web analytics
Library of Alexandria St Paul Table talks (commercial translation)

Uncle Adolf’s table talk, 147


5th July 1942, evening

Falsification of war communiqués—Switzerland believes the Jewish lies—Britain in the hands of the Jews—Conservation of our racial integrity—Farcical success of Saint Paul.

Commenting on a completely false Soviet war communiqué which had been published in the Swedish and Swiss Press as well as in that of Britain and America, the Fuehrer said: These communiqués are typical Jewish fabrications. Although they do not even give names of places, they are nevertheless published by news agencies all the world over; and the explanation is, of course, that these agencies themselves are for the most part in the hands of Jews.

Unfortunately, this Jewish twaddle is being accepted without question not only in Britain and America, but also in Sweden and Switzerland.

Thanks to the development of National Socialist Germany, I firmly believe, if only on purely biological grounds, we shall succeed in surpassing the British to such an extent that, with one hundred and fifty to two hundred million Germans, we shall become the undisputed masters of the whole of Europe.

A recrudescence of the problem Rome or Carthage in the new guise of Germany or Great Britain is not, in my opinion, possible. For the result of this war will be that, whereas in Britain each additional million of population will be an additional burden on the island itself, the increasing growth of our own races will have open to them horizons of political and ethnological expansion which are limitless.

Further, any alleviation of the overcrowding of towns by a movement back to the land is not possible in Britain, for this would necessitate an immediate revolution of the whole social system of the Kingdom, which, in its turn, would lead to the disintegration of the rest of the Empire.

These very important facts have been largely overlooked in Britain because the country is ruled not by men of intelligence but by Jews, as one must realise when one sees how the intrigues of the Jews in Palestine are accepted in Britain without comment or demur.

One odour most important tasks will be to save future generations from a similar political fate and to maintain for ever watchful in them a knowledge of the menace of Jewry. For this reason alone it is vital that the Passion Play be continued at Oberammergau; for never has the menace of Jewry been so convincingly portrayed as in this presentation of what happened in the times of the Romans. There one sees in Pontius Pilate a Roman racially and intellectually so superior, that he stands out like a firm, clean rock in the middle of the whole muck and mire of Jewry.

The preservation of our racial purity can be assured only by an awareness of the racial issues involved; our laws, therefore, must be framed with the sole object of’ protecting our people not only against Jewish, but also against any and every racial infection.

We must do all we can to foster this racial awareness until it attains the same standard as obtained in Rome in the days of her glory. In those days the Roman protected himself subconsciously against any racial adulteration. The same thing occurred in Greece at the height of her power; according to reports handed down to us, the very market place itself in Athens shook with laughter when St. Paul spoke there in favour of the Jews. If nowadays we do not find the same splendid pride of race which distinguished the Grecian and Roman eras, it is because in the fourth century these Jewish-Christians systematically destroyed all the monuments of these ancient civilisations. It was they, too, who destroyed the library at Alexandria.

One reply on “Uncle Adolf’s table talk, 147”

Christianity must go for the white race to get back to its senses. Yesterday at The Occidental Observer Jack Frost said:

The white man’s entire worldview has become suffused with Christian concepts: a supposedly special sacredness of human life, pathological altruism to others in the name of universal brotherhood, free will, equality of the sexes and the races, extreme philo-semitism — all of it comes from Christianity. How do you kick a defective worldview out of politics? What is the political process but an implementation of a preexisting worldview, anyway? A worldview must necessarily precede the political process as it lays the groundwork of rules by which decisions are made in that process. Therefore a worldview determines politics, but not the other way around. The politics of the West are just what you’d expect given its history; given the way it sees the world.

Tom Sunic commented:

Mr. J. Frost. Agree. The distinction needed to be made more clearly between ethics and politics, going too often hand in hand in the modem liberal system, although being two sharply different phenomena. But with the secularization of our “Judeo-Christian” heritage this was to be expected. Here is the first Jew (convert?) St Paul: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”(3:28) From Mosaism to modern day LGBT transgenderism–makes perfect sense from today’s perspective.

I won’t tire to recommend Umberto Eco’s The Name of the Rose to understand what’s Christian axiology, especially how Eco depicts the 14th century Fraticelli, inspired in St Francis.

Comments are closed.