My account on X has been blocked because of these posts I made today (my comment was about a young Aryan woman and her family of niggers):
It’s clear I’ll never comment on that damned Elon Musk platform again, even though the ban only lasts half a day. If I can’t say what I think, what’s the point of talking?
Editor’s note: Although the author of this post on X is a Christian, and therefore an enemy, what he says is true except for the 6 million holocausted Jews. (Even in the famous David Irving trial, both the defence and the prosecution had to acknowledge that the number of Jews who died in WWII was no more than 4 million.)
Remember that this year I made a pilgrimage to Dachau because I not only approve of what Himmler did there, but because I want us to found an archipelago of Dachaus throughout the West after the holy racial wars bring us to power.
The Christian posted:
______ 卐 ______
Catholics who find themselves defending or downplaying Hitler should read this to the end.
It’s time to put it to rest.
Adolf Hitler was not a misguided patriot. He was one of the Church’s most determined enemies.
He personally authorized the annihilation of six million Jews.
He ordered the gassing of the disabled, the sterilization of those he judged defective, and the deliberate starvation of prisoners in a program that began with children and never truly ended.
He filled Dachau with Catholic clergy; hundreds were worked to death or died under medical experiments.
Bishops who preached against euthanasia faced arrest.
The Gestapo dissolved every independent Catholic youth organization in Germany. Catholic newspapers were banned, publishing houses seized, confessional schools closed or converted to state use.
The Concordat he signed in 1933 was violated before the ink dried.
In his own recorded words he called Christianity “an invention of the Jew” and “the heaviest blow that ever struck humanity,” declaring that the Church would be eradicated once the war was won. His inner circle confirmed the plan was total.
Pius XI answered with Mit brennender Sorge, the only encyclical in history smuggled into a country and read from every Catholic pulpit on the same Sunday, condemning the idolatry of race and blood, and National Socialism itself, by name.
Maximilian Kolbe, Edith Stein, Franz Jägerstätter, and thousands of others laid down their lives rather than accommodate that regime for a single moment.
There is no Catholic path that passes through admiration for Hitler, sympathy for his movement, or silence about what he did.
The only response compatible with the Catholic faith is this: remember it exactly as it was, and reject it entirely.
______ 卐 ______
Editor’s note: Let’s rephrase: The only response compatible with the faith of the priest of the sacred words, the Hitlerist, is this: remember it exactly as it was and accept it entirely.
Nymph of yore.
Nymph of today.
A Spanish speaker posted the following on X, which I will now translate:
Piers Morgan (pure Boomer) vs. Nick Fuentes (radical Zoomer): the interview is a surgical X-ray of the generation gap. These guys speak completely incomprehensible languages and are driven by entirely opposing ideas.
One grew up in the era when the labels “Nazi,” “anti-Semitic,” “homophobic,” or “racist” functioned as an instant social guillotine: simply uttering them was enough to make the accused kneel, beg for forgiveness, and disappear off the face of the earth.
The other grew up in the era when those same words became badges of honour, war trophies, visible proof that you don’t kneel before the official religion of globalist progressivism. The Boomer tries to use them as a method of control; the Zoomer wipes his ass with them.
The Boomer tries, time and again, to activate the old control mechanism: he raises an eyebrow, raises his voice, launches the sacred accusation, expecting automatic submission.
The Zoomer smiles, shrugs, and basically replies, “Yeah, so what? Is that all you’ve got?” “Yes, I’m a Nazi, think what you want.”
There’s no shame, no withdrawal, no fear. Only defiance and mockery. The slightest conventionality has been eradicated from the dialogue.
And that, exactly that, is what drives the old-school boomers crazy: discovering that their moral nuclear weapon, which they wielded for decades, is now a wet firecracker. That they, who were the servile lapdogs of Zionism, can’t leave their ideological sperm in the next generation, and that, at best, they’ll receive a: “Take your cheap ideology and die with it, leave us alone, boomer.”
The average person hasn’t processed it yet, but the message has been sent: the spell is broken. The fracture will be total and extremely painful.
The words “nazi” and “racist” are equivalent to “pagan” in the Early Middle Ages or “witch” in the Late Middle Ages. Compared to the old Greco-Roman world, these Christian words—the Newspeak of the time—only had power when the Church had its secular arm that destroyed the dissenter. What Europeans don’t seem to realize is that in the land of the First Amendment, a 27-year-old can say these things and get away with it because there isn’t a secular arm to remove the infected sheep so he doesn’t infect the flock, to use the language of the inquisitors of old (always remember that two former commenters on this site are serving sentences of eight and seven years in the UK for “thought crimes”!).
It must have been around 2010 that Greg Johnson said in his fledgling webzine that a heretical statement from a notable figure could cause “a glitch in the Matrix”. Nick Fuentes’ ignorance regarding the Hellstorm Holocaust (what Stalin’s Asian hordes did in Germany) may disgust me big time, but despite his ignorance the glitch has occurred.
Now, new voices must emerge online, more mature than Nick’s, to continue this tactic of accepting labels (which in the Middle Ages led to the stake and today to European prisons) as badges of honour.
Yesterday, Sid Lukkassen posted the following on X:
What Nick Fuentes is trying to do, with his “Hitler is cool” pose, is to break The Final Seal. And that final seal is the lynchpin that holds the contemporary morality of the West together. “Hitler is evil” is The Final Seal, because it is literally more important to the establishment than voting rights for women, the climate-narrative and “Muslims are peaceful”.
Because once this seal is broken, it is possible again to conceptualize that White/European ethnic groups are worthy of self-esteem and pride in their achievements; that they have interests specific to them as a group. This concept of course defies globalism, technocracy and multiculturalism. All this is locked away behind “Hitler is Evil”. Once this seal is broken, the West will undergo a Copernican revolution—it will be what Auguste Comte and Michel Houellebecq call a “metaphysical upheaval”, in a moral and spiritual sense similar to the Crucifixion of Christ. A complete re-orientation of values.
Well, well! This is precisely what we’ve been saying on this site for a long time! Although Nick Fuentes is a greenhorn who “admires Stalin much more than Hitler,” as he confessed in his podcast monologue the same day as his interview with Piers Morgan, what Nick said about Hitler in that discussion—that he “was cool”—has shaken the Aryan collective unconscious, which is what interests us.
It’s true that I’ve said that the best mind the United States has produced is that of William Pierce. But Pierce made a colossal mistake by refusing to use Hitler as a central figure when he left Lincoln Rockwell’s organization. While Rockwell didn’t have Pierce’s intelligence, he was more noble. And the words of his successor, Matt Koehl, should be engraved in marble and in the hearts of every American Aryan who wants this new Copernican revolution to take place: “A race that rejects Him will surely perish.”
Greg Johnson has said that Nick doesn’t read books. If the Groypers could develop even a fraction of the severitas and gravitas required to save their race from extinction, they would read the abridged edition of The Gulag Archipelago that’s available on the market. And better yet: in addition to reading Solzhenitsyn, they would also read Hellstorm, which details the atrocities that Stalin’s willing executioners (many of them not Russians but Asian hordes) committed against defenceless Germans, including the mass rape of German women.
That’s why I so desperately want the dollar to collapse: so that the Zoomers will finally mature. Echoing the 4 words, without the necessary suffering (something both Revilo Oliver and Pierce foresaw), Americans will remain in “happy mode”: not only Nick and his Groypers, but a large part of the racial right. Before the collapse, only this kind of reading could mature one of these Zoomers who are celebrating what happened the other day on Morgan’s show. They’ve taken a baby step. Granted. Now, with these readings, they must continue crossing the Rubicon.
I think this is a good time to remember our dear friend Tom Goodrich, the author of Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, who died a year ago (exactly, on December 4th).
After posting this entry, I will delete the previous one, which I had titled “Groyped!”, and move it to the comments section of this post.
The reason for this change is what Nick Fuentes said yesterday: that he admired Stalin much more than Hitler because he had won the war.
That line of reasoning is as stupid as saying we should admire the House of Constantine because it won the war against pagan Rome. I realised this twisted way of thinking ever since I read William Pierce’s history of the white race: We admire the figures of Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar without realising the immense damage they did to the white race. Except Emperor Julian, the same could be said of the emperors of the House of Constantine, who destroyed the Aryan Gods to impose the god of the Jews on us: something that literally transvalued our values to the values of the Jews.
Nick Fuentes is a greenhorn, and his perpetual immaturity reflects the fact that Americans haven’t suffered the way Revilo Oliver said they should before a true paradigm shift takes place. That gravitas, like that of the Republican Romans before Caesar’s actions started the Melting Pot empire, can only develop years after the dollar collapses and American society descends into utter chaos. We badly need the fall of this new Rome.
Until that happens, we will continue defending the Hitlerian faith on this site, even though very few people listen to me in the desert where I preach.
Many years ago, I think it was 2007, before I discovered the white nationalist forums that split my intellectual life in twain, I used to interact with Alice Miller fans (before 2010, I dedicated myself body and soul to writing about the devastating effects of parental abuse on children). A Dutchman told me that my depression stemmed from unprocessed pain from my past and quoted Miller.
His explanation seemed misguided and simplistic, since it was obvious that the lack of a degree, and consequently a job (in the Third World it’s very difficult to prosper without a university degree, unless you inherit a family business), was what was bothering me.
Now I’m still unemployed, but at least I’ve finally understood not only what happened in my family, which took me decades to write about. (Unlike a novel, I had to wait until both my parents died, and my only non-traitorous sister also died, to finish writing the last page.) At the same time, I understood another depressing factor: the reason for the darkest hour in the West, thanks to the authors who enlightened me, whose texts can be read on this site.
Enlightenment on matters of family tragedy, or on the situation of white man’s ethno-suicide, represents only a couple of steps toward recovering one’s spirits. This morning I was answering an email from a visitor to this blog, in which I said that what we need is a kind of Spartan syssitia in which, through daily podcasts, we communicate with young Aryans in a way that is infinitely better than what Nick Fuentes does, because we are the National Socialists of the 21st century.
It seems absurd to me that those of us who want to do something effective in the world aren’t at least living on the same block to eat the three meals together, as the Spartan soldiers did. It’s impossible to recover our spirits if we don’t get together!
It’s true that a syssitia like the one I’m proposing is missing something fundamental. In Sparta, every man was expected to marry and procreate (incidentally, even after marriage the soldier ate with other soldiers to solidify the Männerbund). But given that the laws and culture of recent decades have completely corrupted women, for the moment what I propose is simply to meet like those Parisian salons before the Revolution. And although we couldn’t say anything illegal on the podcast, we would prepare young people to think in a revolutionary way. Women would come later: when, thanks to the Revolution and the laws of the Aryan state, we have already transvalued values.
Lately, I’ve been reposting images like this on X:
What’s hard for young people is waking up to the fact that this prize, marriage to a real woman—unlike the Gomorrahite freaks of today—could only be accomplished after the Revolution. Before then, it is impossible given the fiercely ethno-suicidal nature of Western culture and its laws against us. But the first step, I insist, is for this vanguard of priests of the sacred words to live under the same roof, or on the same block, to share meals and transmit our radical message to the dispossessed youth.
It will be impossible to get depressed under those conditions…
and the survival of the West, 4
by Revilo Oliver (1973)
Chapter Four THE PREDICTABLE FUTURE
Christendom is no longer Christendom. The faith that Christ was literally the Son of God, which dominated the Western world for fifteen centuries, and effectively united all the men of our race for ten, has become the faith of a minority. […]
One common ground for hope is, at best, uncertain. We Americans, thanks to our folly, will soon undergo a considerable amount of physical suffering: domestic violence, economic collapse, probably some starvation, quite possibly conquest by foreign invaders and resident revolutionists. It is true that, as history shows, such afflictions usually induce a revival of religion, and many Christians expect such an effect here. That is not likely in the future that we can foresee. For one thing, the historical effect requires an unremitting and prolonged suffering—thirty years or more. The Crusade to Save the Soviet in 1939-1945 inflicted great suffering on many nations of Europe, especially Germany and Poland, but produced no significant religious revival. Secondly, if there should be such an effect, it probably would not benefit Christianity. The Protestant Churches as a whole have long been disgraced by the pinks and punks of the National Council. The Catholic Church is now committing suicide by repudiating its own doctrines and burlesquing its traditions. In the eyes of non-believers now, the religion has been compromised by the antics of the greater part of the professional clergy, and despite the admirable loyalty of “traditionalist” and “fundamentalist” minorities, it is likely that the coming disasters will—unjustly, but understandably—make Christianity seem a religion that failed. Thus any revival of religiosity will benefit cults that will have the attraction of novelty and a new “revelation,” possibly including some doctrine of metempsychosis.
We are left, therefore, with the present situation and very little hope that it will or can be soon altered. So we had better reckon with it, whatever our personal desires or convictions.
The visible consequences of the withering of our religion are enormous, overshadowing, frightening. Christianity was much more than a religion comparable to the religion of Osiris in early Egypt, the worship of the Olympian gods, the Orphic mysteries, or Mithraism. Unlike those cults in their time and place, Christianity for a large part of our history was the whole formal basis of our entire culture, the absolute from which were deduced our moral codes, our laws, and our political systems; it largely informed our art, inspired our literature, animated our music, and sustained our men of science. The void that has been left is so great that few can peer into the dark abyss without vertigo. […]
If Christ was not literally the Son of God, the entire morality on which our civilization was consciously based for so long seems to collapse, to vanish as an illusion, to be as unfounded as the old nation that the earth was flat. [Editor's Note: This gives me carte blanche for my exterminationist fantasies.] And this apparent dissolution includes all of the ancient Indo-European morality that guided our peoples in the many centuries that preceded our adoption of Christianity.[1] That is obviously what is happening—has happened today, when we witness everywhere tacit and explicit repudiation of all morality—not only Christian teaching, but the antecedent and basic morality without which civilization is flatly impossible. And, what is even more disheartening, there seems to be no basis left for any morality.
For a long time, men, except a few romantic and evangelical atheists, have agreed that a viable morality must be based on a religious faith. Hesiod, whom some scholars place in the ninth century B.C., warned the judges of his day that Zeus had 30,000 invisible and immortal observers who go through the whole earth and report the evil deeds of men. A discerning correspondent, whose letter reached me yesterday, remarks that “unfortunately, most people need to feel that they are watched by a superhuman power.”
For Aristotle, Plato, and Cicero, civilized society must be based on a generally accepted and uniform religious faith. And, with few exceptions, the thoughtful non-Christians of our world have held the same opinion. Renan, for example, took leave of Christianity with elegiac sadness and deep apprehension: “What is ominous is that we cannot foresee for the future any means of giving men a code of conduct that they will generally accept… I frankly admit that I cannot imagine how it will be possible to restore, without the ancient illusions, the foundations of a noble and serene life.”
On a quite different level, the pragmatic and cynical Augustus believed religion the indispensable basis of political stability, and many rulers and statesmen, before him and after him, had the same conviction. And some of the world’s most acute minds have drawn the conclusions that Machiavelli, perhaps, stated most bluntly:
Principalities and republics that would save themselves from decadence must above all other things keep uncorrupted the ceremonies of their religion, and hold it always in veneration; for there can be no greater symptom of the ruin of a state than to see divine rites held in contempt… They should therefore use every opportunity to foster and augment their religion, even though they perceive it to be false; and the more prudent they are and the more they know about natural phenomena, the greater their obligation to do this.
It is now too late to heed Machiavelli ‘s warning. The disaster that he apprehended has come upon us.
It is vain to dream of a religion to replace Christianity. Comte’s notion of a “Religion of Humanity,” whereby congregations would throng temples to venerate Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, and Werner von Braun as “benefactors,” was one of the ideas that occurred to him when he was out of a straight-jacket, but it should have suggested to his friends and keepers the need to hustle him into one. True, there have been serious proposals by eminently sane men, who, however, seem to forget that a religion must be based on faith, not speculation or psychological peculiarities. Captain Ludovici is a highly intelligent and earnest man, and when he wrote his Religion for Infidels (1961), he must have known that his “rational religion” could appeal only to a few, and had no chance whatsoever of meeting our society’s need for a unifying faith.
If the faith of Christendom was an error, alien gods can command no true piety—not even in the little circles where they may enjoy a passing vogue. The Oriental cults that make wealthy dowagers beam and write cheques are not for men. Christianity is irreplaceable.
___________
[1] Christianity, of course, introduced very little that was novel in the practical ethics governing human conduct in society, most of which were not only traditional in our race but were common to most civilized societies, including the oldest of which we have adequate knowledge. (Clergymen who impudently talk of “Judaeo-Christian ethics” try to give the impression that the prohibition of theft, adultery, etc. in the Ten Commandments was some kind of dazzling and miraculous invention, but if they were honest they would speak of “Sumerian-Christian ethics” in that connection.) About the only element that can fairly be called a Christian innovation was the great emphasis on forgiveness as a duty rather than an act of unnecessary generosity. (Its doctrine of rewards and punishments after death tended to enforce observance of the whole moral code, but that is another matter.) The historical antecedents, however, will not help us now, for our religion was so long regarded as the one and only basis for morality and the unique source of all right conduct that the earlier traditions have vanished except insofar as we still instinctively regard certain actions as dishonorable. Even those feelings, however, may be consciously repressed as “relics of superstition” by persons who have reacted strongly against the religion and are proud of having “emancipated” themselves from it.
Jewish books are for the Jews, And Jew Messiahs too.
But if you’re not of Jewish blood, How can they be for you?
To make an Idol of a book, Is poison for the brain;
A dying God upon a cross
Is reason gone insane.
Beware of all the Holy books And all the creeds and schools,
And every law that man has made And all the golden rules.
‘Laws’ and ‘rules’ imposed on you From days of old renown,
Are not intended for your ‘good’ But for your crushing down.
Then dare to rend the chains that bind And to yourself be true,
Dare to liberate your mind, From all things, old and new.