web analytics
Psychology Who We Are (book) William Pierce

Paradigm shift


Kuhn used the duck-rabbit optical illusion to demonstrate the way in which a paradigm shift could cause one to see the same information in an entirely different way.

Most white nationalists start their intellectual career by believing that the West’s darkest hour is due to “homicide”: Jewish influence is killing us. I myself navigated in that ship. But the more I thought on the subject, the more water entered the ship in the sense that holes started to appear in my working paradigm. The recent exchange at several threads of Occidental Dissent on this subject gave me an opportunity to disclose my ideas in a popular forum outside the provinciality of this site.

It is a very difficult subject from the psychological viewpoint. And you will be surprised to learn that in the past I constantly shifted in my mind from Type-A to Type-B and vice versa—that’s to say, in my soliloquies I blamed Jews Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and Whites Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays!—depending on the sort of literature I happened to be reading.

The biggest hole that started to sink the ship, and I am following the metaphor in the sense that all of it was a mental warfare inside my head, was the fact that even when Christianity was healthy the Iberian whites, especially the Portuguese, ruined their gene pool by mixing their blood with non-whites in the very centuries when Jews had no power in the Iberian peninsula thanks to the Inquisition. I thought along those lines because, as my readers can appreciate, I was born in a place formerly known as New Spain. (Which explains why I could write so easily a long essay about the Aztecs that I translated for this blog.)

A paradigm shift is, according to Thomas Kuhn in his influential The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, a change in the basic assumptions or paradigms within a ruling theory. See the image at the top of this entry and discover what happened in my mind:

During the process of wrapping my mind as I tried to solve the conundrum of who was guiltier, Jews or Whites, the only defense I had against such intellectual agony was simply to take a closer look at the evidence. For instance, investigate what had happened to the white people in cultures that predate the Jewish takeover of the western media today.

The closer I zoomed in, the more I realized that the phenomenon I was trying to grasp in my visuals was not a duck but a rabbit. It only looked like a duck at a distance because of an optical illusion. In other words, all shifting in paradigms is due to an internal change. It is the mind what “chose” to see it either way. That’s why I stated above that trying to decipher whether Western malaise is suicide or homicide is, in the final analysis, a psychological issue.

In other words, if you eat too many Jews for breakfast, as monocausalists do, you will always see a duck. It is only when you start to broaden, say, Kevin MacDonald’s perspective into the meta-perspective that William Pierce offers us in his last book, Who We Are, when in addition to the Jewish Problem you start to see a gigantic White Problem as well. Pierce’s book is what one finds at the deepest level of the rabbit hole.

In the last chapter of Who We Are Pierce says, “In the final analysis, however, none of these things changes the fact of profound moral illness on the part of the White populations of the Western nations in the postwar era. It is an illness with roots deep in the past, as has been pointed out in earlier installments, but in postwar America it bloomed. It is difficult to analyze the witches’ brew and place exactly the proper amount of blame on each ingredient.” And after mentioning the ingredients of the brew he added, “The evil spirit of the immediate postwar period was, at the time, apparent only to an especially sensitive few, while most could not see beneath the superficial glitter of change and motion.”

Take note that Pierce always was perfectly aware of the Jewish problem. As you can see, the article I mention at the sidebar, “Best article on the Jewish question” is #1 when I advertise his texts. But unlike monocausalists and Type-A bicausalists like Greg Johnson (“So, is it all “our fault”? Of course not”) Pierce knew that, after the Second World War, something monstrously evil in the white soul was ultimately the culprit of our woes.

That’s why I will always advertise Hellstorm as the starting text to understand this blog.

9 replies on “Paradigm shift”

Here I do agree on “in addition to the Jewish Problem you start to see an absolutely gigantic White Problem as well”
And I’m glad your position softens a bit, while still blaming whites and christendom, you are now putting a fair share on jewry.
But the problem is as you have justly noticed through the ages , even in the absence of jews, we lemmings have to be protected. And the only thing we can uproot is jewry, while we can not uproot our very naive selfdestructive soul. Checkmate, mate..

ps : the portuguese streets in that painting of that ero you mentionned are heavily filled with blacks AND jews. IMO the portuguese never took seriously their expelling of jews. Spain did. Then the jews became the cosmopolite travellers as we know them between Lisbon and its colonies and Amsterdam and Antwerpen.

“while we can not uproot our very naive self-destructive soul. Checkmate, mate.”

We can, by means of National Socialism. That’s why Anglos are the monsters of our story, for what they did to Frodo. Unlike Tolkien’s story, they killed him.

Thanks for your question. My abridgement can be seen at the Addendum. If you want to read all of it, I would suggest obtaining a hard copy of it. (Important books should be in our bookshelves.)

The paradigm occurred a long time ago, when a fledgling White Nationalist movement began firstly, by not seeing the West in a ‘declining, no-win situation’, such as many still do today; even the english title of ‘decline of the West’, only served as a ‘eye-catcher’, and unless someone actually read the tome, would subconsiously sense a unbeatable Ragnarok.

All the dark and subtle commentaries, bereft of ‘jews’ or no, is of negative import, and the ability to create an ethos of positive affirmation, traditional re-affirmation, and a contnuing striving for political and national supremacy is the only thing, which should matter to the people of the West.

Comments are closed.