web analytics

Author: C .T.

Categories
Child abuse

Lidz

I want to expand on what I discussed yesterday with Benjamin about the trauma model of mental disorders because the topic is a universal taboo, including in the racialist community, to the point that catastrophes like those of William Pierce and Don Black’s children are incomprehensible. (My working hypothesis is that, had they been treated well as children, they would have followed in their parents’ footsteps instead of betraying their ideals.)

It all has to do with the omnipresent taboo, and I’d like to illustrate it with the first reading I ever did of a mental health professional who, unlike bio-reductionist psychiatry, which is pseudoscientific, was one of the pioneers in talking about parents who schizophrenized their children.

Theodore Lidz

It was 1983 when I was broke precisely because of the abuse I had suffered at home the previous decade. At the famous Gandhi Bookstore in Mexico City, I read the interview with Dr Theodore Lidz in the book Laing and Anti-Psychiatry, edited by Robert Boyers and Robert Orrill. Back then, there were no comfortable armchairs like those found in Barnes & Noble bookstores, and I had to read that long interview standing up because the subject fascinated me. It was the first time in my life I had read someone who came close to what I believed had happened in my family.

Seven years later, I managed to buy a copy of Boyers and Orrill’s book, translated into Spanish by Alianza Editorial of Madrid, which was the same edition I had read at the Gandhi Bookstore. Since I don’t have the original English version, I can’t quote a passage from the interview with Lidz verbatim, but I can restate its content.

When the interviewer asked if Lidz was surprised that books on schizophrenia, like those by Ronald Laing, had become popular among young people (this is a 1971 book and reflected the mood of the 1960s), Lidz replied that he was surprised that Laing wrote for the general public and not for a professional audience. What struck me as I reread that interview yesterday was that Lidz added that it wasn’t the public’s business to know what happens in these families, even though Laing might have altered the details to make his cases anonymous. Lidz added that, in his work on cases of schizogenic parents—that is, those who drive their children mad—he wasn’t able to publish the reports of most of the families because some of the parents were quite well-known, and even with pseudonyms, they could have been recognised. He added that some of the cases ran to 50 to 80 typewritten pages, ‘truly precious documents’, but that they couldn’t be published.

This struck me greatly because in my Letter to Mom Medusa, I cite a case in which Lidz violated what he said above: the case of Mrs Newcomb (a pseudonym) and her extremely passive husband, who helped me so much in understanding my parents.

On the next page I reread yesterday, Lidz, with whom I spoke on the phone in the 1990s when he was already quite old, surprised me again because he wrote that he didn’t believe the schizogenic parents had done anything wrong; that they hadn’t meant to harm the child, and that this contrasted with what Laing wrote, for whom the parents’ intentions were often malicious. Lidz added, and here I retranslate it again from my Spanish copy into English, that ‘parents do the best they can—they can’t be different from what they are’.

This goes against the thesis of my autobiographical books, where I say that my father could have chosen the good: not to be influenced by the lies his wife told about me, but rather should have communicated with me in my adolescence (cf. both the final pages of Hojas Susurrantes and the first chapter of ¿Me Ayudarás?).

It’s been forty-two years since I first read the very lucid interview with Lidz standing in the Gandhi Bookstore, an interview that was a turning point in the research I did on my parents. It’s only natural that after so many years, my thinking has matured, largely due to the work of Alice Miller: the first psychologist in history who, unlike her predecessors (like Lidz), unequivocally took the side of the victimized child. (Despite what Lidz said, Laing didn’t completely side with the victim either, as we see in the middle chapter of my Hojas Susurrantes.)

In the previous thread, Benjamin complained that the racial right couldn’t care less about the issue, to which I responded that the German woman who received the mantle after Alice Miller died said that blaming parents is the most potent taboo in the human psyche. I’m posting this entry because, I see now, the taboo was present even in the works of my admired mentors, whom I read decades ago. The abysmal difference between them and us is that, in siding with the victim, we don’t care about what Lidz and company feared: that the public would realise which families the clinical material refers to, those ‘truly precious documents’ he didn’t dare publish (and which would have done enormous good for our cause had they been published!).

Do you now understand the new literary genre that people like John Modrow, Benjamin and I want to inaugurate? By siding a hundred per cent with the victim, not only do we not care about people recognising the abusive families, but we write using their real names!

Only revenge heals the wounded soul, even though we’re talking about literary revenge.

Categories
Quotable quotes

Xtianity

‘The kind of society you want to create, Christianity makes impossible’.

—Alex Linder

Categories
Benjamin (commenter) Poetry

A poem

in memory of the German war dead

Only thanks to the help of an old friend, who offered me his house as storage, yesterday I managed to save the furniture that accompanied me in my home during my childhood and adolescence. Now I need to complete the long bureaucratic process to rent a modest flat in a decent area of the capital.

While I settle in, a helpful way to spend the time would be to listen to this poem, and also these audio clips from Benjamin’s books.

Being a ‘man against his time’ not only means revaluing the values regarding the heroic National Socialists who died in the war, but also inverting them equally when it comes to other lies accepted by society—such as psychiatry and what really causes mental disorders.

If the racialists understood what Benjamin and I have written in our autobiographical books, things like the grotesque betrayal of Don Black’s son, or the betrayal of William Pierce’s son, wouldn’t have happened; and I dare say David Irving’s daughter wouldn’t have become schizophrenic.

It’s time for contemporary racialists to stop believing the System’s lies (psychiatry is taught in every medical school). A good way to do so is to start familiarising onseself with the literature of those of us who have survived truly hellish adolescences.

Categories
Catholic Church

Sin

by Gaedhal

Eradica used to have a saying: the daily outrage. Grifters such as Sargon of Akkad have found a way to monetise the daily outrage. Similarly with redpill and manosphere content: they have found a way to monetize the daily outrage. This is why I cut outrage-bait from my feed. However, new sources of outrage bait continually crop up, as baiting outrage is an extremely lucrative endeavour.

What is missed in all of this is that the Christian Churches in Ireland, North and South—when we subtract the Levantine Hocus Pocus and blood-magic Voodoo from them—are simply just government funded NGOs who advance the Great Replacement. It was the Roman Catholic Church and Sister Stan who set up the Irish Immigrants’ council. The Catholic angle in all of this is conveniently ignored by Catholic Nationalists such as John McGuirk and Niamh Nic Mathúna.

GRIPT has links to Roman Catholic Youth Defence and the Catholic Nationalist family the McMahons—or, unpronounceably, the Mac Mathúnas. But the Roman Catholic Church is the biggest NGO, in Ireland, that is behind the plantation.

I personally, do not agree with “debates” such as this, as it sends out the signal that the 14 words are up to debate, that we can only advance the 14 words, if we “win” debates such as these. Similarly, I don’t agree with electioneering, as the 14 words does not depend upon a majority of the mob, in a rigged system, agreeing with us.

One of the reasons why I am not a democrat is just the effeminacy of the thing. Genocides—population displacement is genocide—and invasions such as these are not repelled by debates and electioneering. Voting harder has never once repelled a genocide or an invasion. Muh debates has never once repelled a genocide or an invasion. And if the white Irish are too stupid cowardly and effeminate to realise this then they deserve to go extinct. Ultimately nature is fair. Nature might be so cruel that it is impossible for any Classically theistic gods to exist, however Nature is fair.

Nature has given white men several opportunities in the past to adhere to the laws of nature and to dominate the entire planet. White men have squandered every single one of these opportunities. The white race has committed this sin against the Holy Ghost countless times, against nature, and yet nature is more forgiving than Rabbi Jesus, and instead of consigning us to the flames of total societal destruction, has forgiven us and given us more and more chances.

But even Nature’s patience will, one day, eventually wear out. Eventually White men will sin away their days of grace as far as nature is concerned, and nature will condemn Homo Sapiens Candidus to be one of the 99.9% of the species that went extinct… and do you know what? This will be fair. Nature, after consigning whites to extinction will then turn to the Jews, or the Chinese, and they will inherit the earth. As Dr. Robert Morgan points out: it is impossible to save a race that does not want to be saved. The white race has contracted toxoplasmosis—I argue that it contracted this toxoplasmosis from Christianity—and is doing everything in its power to bring about its own destruction.

We all know what has to be done.

Perhaps the reason why I feel such an affinity with Loyalism, these days, is because I recognise that Rome Rule is destroying the country. Carson, Craig et al. were correct to reject the Rome Rule of Ireland. The Roman Church is the primary instigator of population displacement in Ireland, and thus it is the primary genocider of the Irish.

P.S. Some of the sins against the Holy Ghost are obduracy in sin, presumption and opposing the known truth. All three of these sins against the Holy Ghost have been committed by the white race. Another sin against the Holy Ghost in preconciliar Catholicism is despair, but our Führer told us never to despair and to praise victory.

Categories
Correspondence Justice / revenge Kalki

Moving again…

The tenants called me about my visit yesterday to a mini-flat in a prime area of ​​the city. That means I won’t be blogging, except perhaps approving a few comments, in the coming days and weeks until I’m settled back in the capital.

Incidentally, I didn’t let Adunai’s comment go through today because he’s banned, but as compensation I’ll quote his words which he emailed me shortly after my recent trip to Europe:

I would really love a nuclear annihilation of all the cities in Europe, because only a destruction of statehood might give a chance for a spiritual rebirth. Kill all politicians, all media people, all ideology peddlers, all university staffs, literally everyone must die for the functioning of the System to cease. This is my baseline level.

I reiterate what I’ve said several times. The malignant psychosis of today’s white man is such that only an apocalypse could reset the button of his collective unconscious so that the few survivors may regain a primal Lebenskraft.

Categories
Kali Yuga Mexico City

Uncle

Beto’s house

I recently complained that in Europe I saw a huge number of non-white people in a West whose new faith seems to be the extinction of the white man. These days I left the town where I live, where the only white person is my dentist, to look for a room in the big capital, where there are still some white people. The hotel where I was staying is near Magdalena Street in Mexico City, where my loved ones used to live. Now that area is a disaster due to the uncontrolled reproduction of Neanderthals.

The greatest outrage to the beautiful street of my memories is that where Magdalena #115, my Uncle Beto’s house, once stood, there is now a car park guarded by nacos.[1] The house was demolished long ago. I mention Uncle Beto in my trilogy, sharing several anecdotes that portray him as the only relative who, as a young man, was a fan of National Socialist Germany. His house was beautiful: the only one where, decades ago, I saw a copy of Mein Kampf in his library. Seeing a hole in place of such a lovely house now ruled by nacos in a hideous, enormous car park that even extends to the other street on the same block, kills a part of my soul in the sense that my past with my loved ones (now almost all deceased or moved away) is part of my soul.

The Mexican capital has deteriorated far more than the European cities I recently visited, as the population growth of the nacos has been exponential. My once beloved Magdalena Street is just one example of what is gradually happening throughout the West.

I suffered greatly trying to find a mini-flat in a privileged area. What a difference with a movie I saw a long time ago, The Day the Earth Stood Still! If instead of nacos, blacks and gooks there were only whites, as in that 1951 film, it would be possible to find room and board in a house as decent as the one that the alien Mr Carpenter, whose image appears at the beginning of this post, saw when he was looking for shelter:

But in the same film, which I recently rewatched on YouTube, we see the cause of that demographic catastrophe that has already destroyed the best neighbourhoods of the Mexican capital, and is destroying Europe. In one scene, looking at the great statue of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., Mr Carpenter tells the boy that Lincoln ‘must have been a great man’.

Therein lie the Christian roots, as talking about Lincoln Dr Robert Morgan has so often pointed out in the comments section of The Unz Review, of the current replacement of whites by coloureds. If Christian ethics hadn’t taken hold of the soul of the white man, or if Hitler had won the war as my uncle Beto wanted, perhaps his decent house would still exist instead of the Dantesque hell I encountered yesterday while walking through Magdalena Street.

By the way, I will be absent from blogging again during the days when I move, once more, to the capital.
____________

[1] In Mexico a naco is a person vulgar or uneducated, regardless of economic status, although it is often used as a racial slur.

Categories
Axiology Correspondence

César,

I was worried about you, there, but it turns out that you had taken a trip to the Vaterland.

Here is an interesting short from woke atheist, Rebecca Watson.

‘When I lost belief in God, I didn’t loose belief in anything else.’

I.e. the Christian axiology.

She says, further, that as soon as she lost belief in God she immediately became a humanist. As Revilo P. Oliver points out: humanism is merely atheistic Christianity.

When someone believes in the Christian god, their equalitarianism is anchored to the mores of the 1st-century C.E. Their equalitarianism is tethered to the conservative Jewish culture that gave us Saul and Jesus. However, when one stops believing in the Judeo-Christian god, “but not anything else”, then this equalitarianism remains and goes hyper. It is no longer tethered to the Conservative Jewish society that spawned Saul and Jesus. It thus goes hyper. Your “red-giant” analogy is brilliant. Woke atheism is merely a godless Christianity that has lost its supernatural core. In the same way that a red giant goes hyper, so does Neo-Christianty. The equalitarianism of Christianity slips away from its 1st-century Jewish moorings, and becomes a monster, or red giant, or red ogre, perhaps!

Sincerely,

Gaedhal

Categories
Benjamin (commenter) Racial right

Dear César,

Thank you for your email. I’m sorry to hear you are in such abject unhappiness. I hope returning to your childhood area helps you. I grew up on the outskirts of a tiny, picturesque country village. I don’t know if it would let me down these days if I returned and examined it in adult detail, but all I remember from then are miles of bright cornfields and flower meadows, horses, and fields of cows, the scent of manure, and wood smoke, and plenty of butterflies. It’s a shame the atmosphere inside my family home did not match the delightful pastoral exterior, at least not for very long. Still, it’s good therapy to extricate yourself from what sounds like a nightmare town. As an honorary ‘country person’ I’ve never liked living in cities or towns much. I can’t imagine what it would feel like to live in an area with no white faces. I imagine it would make me paranoid, as if they were ‘closing in’. I look at the classic illustrations of Rome in about 400-500 AD, totally decayed and vulgar, fallen to pieces, and terribly depressing, and I think of our countries these days.

As with myself, I know you are betting on a currency collapse to aid your financial situation. I often feel I have let myself down by not having a job which could provide for us ([my girlfriend] and myself, but also donations), but then I remember that I was at various university courses until age 26, then spent longer than a decade after that in regular psychosis which only really went into remission once I wrote my books (and with the trial out of the way), and I remember that, on this account, I’ve simply been too busy/ill. I wish I could help you out more financially. None of my myriad self-employment creative efforts ever sell.

I was shocked by Europe. True, the buildings and statues were awe-inspiring, especially compared with the slum of Britain, but it was simply eye candy, and, when placed in context with the degenerate soullessness of the natives, somehow garish, and totally empty. A decent civilization requires decent quality people. I was surprised more did not comment on your report.

That’s the long-term problem with your site—it’s erudite, and intensely detailed, and high-brow (and challenging both intellectually and ethically) unlike the stale, pop journalist circle-jerk of Unz for example, or the smug hipster pretension of C-C. You know what you get there. I imagine it’s like cocaine to them, their daily slew of bland articles. Ego-stroking prolefeed, to do no more than delay vast numbers, and keep them vegetating in their echo-chamber. I should rephrase: the problem is not your site, it’s that people are idiots. I’m left waiting for the likes of Walsh to get out of prison so they can come back to commenting (although I imagine he’ll be monitored pretty tightly in aftermath).

I re-read your PDF booklet on American racialism recently. I didn’t realise there were so many small NS movements, all highly unsuccessful. It seemed to go in cycles. I noticed that the hardest point is always finding, recruiting, and holding onto people. It’s like NS is on the whole dead, somehow. The British Movement disappointed me terribly recently. It seems I was right—this country has no National Socialist presence. It’s just scores of bourgeois dissident rightists here and there, some with swastika paraphernalia, and fat, football hooligan punks.

I have to go shortly, I have a health appointment. I’ll write more later.

Best regards,

Ben

Categories
David Irving Holocaust

Irving

on the holocaust

Really fascinating to watch!

Categories
'Hitler' (book by Brendan Simms) Racial right

Another pdf!

From 18 November 2023 until 12 January this year I had been publishing some extracts from Brendan Simms’ book on Hitler. I will no longer quote it at length. But I have just edited a PDF that can serve not only as an introduction to Simms’s intellectual biography—in the sense of trying to understand Hitler’s ideas— but for something more important.

I am referring to the fact that, even eighty years after the fateful 1945, the American racial right still fails to understand fundamental aspects of National Socialism. I hope that our ‘Hitler’ PDF will serve not only to make them, at last, begin to understand Uncle Adolf, but also the German—and European—degenerates I saw earlier this month on my recent visit to continental Europe. In his book, Simms observed:

Hitler rose to new heights of invective against the German middle class, whom he dismissed as ‘philistines’, ‘bourgeois boobies’, who were so befuddled by the ‘fug of associational meetings’ that they were unable to transcend the ‘usual jingoism of our bourgeois world of today’. He contrasted the robustness of the SA, who knew that ‘terror can only be broken by terror’, with ‘bourgeois wimpishness’. Hitler also trenchantly restated his objections to parliamentarism and electoral politics, and western democracy in general, concluding that the ‘majority principle’ amounted to ‘the demolition of the Führer idea as such’.

Does one begin to understand why I have so much contempt for the racial right of our day, infinitely closer to American conservatism than to National Socialism? I recommend reading these excerpts from Simms’ book to anyone who wants to understand history’s darkest hour.