web analytics
Categories
Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 1

“For me, the overall result is the visible and systematic poisoning of the youth of our people through Christian education…” —Himmler to Bormann (see the bibliographic source for this letter in my article from yesterday).

Yesterday, the first hour of a ten-hour series of Nick Fuentes’ interview with Christian nationalist Joel Webbon was uploaded on YouTube.

At the beginning of the interview, we see that Nick is infinitely closer to Christian nationalism than to white nationalism (recall that in his interview with Tucker, Nick said he was a white nationalist but not at the level of William Pierce’s WN, his words). Obviously, neither Fuentes nor Webbon are National Socialists.

Shortly after, Nick says that the US should have a Christian government. Compare this to what Richard Weikart says about Hitler’s esoteric anti-Christianity, in contrast to the Führer’s exoteric image (prolefeed for the German proles).

Soon after, both say things that go against the US Constitution, such as that the government should not pass laws regarding the establishment of a religion. Then Nick mildly approves of the interviewer’s crazy idea of implementing blasphemy laws in the US: something that would overturn the First Amendment. Interestingly, as a gospel follower, Nick doesn’t want the death penalty for most murderers, but he does want it for those who desecrate the consecrated host or wine.

Only at this point does Nick speak about secular racialism, and they even briefly touch on the topic of our worldview, which we might call anti-Christian racism. Nick confesses that his Groyper movement was precisely a reaction against that secularized racialism: a step back towards American traditionalism.

The interview ends with Nick expressing his desire for an alliance between his America First ideology and his interviewer’s Christian nationalism. Their movement represents, in my humble opinion, the last-ditch effort of American Christianity.

Categories
Christian art Gaedhal (commenter)

César,

by Gaedhal

I am not a Randian Libertarian, but one thing that she got right is that we are at home upon the earth. The Orthodox anchorite is not at home upon the earth, which is why he is climbing a ladder to “Heaven” to escape it. Take a look at some of these Orthodox icons. They can be really trippy:

The earth is presented as a sterile desert… because Christianity was, originally, a desert religion.

As we discussed on your blog, César, there is probably a Schopenhauerian, Pessimistic, Benetarian, Antinatalist, EFIL-ist interpretation to these icons: better to have never been, and second best is to deny the will to live, and to annihilate oneself, through ascesis and chastity/celibacy, so as not to burden another generation with the “pain and boredom” of life, as pessimists put it. As Jesus himself said: let he who can take castration, take it. One of the things that Antinatalists often do is get vasectomies. Richard Carrier has gotten a vasectomy, which is why I suspect his being an Antinatalist.

In my view, “Jesus”, is merely Nirvana, the “breathed-out state”, as Alan Watts put it, i.e. the “all-sufficient void” as Schopenhauer put it. It is conjectured by the likes of Richard Carrier that there was an adept Christianity, that is now lost to us, wherein the obviously fictional life of Jesus was understood as a parable. The Christian adepts understood that deceased Jewish carpenters do not respawn and float off into the sky. Dominic Crossan, my fellow Ulsterman from the lost county of Donegal, also believed that Jesus’s entire life, as recounted by the gospels, and especially the original gospel, the gospel of Mark, is a parable.

But a parable for what? Who knows? But given that we know that there were Antinatalist Buddhist preachers/missionaries in the Levant, since around 100 BCE—see mythicist papers for more on this—perhaps Christianity is a parable for the various forms of Pessimism, listed above.

If John of Patmos had an IQ north of 80, then he too would have understood that Jesus’s life was a parable. Again, virgins don’t give birth, and dead Jewish carpenters never respawn and levitate into the sky… there are no exceptions to this. I am putting money on the fact that the Jewish con-artists who wrote the New Testament understood this as well. Thus, the true end to the Book of Revelation would be the earth melting in fervent heat—as pseudo-Peter sayeth in an epistle—and the sky being rolled up as a scroll. The sky was a physical thing in those days, preventing the primordial waters from drowning us all. Thus, the Revelation is an EFIL-ist parable where the ideal state is the destruction of the planet. Revelation is a 2nd-Century C.E. version of the Red-button EFIL-ist thought experiment. The “New Heavens and the New Earth” is merely for the non-adepts, for the profane.

As Schopenhauer says: he is practising true Christianity, and in my view it could actually be the original version of Christianity.

And here is the website where Salm explores the link, perhaps direct, between Buddhism and Christianity. We know that there were Buddhist proselytizers from India in the region, at about the turn of the era, in about 1 CE.

However, it could just be a case of independent convergence. This is a hell-planet where living things must kill and eat other living things to survive. This is the Darwinian problem of evil [emphasis added by Ed.]. No sensible or ethical god would have created a system like this. This is why I view “theistic evolution”, such as that promoted by Biologos, to be every bit as delusional as creationism. To me, Pete Enns is every bit as delusional as Ken Ham. Once we introduce gods to evolution, then it becomes intelligent design. Theistic Evolution is an oxymoron to me.

Given that this is a hell planet for most sentient beings, then the thought often independently arises that it were better to have never been. The Jesus movement need not have had a formal connection to Buddhism to come up with Pessimism and Antinatalism—let he who can receive [castration] receive it—on their own.

Categories
Conservatism

Tort

vs. Walsh & Tucker

I can use this segment from Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Matt Walsh (both Christians) to show what the priest of the sacred words—an anti-Christian admirer of Nazi paganism—has in common with American conservatives. Let’s consider the values that, according to Walsh, those who share them are essentially on his side. According to Walsh, the first value is:

1) Objective truth

Here we seem to be in complete agreement.

But as commenter Gaedhal has said, when it comes to approaching the New Testament from the standpoint of objective truth, conservative Christians are more primitive than liberal Christians. Quite a few of the latter are aware of the historiographical problems that have been raised for centuries about 1st century Christian writings. In contrast, people like Walsh, Tucker, and racialist Christians generally ignore the issue, although it is evident that there is an objective truth regarding the historicity of the New Testament stories. If you ignore it, you are basically ignoring this first value.

If all these conservatives educated themselves honestly on the subject, they would realise that there is not even evidence for the existence of Jesus, and the same could be said about the existence of the Jewish god, whom both Walsh and Tucker worship.

Curiously, both recognise that everything stems from there: from objective truth. But if this pair and the Christians of the racial right don’t even dare to discuss the issue, we can assume that when it comes to Judeo-Christianity, they are not interested in such a thing as objective truth.

The next thing Walsh mentions is:

2) Preserving American identity in particular: the institution of the family (and therefore the institution of marriage), and Western civilisation in general.

Note that not for a second do these two Christians talk about preserving the white race, which is what the priest would mention as the priority. It is from the 14 words that one understands the need for the institution of marriage[1], which only makes sense if both husband and wife are whites. To the conservative question of what we are trying to conserve, my answer would be: the DNA of the Aryans.

It is precisely because of this omission that Walsh and Tucker later criticise multi-culturalism. The religion of this pair doesn’t allow them to criticise the multi-racial society that the US has become. (When an Aryan marries a coloured, for the priest of the sacred words s/he sins against the holy spirit of life.)

_________

[1] Remember that my favourite films are Sense & Sensibility (1995), and Pride & Prejudice (2005).

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Rick & Nick

Four days ago, Richard Spencer interviewed Nick Fuentes again. In sharp contrast to my post this morning, after minute 24 Nick says he lives in a racially diverse city and prefers to live there rather than in a small town populated exclusively by white people—because it would be boring, Rick adds!

Around minute 27 Rick mentions WW2 without saying a word about the Hellstorm Holocaust, or that the bad guys won the war. But he is right at the 30-minute mark that in the previous century there was a window for fascism or communism to escape the System, but now everyone is a slave to capitalism and material comfort.

When they talk about Russia around the 50-minute mark, this pair doesn’t seem to distinguish between the American state (which is in fact anti-white) and the white American nation, which is dwindling every day. That doesn’t mean I’m a Russophile in the last, just that they don’t express themselves like 14-word priests.

Half a minute before the hour, Nick seems to like the universalist “compassion”—he used this word—of today’s woke Europeans (note the difference with us, who propose exterminationist hatred). Nick then goes on to say that he likes the European Union, omitting that it is an exterminationist entity, yes: but of the white man!

More than half an hour later, when they talk about Christian Nationalism, they fail to note that the racial factor should be our #1 priority (Christian Nationalism is not National Socialism with its Nuremberg laws, mass deportations, concentration camps, etc.).

When it was time for wrap-up questions, the first person to ask Nick a question noted that the Catholic Church is browning. Nick acknowledged this harsh reality but failed to suggest any cure, even saying that he liked both the current Pope and Pope Francis.

Rick then spoke about Greco-Roman religion, but he doesn’t seem to have read William Pierce’s history of the white race, Who We Are. Both admire the Roman Empire but are completely ignorant of how the empire’s miscegenation caused Rome to decline and fall (see e.g., this paper of a Swedish scholar).

At 1:50, it is clear that Nick follows Christian ethics. He is asked about the outcome of the Aryan dilemma in the future and responds that ethnic cleansing will not be practical in the US (i.e., expelling them to “Aztlán” as in Harold Covington’s futuristic novels) and Rick nods because, although he isn’t a Christian, he shares the Christian ethics of the Catholic Nick.

Compare all this with the Third Reich, which was determined to solve the problem of miscegenation (i.e., the destruction of the Aryan race) at any cost. I confess that after watching this friendly chat between Rick and Nick, it seems obvious to me that America, as an idea, must die in order to save the Aryan DNA north of the Rio Grande.

At 1:57, Nick voices the official Americanist POV on the war in Ukraine—nothing like what someone like John Mearsheimer would say on the subject! It’s incredible, and it’s the same POV as Rick’s. I say incredible because we need to humiliate NATO, the European Union and the US: the greatest enemies of the white race (remember that, during the US bombing of Serbia in 1999, the American who headed NATO declared that Europe no longer had any right to ethnostates).

I am by no means a Russophile, but Russia is certainly not the greatest enemy of the white man, rather this Western Leviathan. Given that Ukraine will certainly lose the war next year, it will be magnificent to see how this pair of blind Americans, who believe the official version of this war, react when the humiliating defeat for NATO, the European Union, the US and Ukraine finally comes.

From this angle, the American Michael O’Meara was much wiser than this pair. O’Meara published an article in Counter-Currents on 7 October 2013 entitled “Too Much Putin?”, in which he said:

US hegemony may be approaching its end. Once the world refuses to acknowledge the imperial authority of its humanitarian missiles [e.g., what Bill Clinton’s military forces did in Serbia because the Serbs were expelling the Muslims from Kosovo—Ed.], and thus stops paying tribute to its predatory model of the universe, then American power inevitably starts to decline—and not simply on the world stage, but also domestically, among the empire’s subjects, who in the course of the long descent will be forced to discover new ways to assert themselves.

But at 2:10 Nick said something humorous: that he can’t run for president because he’s too short “and not white enough.” At least I find that honest (I could say something analogous about me).

At any event, I believe that the future fall of the dollar will create the necessary gravitas for other American racialists not to get stuck halfway across the Rubicon, as this pair are. In the end of the video, both speculate about what we need without mentioning National Socialism (NS is the other side of the Rubicon, following my metaphor). Instead, Nick ended his speech by saying that what we need is “the Hellenised Jew, who is Christ, I suppose.”

The Hellenised Jew, right?

America delenda est!

Categories
Correspondence

A New

Christian Dark Ages?

by Vladimir

Salutations once again, Mr Tort. I hope you are doing well despite life’s challenges and your splendid work on The West’s Darkest Hour. I am really enjoying your videos regarding family trauma and family dynamics. The email I am sending you addresses the Christian Question.

Here in Romania, a couple of months ago, the inauguration of a building called the National Cathedral of Romania, a Judeo-Christian monument, took place. It cost almost 300 million euros. Over the years, we have seen a rise of Christian nationalists in the Western world. These people who worship Charlie Kirk as a martyr or see Donald Trump as the literal Second Coming of Jesus think they are making progress and standing up to Jewish globalism, but the priests of the 14 words know the truth.

These Christcuck Nationalists are still the slaves of the Jews and their Hebrew god. These people don’t want actual change. They just want to live in their Christian bourgeoisie echo chamber and keep feeding the sick system that is destroying us both in body and spirit. I am deeply concerned that with the rise of Christian nationalism we will not see a revival of the West but rather we are entering a new Dark Ages. The vast majority of Christians are a stupid lot. I just don’t understand them. They never ask questions or take time to actually reflect on their faith and how damaging it is.

Furthermore, Eastern Europe, while less toxic than the Woke West, is not the traditionalist Christian paradise with trad-wives as many western conservatives and passport bros naively think. We have many issues including corruption, alcoholism, low IQ white trash, child and animal abuse and disloyal money-hungry women. I have had my fair share of toxic people who surprisingly still believe in god; their faith only fueling their narcissism. Most don’t actually practice Christianity but use it to gain social brownie points or to simply feel good about themselves. As a teenager I took Christianity very seriously and it did not elevate me; it only gave me trauma, anxiety and depression with its doctrines of Judgement and eternal Hell. Even now at thirty-two I feel pain because this sick Jewish faith destroyed my teen years and early adult life.

Of course there have been voices who protested the building of such a ridiculous and costly cathedral, but those aren’t our friends either. Their critique comes from a secular Christian / humanist standpoint. They wished for the money to be spent on infrastructure, schools and hospitals. Fair point, but a priest of the 14 words would also use such money for eugenics programs, improving the white man so he would not be dependent on so many hospitals, fund Hitler Youth associations, allowing children an escape from abusive families, build weapons to wipe out sub-humans, encourage the Lebensraum and of course erect monuments dedicated to the Führer and National Socialism.

What the secular Christian normies and post-Soviet boomers here don’t understand is that we need monuments and buildings to cultivate the Aryan spirit—food for the soul.

Many Romanian elders here praise Ceaușescu for building numerous communist flats and providing people with jobs and food. When I go outside and see those flats, it makes me sick, and I want to demolish them. Those are buildings meant to cultivate obedient soulless slaves with no sense of high culture. The Capitalist West is no different. So many old impressive cities are now suffocated by modern architecture. For an Aryan, a picturesque Norwegian village at the shores of a fjord or an old medieval German town are worth more than New York, Los Angeles or Bucharest combined.

Going back to the Cathedral, I also want to add that Orthodox art is very ugly and morbid. Most of the time Orthodox art is flat, 2-D, symbolic and non-naturalistic, expressing detachment from the real world. I will give a small credit to Catholics. They did a good job embracing naturalist Greco-Roman art during the Renaissance. From an objective perspective, Renaissance and Baroque Catholic artwork is impressive. But in an ideal Aryan world, we would have towering monuments and temples dedicated to European Gods and heroes. Imagine a basilica full of nude sculptures and paintings portraying Achilles and Hercules instead of sickly, weeping Christian martyrs. Now, that’s what I would call a real transvaluation of values!

That is all I have to say, Mr Tort. I wish you good luck in all your endeavours, and I will end this e-mail with a quote from the 1979 Vlad Țepes movie and a quote from Alfred Rosenberg:

Vlad Țepeș – It is not the love of God that brings people to Church, but fear, the fear of Hell’s torments.

Alfred Rosenberg – The German people are not marked by original sin, but by original nobility.

Categories
Bible Judaism New Testament

Might is right, 17

Jewish books are for the Jews, And Jew Messiahs too.

But if you’re not of Jewish blood, How can they be for you?

To make an Idol of a book, Is poison for the brain;

A dying God upon a cross

Is reason gone insane.

Beware of all the Holy books And all the creeds and schools,

And every law that man has made And all the golden rules.

‘Laws’ and ‘rules’ imposed on you From days of old renown,

Are not intended for your ‘good’ But for your crushing down.

Then dare to rend the chains that bind And to yourself be true,

Dare to liberate your mind, From all things, old and new.

Categories
Adam Green

C Q

“The Christian Question, definitively: I think it’s the most central issue of our time right now…” said Adam Green, and Richard Spencer agrees (video from three months ago).

That is precisely why I find it magnificent that The Fair Race is available again in print.

The tragedy of National Socialism is that Hitler couldn’t write a manifesto because he couldn’t criticise Christianity as openly as Himmler did in private.

In other words, there is no public National Socialist manifesto, only private ones like the article for the SS published in The Fair Race (Main Kampf was written for neo-normies).

That wouldn’t have mattered if Hitler had won the war. But since he lost, we can no longer disguise ourselves publicly as Hitler did (to paraphrase the New Testament, he spoke to the masses in parables but explained everything to his apostles). The time has come for the esoteric aspect of National Socialism to become exoteric. This is the only way to replace the Jewish archetype that has seized the collective unconscious of white men with the Aryan archetype.

In this, Richard Spencer is wrong. Using the caduceus metaphor he used in the video, I would modify it by claiming that one serpent of the caduceus is heading towards the wings (the Aryan), but the other wants to take us down to the earth (the Jewish one): that is, to say goodbye to our recently acquired feathers!

Categories
Racial right

Goner

by Dr. Robert Morgan

Heart of America: The Blessings of Repentance, painted at the “Crossroads of America” event at Goshen, Indiana.

Trying to imagine America without Christianity is like trying to imagine Nazi Germany without Hitler.

Just as did Pierce and Rockwell, Linder wanted an America with Americans other than they are. This attempt to reform people who don’t want to be reformed—to save people who don’t want to be saved—is the strategic weakness that caused all three of them to fail [emphasis by Ed.].

No amount of clever typing is ever going to work. In the current environment, building a mass movement like NSDAP is impossible.

That’s why I say that inducing a permanent collapse of the technological system is a better way to achieve the goal of saving the white race. It’s something that could be accomplished by only a small group of fanatics, or maybe even a lone genius. The system is vulnerable to attack in thousands of ways. I sketched out one possible way [elsewhere].

Categories
Adam Green Richard Carrier Videos

Jewish psyop

Categories
Adam Green Christendom Videos

Christianity’s

role in eroding ethnic consciousness