web analytics

Category: Correspondence

Categories
Correspondence Exterminationism

Dear Cesar,

To answer your question regarding your latest post, I agree with you in that I too think (lawful? as if that would be allowed!) secession is not enough, and would be better achieved itself through violent aggressive revolution.

There are too many enemies otherwise, and they cannot be left alive, as with their grasp on modern technology, and, as the quotation of extermination says, in paraphrase, what if 10, or 10,000 aren’t enough, and you need to eliminate nigh on 10 billion. One can only do that through long-term—perhaps intergenerational—Turner Diaries-style insurgency. Secession feels a little like these ‘prepper’ hippies who retire to the woods in cabins and think that is enough to save them from civilisation’s degradation, with the problem unsolved all about, just over their horizon, or indeed Covington’s effective ‘Murka II’, where, without ideological fanaticism and stringent adherence to iron rule patriarchal norms, it slips back into just another (feminist) democracy.

As you commented on the final author saying—revolution being a state of mind, I think I go with the former commenters (I can’t remember if it was originally Greg Johnson, Larry Auster, or Alex Linder) that the fanatic attitude of hatred as much as the mythological ideals of what our race was and should be​ thinking of Cro-Magnon point for a historical example—coupled to the 4-words is enough for me to feel there is already revolution, even if not among many people; even if they are simply waiting in frustration for an opportunity.

Personally, I find the (second half of the) 14-words harder to fight for, almost a given to me, and harder to feel passion over (perhaps it’s because I have a long-term partner, so am in some sense complacent, small-minded or selfish over that). But to answer O’Meara’s point then, it’s not about inheriting the Leviathan as much as de-fanging and de-clawing it permanently, and tossing the remains into that ‘ashpit of history’, so nothing like our current situation can ever arise again, a real scorched earth tactic psychologically, and only then could I realistically think descendants could plan for a peaceful pure Aryan society in aftermath, having that opportunity awarded automatically to then, as the only survivors, left then to expand across the globe in further war, and wipe out remaining enclaves of enemies. At the moment, there’s too much war in my mind to think of a simple dislocation.

I hope this gives my basic thoughts reflecting on your latest piece.

Best regards,

Ben

Categories
Correspondence Nordicism

Lebensborn

by Heinrich

If you’re a young Nordic person who wonders what could be done in today’s world for our cause, legally and peacefully, without getting yourself into trouble, and without ruining your personal life, wonder no more, we have the solution. Too good to be true? Keep reading and see for yourself.

Who are we looking for: In terms of location he should live on mainland Europe. He shouldn’t be much older than 30, nor younger than 15. (we can show some flexibility here) He has to be physically fit, someone who can at least run 3-5 kilometres (not jog, run) and move his own body weight in exercises like pull-ups and push-ups smoothly. If for whatever reason, you don’t meet these at the moment, but you have the determination, you can develop these capacities, and contact us when you are ready.

In terms of hereditary traits: he should be at least 176cm in height fully grown. Shape of the skull should be dolichocephalic, with a projecting occiput, looking elongated from the side and narrow from the front. Hair light to golden blond or reddish-orange, texture soft, and slightly wavy. Eyes blue, a lighter greenish undertone could still work but should have that crystal clear look effect, not muddy water effect. Skin pinkish white, fine if it can tan to a bronze colour, but baseline should be white with a pinkish undertone on body parts that get no sun, more reddish looking skin that cannot tan at all is accepted as well. Nose has to be straight with a high and narrow bridge, either with a sharp and pointy tip, or a more fleshy tip is okay if it looks well-formed and in harmony with the face, nostrils narrowly positioned close towards the centre. Lips thin with a pink to reddish colouring, chin prominent, should project to at least in line with the lips when viewed from the side, jaw rectangular and strong, forehead near vertical, with prominent brow ridges, eyes sitting deep set, eye sockets rectangular. No hair loss or greying at this age is accepted, no grown together eyebrows, slanted eyes, noses tending even slightly towards flat or hooked shapes, wider nostrils puffy lips, olive skin, dark hair, brown eyes, brachycephalic skulls or receding chins would be accepted.

If someone feels like he stands close enough to this description he should contact us in the following Telegram group: @ZEROILLEGALITY

The name is not a joke. There is nothing illegal here, we don’t spread our views, which could be considered hate speech, we don’t hurt anyone, nor do we plan anything dangerous, violent or illegal, and if anyone suggests such a thing he will be kicked immediately. What we do is simply constructing a private circle of friends who happen to look like us and think like us. Is this going to fix everything overnight? No, but it’s a step into the right direction. Feel free to share this to people wo share our views and fit our expectations.

Categories
Correspondence

Imperium

by Gaedhal

Let us take the problem of pornography. Pornography cannot be banned anywhere unless it is banned everywhere. To ban pornography, anywhere—and thus everywhere—would require global governance.

The beginnings of global systems of governance such as the UN and Interpol allow us to tackle the global problem that is the trafficking in child-abuse imagery on a global scale.

Ultimately, I am not a white nationalist, I am a white globalist: I want a white globalist imperium. However, that imperium would consist of self-governing vassal states. To the extent that these vassal states or client states do not cause any global problems, the Global Imperium would leave them alone. However, once a vassal state starts causing global problems, then the legions are sent in to subdue them.

 

______ 卐 ______

 

Editor’s 2 cents:

This is precisely what Adolf Hitler attempted. For having lost, look at the grotesque state Europe is in now. By the way, I fixed a few typos of my article about my visit to Europe this year, and the revised PDF can be read here (I’ll delete the now-obsolete PDF later today).

Categories
Catholic religious orders Correspondence

Marcial Maciel

— my antipode —

When I read William Pierce’s Who We Are years ago, I was struck by Pierce’s assertion that forming a society requires people deeply committed to the cause—what we here call the priesthood of the sacred words. Without such committed individuals, he argued, a lasting society cannot be formed.

That is very true: and the only way to form it would be, as Lycurgus ordered, for the meals of that religious-military order that was the Spartans to be communal in order to achieve adequate bonding between men.

No one now follows the precepts of Lycurgus, although it is more than obvious that there should be a group of us living very close together, always eating together, to get to know each other better. As Benjamin said in his email today, “It’s the same with all the rest of them online! None of them seem to want to get to know each other on a more personal basis, so all proper male bonding is out the window, and thus an organization can’t form”. He added:

It’s been ages since someone said something substantial in the comments on The West’s Darkest Hour! (I’d say, just out of politeness to make an exception for Jamie, Jorge and Vinster though). There’s a reason I privately call them the hyenas. The lions have all decamped, or been killed off spiritually, and now it’s just these asinine feminine predators, circling, in a more distant lurker/helicopter visit crowd of what might as well be f**king flamingos.

As soon as it can ever be achieved, in desperate need, I think one of the first steps of a real revolution would be to send every current dissident right leader and popular ‘far-right’ website grifter the way of those university professors I mentioned in a recent comment. There’s no other way to upend the current order all across the right. At least rough them up; make them worried.

Ditto!

Yesterday and today I watched selected passages from the LOTR trilogy by Peter Jackson. While my featured article used an image from Game of Thrones (John Snow and Sam), the analogy of Frodo and Sam is actually more accurate for my argument. Alas, unlike LOTR Benjamin and I find ourselves completely alone in pursuing the goal of destroying the “One Ring”—i.e., gold and Christian ethics—that corrupted the Aryan spirit. Our effort lacks a “Fellowship of the Ring” because it was destroyed during the Hellstorm Holocaust (see my post this morning).

In the following century after the Hellstorm Holocaust, except us there is no one like Frodo and Sam, determined to walk for days in that horrible, rocky and volcanic landscape. No one I know wants to put the ring into the lava as resolutely as Ben and I: which obviously means working intellectually every day (on the other hand if an aspiring priest is employed by the System, he could still donate to the cause).

Today, I also watched the recently released HBO Max series Marcial Maciel: The Wolf of God. I find it odd that there is still no article about this miniseries on Wikipedia. Incidentally, I have sat down several times to talk with one of the interviewees in Marcial Maciel: The Wolf of God. I am referring to Don José Barba, who still lives in Mexico City.

As my earlier points in the featured article suggest, Ben and I are men against our time. It will be tough to find another man willing to take vows for our cause. By contrast, Marcial Maciel thrived as a man of his time: he drew thousands of children to his Catholic schools and amassed tremendous institutional power. Notably, his Legion of Christ at one point generated annually double the Vatican’s income: $600,000,000 dollars!

What an eloquent way to distinguish someone who trained priests in a multimillion-dollar fraternity that worships the god of the Jews and I, who aspire to the modest Aryan temple of which I posted an image yesterday. And the temple would be a luxury. I’m missing the most basic of all. In recent months, I have been suffering agonies since my siblings sold the house where I lived!

Behold a man against his time—that is, against the Christian era—and a man of his time like Maciel, so perfectly integrated into the calendar that begins with the mythical birth of J.C. Perhaps because of all this, we can understand Benjamin’s words in his email today:

I’d like a list in my head: what requires one person [committed to the sacred words]; what requires two people; what requires three people to achieve, etc. —currently I’m stumped.

I too am perplexed that there are only two of us who believe that the “ring” is what is worth destroying (the JQ is just the consequence of the kings of the West wielding the slave rings to the One Ring).

Metaphors aside, even a single person with a modest job could do us a favour with a modest monthly donation. Someone who is unemployed and aspires to the priesthood of the temple could also contribute greatly (for example, by dedicating himself to preaching our philosophy in the comments section of other racialist forums). But for the moment, there are only two of us priests.

It is curious that Maciel—who created a fabulous empire—and I—who now even suffer from terrible anxiety at the possibility of becoming homeless—have lived most of our lives in Mexico. Although the paedophile is now dead, we were, and spiritually are, perfect antipodes.

Categories
Correspondence

Mail

by Benjamin

“The silence of the site frustrates me too. You’ve put up consistently excellent material recently (and indeed from over the last year) and it’s all been ignored. It’s agony for me to process that, unfathomable disappointment. I think the reason it disappoints me so much is that I know the threat we’re under, and thus, knowing there aren’t any good people gives me less hope of a solid Aryan pushback”.

Categories
Correspondence

Hello César,

Hope you are doing well. I’m back in the old country.

It seems you found a perspective-changer in Them and Us. If you deem this work to be important, it is only right that I delve into it too. Anthropology can be quite fascinating, and there’s much to learn in the tens of millennia of our evolutionary history.

Be aware, though, the topic of Neanderthals can be a divisive one. Varg Vikernes, a vehement Nordicist, believes that we actually descend from Neanderthals, not Homo Sapiens.

He believes Neanderthals were a superior race, due to their skull size and body strength; that Sapiens were an African racial inferior who, through the use of civilisation and its technological advantages, defeated and outbred their forest-dwelling, big-brained cousins.

I have a lot of respect for Vikernes, but I think he is biased towards Neanderthals due to his anti-civilisational worldview, which is clouding his judgment.

Here is a link to Varg’s website, where he “debunks” anti-Neanderthalism.

I centre my philosophy on the 4 Words. I believe it took astronomic hatred to birth blue-eyed beauties into this world.

If you wish to post this email as a comment on WDH, go ahead.

Cheers,

Mauricio

Categories
Correspondence

“I hate…

…nothing more than sitting in my study office, day after day, as the weeks pile up, feeling impotent, raging, and yearning to be able to make a difference, yet knowing that one person is simply not enough, and that not enough people so far are this angry, and this embittered against our many enemies, not knowing how to proceed (and not for a lack of imagination)”.

Categories
Correspondence Racial right Solitude

Silencio

The tragedy of Friedrich Nietzsche’s life was that it happened to be a one-man show, a monodrama wherein no other actor entered upon the stage: not a soul is at his side to succour him; no woman is there to soften by her ever-present sympathy the stresses of the atmosphere. Every action takes its birth in him, and its repercussions are felt by him alone. Not one person ventures to enter wholeheartedly into the innermost sanctum of Nietzsche’s destiny; the poet-philosopher is doomed to speak, to struggle, to suffer alone. He converses with no one, and no one has anything to say to him. What is even more terrible is that none hearken to his voice. —Stefan Zweig

Today, Benjamin sent me an email containing this paragraph: “I’m disappointed no one else even seems to have clicked my link to the page though (or if they have, from my analytics they haven’t stayed more than two minutes—odd with an easy-access layout one-page site containing many hours of content). Bar the psychiatry focus, and the veganism, I thought I was basically covering topics we talk about all the time on WDH. I don’t understand (my perennial problem: trying to analyse the apathetic) why they’re not interested. Maybe they haven’t got 6 quid. I hope not, or our movement is screwed”.

This is something that, in the past, has seemed like an extraordinary phenomenon to me, and I would like to respond to Benjamin in the second person singular:

As I’ve told you several times, even years before you found my site, when I posted quite insightful entries and thought some of them would have a large quorum, no one said a peep, and over time I invented a saying that I used to say to myself in soliloquies: “Here come the silent ones…!” in the sense that they left me talking to myself, over and over again.

It was so exasperating that, occasionally, as I’ve also confessed to you, I let the insulting trolls’ comments slide because I preferred the insults to have the racialists apply what the Germans call “death by silence” tactic. (My family, relatives, friends, therapist and acquaintances “killed me with silence”. No one wanted to know anything about what was happening at home, and it was precisely because no one wanted to listen that I dedicated myself to writing about the family tragedy.)

As I told you by email, the silence of the visitors began several years ago, when it became clear that my criticisms of white nationalism were going to be incisive, constant, and persistent. That scared everyone away. And they are fundamental criticisms: I was trying, and am trying, to shift the paradigm from the JQ to the CQ. And I do this not because I side with the Jews: I believe they should be expelled to Madagascar, Hitler’s original idea (or to Israel, although that country has already become a precarious place, and the war with Iran could evolve into a regional war).

I suspect that the relative silence in the comments section is due to what Thomas Kuhn said about a paradigm shift. The old guard first ignores the new paradigm (admirably summarised in yesterday’s post, citing your book!). When it’s no longer possible to ignore the new paradigm, let’s say if voices like yours were to multiply (obviously, we’re not there yet), the old guard fiercely opposes the new paradigm. Finally, the new paradigm is accepted as the most natural thing, although that only happens with the biological death of the old guard who controlled the boundaries of discourse. The new generations are seeing that the old paradigm was wrong or at least incomplete: something that, to preserve their egos, the older generations were reluctant to concede.

It’s similar to what Scott Peck says about narcissistic parents who never admit that they might have made a mistake with one of their children. It also reminds me of the case of a girl diagnosed as schizophrenic in one of Ronald Laing’s books. Laing wrote that it was precisely because the mother was incapable of accepting an ounce of guilt that her daughter was so disturbed.

The same thing happens with white nationalists: they are incapable of accepting that our civilisation took the wrong path many centuries ago. These nationalists maintain a working hypothesis that resembles a religious dogma: Jewry is responsible for our misfortunes. We say: Jewry is very powerful in the West and very subversive: but whites empowered them by destroying the religion whose Gods represented the Aryan collective unconscious, replacing it with the Judeo-Christian collective unconscious. As Emperor Julian saw when the transition from one collective unconscious to another was underway, “Why were you so ungrateful to our Gods as to desert them for the Jews?”

Contrary to what Hitler privately confessed to his closest friends, today’s nationalists are like the mother of the schizophrenic woman: they don’t accept an iota of blame. Compared to intelligent people like William Pierce, who wrote Who We Are, or scholars like Revilo Oliver, the ideology of today’s nationalists, besides being simplistic, represents a giant step backwards. If we follow the Rubicon metaphor it’s as if, after two solid steps toward the other side of the river—racial realism and becoming aware of JQ—instead of moving forward, these racialists panic about what they begin to glimpse through the fog on the other side. Transvaluing implies genocidal actions against our enemies and, like a magnet pulling them toward Normieland due to their Christian programming, they begin to take steps backwards instead of forward to finally cross the river toward National Socialism.

We can’t do anything with these cowards. We must be very patient. If Kuhn was right, the older generations—in our case, the white nationalists—will have to die. Perhaps those who are now Aryan children, or even unborn minds will have a better chance of seeing things differently: of discovering this site and embracing the post-1945 National Socialist antichristian worldview. But trying to do so with the hundreds of conservatives who comment on, say, The Unz Review and other racialist forums is a fool’s errand.

Since I’m already in my sixties I hope that if death were to surprise me, our work wouldn’t disappear but that I could pass the mantle to someone younger, like you: someone who would maintain the content of this site, especially the PDFs where the vital information is condensed.

And when it comes to the havoc that abusive parents wreak on their offspring, the situation is even worse! The taboo is universal due to the “problem of the attachment with the perp”, a concept explained in my Day of Wrath. However, if it makes you feel better, I received an email today from a Panamanian who asked me to share the link to your site, which I did.

Categories
Correspondence Justice / revenge Kalki

Moving again…

The tenants called me about my visit yesterday to a mini-flat in a prime area of ​​the city. That means I won’t be blogging, except perhaps approving a few comments, in the coming days and weeks until I’m settled back in the capital.

Incidentally, I didn’t let Adunai’s comment go through today because he’s banned, but as compensation I’ll quote his words which he emailed me shortly after my recent trip to Europe:

I would really love a nuclear annihilation of all the cities in Europe, because only a destruction of statehood might give a chance for a spiritual rebirth. Kill all politicians, all media people, all ideology peddlers, all university staffs, literally everyone must die for the functioning of the System to cease. This is my baseline level.

I reiterate what I’ve said several times. The malignant psychosis of today’s white man is such that only an apocalypse could reset the button of his collective unconscious so that the few survivors may regain a primal Lebenskraft.

Categories
Axiology Correspondence

César,

I was worried about you, there, but it turns out that you had taken a trip to the Vaterland.

Here is an interesting short from woke atheist, Rebecca Watson.

‘When I lost belief in God, I didn’t loose belief in anything else.’

I.e. the Christian axiology.

She says, further, that as soon as she lost belief in God she immediately became a humanist. As Revilo P. Oliver points out: humanism is merely atheistic Christianity.

When someone believes in the Christian god, their equalitarianism is anchored to the mores of the 1st-century C.E. Their equalitarianism is tethered to the conservative Jewish culture that gave us Saul and Jesus. However, when one stops believing in the Judeo-Christian god, “but not anything else”, then this equalitarianism remains and goes hyper. It is no longer tethered to the Conservative Jewish society that spawned Saul and Jesus. It thus goes hyper. Your “red-giant” analogy is brilliant. Woke atheism is merely a godless Christianity that has lost its supernatural core. In the same way that a red giant goes hyper, so does Neo-Christianty. The equalitarianism of Christianity slips away from its 1st-century Jewish moorings, and becomes a monster, or red giant, or red ogre, perhaps!

Sincerely,

Gaedhal