Category: Eduardo Velasco

Click here

Click here

Translation of the final paragraphs of ‘Descendants of the Aryans – remnants of Indo-European blood in Asia (III of IV)’ and the caption of a photograph chosen by the author:

We must start from the assumption that any kind of ‘policy’ towards these people seems utopian and redundant at a time when we have enough to do with Europe, with the West, with preserving European biodiversity and with the serious ethnic conflicts that are looming in our society due to the implantation of Third World societies in our midst. However, if the situation were to turn around and a regenerated Eurasia could afford it, it would not be a bad thing to consider ‘sponsoring’ these people to protect them and prevent the extinction of their genetic legacy, which after all is a cutting from the European tree growing on Asian soil.

It is simply amazing that specimens
like this still exist in deep Asia.

History (or a walk down the street) shows that multiculturalism does not work and that multiracial societies fall into Third Worldism or succumb to ethnic wars. In the upheavals of the times to come, it will be time to break with all the egalitarian, perverse and anti-evolutionary creeds that have been poisoning humanity for the last 2,000 years, to credit the idea of human inequality and to return to the natural idea of highly trusted, genetically linked, popular communities. From this perspective, it would be most desirable to learn the lessons that these people can offer us. A new pan-European doctrine must emerge to bring these peoples back into the European geopolitical sphere of influence, spearheaded by genetic, linguistic, esoteric, archaeological and anthropological studies on the ground.

Click here

Translation of one of the final paragraphs:

The Indo-Aryans, coming into violent contact with aboriginal populations, immediately acquired an instinct of purity and a reflex of protection against non-Aryan races, which is also embodied in the Rigveda, a truly racist book that has surprisingly not already been censured by the System as ‘apologia for genocide’ and ‘incitement to racial hatred’.

Click here

Translation of the first paragraph of the article ‘Descendants of the Aryans—remains of Indo-European blood in Asia (I of IV)’:

Everyone has heard of that National Geographic cover of a white, green-eyed Afghan refugee. That cover caused a sensation. Countless people offered to adopt the girl in question, and became interested in the issue of ethnic groups in the East. Today, practically anyone knows that even in the most unknown corners of deep Asia, there are remnants of European genetics.

Since the image of the Afghan refugee is broken in the PDF that I link to, I am adding that image here.

Click here

Translation of the final words of ‘Were the Egyptians white?’:

What happened to Egypt, why did it fall after millennia of splendour? As with the fall of all civilisations, the answer lies in biology in general and genetics in particular.

In 1296 BCE, the Egyptians conquered Nubia (South, Negroid inhabitants), building a series of forts to protect the borders and control insurrections. At one point, it was forbidden for any Nubians to cross the border into Egypt. Eventually, and as is obvious in Egyptian art, black slaves were imported. As always, a low birth rate among the Egyptian nobility, a high birth rate among the black and Semitic slaves, and the miscegenation produced by the relaxation of the warrior, aristocratic and dominant mentality, was the curse of Egypt. Finally, in 200 years, Egypt went from being a great civilisation to disappearing from the map of civilised nations, at the mercy of stronger foreign powers.

Until 1050 BCE, all pharaohs had been predominantly white or Nordic. With the advent of the 25th Dynasty and the “black pharaohs”, who had a brief and decadent reign of 75 years, during which they built rickety pyramids 20 metres high (the great pyramid of Kheops, from the good old days of the true pharaohs, was 146 metres high), the original genetic and biological substrate that had created, from nothing, the Egyptian spirit, was drowned forever in the dense thicket of dark blood.

Click here

Title translation:

‘Evropa Soberana presents The heretic’s arsenal – great personalities advocate eugenics’.

Click here

Click here

Translation of one of the final quotations from the article:

Christianity – and this was its greatest merit – subdued to some extent the brutal warlike ardour of the Germans, but it could not break it entirely, and when the Cross, that restraining talisman, falls to pieces, then the ferocity of the ancient fighters, the frenzied berserker fury of which the Norse poets have said and sung so much, will be released again. The talisman has rotted, and the day will come when it will crumble painfully into dust. The old stone gods will then rise from the forgotten ruins, and wipe from their eyes the dust of centuries, and Thor, with his giant hammer, will rise again. When you hear the tread of boots and the clash of weapons, ye sons of his neighbours, be on your guard… perchance he will unleash himself upon you.

Click here

Translation of some of the concluding paragraphs:

You have heard how in ancient times it was said, “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth”. But I say to you, blessed are the brave, for they shall make the earth their throne. And you have heard the man say, “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for they shall enter the kingdom of heaven”. But I say unto you, blessed are they whose soul is great and whose spirit is free, for they shall enter into Valhalla. And you have heard men say, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of the Lord”. But I say unto you, blessed are they that make war, for they shall be called, not sons of Jehovah but sons of Wotan, who is greater than Jehovah. And I say to you finally that Wotan has put a heart of stone in our breast, that those words of the old Scandinavian saga came from a true Viking, and that a man born of such a race is proud that he was not bred to feel pity.

• Christianity was a subversive movement of agitation against Rome, against Greece and ultimately against the European world.

• We have to assume that what has come down to us from the culture of antiquity is only a tiny part of what was there and that it was taken away from us by the Judeo-Christian destruction.

• Christianity, as a slave rebellion devised and led by Jews to destroy Roman power (and, ultimately, all European power), was and is a doctrine aimed at turning vigorous peoples into tame flocks.

Click here

Editor’s note: The following is a translation of the first paragraphs of the author’s conclusions on his second instalment of the Rome-Judea conflict.

SOME CONCLUSIONS

– The Greeks and Romans, in their Olympian naivety (and I say this because only a naive person could think of banning the Torah, Shabbat or Brit Milah without realising that Jewry would rather die in one piece than renounce its traditions), were too short-sighted and too superficial in their treatment of the Jewish problem. They also showed themselves to be unaware of the particularities that differentiated the Jews from the other Semitic peoples of the Near East and thought that they could place their temples and statues there as if it were just another well-Hellenised and well-Persianised Arab or Syrian province. The persistence of identity that the Jews had shown did not make the unconcerned Romans think enough.

– The Romans’ conviction that they were the bearers of a superior culture made them fall into a fatal error: they thought that one culture could be valid for the whole of humanity and exported to peoples of different ethnicity. The Hellenisation and Romanisation of East and North Africa had only one effect: ethnic chaos, the Balkanisation of Rome itself, strife and, finally, the emergence of Christianity.

– Even using the brute force of its legions, Rome was slow to realise that the Jews, in their resentment and lust for revenge, did not care to slaughter waves and waves of individuals if it meant annihilating a single Roman detachment. This fundamentalist fanaticism, which went beyond the rational, must have astounded the Romans, who were not used to seeing a militarily ill-equipped people immolate themselves in such a convinced manner, their minds filled with blind faith in a jealous, vengeful, abstract and tyrannical god. What the Jews call Yahweh and in Europe became known as Jehovah is undoubtedly an extremely real will, and a force opposed to the Olympian and solar gods of the European peoples, the height of which was the Greco-Roman Zeus-Jupiter.

– The revolutionary and agitational vocation of Jewry was born here.

Evropa Soberana writes above: ‘They also showed themselves to be unaware of the particularities that differentiated the Jews from the other Semitic peoples of the Near East’. Quite right. The Romans tried to apply to Judea the same medicine they had previously applied to another Semitic people, those living in Carthage. The big difference is that the Jews were not like the Carthaginians. As an act of revenge after the Temple of Jerusalem was destroyed, they left us a little gift: Christianity, as we will see in tomorrow’s PDF. (It is worth having the original PDF in Spanish of what we call here the ‘masthead’ of this site.)