In a recent thread on The Occidental Observer Jack Frost commented:
Very interesting talk by the professor referenced above. One thing that stood out for me was how, while he did spend a lot of time discussing Puritans and their universalistic outlook, he avoided the “C” word (Christianity) entirely. I’m with Sunic on this, and would even go him one better. I would venture to say you can’t hope to understand the origins of this white pathology without a full analysis of the way Christianity has shaped the culture of the West. Attempts to locate the source of the pathology in prehistoric times, as a response to severe environmental conditions, fail for at least a couple of reasons.
For one thing, if that were the case, wouldn’t individualism and pathological altruism also be found at similar latitudes all over the world? It isn’t. As KMD [Kevin MacDonald] himself acknowledges, whites were the only ones to develop in this way. Also, if the origins of individualism and pathological altruism were really that ancient, why didn’t it manifest itself in classical times?
Pre-Christian Roman society was decidedly un-altruistic, and un-empathetic. You can scour the history books all you want, and you will find no mention of Roman charity missions to help foreigners. They wouldn’t have understood that idea at all. Foreigners were taken to be useful as slaves and made into tributaries, but little else. Those who didn’t cooperate were put to the sword. And empathy? Forget it! The Romans were expert torturers and considered death an entertainment. On a typical weekend they’d watch gladiators hack each other to pieces just for fun! The excruciating and prolonged death by crucifixion was a Roman specialty of which they made frequent use. After the failed revolt of Spartacus they crucified the surviving rebels along a 300 mile stretch of roadway, about one every hundred yards or so. The bodies were left to rot, as a lesson to the rest.
All of this changed eventually only with the coming of Christianity. It is Christianity, in its manifold forms, and especially, in its cultural residue, which influences and shapes the perceptions of even non-believers, that is the source of the racial egalitarianism and philo-Semitism that rules modern life.
Christianity has even reshaped our genetics, as KMD has documented elsewhere in his paper that dealt with outbreeding as a policy promoted by the Catholic Church. Over time, it has become, in effect, a fully metastasized cultural and genetic cancer that has changed who we are.
There’s a tendency in our circles to think of Christianity as either completely good or completely bad. I would put forth the proposition—mind-blowing to some, no doubt—that it has both good and bad points; that as a means to an end it once offered advantages with respect to some ends, but that those advantages were obtained only at a tremendous cost. The consignment of the white race to oblivion may well be one such cost.
9 replies on “Christianity on the dock”
For your interest, Tom Sunic posted a couple of posts there:
The Christian churches are often force to “move with the spirit of the times” in order to adjust to the dominant political environment. Which now means accepting the dominant consesus of political correctness, tolerance and multiculturalism. Catholic Church has only a fragment of the power it once had. Once upon a time the Catholic Church supported Mussolini, Franco and Salazar and their nationalistic and traditionalist governments. It is not the duty of the Catholic Church to get involved in politics. Saving the various white ethnic groups is the duty of secular nationalist politicians and intellectuals first and foremost.
Those regimes you mention (Franco et al) were not racists. You can even expel Jews and Muslims in late 15th century as Iberians did and still be committing ethnic suicide—as they did the next century.
Another question is, Why was it only after 1945 that the terminal suicidal symptoms of Christianity appeared full-blown? Before WW2, the White race had dominion over the whole earth. The Romans didn’t manage that. It’s like in 1945 the White race subconsciously knew they could continue on as racist Nazis, or commit suicide like good Christians, and consequently chose suicide.
I deleted my previous comment because I now believe that you are on a more profounder track than what I previously thought. When I visited England last year I could not understand why English males didn’t seem to feel the level of hatred and dismay I felt when watching white women with monkey partners on the streets, not even at the London Forum meeting. Something mysterious has happened to the white psyche that is missing in my analysis.
Yes Cesar! I must admit I found your previous response to be slightly disappointing, I’m glad you now think I’m “on a more profounder track than you previously thought”. I believe the White psyche or collective White unconscious changed overnight in 1942 when Nazi Germany began to lose WW2. That’s not a fixed opinion. Just a speculation. It is like the White race collectively chose to commit suicide at that point, and everything since late 1942 has been intentionally downhill for the White race.
I agree the White race had deep problems (the witches brew) before 1942, but none of those problems had threatened the survival of the White race as a whole up to that point. It’s like the witches brew that had built up over millennia exploded into action after Nazi Germany lost the war. For example, although individual White civilizations had committed suicide in the past, the race as a whole had never attempted suicide from what I can tell.
Yes, the White psyche has been altered dramatically over a very short space of time. All White males, even racist White prison gangs in America that are not Christians by any stretch, are retreating and have become very passive. ?
Reblogged this on oogenhand and commented:
Do you seriously believe that the Roman Catholic Church is a Christian institution?
As for St. Paul; what he said may have a certain spiritual truth about it, but it in no way confers on any dark-skinned or non-White human being(insult alert) any right to migrate to Europe.
I believe the the European Union has a deliberate policy of replacing White Europeans with mulattos, for their own nefarious political reasons and irrational deranged and deracinated leftists are their intellectual cannon fodder that they use to promote this anti-European agenda. Should this agenda ever be realised; the Euro elites will then discard their leftist tools and lock them out of their promised workers paradise.
White Europeans have been brought up to believe that they have rights and these notions are a inconvenience and a hindrance to the neo-feudalists behind the European Project; so White Europeans have to go, so that the Euro-elites can lord it(as they so fondly imagine) over their new mud-coloured helots; whose primitive minds cannot really grasp or understand the concept of rights. Did you ever think of that: that the real objective of the European Union is the re-imposition of the feudal society that the European nations escaped from with the Enlightenment? To me, that’s where I see it headed.
Finally, you must understand that there are two kinds of leftists; the inner cadre who know that the socialist leftie ideals that they preach are totally bogus and the stupid true believers(aka useful idiots in commiespeak) who swallow it whole.
Yes: the Catholic Church is a Christian institution (see my Christmas post: here). I’ll tell you what I tell the other Christians who visit this blog: read the section on Christianity in The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour, linked on the sidebar, before commenting.