web analytics
Categories
Jesus Judeo-reductionism Kevin MacDonald

Morgan’s comments on Unz Review

Christianity has always been anti-racist. How could it be otherwise? It’s built upon the idea of whites worshiping a Jew; i.e., someone of another race. Jesus encouraged the apostles to make converts of all races. More, from the earliest times the church has allowed and even encouraged interracial marriage.

The white Christian cult of the victim began with Jesus, and continued through the various martyrs celebrated by the Catholic Church. Before the Christian takeover of white civilization, there was no cult of the victim. White people didn’t see any virtue in being a victim at all.

MacDonald thinks Christianity is generally positive for whites, and because of that, his way of explaining the fanatical anti-racist and pro-immigration stance of all mainstream Christian churches is to say that they have been infiltrated and subverted by Jews. Poor white people! Not even safe from Jewish attack within the confines of their own churches! No, it definitely could not be the case that two thousand years of Jesus’ message to love everyone, regardless of race, has had a weakening effect on their racial solidarity. Perish the thought! MacDonald approves of Christianity even though it came from Jews and even though it perfectly fits his own paradigm of a Jewish movement. In his view, whites were completely helpless to prevent the takeover of their churches by the devious, treacherous, scheming Jews.

His approach to issues such as feminism, corporate power, civil rights, the mass media and so on follows this same pattern. To MacDonald the vast majority of whites are mere clay, existing only to be molded by Jewish power.

Assuming he was an actual person and not just a mythic figure, and his Biblical portrayal is accurate, it would be fair to describe Jesus as the original social justice worker. He’s the prototype, and all the rest, with their foot washing and boot kissing, their uplifting of the poor, the persecuted, and the meek (like Jesus!), and condemnation of the rich, the proud, and the strong (like Satan!), are but imitators of Christ. As for racial in-group constraints, the whole point of Christianity seems to be to eliminate them, and while one can dispute all day whether that’s a proper interpretation of various Bible verses or not, it’s inarguable that that has been the effect Christianity has produced. The Christian mainstream is ostentatiously “color blind” and places no value at all on race.

This view also presents a problem for Sunic’s friend MacDonald, since if the egalitarian impulse is indeed “primordial”, and present in everyone as a matter of “instinct”, why would Jews be needed to bring it out? As an alternative explanation, could it not be that, instead of being “brainwashed”, subverted, and culturally undermined by Jews, whites are merely following their own egalitarian impulses? Hard to see why not. It doesn’t require much persuasion to persuade someone to do something they want to do anyway.

Of course, portrayal of oneself or one’s in-group as a victim is a handy way to avoid self-examination and self-blame. A man who enters on a self-destructive course of action will often blame someone other than himself. But everyone knows, or should, that that’s just an excuse.

Categories
Judea v. Rome Kriminalgeschichte des Christentums (books) Merovingian dynasty

Christianity’s Criminal History, 125

Kriminalgeschichte des Christentums
(Christianity’s Criminal History
)

As I said recently, the masthead to understand the direction of this site is the essay translated into English ‘Rome against Judea; Judea against Rome’. This text is not academic but an essay that a Spaniard published for his website under the penname of Evropa Soberana. Those who doubt the historical veracity of Soberana’s essay can read some passages that we have translated from Karlheinz Deschner (1924-2014) about the first centuries of Christianity.

But like Soberana’s essay, our translation of those passages taken from Deschner’s work, Kriminalgeschichte des Christentums, does not include the hundreds of footnotes, with their respective bibliographic references, that appear in the German historian’s maximum opus. My idea is not to translate Kriminalgeschichte but to show in this translation of Deschner that what Soberana says can be supported by academic references. The serious scholar interested in verifying the facts mentioned in ‘Rome against Judea; Judea contra Roma’ can acquire the first volumes of Deschner’s work in German and work from the primary sources that the author cites.

Unlike the more formal translations, my purpose in this humble blog has been simply to popularise the true history of Christianity. Thus, our translations of Deschner are a bridge, so to speak, between the revealing yet relatively short essay of Soberana—a ninety-page book—and Deschner’s massive ten-volume study.

(Laocoön and His Sons. The sculpture that once was in the palace of Emperor Titus represents the tragic agony of the Ancient World: classic, athletic, wise, beautiful, courageous and close to the gods, at the hands of the Eastern serpent.)

My Spanish-English translation of ‘Rome against Judea; Judea against Rome’ ends with the defeat of the classical world by the Judeo-Christians during the reign of Theodosius II, a spiritual heir of the absolute intolerance of Yahweh before any cult that was not Hebrew. From the next entry of Christianity’s Criminal History on we will begin the translation of some passages from Deschner’s fourth volume that begins in the High Middle Ages: a book that covers from King Clovis to the death of Charlemagne. (Clovis founded the first dynasty of France, the Merovingian, and was also the first Christian king. This is why most of the French kings were called Louis, a modern form of Clouis.)

The fact that partial or full translations of Deschner’s ten volumes have been published in Italian, Spanish, Greek, Polish and Russian but not in English* speaks about the addicted state in which English speakers find themselves concerning the religion of their parents.

___________

(*) The translation that this site provides cannot reach bookstores or libraries in North America, the UK or Australia.

Categories
Ancient Greece Christian art Homer Iliad (epic book)

Homer

A few decades ago I heard non-Christian Octavio Paz (1914-1998) assert on television that Dante was the quintessential poet of the West. Something rebelled in me when I listened to Paz, my then hero of the Cervantes language, but only until now can I answer such an aberration.

Like many other intellectuals, historians, and writers, Paz confused Western Christian civilisation with European civilisation. But Christendom is not the West. Christianity was the psychotic breakdown that the West has suffered since Constantine began to impose the god of the Jews on a race that has been non-Christian for much longer than Christian. What Albus said on this site when commenting on the sacred music of Johann Sebastian Bach we could apply equally to Dante’s great poem:

As a former Catholic I have stopped visiting any church building for all my life. Never again a famous cathedral will impress me, especially not out of an interest in art. It took me major efforts to recognise that Christian representations in art and ‘sacred music’ are without exception infectious material, propaganda means of subjugation, the original degenerate art for Aryans. One should shrink from letting any such product enter into perception as one would shrink from the sight of the mutilated corpses of children. Aryan Weltanschauung demands logical consistency and gravitas wherever we go.

That is very true, and we could also shrink from Dante’s Commedia. The white race won’t be cured of its ethno-suicidal drive until it dares to repudiate an alien religion. Dante is not the poet of the West as the Nobel Prize winner of literature said, but Homer. And if we want to reconnect with the world prior to the religious drift that now has reached a florid psychosis (see the psychological articles in my recently published Daybreak), we have to rescue our real European roots.

Before the traitorous Roman emperors imposed a Semitic cult on the white man, the Iliad was considered something like the Bible of the Greco-Roman world: which makes perfect sense as, unlike the Bible in which all heroes are Jews, in the Iliad all heroes are Aryans.

No wonder that much of the content in the Library of Alexandria that our ancient enemies burned was commentary on the Iliad. (Just as, after the destruction of the Aryan world, our treacherous libraries have contained a myriad of books commenting on biblical passages.)

I recently said that after my new book was published the character of The West’s Darkest Hour would change, and that I was going to follow Manu Rodríguez’s advice about creating a new ecclesia. To do this we have to build more centres like the Parthenon in Centennial Park, the large-scale replica of the original Parthenon in Athens. But the difference is that these new temples, very small at the beginning, would be run by priests of the fourteen words and used to preach to the fair race. For example, instead of television and movies produced by our enemies, a song of the Homeric poem would have to be memorised and recited as it used to be performed and as Homer himself did without customs, sets or props but in a modest room, where even the children liked it.

How many have seen, performed live and from memory, at least one of the twenty-four songs of the Iliad as it used to be performed since Homer? The translated text that we can buy in bookstores is a dead letter. By contrast, in the ancient world Homer’s poem was represented by a single man who recited it with emotion. Compare such a bare performance with the mass-consumption poison that non-Gentiles make us see and hear thanks to billions of American dollars.

It is estimated that Homer could have lived in the 8th century b.c.e. in Ionia. To visualise the epic narrated by a single man you have to forget all the neoclassical paintings because the Homeric Hellenes were blond. See the articles in The Fair Race that prove it. Alas, after the Aryan apocalypse, also narrated in that same book that I compiled, Ionia, present-day Turkey, became a land of mudbloods…

Those who could really appreciate the Iliad would be those Aryans who wanted to re-conquer those lands for their race (e.g., the National Socialists), as the Iliad is circumscribed in the genre of the epic of the conquest of the peninsula and its islands by the blond beast of the north.

Categories
Daybreak Publishing

Two essential books

PDF of my recently published book here, hard copy here.

Lulu, Inc., has solved their technical problems and I was able to publish not only Daybreak, my collection of sixty essays, but also the September 2020 revised edition of The Fair Race.

Don’t try to get The Fair Race via Amazon or Barnes & Noble; only through Lulu (PDF here, hard copy here).

Amazon and others are selling a pirated, outdated copy before I removed and added several articles, and copiously checked the Spanish to English translations.

If you have trouble ordering either book please let me know through my email that appears on the sidebar.

Categories
Daybreak (book) Daybreak Publishing Mauricio (commenter)

Daybreak’s preface

The other book I compiled, The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour, collects essays by other authors. The vast majority of the essays that I collect here are mine. I put them in the chronological order in which I published them from the past decade to the current year and wrote them with English as my second language, although I couldn’t afford that a native-language checker proofread these articles. Both The Fair Race essays and the ones I publish here originally appeared on my website The West’s Darkest Hour.

These two books represent a paradigm shift in white advocacy. White nationalists err in their diagnosis of blaming only Jewry, as if whites were not responsible for their own decline. The real diagnosis of the decline of the West—Christianity, or rather Christian ethics—has been exposed in The Fair Race.

I am afraid to say that there are no apostates from Christianity among Westerners, not even atheists. Their great sense of guilt and so-called human rights are self-abasements and Christian ethical mandates in a secularised form. Not wanting to see it—and the final essay in this book includes a critique of Kevin MacDonald for being in denial—means that the pro-white movement is in its infancy. In Europe the situation is even worse, since after the Second World War all racism was mercilessly banished by the American Diktat. So we have no choice but to keep focusing on American racialists.

There is a lot of doublethink in believing yourself Jew-wise and continuing to live by the precepts for Gentile consumption that a Jew wrote in the New Testament. Concurrently, white nationalism is reactionary, not revolutionary as National Socialism was. None of the important figures in the current movement is proposing armed revolution like The Turner Diaries as the only way out. The pacifism of white nationalism is a consequence that the Americans who promote it have been unable to break away from the bourgeois and ethno-suicidal lifestyle that sells us both the gospel and secular liberalism. Today’s generation of whites, feminised to the core and worshipers of Mammon, is the perfect antithesis of the Spartans, the Republican Romans, the berserkers and the Nazis we studied in The Fair Race.

Of the present collection, the texts authored by other authors are ‘The Red Giant’ by a Swede, ‘How awake are you?’ by Mauricio and ‘On the Origin of the Word Racist’ by an American. As you can see in Mauricio’s rating scale, white nationalists are psychologically stagnated in levels four and five (the following ‘turner diaries’ levels can only be reached after transvaluing Christian values). I included ‘The Red Giant’ because it represented a eureka moment in my intellectual life. Before reading it I idealised not only Christianity but the United States itself (as we can see in that text).

I have modified many of the articles for inclusion in this book, and some of them have been heavily edited. For example, the first article that I collect here was written in 2006. I recently added a short sentence about the hand that Jaime Lannister lost in the third season of Game of Thrones, an episode that did not premiere until 2013. In some of the following articles I also added, or subtracted, several sentences when reviewing the text. From my magnum opus, From Jesus to Hitler, this book only translates a couple of chapters and the text about the Turin shroud that appears in ‘Introjection’. In the Contents page I have indicated in bold-type those chapters in addition to other serious essays that exceed 5,000 words. Most of the articles in this book, by contrast, were originally short blog posts.

Only the Aryan race has the potential to attain divinity, as can be seen on the cover image, Daybreak, which is also the image I chose in the original incarnation of The West’s Darkest Hour. The moment the white man sees that the religion of his parents is responsible for the darkest hour in the West will represent the breaking of dawn.

C. T.
September 2020

______ 卐 _____

 
It seems that Lulu, Inc., has solved some of its problems, as I was able to download my new book today and I’m just waiting for the proof copy to reach my postal address to approve the project!

Categories
Hate

New WDH

Keep in mind what I said in ‘White nationalism is a club for women’. The gulf that separates me from those who promote race realism, civil racialism, and even outright racism and white supremacy, is my ability to hate.

Today for example I was reviewing the comments about the article that Fred Reed published yesterday on The Unz Review about blacks who have recently murdered white children and adolescents. There are neochristian commenters on that webzine who keep saying the same old bullshit: giving each black man thousands of dollars to return to Africa, etc. Just compare that love of neighbour with the spirit of Pierce’s great novel, or with what I say in my first Day of Wrath essay.

I am reviewing sixty selected articles that, since the previous decade, I have published on this site for inclusion in a new book. Once the review is done I will try to publish that compilation in both printed book and PDF.

Reading racialist neochristians kills my spirit, so after I finish reviewing my new book I’ll change the direction of this site. I will follow the advice of Manu Rodríguez that appears in The Fair Race: ‘But we do not need a new religion, only to be aware of our pre-Christian cultures. We must recover such cultures to educate our children according to the varied heritage that these cultures represent. I think of the Edda, of the Mabinogion; of Homer and Virgil…’

The priest of the 14 words must be consistent, and the only way to do that is to suppress almost to zero all neochristian reading through readings that come before the Judeo-Christian infection: infection so well explained in the Judea vs. Rome section of my previous post.

So after my new book is published the character of The West’s Darkest Hour will change. I guess my thinking will reach maturity…