hasn’t been published since Pierce’s death in 2002.

Kelvin, William Pierce’s son.

The trauma model of mental disorders is so relevant (Kelvin’s anti-racist rebellion is obviously a product of a troubled soul) that, had Pierce treated him well, the son would have taken up his father’s mantle, and Who We Are would have been a major bestseller in our community a quarter of a century ago. The fact that the exact opposite happened—that the son was seduced by the dark side to the point of “denouncing his racist father” in the Jewish media—proves my point.

That’s why I’m tempted to start posting more in-depth articles about the trauma model than about racial issues, since the relationship between the two isn’t obvious to visitors. For example, Kelvin has confessed that his father used to beat him. It seems obvious to me that if Pierce had truly treated him well, a lie of this magnitude would be inconceivable from a psychological perspective. We are biologically predisposed to attach to and love our parents, and acts of rebellion such as becoming transgender (Don Black’s son), becoming an anti-racist sold out to MSM (Pierce’s son), or even losing one’s sanity (Irving’s daughter) can only occur as a result of a profound betrayal of one’s offspring by the parent during the child’s childhood or adolescence.

Given that Irving’s daughter ultimately committed suicide, had these people not been mistreated they would now be, as I said, champions of our cause.

Finally, I was deeply struck by what Pierce said at the end of Who We Are: that without a specific type of person (what we call here a “priest of the sacred words”), the organisation he wanted to create couldn’t flourish. This is so true that it is reflected in what I just said: the most important book ever written by an American, precisely the one mentioned in this paragraph, hasn’t been properly published.

It is my duty to educate the racialists who visit this site about the trauma model.

Categories
Racial right

X

I’ve noticed that the platform closest to The West’s Darkest Hour are the accounts of some users on X, formerly known as Twitter, where Hitler and National Socialism are openly glorified, and Christianity is exposed as a Jewish psyop.

It’s very important to point this out because none of the main forums of the American racial right is NS or anti-Christian. Apparently, it’s a few hobbits who are carrying the one ring, not the bigwigs of so-called white nationalism.

Here are two recent posts on X that exemplify what I’ve said above. The first is an audio-visual selfie clip of someone who has a good grasp of the CQ, and the second is a repost including the image the Twitter user chose:

“We are a link in an eternal chain of ancestors and descendants. This blood which we carry is not our property, but is the property of our ancestors and our descendants. A people that honours its ancestors and keeps its blood pure will never die.”

—Heinrich Himmler

Categories
Racial right War!

Michael

I no longer read entire articles on white nationalist websites. But just by looking at the headlines, it seems none of them are celebrating this war in the sense that, if the US/Israel lose, it will be magnificent for the sake of 14 words.

It’s important to remember that losing means, as Scott Ritter and others have pointed out, failing to achieve regime change in Iran. Even by merely surviving the bombing—say, as Serbia survived it in 1999 for over two months—the US/Israel would lose.

I think the American racialist websites aren’t focusing on the consequences of defeat because they don’t see their country as the Great Satan for the Aryan race, to paraphrase what Iranian clerics say, but with a National Socialist twist.

Among notable Americans, only Francis Parker Yockey (he died at age 42 in a prison in San Francisco) and Michael O’Meara saw something of this: the Judaized US is the enemy. I’ve already asked, but it’s worth asking again: Does any visitor know if Michael is still alive?

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Webbon’s

interview – 8

This episode was about race. Fuentes calls himself a race realist, and he starts his interview well, as if he were a reader of Jared Taylor.

But after the ninth minute, Fuentes says that the biggest problem is individualism. Here begins the eternal blindness, since we have already said that individualism is an epiphenomenon of the “spiritual terror” (Hitler’s words) that Christianity introduced into the Aryan collective unconscious, especially in its Anglo-Saxon version. Not seeing the beam in one’s own eye is a leitmotif of Christians like Nick Fuentes and Joel Webbon.

Then Fuentes began to talk about black Americans. When Webbon intervened speaking about the various religions, he openly said that for him, “religion would trump race” and that the racial factor is not deterministic, although he is sympathetic to racial realism.

I think this dialogue shows why the Jared Taylor school of racialism has failed: it isn’t anti-Christian. In the real world, it’s impossible to expel people of colour with such a lukewarm philosophy. It’s no wonder that when I discovered white nationalism (I was living in Spain), a Swede said that this American movement was weak. Paradoxically, Webbon then said a great truth: that all contemporary whites are (1) suicidal, (2) suffer from toxic empathy, and (3) are cowards. He added that that’s why the West is falling apart. I couldn’t agree more!

Unfortunately, shortly after, Webbon, after saying that blacks are generally impulsive and lazy and Jews are subversive, states that as a Christian he shouldn’t hate them or deprive them of certain rights. And everything Fuentes says afterward in his dialogue with Webbon doesn’t suggest a National Socialist-type racism. It’s the same old timid crap we see throughout the American racial right. At 39:50, for example, Fuentes gives the example of a black family, albeit educated, moving nearby and asks the rhetorical question of whether any of us would have a problem with that. As a good Christian, Webbon answers no, and then Fuentes gives the same example with a Chinese, Indian, or Mexican family.

It couldn’t be clearer. Fuentes and Webbon are also suicidal, suffer from toxic empathy, and are cowards. Nick is somewhat aware of this, as he goes on to say that this dynamic ends up with 90% non-white people in a neighbourhood that was previously all-white. But he doesn’t seem to realise that Christian ethics caused the problem in the first place; that 10% is similar to not worrying about the first cancerous cells in your body and only starting to worry when metastasis takes hold.

Then I was surprised that when Webbon asked Nick how the races originated, Fuentes mentioned Adam, and that the various races arose from him. Is Nick a Catholic fundamentalist (liberal Catholics believe in Darwin)? The fact that they then talked about Cain, the Tower of Babel, and Noah’s offspring, as if all of that were historical, doesn’t even warrant a response from me.

Then, at this point, Fuentes says he is completely against racial hatred. Compare this to what we recently said about Cro-Magnons hating Neanderthals. (By the way, my next article will be about Vendramini’s book, which I’m about to finish reading for the second time.)

Categories
Literature Racial right Them and Us (book)

Messala’s advice

These days I’ve been reading a printed copy of Them and Us, which I used last year in its Kindle version for my excerpts from that book.

A common mistake among young Aryans who rebel against the System, even while admiring National Socialism, is wanting to imitate the men’s sports of the Third Reich.

I’ve often mentioned this moment of the 1959 film when Messala tells Sextus how to confront a Jewish idea that is infecting the Romans: with another idea!

The mistake of these young men lies in not knowing the saying, “For a stick to tighten, it must be made of the same wedge.”

We cannot move beyond the collective Jewish unconscious that has seized the Aryan soul with rough sports for Aryan men. We need to follow Messala’s advice. And to do so, it is necessary to become a philosopher, not in the way philosophy is understood in academia today, but in its ancient sense which implies questioning dogma.

There are several books that revolutionised my view of the world today. In my work on parental abuse of children, I have mentioned Alice Miller, whom I discovered almost a quarter of a century ago.

The next bibliographical milestone was two books by William Pierce: one fiction and one non-fiction, which I have mentioned countless times on this site. Pierce wasn’t a National Socialist, and I had to supplement his work with the memoirs written by Savitri Devi. Both authors address exterminationism.

After I had uploaded many hundreds of posts to The West’s Darkest Hour, I discovered Richard Carrier’s work on the highly dubious existence of the historical Jesus, which profoundly impacted my thinking because, since my early teens, I had been internally struggling with the Catholicism instilled in me by my father.

Last year, just when I thought my worldview was complete, I discovered Danny Vendramini’s book: a study of real prehistory which complements what Pierce wrote in his story of the white race.

We will never defeat the Jewish ideology that has seized our souls without these superb readings. It doesn’t matter that Miller, Carrier, and Vendramini are antagonistic to National Socialism. What matters is that it is perfectly possible to use their findings to further the National Socialist cause, as I have demonstrated on this site.

To young lads who believe that by practising rough sports in semi-secret societies—a healthy Männerbund—they will challenge the System, I suggest they follow Messala’s advice.

Become philosophers! Physical fitness is not enough.