web analytics

Tag: Gaedhal (commenter)

Categories
So-called saints

St Patrick

by Gaedhal

I don’t celebrate Saint Patrick’s day, as, in my view, the imposition of Christianity upon Ireland was a disaster. He was the first invader, making the valleys flat and the mountains plain, and the highways straight for the invaders that would follow in his train. Indeed, Christianity is the worst NGO in Ireland when it comes to facilitating the Plantation, the Great Replacement.

For Christianity to be true, we must believe—in all seriousness—that God commenced his revelation to mankind by slicing up both animal carcasses and baby penises. Abraham slices up some animal carcasses, and claims that he saw Yahweh, a Canaanite storm god, walking through the midst of these animals sawn assunder. That is some wild stuff! Abraham then began to slice up his own and Isaac’s penis, before then almost sacrificing Isaac to Yahweh at Jehovah-jirah. It is a tragedy that this desert cult was imposed upon Ireland.

Christianity is pure bullshit—and I mean this in the philosophical sense. There is no science or logic or scholarship that supports even one of its supernatural claims. Indeed most of its mundane claims—the Bible, even the Old Testament, is mostly pure fiction and mythology, even the so-called “Historical Books”—has been disproved by Science and Philosophy and Historiography.

That someone could write something like this in a national journal, indeed, the premier national journal, The Irish Times, just goes to show how insular and backwards Ireland is:

There are those who would rather see us return to a superstitious, undeducated pre-Christian era of druids and magic, rather than the science logic and scholarship of Christianity, with its sophisticated and systematic philosophy and theology.

As Captain Cassidy McGillicuddy, my fellow Irishperson, puts it: she is still in the early naughties keyboard warrior age. She is twenty years behind the times. Atheism soundly won the internet keyboard wars in the late nineties and early two thousands. Maria Steen seems still to labour under the misapprehension that there are sensible reasons for Christianity! She must have not spent a lot of time on the internet. Christianity came there to die, and did die, and is buried in a Sadducee’s grave, whence no resurrection, a long time ago. This is why apologists rarely talk to us! If they talk to us, at all, then it must be in the setting of a “formal debate” where they can Gish-gallop for about half-an-hour uninterrupted, and then they can employ stalling techniques at the questioning session. Apologists have siloed themselves away from atheist critiques a long time ago. So much for “systematic theology” which is nought but a post-hoc system of lies that is geared so as to blend and synthesise the multiple contradictory philosophies and theologies of the Bible into a single lying religious system.

Steen assures us that, today, she will countenance Popish worship and engage in a cannibalism ritual and ingest the body, blood and bones of a long-dead—if he ever even existed at all—failed Jewish apocalyptic prophet… because that is sensible. This is exactly the sort of sense that we need in an Irish President (which is why I am relieved that the office of Irish Presidency seems to be firmly post-Catholic and firmly post-Christian).

That this lunatic was almost a candidate for the Southern Irish presidency just goes to show how insular and backwards Ireland is. On the British mainland, “they don’t do god”, which is actually why I prefer to be over there.

Sermon

by Gaedhal

A Red Giant, to oversimplify, is a star that has lost its core, and this causes it to go hyper, such that it destroys planets astronomic units away.

The supernatural core of Christianity keeps it tethered to the social mores of the first century. Jesus and Saul are terminuses beyond which the inherent subversiveness of orthodox Christianity cannot go beyond.

However, when a Christian becomes a humanist, then he/she has slipped from orthodox Christianity’s moorings. The newly deconverted “humanist” now finds himself/herself on an open sea of utter craziness. It is like that clip of Rebecca Watson, where she says that whenever she deconverted from Christianity, she ipso facto became a humanist. It is almost as though “secular humanism” is just an aggressive form of Christless/Godless Christianity. “Secular humanism” is what is left when the myths and miracles have evaporated.

“Secular humanism” is like an axiological residue of Christianity.

When Christianity loses its supernatural core it goes hyper, and destroys habitats such as Rhodesia and South Africa, in the same way that the sun will destroy our earth, one astronomic unit away from it, when it goes hyper, in about 4 billion years. This is why I call it “atheistic hyper-christianity”. You [the editor of this site] call it neo-Christianity.

I constantly see Leftist atheists trying to shame Christian Nationalists into being more Christlike, i.e. into adopting the suicidal teachings of the sermon on the Mount. As Ragnar Redbeard put it: the preachifier of the Sermon on the Mount is “the true crown prince of evil”. Ayn Rand also says that an enemy who destroys one is less evil than an enemy who convinces his victim to destroy himself. Jesus is the personage who persuaded the formerly white West to destroy itself, with suicidal teachings such as turn the other cheek; resist not evil; and welcome the xenos/stranger/foreigner.

Categories
Axiology

Renée

by Gaedhal

I didn’t want to comment on the killing of Renée Nicole Good. First off, it has nothing to do with me. The only link Good has to Ireland, is that she was a missionary in Northern Ireland.

And the people who are shooting your ideological enemies in the face, today, are the same people who could very well be shooting you in the face tomorrow. Hence, the governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis (R) actually came out against this shooting. As I said before: one probably has to have a personality disorder to join either the police or the army. Perhaps police forces and armies are necessary in this world; however, in my view they are necessary evils.

In Northern Ireland, we have an anomoly. We have a police force that is secret; we have a police force that is armed; we have a police force that allows its officers to carry weapons, whilst off duty.

Now the police service of Northern Ireland is not ICE, not by a long shot; however, there are parrallels. All of the other police forces in the British Isles are mostly unarmed.

However, the term “U.S. Citizen” has suffered from hyper-inflation, due, in large part to immigration. When the U.S. was a white racial republic, the term “US citizen” actually meant something. The founders were explicit: the republic was founded for their posterity. However, a citizenship that anyone can claim; well, that becomes sorta worthless. If anyone can become a U.S. citizen, then U.S. citizenship is sorta worthless.

Liberals—those to the right of Leftists, in this context—largely turned a blind eye to non-citizens being denied constitutional rights, even though the courts said that the norms of the U.S. constitution applied everywhere that the U.S. was the sovereign or de facto sovereign power. Obama never shut down the concentration camp at Guantanamo bay. Although he did attempt cosmetic changes in an attempt to bring some of what goes on there in line with constitutional norms.

Also, in a polarized society, one’s political opponents no longer inhabit the same moral universe. At the beginning, the Left and Right, in America, had a shared vision of what America is was and should be, however, they differed on the issue of federalism or antifederalism. Today, there is no agreement between Left and Right on just about anything. Thus appeals to Renée Good’s being a “U.S. citizen” from the Left are utterly worthless, given the polarisation of America.

I really only have an expressable opinion on this one aspect of this controversy: appeals by Liberals and Leftists to Renée Good’s being a U.S. citizen, and why they are likely to fall upon the radical right’s deaf ears.

In Ireland, “Irish citizen” is actually a sarcasm, describing some invader who was magically alchemised into his/her becoming Irish by way of a magical piece of paper, to wit, an Irish Passport.

And, of course, as my good friend Alex, who has since gone to be with the ground, “magic paper” such as passports are merely the secular version of “magic water”. Indeed, the idea of a birth certificate might have actually come from the Roman Catholic Baptismal certificate.

Catholics believed that magic water could turn the inhabitants of Africa into Christians—i.e. civilized white men, but with a different skin tone—and Liberals believe that the alchemy of magic documents, such as passports, can more or less accomplish the same thing. Catholics believed in the magic of catachesis, and, as Revilo P. Oliver points out: Liberals believe in the magic of education. Education, very often, to Liberals, is a snake oil that will cure whatever ails society.

Thus, we are still under the tyranny of Christian axiology; of Christian assumptions; or, as Oliver might have put it, the reformed Church of Marxianism has superceded the unreformed Catholic and Protestant Churches.

Categories
Christian art

César,

by Gaedhal

I am not a Randian Libertarian, but one thing that she got right is that we are at home upon the earth. The Orthodox anchorite is not at home upon the earth, which is why he is climbing a ladder to “Heaven” to escape it. Take a look at some of these Orthodox icons. They can be really trippy:

The earth is presented as a sterile desert… because Christianity was, originally, a desert religion.

As we discussed on your blog, César, there is probably a Schopenhauerian, Pessimistic, Benetarian, Antinatalist, EFIL-ist interpretation to these icons: better to have never been, and second best is to deny the will to live, and to annihilate oneself, through ascesis and chastity/celibacy, so as not to burden another generation with the “pain and boredom” of life, as pessimists put it. As Jesus himself said: let he who can take castration, take it. One of the things that Antinatalists often do is get vasectomies. Richard Carrier has gotten a vasectomy, which is why I suspect his being an Antinatalist.

In my view, “Jesus”, is merely Nirvana, the “breathed-out state”, as Alan Watts put it, i.e. the “all-sufficient void” as Schopenhauer put it. It is conjectured by the likes of Richard Carrier that there was an adept Christianity, that is now lost to us, wherein the obviously fictional life of Jesus was understood as a parable. The Christian adepts understood that deceased Jewish carpenters do not respawn and float off into the sky. Dominic Crossan, my fellow Ulsterman from the lost county of Donegal, also believed that Jesus’s entire life, as recounted by the gospels, and especially the original gospel, the gospel of Mark, is a parable.

But a parable for what? Who knows? But given that we know that there were Antinatalist Buddhist preachers/missionaries in the Levant, since around 100 BCE—see mythicist papers for more on this—perhaps Christianity is a parable for the various forms of Pessimism, listed above.

If John of Patmos had an IQ north of 80, then he too would have understood that Jesus’s life was a parable. Again, virgins don’t give birth, and dead Jewish carpenters never respawn and levitate into the sky… there are no exceptions to this. I am putting money on the fact that the Jewish con-artists who wrote the New Testament understood this as well. Thus, the true end to the Book of Revelation would be the earth melting in fervent heat—as pseudo-Peter sayeth in an epistle—and the sky being rolled up as a scroll. The sky was a physical thing in those days, preventing the primordial waters from drowning us all. Thus, the Revelation is an EFIL-ist parable where the ideal state is the destruction of the planet. Revelation is a 2nd-Century C.E. version of the Red-button EFIL-ist thought experiment. The “New Heavens and the New Earth” is merely for the non-adepts, for the profane.

As Schopenhauer says: he is practising true Christianity, and in my view it could actually be the original version of Christianity.

And here is the website where Salm explores the link, perhaps direct, between Buddhism and Christianity. We know that there were Buddhist proselytizers from India in the region, at about the turn of the era, in about 1 CE.

However, it could just be a case of independent convergence. This is a hell-planet where living things must kill and eat other living things to survive. This is the Darwinian problem of evil [emphasis added by Ed.]. No sensible or ethical god would have created a system like this. This is why I view “theistic evolution”, such as that promoted by Biologos, to be every bit as delusional as creationism. To me, Pete Enns is every bit as delusional as Ken Ham. Once we introduce gods to evolution, then it becomes intelligent design. Theistic Evolution is an oxymoron to me.

Given that this is a hell planet for most sentient beings, then the thought often independently arises that it were better to have never been. The Jesus movement need not have had a formal connection to Buddhism to come up with Pessimism and Antinatalism—let he who can receive [castration] receive it—on their own.

Categories
Abortion New Testament

Matthew

by Gaedhal

Christianity, as I said before, is about breeding up “the least of these”, because, as I said before, only “the least of these” have ever, historically found Christianity attractive.

Minus coercion, as Captain Cassidy points out, the best of these have no interest in Christianity. The best of these only pretended to be Christian when Christianity had the power of the sword. Today, when Christianity no longer has the sword, the best of these, the scientists and the philosophers and the otherwise well educated, are atheists, overwhelmingly.

Christianity is abroad in the world breeding up the future generations of the least of these.

Abortion is usually argued for in Liberal—i.e. axiologically Christian—terms. Liberal Atheism, or Humanism, is just an aggressive and obnoxious form of godless Christianity. As Revilo P. Oliver correctly put it: it is merely a non-theistic sect of Christianity; the non-theistic Christianity of the Marxian Reformation. Atheistic Hyperchristians still subconsciously believe in some sort of a magical force that magically makes us all equal; all equally adapted to living in a modern technological world. In a technical sense, the term “equal” or “superior” is meaningless in evolution. However, an organism can be better or worse adapted to a Given environment—in this case a technological Western Civilization. In a godless universe, such as what presents itself to us, we would not expect all humans to be equally adapted to living in a Western technological civilization. Indeed, the people best adapted to a modern Western technological civilization would likely be those who invented it, i.e. White Europeans.

Abortion is usually argued for in Liberal, i.e. Neo-christian terms… however it could also be argued for in right-wing terms… whatever works, right?

Even the antichristian radical right is usually pro-life… even though, as this book The Fall of Roe puts it, more poor non-white women get abortions in America than white women. Abortion appeared to be operating in a eugenic way in America, one of the few statistics that were positive, as regards maintaining White demographics in America… and then Christians killed Roe, first with the Hyde amendment, which stopped the government from federally funding abortion in its donations to Planned Parenthood, and with getting rid of Roe itself.

Abortion was one of the few phenomena, in this world, actually working in favour of White demographics, and the Christians got rid of it.

Every. Single. Time.

As César points out: the Christians are doing more to harm us whites than the Jews.

The podcast whence this book emanates, incidentally, is what changed my mind on the abortion issue. Pro-lifery was one of the last Christian vestiges that I deconstructed / deconverted from.

Categories
Liberalism

Stage

by Gaedhal

My good friend Alex [Linder], who has since gone to be with the ground, said that we should attack and mock—with our words—conservatives, because we are in direct competition with them, and not with Liberals, and Communists.

There are a lot of voices out there, like this nutcase, who wish to drag us back to a previous stage of the Christian Revolution. Fascism is different to Naziism. Fascism is a Christian phenomenon, whereas Nazism is esoterically antichristian. I was reading Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin, and it is clear from this dialogue that Hitler was antichristian, although he pretended otherwise. In Bolshevismus by Dietrick Eckhart, Hitler calls Christianity “the first communist cell”.

This form of Fascism—specifically, Christian authoritarianism as practiced by Salazar, Franco, Mussolini, and Dollfuss—is inherently Christian. Communism and Liberalism, so far from being anti-christian is simply what happens when Christianity, naturally, atheises. The Christian god, let us remember, does not exist, and so Christianity, if left to itself, will eventually atheize. Thus Revilo P. Oliver spoke of “The Marxian Reformation”.

Liberalism was dreamt up by the Christian theologian, John Locke.

Spinoza, who dreamt up the “dialectical” metaphysic of Communism was good friends with Quakers, who themselves were a more extreme sect of Communist Anabaptists like John Bunyan and Thomas Muentzer.

Thus, what our wingnut, Alex Hexagon, describes as political systems of decay: Communism, Liberalism and Christian Authoritarianism, are merely evolved states of Christianity.

Hexagon equates Liberalism with The Cult of Ugliness. Christianity was the original cult of ugliness. They whitewashed the frescoes, threw sculptures into the see, defaced sculptures with crosses, destroyed beautiful architecture such as the Serapeum. Christians did in the first centuries of the Common Era exactly what “Liberals” do today: and a hatred of good architecture is shared between yesterday’s Christians and today’s liberals.

Isaiah assures us that the central character in the Christian mythos, Jesus Christ, has no beauty in him. Early Christianity was a literal cult of ugliness.

The answer to a revolution is not to overthrow it with an earlier stage of that revolution, but to overthrow the revolution, completely, ad radicem, at root.

Christianity, as Revilo P. Oliver points out, was a mob revolution against Aristocratic Epicureanism. If you want to overthrow the revolution, then return to Epicureanism, i.e. the observance of causal reality. In Epicureanism, there most certainly is a difference between Jew and Gentile, between male and female. In Aristocratic Epicureanism, the first are always first and the last are always last. In Aristocratic Epicureanism, the Xenos is not someone to be welcomed, but an enemy invader to be countered. Aristocratic Epicureanism is basically an opposite ethic to that of the sermon on the mount. If you want Europe to return to its former greatness, then re-embrace what Revilo P. Oliver calls the true white western philosophy: Aristocratic Epicureanism.

There are plenty of hucksters out there selling Christianity as a cure-all for all that ails us, whereas, in my estimation, it is the thing that slowly poisoned us to begin with. A philosophy totally at odds with reality: the last shall be first, will eventually doom our civilization.

Starting with the Reformation, Europeans began to take the ethic of the New Testament seriously. Illiterate peasants, prior to the Reformation, probably had no idea what the Sermon on the Mount even was, and, therefore, opperated according to the previous pagan-ethic. The Roman Catholic Church, certainly, did not want to follow the suicidal ethic of the New Testament. However, as Nietzsche points out: when Luther “restored the gospel”, the poisonous suicidal ethic of the New Testament was let loose upon Europe unto its own destruction. The Roman Catholic Church would itself embrace this suicidal ethic at Vatican 2.

Categories
Correspondence

Imperium

by Gaedhal

Let us take the problem of pornography. Pornography cannot be banned anywhere unless it is banned everywhere. To ban pornography, anywhere—and thus everywhere—would require global governance.

The beginnings of global systems of governance such as the UN and Interpol allow us to tackle the global problem that is the trafficking in child-abuse imagery on a global scale.

Ultimately, I am not a white nationalist, I am a white globalist: I want a white globalist imperium. However, that imperium would consist of self-governing vassal states. To the extent that these vassal states or client states do not cause any global problems, the Global Imperium would leave them alone. However, once a vassal state starts causing global problems, then the legions are sent in to subdue them.

 

______ 卐 ______

 

Editor’s 2 cents:

This is precisely what Adolf Hitler attempted. For having lost, look at the grotesque state Europe is in now. By the way, I fixed a few typos of my article about my visit to Europe this year, and the revised PDF can be read here (I’ll delete the now-obsolete PDF later today).

Categories
Catholic Church

Sin

by Gaedhal

Eradica used to have a saying: the daily outrage. Grifters such as Sargon of Akkad have found a way to monetise the daily outrage. Similarly with redpill and manosphere content: they have found a way to monetize the daily outrage. This is why I cut outrage-bait from my feed. However, new sources of outrage bait continually crop up, as baiting outrage is an extremely lucrative endeavour.

What is missed in all of this is that the Christian Churches in Ireland, North and South—when we subtract the Levantine Hocus Pocus and blood-magic Voodoo from them—are simply just government funded NGOs who advance the Great Replacement. It was the Roman Catholic Church and Sister Stan who set up the Irish Immigrants’ council. The Catholic angle in all of this is conveniently ignored by Catholic Nationalists such as John McGuirk and Niamh Nic Mathúna.

GRIPT has links to Roman Catholic Youth Defence and the Catholic Nationalist family the McMahons—or, unpronounceably, the Mac Mathúnas. But the Roman Catholic Church is the biggest NGO, in Ireland, that is behind the plantation.

I personally, do not agree with “debates” such as this, as it sends out the signal that the 14 words are up to debate, that we can only advance the 14 words, if we “win” debates such as these. Similarly, I don’t agree with electioneering, as the 14 words does not depend upon a majority of the mob, in a rigged system, agreeing with us.

One of the reasons why I am not a democrat is just the effeminacy of the thing. Genocides—population displacement is genocide—and invasions such as these are not repelled by debates and electioneering. Voting harder has never once repelled a genocide or an invasion. Muh debates has never once repelled a genocide or an invasion. And if the white Irish are too stupid cowardly and effeminate to realise this then they deserve to go extinct. Ultimately nature is fair. Nature might be so cruel that it is impossible for any Classically theistic gods to exist, however Nature is fair.

Nature has given white men several opportunities in the past to adhere to the laws of nature and to dominate the entire planet. White men have squandered every single one of these opportunities. The white race has committed this sin against the Holy Ghost countless times, against nature, and yet nature is more forgiving than Rabbi Jesus, and instead of consigning us to the flames of total societal destruction, has forgiven us and given us more and more chances.

But even Nature’s patience will, one day, eventually wear out. Eventually White men will sin away their days of grace as far as nature is concerned, and nature will condemn Homo Sapiens Candidus to be one of the 99.9% of the species that went extinct… and do you know what? This will be fair. Nature, after consigning whites to extinction will then turn to the Jews, or the Chinese, and they will inherit the earth. As Dr. Robert Morgan points out: it is impossible to save a race that does not want to be saved. The white race has contracted toxoplasmosis—I argue that it contracted this toxoplasmosis from Christianity—and is doing everything in its power to bring about its own destruction.

We all know what has to be done.

Perhaps the reason why I feel such an affinity with Loyalism, these days, is because I recognise that Rome Rule is destroying the country. Carson, Craig et al. were correct to reject the Rome Rule of Ireland. The Roman Church is the primary instigator of population displacement in Ireland, and thus it is the primary genocider of the Irish.

P.S. Some of the sins against the Holy Ghost are obduracy in sin, presumption and opposing the known truth. All three of these sins against the Holy Ghost have been committed by the white race. Another sin against the Holy Ghost in preconciliar Catholicism is despair, but our Führer told us never to despair and to praise victory.

Categories
Christendom

Christianity

is a trillion-dollar corporation

by Gaedhal

Martin Luther and the Scriptures

I find that oft I must needs remind myself of this: Christianity is a trillion-dollar corporation, or, rather, Christianity is a cluster of corporations whose aggregate sums to about 1 trillion dollars. Some of these component corporations, like the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church are worth billions all by themselves. The Church of England were paid reparations when their slaves were set free. This debt contracted by the UK government to the Church of England was only paid off in the last few decades. It is ironic that slaveholders were paid reparations, but not the slaves themselves.

And so the Churches are vast storehouses of ill-gotten wealth. The Vatican was built on the backs of the purgatory scam. Christopher Hitchens mentions this as a reason why he never finds himself enjoying the splendid art and architecture of the Vatican: it was built on the backs of scamming peasants with Pugatory.

The corporate nature of Christianity must needs be remembered by us. Answers in Genesis, for instance, is not Ken Ham. When Ken Ham goes to be with the ground, AiG will be unaffected… because AiG is a corporation… and it is that corporation that demands that its employees adhere to a ridiculous Statement of Faith that includes inerrancy.

We could deconvert 99% of all Christians, and Christianity, as a corporation would hardly be affected by this at all. This is something that Cardinal Pell discovered. The Church in Australia was all but dead, which is why Pell schmoozed the politicians, and campaigned for the Roman Church to win government contracts. This, incidentally, is also why the Catholic Church is taking over the American Healthcare system. In Ireland, most schools and hospitals are still owned by the Catholic Church… but the government pay the salaries of the Catholic Church’s employees. I am amazed that outrages such as these are suffered to continue. One would think that in a Catholic theocracy like Ireland, that there would be a strong and vibrant secular movement. If there is, I haven’t run into it, yet.

I tell myself that long after I go to be with the ground, there will be psychotic lunatic apologists and clergy lying for Jesus.

We cannot decommission the good ship Christianity in our lifetime. No. The counterapologetic movement is more like a weak acid: like acid rain. Century after century we rain upon and wear away this edifice of fraud and cruelty.

We have achieved a lot, over the centuries. Europe is firmly post-christian. The United States of America will be majority atheist in the next century. However, it will take centuries. And this is where Stoic thinking comes in. I love my fate. I love that I have been fated to fight a battle that is ultimately unwinnable in my lifetime, but will, in about a thousand years, be firmly settled on the side of secularism.

Eventually, when we do get to a 99% deconversion rate, centuries into the future, then Christianity as a corporation would then need to be dealt with. Its ill-gotten assets ought to be seized and distributed amongst the people.

And we must also remember this when battling, in the field of ideas, with apologists such as Michael Jones: they are employees of a corporation. Their salary depends on their never ever ever conceding a single point!

What amazes me about this video is that Dr. Josh Bowen and Derek Lambert seem shocked—yes shocked!—(I’m not that shocked!) that apologists such as Jones and Manning act as they do! It is almost as though Christianity is a nasty totally intellectually bankrupt damnation cult; a nasty planetary-destruction cult; a nasty human-sacrifice cult; a nasty genital-mutilation-and-animal-abuse cult and that its cultists—its clergy and apologists—are, similarly, nasty people.

Now, again, there are plenty of salt-of-the-earth Christians with whom I have no problem. Their Christianity is a personal private thing, and with this, I have no issue.

However, evangelists and apologists are another thing entirely. They promote the lie that Christianity is veridical, and liars don’t tend to be nice people. As I said before: facility in lying is a symptom of sociopathy. This is why Pinecreek Doug is correct that neither money nor vulnerable people should be left alone with clergy or apologists.

This is why, these days, I simply ignore apologists. I have rooted them out of my YouTube algorithm. Go thou and do likewise!

Categories
Axiology Film

Iceberg

by Gaedhal

I watched the 2014 film, Still Alice, yesterday.

One of the things that I liked about it was its treatment of the stages of grief. The denial stage is well treated. Alec Baldwin just openly denies that Alice has Alzheimer’s. Alice is quick, almost immediate, to acknowledge verbally that she has Alzheimer’s, but she still lives in denial. She still believes that she can go running, go on holiday, lecture Linguistics at college etc. And also, we kinda get a subtle hint from a neurologist who looks uncannily like Lawrence Krauss that Alice was late in seeking a diagnosis. It was only really when Alice could no longer disguise her memory problems that she sought a diagnosis.

Alice has familial early-onset Alzheimer’s. This is caused by a mutation in the genome.

I remember, in the grand old days of yore, I used to install television satellite dishes with my father. The set-top box, for to decode and unencrypt the digital television signal had a forward error correction rate. The set top box had an algorithm that could correct some errors received from the Satellite. Do not ask me about the engineering wizardry behind this. To me, digital satellite television is a technology sufficiently advanced to be indistinguishable from magic.

However, where is the forward error correction in our genome? Unintelligent design strikes again. This is why, in my view, Paley’s watchmaker argument fails in our day. In Paley’s day, technology was still, very much, in a crude and primitive state. However, in our day, the process of technological manufacturing is so refined that the organs—organum in Latin means: ‘tool’ or ‘instrument’—produced by nature are wholly deficient when compared to the tools, and instruments produced by humans. We humans can contrive forward error correction, whereas biology and nature, thus far, cannot.

And this, incidentally, is why I am pro-abortion.

One of Alice’s children has the gene for early-onset Alzheimers. She swiftly conceives twins by IVF. The embryos in the petri dish are screened for the familial-Alzheimer’s disease, and the embryos containing this gene are destroyed, and only the healthy embryos are implanted. In essence, a woman’s uterus does the same thing: it screens sperm and embryos for nasty genetic material, and if it discovers any such nasty genetic material, then it either kills the sperm, or it kills the embryo or foetus. Thus, naturally, a woman’s uterus has its own contraception and abortion mechanisms. Contraception and abortion is merely the augmentation of a natural process. And if you believe in God, then God ultimately designed these contraceptive and abortifacient faculties that a woman contains in her uterus.

Evolution explains this. Evolution wants a woman to give birth to offspring that will reach adulthood, such that they too will either give birth to or sire offspring. Evolution does not want a woman to either accept defective sperm or to incubate defective embryos. Thus, evolutionarily speaking, the contraceptive and abortifacient faculties that a woman already possesses makes sense. And if you want to defy Ockham’s razor and add a god to the mix, then go ahead. If you do so, then contraception and abortion become divine.

Anyhow, another pro-death position that I hold is euthanasia. There is a scene where Alice tries to commit suicide by ingesting an overdose of Rohypnol. I, of course, was cheering her on, because Alzheimer’s is a fate worse than death. At this point of the film, she was only ½ Alice, by my reckoning. Unfortunately, Consuela from Family Guy, her nurse and housekeeper, gives her a jump-scare, knocking the tablets out of her hand, dooming her to become a human vegetable.

If I ever get diagnosed with dementia, I will book a trip to Switzerland and ingest some Pentobarbital at a Dignitas facility. However, such a service, ideally, ought to be available in Ireland. Evangelical Protestantism prevents euthanasia from being a reality in the North—although it is becoming a reality on the British mainland—and the vestiges of a Catholic theocracy prevent euthanasia from becoming a reality in the South. Again, why I am an antitheist. On the Island of Ireland, Roman Catholicism and Calvinism—the two biggest brands of Christianity, on this island—still have way, way, way too much power. There are no good secular arguments against euthanasia, just as there are no good secular arguments against abortion. Which is why the atheist British mainland is far in advance of Ireland, North and South on these issues.

My grandmother was not still my grandmother after about a year and a half of dementia. However, she lived on as a human potted plant—a mockery of her former form—for about two years after. I was glad, for her sake, when she died. In the words of Saint Thomas More, in his Utopia she outlived herself. Annie Bessant quotes the Utopia in her essay in favour of euthanasia.

 

______ 卐 ______
 

Editor’s 2 ¢

Since I studied the fraudulent profession called psychiatry in-depth, I realised, in reviewing its 19th-century origins, that psychiatrists were simply pathologizing behaviour such as suicide, a ‘sin’ considered lèse majesté divine, dogmatically declaring it to be a disease of unknown biomedical aetiology (and the same with the other diagnostic categories ‘of unknown aetiology’!).

Like me, Benjamin has spotted a tremendous error in the racial right, for example, in the comments sections where hundreds of commenters opine in The Unz Review. None of them seem to notice the pseudo-scientificity of psychiatry. Neochristianity, as we understand it on this site, means that the axiological tail of Christian morality persists, foolishly, in today’s secular world. What Gaedhal mentions above is only one example.

I would add that the negrolatry (BLM, mixed couples, etc.) that so afflicts today’s mad West is another example of Christian morality exponentially exacerbated in the secular world (from this site’s seminal essay, ‘The Red Giant’, a Swede noted that secularism exacerbates Christian morality big time).

White nationalists shouldn’t ignore us. They should realise that rather than our paradigm (CQ) competing with theirs (JQ), our POV expands the latter as with the iceberg metaphor. They only see the iceberg’s tip but we know that the Jewish Problem is supported by the huge mass of Christian ethics that lies underneath. Dr Robert Morgan agrees with us in the post from a couple of days ago.