web analytics
Civil war Free speech / association Hate Islamization of Europe Justice / revenge Liberalism Pseudoscience Psychiatry Real men Sexual "liberation"

Breivik’s closing statement

Today I read a wonderful article by Andrew Hamilton at Counter-Currents about Norwegian revolutionary nationalist Anders Behring Breivik, 33. Hamilton let us know that among Norwegians the date July 22 is like September 11 in the US, that “literally everyone knows what it means.”

Recording and broadcasting of both, opening and closing statements by Breivik (April 16, 2012 & June 22, 2012) in Oslo District Court in Norway was prohibited. Reporters had to take manual notes.

It seems that Breivik’s courtroom statements have not been published by any major media outlet in any European language outside Norway. I would recommend future revolutionaries to study closely both statements and think seriously of what a trouble trio can do once it hits the fan.

Breivik’s statement

Thank you.

I think we can all agree that on July 22 a barbaric action occurred. What happened on July 22 in the government quarter and on Utøya were barbaric acts.

And I remember that on July 21 I thought after several years of planning, “Tomorrow morning I will die” [Breivik took a deep breath and leaned forward before continuing].

I came to within 200 meters of the government quarter. Then I remember I thought, “In two minutes I will die.”

And what am I going to die for? That’s what I’m going to talk about now.

I’m not going to deliver a speech. I gave my explanation on April 17th, and it contains many of my arguments. That statement explains the most. [See Breivik’s opening statement on Day 2 of the trial.]

There are still some things I did not say enough about, and that’s what I’ll take up now.

The Sanity Issue

I will start with the assessment of my sanity. As a starting point, every person under the law is presumed sane.

And of those who have evaluated me, a total of 37 highly qualified individuals, out of 37 people, 35 have not found any symptoms at all. And of the 37, two have found a multitude of symptoms.

So it’s pretty obvious what one should emphasize. The 35 people or the two people. It’s clear the prosecutors do not want to repeat here in court what I said in the interrogations. I will not go into that now.

The prosecutor said I wanted to claim mental incapacity in the beginning. That is not true.

In December or late November, when the firsaA [psychiatric] report came [concluding that Breivik was a paranoid schizophrenic], everyone was shocked

I was thinking: What to do next? I thought I would wait for the debate to die down. And I thought hard about strategy before demanding two new experts.

Also, gradually I thought: Now that I have been betrayed by two psychiatrists who do not have access to the conversations, how will I ever trust a psychiatrist again? That’s why I was considering not allowing myself to be examined again. If I get two reports against me, it’s over.

Democracy No Longer Functioning

As I’ve explained, especially on April 17 [the opening statement], the European democratic political model is not working. The arguments I presented emphasize the need for a fundamental change of leadership in Norway and Europe.

This began with World War II. In the 1960s the Labor Party decided that a large group of Pakistanis who had been refused entry into Finland, and who came to Norway on a tourist visa, should be granted residence.

And that was how the multicultural experiment in Norway began. The Labor Party decided that Norway should follow Great Britain’s example, with Asian and African mass immigration.

I have already talked a lot about the ridicule of cultural conservatives. So I will not talk much about it, except to address some high points.

The main characteristic has been political discrimination. Cultural conservative NGOs [non-governmental organizations] and youth organizations receive no funding. They are opposed. Perhaps the only cultural conservative newspaper we had in Norway, Norway Today, lost press subsidies just a few years ago.

After July 22 subsidies to HRS [Human Rights Service], a cultural conservative organization, were halved. That’s an organization that has nothing to do with me. During the past 20 or 30 years there has been public funding of extreme left organizations in Norway such as Blitz [an “antifa” communist, anarchist, and socialist youth movement permitted by the state to employ violence against the Progress Party, the Fatherland Party, the Democrats in Norway, and others] Serve the People [Serve the People—Communist League; Tjen Folket – Kommunistisk Forbund, a Maoist group] and the Norwegian Center Against Racism [Antirasistisk Senter, an anti-white NGO].

Ethnic Deconstruction

Perhaps some will remember the leader of Future In Our Hands [Fremtiden i våre hender], Steinar Lem [a Norwegian environmentalist], who died of cancer a few years ago. One of the last things he said was something that had burned within him, but he had not dared to articulate before he knew he was going to die.

It was that we fought for Tibetan rights and the Tibetan indigenous people, but in Norway it is not permitted to say that Norwegians have as much right to a homeland as the Tibetans, and that our rights are in fact equally important.

He did not dare to speak the truth before he was told by his doctor that he was going to die. Only then did he dare to say what he thought.

In part of the compendium, I’ve written a lot about [ethnic] deconstruction and the absence of morality in Norway since 1968. They are huge problems. In Norway today, ideals are upheld that are extremely harmful and will be detrimental to our future.

When it comes to sexually transmitted diseases and the sexual revolution, it’s actually something that is underreported, and has created major problems in Europe. The ideal being upheld is to have sex with as many strangers as possible. Instead of focusing on the nuclear family, the focus is on dissolving it, and all the problems which that entails.

For example, the Sex and the City ideal, where Samantha and Carrie through 100–200 episodes of the series have sex with hundreds of men. These are the ideals that are upheld today. This is a disease. It’s like sugar to the audience. These sick ideals should be censored and shielded from our community.

So people neglect their duty to family and nation. They get education, travel, and are 35 before they start having children. Women should begin having children in their 20s. Our birth rate is below replacement level.

No Free Speech

One of the most influential people in Norway, Arne Strand [a print and broadcast journalist and former member of Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland’s cabinet] in Dagsavisen [the daily newspaper Strand edits, until 1999 the official organ of the Labor Party, now independent] has issued many statements about press subsidies.

He proposes that everyone on the right, to the right of Carl I. Hagen [former Vice President of the Storting (Norwegian Parliament) and ex-chairman of the Progress Party], should be censored, and excluded from the democratic process. He says straight out that government press subsidies [to the Left, denied to the right] are necessary to preserve the current political hegemony.

We must protect hegemony, we must not allow people the right to express themselves. The system of press subsidies ensures that Norway will never be a democracy, because those on the far right are excluded.

I will mention some important political actions by the Labor Party, those in power in Norway, that legitimize and may trigger violent counter-reactions.

Psychiatry and the Legacy of World War II

Svein Holden [one of Breivik’s prosecutors] said that after WW II not many people in Norway were sent to psychiatric wards. He meant that only novelist Knut Hamsun and Justice Minister Sverre Riisnæs were sent to mental hospitals.

[Sverre Riisnæs served in Vidkun Quisling’s Nasjonal Samling (NS, National Unity) government during the German occupation; after the war he was imprisoned in a Norwegian psychiatric hospital from 1948–1960.]

But there were several. [“Breivik sits leaning forward in his chair as he speaks. Defense attorneys Geir Lippestad and Vibeke Hein Bæra lean back and look down at the table.]

It’s no secret that after the war many cultural conservatives and nationalists were neutralized with the help of psychiatry. Many members of the Nasjonal Samling were sent to the madhouse by Labor.

Halldis Neegaard Østbye, Quisling’s secretary and NS-ideologue, among other things wrote the book Jews’ War in 1943. She eventually died at Dikemark madhouse. Her and her husband’s ski factory was taken from them by the Labor Party at war’s end.

[Halldis Neegaard Østbye, active NS leader and prolific writer. In 1938 she wrote The Jewish Problem and Its Solution under the pseudonym “Irene Sword.” It was reissued in 1942 and 1943.]

And Knut Hamsun we know about.

These unconstitutional, unjust, illegal sentences should be abolished, and compensation provided to the relatives.

Non-NS’ers who were opposed to the Labor Party were also tried and declared mad.

An example is editor Toralv Fanebust [a harsh critic of Norway’s post-WW II trials and persecutions]. When the attempt [to declare him insane] failed, he was given a lengthy prison sentence for having written about important Labor Party members’ actions before and after the war.

His grandson has recently released the book Krigshistorien: oppgjør med mytene [War History: Reckoning With the Myths].

Violence Against the Right

What else has the political power instigated and applauded that is likely to precipitate violent resistance?

The Fatherland Party [FLP, Fedrelandspartiet, a nationalist party in Norway between 1990 and 2008] received about 0.5 percent of the vote in 1993, the first time they ran in Parliamentary elections.

[FLP leader] Bjarne Dahl in 1993 tried to legitimize political opposition to immigration. At a market square meeting in Oslo, he had his face smashed with an iron pipe, his jaw broken, and his teeth knocked out in attacks by some Blitz members [antifas belonging to the state-funded group mentioned previously].

Party leader and professor Harald Trefall [1925–2008, experimental physicist, anti-immigration activist, and Fatherland Party founder] was also hit in the face by something that was thrown. The party chairman was bleeding from a wound in the face.

Also, others were beaten and kicked.

When a horrified spectator tipped off Dagbladet [one of the country’s largest newspapers] about these violent attacks, he received the following response from Dagbladet: “Isn’t that good, then?”

This was their attitude. The same attitude shared by most of the press. The mass media made no mention of the violent and dangerous attacks against the Fatherland Party.

No Freedom of Association

On June 28, 2002, the parliamentary parties committed democratic suicide. They passed a new law saying that all parties that hadn’t received at least 5,000 votes in the last election were stricken [from the ballot].

They must collect 5,000 signatures under stringent restrictions. This means that there are very few small parties. It is almost impossible to start a new party in Norway today. In Sweden, the requirement is 1,500 signatures.

Vigrid logo

The PST [Police Security Service, Politiets sikkerhetstjeneste, internal secret police] boasts unrestrainedly about how they crushed Vigrid [link to its website]. The police called on all the young people in the organization and their parents. PST destroyed the organization through harassment of its young members.

[One day in 2004, agents from all 26 field offices paid personal visits to each of Vigrid’s members, many of whom were teenagers living with their parents. The investigators continued this tactic for several months, until about 60% of Vigrid quit the group. –Trans.]

What they have done is systematically harass political activists.

In addition, PST ran a comprehensive harassment campaign against the leader of Vigrid, Tore Tvedt. Among other things, extensive surveillance, house raids, arrests, and making sure he was repeatedly thrown out of rented houses.

At a school debate on August 28 in connection with the parliamentary elections of 2009, the party leader [Øyvind Heian] of the Norwegian Patriots [NP, NorgesPatriotene, a defunct anti-immigration party] received cuts in his forehead causing severe bleeding [during an attack by a far left anti-white mob including SOS Racism], forcing him to leave the meeting. The meeting continued as if nothing had happened. Neither the school administration nor the police did anything at all about the attack on the party leader.

Before local government elections last year the Christian Unity Party [KSP, Kristent Samlingsparti] was attacked by a person belonging to SOS Racism; they are communists.

Such things of course anger everyone with nationalist attitudes in this country.

That a counter-reaction has not occurred before July 22 amazes everyone who follows national trends. The anti-democratic forces that govern our country are obviously expecting something. This can be seen from the adoption of new surveillance measures. They have been doing exercises on scenarios like what happened [on July 22].

Yet those who govern the country say they have done nothing that could give rise to such a reaction. It is quite possible that many people connected with the power structure actually believe this.

Which means dark prospects for our country.

Communism and the Ruling Class

It is well known and documented that the Labor Party before World War II received funding from the Soviet Union. However, it is wrong to say that Labor is a full-fledged communist party. They do not support a planned economy. Hence the expressions “cultural Marxists” or “semi-communists.”

It is known that many Labor Party leaders had close relations to the Soviet Union right up to 1993. The Prime Minister’s father, [former Norwegian Foreign Minister] Thorvald Stoltenberg, had, for example, a code name in the KGB. Even Jens Stoltenberg [leader of the Labor Party and current Prime Minister of Norway] had a code name, “Steklov,” in the KGB archives.

[According to Wikipedia, until 1990 now-Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg “had regular contacts with a Soviet diplomat who later was revealed to be a KGB agent. According to Stoltenberg he immediately broke off this relationship when he came to the knowledge that his contact was a KGB agent. Several sources have confirmed that Stoltenberg’s code name within the KGB was “Steklov,” a name Jens Stoltenberg used as his online alias when playing computer games such as Age of Empires.]

Of two books about this, one, The Eagle Has Landed [Ørnen har landet, 2003] by Reiulf Steen I do not think has been suppressed, but I believe there’s a new book by Christopher Andrew that has been halted.

The problem with Labor is not their communist past, but that they refuse to acknowledge it.

Deconstructing the Nordic Race and European Culture

Labor Party Secretary Raymond Johansen claims they are required by international agreements to admit immigrants—instead of confessing that they want to transform Norway ethnically and culturally.

Raymond Johansen is intelligent enough to know that Japan and South Korea have experienced the same pressure from the UN to accept immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers. Japan and South Korea have learned to say no. They do not want the nation to be used as a dumping ground for the birth rate of the Second or Third World.

The political model in Japan and South Korea proves that countries that say no to mass immigration in the long run will be stronger than those open to mass immigration.

We will experience huge ethnic, cultural and religious conflicts. It is such conflicts that led to July 22.

This the Labor Party and Raymond Johansen know. If they had any integrity they would admit why they want mass immigration. In other words, they have exactly the same agenda as the social democrats in Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Great Britain.

Labor wants to deconstruct Norwegian culture. They want to deconstruct the Nordic race and Norwegian and European culture.

Individuals who have manifested support for cultural conservative organizations have been systematically ridiculed, harassed and persecuted in Norway and Western Europe since World War II.

In Norway, several hundred people over the last ten years have lost their jobs and been branded as racists because they opposed immigration.

An example is Remi Huseby [the young spokesman for the Norwegian Defence League, a group affiliated with the English Defence League], who lost his job after being labeled an intolerant and vicious right-wing extremist on the ground that he was opposed to the Norwegian state ideology, multiculturalism.

As a result, his employer felt pressured to fire him. This is only one case that documents journalists and editors ridiculing and persecuting cultural conservatives from WW II to the present.

The worst thing is that this demonization is better than being ignored. Being ignored is the worst of all.

In hundreds of cases in Europe and Norway cultural conservatives, anticommunists, and nationalists have been driven to suicide by public labeling and demonization. It is the same as in the Soviet Union.

So, another point I thought of omitting: cultural self-loathing. Norwegian society is suffering from a cultural psychological disorder that manifests itself through self-contempt for Norwegian ideals. This collective cultural psychosis is caused by decades of cultural Marxism.

A good example is Norway’s contributions to the Eurovision Song Contest over the past four years.

We let a White Russian asylum seeker, probably with a Tartar background. It is indeed good that we very occasionally allow an asylum seeker to represent us. But what is going on?

A few years later we let Stella Mwangi [a black, Nairobi-born “Norwegian-Kenyan” singer] win with a bongo song. What is Norway doing, sending an asylum seeker as ambassador? Is it lack of Norwegians in Norway, or are they suffering from self-hatred?

Then we let an asylum seeker from Iran win. This is an insult to all Norwegians. The answer is simple. A great many Norwegians suffer from cultural delusions and have urgent need for “medication,” with immediate implementation of cultural protectionism and the Nordic ideal.

Regarding the definition of the term “indigenous people,” this means original or old residents. It does not mean ethnic Norwegians are not indigenous.

We know of course that the United Nations does not recognize ethnic Europeans as indigenous people. But we must observe the UN’s agenda, its creation when the Axis powers were defeated in WW II.

The UN supports the deconstruction of European states. So does the European Union [EU]. The UN does not support the idigenous European population because the UN is controlled by cultural Marxists—the same as the EU.

José Manuel Durão Barroso, who has been the EU’s supreme leader for many years, was a longtime member of the Portuguese Communist Party. This shows the kind of people that hold power in the EU and the UN.

So, to come back to the definition of the word “indigenous.” There is no definition of “indigenous peoples” that nationalists and cultural Marxists can agree upon. Europe’s nationalists and cultural conservatives use a different definition than does the EU or the UN. The correct definition is “old or original people.”

Why should one support the struggle for indigenous people in Tibet, Bolivia, and other places but not in Europe? Why do indigenous activists in other parts of the world receive support and praise, while indigenous activists in Europe are branded as racists?

The battle is identical for all indigenous activists, namely, to fight against the ethnic and cultural extinction of their people from immigration. The fact that activists elsewhere are supported while we are combated as if we were a disease is an intolerable injustice.

When it comes to ongoing ethnic deconstruction I would recommend that everyone read the essay [he mentions its title, but the reporter omits it] by David Coppell and Johan__.

Muslim Demographics

Regarding Mullah Krekar [a Kurdish Islamic refugee in Norway], the reason I wanted to call him as a witness was to shed light on orthodox Islam’s view of Europe. He calls himself a Kurdish religious leader. He is one of the few Muslim leaders who are honest about Islam’s takeover of Europe.

Krekar said:

“In Denmark they printed drawings, but the result was that support of Islam increased. I, and all Muslims, are evidence. You have not managed to change us. It is we who are changing you. Look at the changes in the population of Europe, where Muslims reproduce like mosquitoes. Every Western woman in Europe has 1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries gives birth to 3.5 children.”

All the sources are in the compendium [Breivik says, looking at the judges].

I also remind you that Muammar Gadaffi, who was recently killed by NATO, said in March 2007:

“There are signs that Allah will grant us victory in Europe without use of the sword. We need no terrorists, we need no suicide bombers. The millions of Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”

I will mention a few points about demographics. Demographic examples documenting how Islamic demographic warfare works in practice.

Kosovo is a very good example that I have not talked about. In 1900 Kosovo was 60% Christian, 40% Muslim. In 1913 the figure was 50% [Muslim], 1948 72%; in 1971 it was 79 percent Muslim. In 2008, after NATO had bombed our Serbian, Christian brothers, Kosovo was 93% Muslim. In just 100 years Kosovo has gone from being a Christian country to being a Muslim country.

Lebanon is an occupied state. In 1911 it was 21 percent Muslim. Today there are more—approximately 80 percent. This is demographic warfare. Warfare that is waged against Europe and against Norway at this moment.

And not only against against Christians, but against Hindus as well. Pakistan [carved out of India as a Moslem state in 1947] was 25 percent Hindu in 1941; in 1948, 17 percent. Today, it is less than 1 percent. This is Pakistani “tolerance” for people who think differently. Bangladesh [which declared independence from Pakistan in 1971] in 1941 was 30 per cent Hindu; today it is less than 8 percent.

Then one can look at the exploding populations in Muslim countries.

In 1951 there were 33 million people in Pakistan. Today they are nearly 200 million. From 33 million to nearly 200 million in 60 years. Officially, they report a birth rate of 3.58, but it is of course a lie.

The media like to convey the idea that most Muslims support democracy, but it is not true. A survey conducted by the University of Maryland, in which 4,000 Muslims were queried, shows that 65 percent want to unite all Muslim countries into a caliphate, and 65 percent wish to implement strict interpretation of Sharia law.

“Child Killer”

One last point. Lawyers previously called me a child murderer. But we know that the average age on the island was over 18.

Many armies in the world have 18-year-old soldiers. Many of our own soldiers in Afghanistan are 18. Does this mean that we send children to war?

The Labor Party and the AUF [Labor’s youth auxiliary] are themselves guilty of mass murder of children in hospitals across the country. Thousands of children are killed every year by abortion. Muslims do not practice abortion because Sharia does not permit it. Labor is thus a culprit in mass murder, and then uses the low birth rate as an excuse for mass immigration.

Resistance Increasing

If you choose to recognize my claim of necessity, you will effectively send shock waves through all the illegitimate regimes in Europe.

The court should remember that the biased judges who worked for Hitler’s Germany were condemned by history after the war. Likewise, history will judge the judges in this case. [When Breivik said this, district court judges Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen and Arne Lyng looked directly at him.] History will tell whether they convicted a man who tried to stop the evils of our time. History shows that sometimes one must implement a barbarity to stop an even greater barbarism.

My brothers in the Norwegian and European resistance movements are sitting out there watching this case as they plan new attacks. They might be responsible for as many as 40,000 deaths. Yesterday, explosives were found at a Swedish nuclear plant, suggesting that my brothers in the Swedish resistance had something to do with it.

In the compendium I describe how to attack Swedish, German (…) [ellipses indicate missing material from the original transcript] nuclear power plants. It is intended to break the back of (…) PST knows that militant nationalists have access to weapons that can cause (…) It is my duty to warn about this because it can be prevented if the will is there.

Create an Ethnostate

In the compendium I described a solution that can prevent all future conflicts with ultra-nationalists.

The smartest thing that could be done is to give us autonomy, autonomy within a specific area of Norway for people who oppose mass immigration and multiculturalism. We are interested in having our own state within the state, reserved for the indigenous Norwegian people. In other words, national conservatives, orthodox Christians, and National Socialists.

Such a solution would be good for both parties. Marxists and liberals would not have to experience our anger and complaining about the current state. And we would not have to live in a multi-ethnic hell. I have written about this political model and will convey the proposal later.

A solution like this can be used in all European countries, and can thus prevent further escalation of the conflict between cultural conservatives and multiculturalists.

The starting point might be that they get control over an area equivalent to about 1–2 percent of the country, and the area increases proportionally with growth. If we do not succeed and flourish, the autonomous state will not be developed. This political model is similar to political solutions relating to indigenous peoples in other parts of the world. Many ultra-nationalists and others would feel positive about developing such a solution.

Fair Warning

The alternative is that we focus on the takeover of the entire country of Norway—something Marxists and liberals would be mightily displeased with.

But the current regime is not interested in dialogue with us, so we have nothing to lose and the conflict will escalate over the next few years. It might not be tactful to say this in that the prosecutor is “gunning” on with “mental incapacity,” but I must convey my peace proposal, which could save many lives in the future [Breivik raises his voice when he talks about what will happen in the future].

This trial should be about finding the truth. The documentation of my claims—are they true? If they are true, how can what I did be illegal?

Norwegian academics and journalists work together and make use of (…) methods to deconstruct Norwegian identity, Christianity, and the Norwegian nation. How can it be illegal to engage in armed resistance against this?

The prosecution wondered who gave me a mandate to do what I did. Was it the KT [Knights Templar] network? I have answered this before, but will do so again. Universal human rights, international law, and the right to self-defense provided the mandate to carry out this self-defense.

Everything has been triggered by the actions of those who consciously and unconsciously are destroying our country. Responsible Norwegians and Europeans who feel even a trace of moral obligation are not going to sit by and watch as we are made into minorities in our own lands. We are going to fight.

The attacks on July 22 were preventive attacks in defense of my ethnic group, the Norwegian indigenous people. I therefore cannot acknowledge guilt. I acted from necessity (nødrett) on behalf of my people, my religion and my country.

I therefore demand that I be acquitted.

See endnotes at Counter-Currents

35 replies on “Breivik’s closing statement”

Now it looks like Breivik and I are the only ones who, in the nationalist movement, have said something substantial about the essentially pseudo-scientific nature of psychiatry. A sign that demonstrates that most whites, even nationalists, are plugged in the Matrix is that very very few recognize that psychiatry is a fraudulent science.

Damn! By now at least a major WN webzine should have published my article demonstrating it.

You have taken a long time to “befriend” Breivik, if that’s what you’re now doing. Tanstaafl was the first one that I know of to speak favorably about Breivik … which took a lot of courage. It was his blogs of 10 April, 20 April, 23 April and 27 April.

After all that, Greg Johnson finally had to write his change of direction in “A New Respect for Anders Breivik” in which he linked to Tanstaafl’s blog.

Tom Sunic, immediately after the attack, denounced Breivik on his radio program in knee-jerk fashion as a “monster” and not a White Nationalist at all, and said he should be shunned. Others followed suit (but not me). This shows who is doing the real thinking among us.

As far as I know, the first to write in relatively positive light about Breivik was MacDonald, the very next day, June 23 2011: “In general, it must be said that he is a serious political thinker with a great many insights and some good practical ideas on strategy…”

Hunter Wallace followed on June 24, stating, “Anders Behring Breivik isn’t a lunatic.”

The next day, on June 25, more than a dozen commenters seemed to defend Breivik in William Rome’s, “Knights Templar: Honesty and Hypocrisy”. Occidental Dissent removed the article. I reposted it in my blog.

I myself defended Breivik the next day. My very brief entry “Breivik’s spectacular message” incensed a commenter, who wrote: “I hope counterterrorism police locate you and execute you upon raiding your apartment.”

As far as I know, S.E. Ronin’s “The Breivik Action: The First Archeofuturist Victory” was the first open apologia for Breivik. I reposted it in WDH and lost a friend. I was told: “César, you have become a despicable human being. I regret once financing your so-called ‘intellectual’ labour.”

This was still in July 2011, the month of the Norway incident.


See also the hilarious “Scolding Norwegian Women”.

Sorry Chechar, I didn’t go back far enough. On June 23, 2011, Tanstaafl wrote his first report on Breivik (same day as MacDonald) on Age-of-treason.blogspot.com. There were 44=6 comments, 7 or 8 from you. In your first one:

Chechar said…

One thing is clear: Anders Behring Breivik is no White Nationalist. No White Nationalist would ever open fire on white kids. I mean: not even in the most gruesome pages of William Pierce’s or Harold Covington’s novels such a thing happens. In those revolutionary novels the nationalists don’t even kill colored kids! (It is important to say this over and over if some nut tries to relate yesterday’s incident at Norway with us.)

Take note that Anders Behring Breivik subscribes to the “Vienna School” of fighting immigration, which is by definition “antiracist”. If this incident damages the anti-immigration cause I can only hope that it affects only the “Vienna School” and not the genuine nationalists.
7/23/2011 09:45:00 AM

True: as you can see in this very blog, WDH, I reposted the quote you mention in my very first entry about Breivik (here): my knee-jerk reaction the day after the incident. But even that day I added a “P.S.”, linking to Breivik’s YouTube manifesto, as you can see in the link.

The next days I started to change my mind gradually, and by the end of the month I had made up my mind, as recounted above.

(“Vienna School” btw = Gates of Vienna blogsite, mentioned by Breivik: where both Tan and I discussed the JQ to a hostile audience.)

This discussion threatens to become a contest in who was earlier pro-Breivik or not.

Well, I have read Breivik’s statement and, though I am impressed by many passages that show clear thinking, still I cannot condone his massacre.

Terrorism will only lead to less sympathy by the public, more repression by the state and in the end accomplish nothing.

There is no other way in WN than through politics. It can be done, Marine Le Pen has proved it. By adopting a more “mainstream” image, other than her father, she managed to become France’s third party.

Make propaganda for a sane form of ethno-nationalism, win elections and then change the immigration policy. That means an immediate stop to non-White immigration and an orderly repatriation program of all non-White residents (including their mixed-race offspring). Then adopt an ethnic identity clause in the constitution that can only be changed with a 90+ % majority (which means practically never). Difficult but doable.

Terrorist Breivik, no matter how “brilliant” his thinking, is only a role model for faillure.

Franklin Ryckaert said:

“There is no other way in WN than through politics.”

Then why does the U. S. military and other military forces throughout the world and throughout history use violence? Because it works. It works when there is no longer a political option. That’s where we are now.

God, you’re a dumber fucker, Ryckaert,. Do you know that?

Franklin Ryckaert said:

“There is no other way in WN than through politics.”

Marine Le Pen’s activities mean nothing. She’ll never get elected and even if she did she’s not going to be able to get rid of the many millions of non-whites in France. That is going to take a blood bath.

Every non-white will have to be slaughtered. Same thing throughout the Whitelands. We simply have to recognize that fact and get ready

“Muslims do not practice abortion”. Yet the hypocrites to not attack abortion clinics.

Norway has its own oil, so oil pressure cannot explain the ridiculous behavior of its elite. Norway is fiercely anti-Israel, so a Jewish lobby cannot explain the weird behavior either.

We could counter Muslim demographic warfare in three ways. We could import Black Christians with large familiews

We could reduce Muslim birthrates with forced abortion, like they do in China.

We could increase our own birthrates, fight promiscuity and get rid of White Guilt by proclaiming that abortion is worse than the Holocaust.

What a ridiculous proposal : countering Muslim demographic warfare by importing black Christians with large families!
Wouldn’t stopping and reversing all non-White immigration be a saner policy?

If saving the White Race required a conversion to Islam by every able bodied European man, then by golly count me in for some Allah Akbhar!

Curiously, if the whole of the white population converted to Islam, there would be more chances to survive than under the current religion of suicidal, individualistic Liberalism. From the lead paragraph in MacDonald’s latest article: “A recurrent theme here is the contrast between the moral universalism of the West versus Jewish moral particularism. Moral universalism is a corrollary of individualism.”

Cultural Marxism is a religion, and religion has never been open to reason and logic. That is why Breivik’s eloquent speech will only fall upon deaf ears, and not be heeded. Becauses if words alone worked, Breivik would never have had to resort to violence. Even Harold Covington argues in favor of violence – at least in his novels. And that may indeed be the only way to succeed.

Hold Back This Day: new edition @ $12.95

The Towers of Eden: new edition @ $14.88

Wow. I’m surprised they let him speak so long without silencing him. He should know that his words will mostly fall on deaf ears or not be published; the few sites that will publish his words will be those already preaching to the choir. He’s right about one thing: people of Europe and America are starting to wake up to what is happening to them. Interesting times ahead. These multicultural assholes think they have the wrap on this whole affair; I think they shouldn’t count their chickens before they’re all hatched because they will not all hatch the way they want…..:)

This is the first time that I read about what Breivik believes. All sorts of rumours stated that he was a communist, or a jew, or a mason. It is a relief to discover that he is a nationalist and was motivated by a desire to hit back at our enemies, the cultural marxists, who are working overtime to destroy us.
It’s remarkable what a motivated white man can achieve when he makes the decision. If there were a few thousand Breiviks among our race the outlook would change rapidly.
As it is, only violence will ever halt what is being done to the white race world-wide. Voting and protesting have become pointless.

@ Am Mark,

So you have a military force at your disposal that is bigger, stronger and better armed than the US army? Is that what you are saying?

I would like to know the average IQ of would be terrorists. I don’t hold my breath. Most of them are not interested in solutions at all, only stupid, blind violence.

The Taliban employs asymmetric warfare against the American occupiers. The Taliban employed asymmetric warfare against the Soviet occupiers. Simpy be more ruthless than your enemy. Take an enemy, cut off his hands, gouge out his eyes, and point out that euthanasia is a Nazi-invention.

Franklin, have you read that novel I linked in the lead paragraph mentioning the trouble trio? It doesn’t even have to be in the American Northwest. Even in Europe a trouble trio would cause havoc—more than what a single warrior like Breivik could. And that would only be the beginning…

Mark, even if we agree to disagree with Franklin, I didn’t like the way you addressed him way above. He is one of the most insightful commenters I have seen in the blogosphere and I believe he deserves some respect.

Nobody is going to go head-to-head with the U.S. military. I didn’t say that and neither did anybody else.

Through a years-long campaign of guerrilla warfare (sniper and hit-and run tactics against all of the enemies forces—not just ISOLATED U. S. military personnel and property), economic sabotage, infrastructure sabotage (the electrical grid), sabotage of the nation’s food production and distribution systems, the highway systems, the water supply, and the healthcare system, the U. S. will become an unlivable place. White guerrilla forces will continue their efforts until neither the Federal Government nor the State governments can control what is happening—I’m talking about the military and all law enforcement organizations on American soil.

This will start, as I outlined in a recent post on TOO, by sniper and close-up hit-and-run attacks against the enemy. It’s already started and will continue to escalate.

It’s the only way to accomplish anything worthwhile in the long run. George Washington, Napoleon, Ceasar, Alexander the Great, U. S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, the guerrilla warriors who fought against repressive regimes in Algeria, Brazil, and Vietnam (and overthrew them) all understood this, and we must understand it, too.

Repressive regimes do not allow themselves to be voted out of power.

There will never be another time in the U. S. for Whites to control anything by elections. That time is long past. Even if Mitt “my father was born in Mexico!” Romney gets elected, he is so beholden to the Jews and the non-whites that Whites will be completely ignored by him just like we are being completely ignored by him NOW!!

Even if we could pass legislation to remove non-whites from North American, the non-whites would just ignore it just like they do now.

It is true that only guerilla warfare can accomplish something. Democracy is useless now. To cheer you up, you do not have to fear an Islamic oil boycot. The Jew already has perfect alternatives to oil, and uses them on a large scale. Otherwise, the taboo on hating Muslims would be far stronger than the taboo on hating Jews, and that is not the case.

As long as White Nationalists dream of killing every non-White, it isn’t bloody surprising that non-Whites resist with every fiber in their body. My main goal is the prevention of Sharia/Noahide law in Europe, and if race-mixing can prevent that, so be it.

Sounds suspiciously “Vienna School” to me.
It’s not about CULTURE, it’s about RACE.

Well, actually, I did criticize “Vienna School” for being too WN. On the other hand, I agree with Breivik that violence get things done. Again, it is the Left, not the Right, that is the most violent.

Francklin Ryckaert: please, document yourself a bit more before being definitive on something. Otherwise you encounter the risk of damaging your credibility and reputation.

There is no other way in WN than through politics. It can be done, Marine Le Pen has proved it. By adopting a more “mainstream” image, other than her father, she managed to become France’s third party.”

Le Pen’s Front National was already France’s third party thirty years ago.

Marine Le Pen only managed to raise the FN back to its electoral levels of 2002 (18%), in a pyrrhic victory: she essentially had to bend over to the Jews and media owners in the most degrading fashion, and abandon so much ideological ground to the enemy that she became an empty shell of vague patriotic and anti-immigration leanings, even more moderate than Geert Wilders or General Franco.

I don’t judge her, since if you want to succeed in modern electoral politics, you can’t make impassioned speeches about International Jewry or Count Gobineau — which would send you to prison or the madhouse to begin with. We are not anymore in the 30s.

But… the problem is that this “moderation” strategy hasn’t worked since 1945 in any country (it has been attempted, believe me!), and will never work for technical (the status quo will never allow it) and demographic reasons (in 2030 more than 50% of French voters will be non-whites or mongrels, rendering the success probabilities… slimmer).

I have spent several years of my life thinking about the issue in the most thorough manner, believe me, and I came to the conclusion that we need to control the mass media to succeed in any political endeavour. If we can’t control them, then we need to resort to force and physical separation.

There are only two alternatives: control the media, or separate. Any other choice will result in our failure and progressive annihilation.

Thanks for the correction. Losing and regaining votes in politics is normal part of the game, which is always kind of unpredictable. Le Pen is at least beyond “pariah” status , further growth depends on clever tactics.

As for “moderation”, the minimum stance should be stopping of all immigration ( including of socalled “asylum seekers”) for reasons of retaining the national identity, no matter how “racist” or even “Nazi” you will be called. There is no other way than that normalcy should be accepted as moral. The elite will keep on demonizing you but the public will eventually accept.

This rises the question of control of the mass media. There is no chance of taking over the MSM but it can be bypassed by the internet, which is the media of the future anyway. More and more people are leaving the MSM for alternative sites on the web, but it is only the thinking part of the public that finds those sites. To the broader public the existence of those sites will have to be made known by advertisement or by distributing leaflets house to house.

Ultimate aim should be the creation of an alternative media on the web containing : 1) News with comment, 2) Nationalist propaganda, 3) Culture, 4) Wholesome entertainment. Such a media need not be costly, costs could be met by membership fees and advertisement.

The wish to retain the national character should be brought in a normal and decent way with which the majority can identify but there should be no compromise about basics.

Fantasies about an “armed rebellion” are in vain, the state is simply too strong for that. The way through politics is indeed difficult, but the way through violence is impossible. We can only chose between difficult or impossible.

Fantasies about an “armed rebellion” are in vain, the state is simply too strong for that.

Rebellion would be easy if each country counted with a couple of thousand Breiviks. The problem of course is that unlike Breivik present-day humans have become wholly degenerate with easy panem and free circenses (this is what makes the state so strong). Fortunately, after the dollar crashes some lone wolves, and even trouble trios, will start to crop up.

There’s no question about it.

There is no possibility we are going to be saved politically. This will still hold true even if the system alters in our future to more openness towards nationalist and far-right parties. Modern political acceptance and respect involves the continuous abandonment of virtuous positions, constant compromise with special interest groups and furthermore the futile attempt and to appeal to both the media and the masses simultaneously. (who are driven by media, go figure).

If any FN-like party achieved political power, they would be so weened by the system that they would hardly have any political capital left to fundamentally alter the suicidal derailment of the Occident.

I press this often: our situation is DIRE, and it cannot be fixed by political band-Aids. Even if we ended immigration entirely, at this very moment, demography would still have its last laugh and we would only postpone our darkest days for two or three decades.

Still, I’m not saying the FN or the A3P are useless, though their positions are mostly irrelevant to remedying the herculean tasks before us. I like them for two reason: one is that even when they speak in PC newspeak they still get mainstream attention to ideas that many non-racialist Whites haven’t even comprehended. So enamored by leftist doublespeak, the culture, the circuses, and the fear of alienation, the masses hardly ever have the opportunity to absorb some piece of information which shakes the cultural-marxist matrix reality constructed around us. I like to think these “far-right” parties may plant the seed-to-racialism from their podiums, for which we cannot do in our dark recesses of cyberspace.

Secondly, they could make good pools of recruits for real WN causes. I’m pretty sure a far-right party conference would have more amiable listeners to White Separatists ideas then your run of the mill Rino conservative conference.

Every White Nationalist must accept this though they need not openly admit it nor necessarily embrace it. Violence is going to be part of the WN solution, and for this there is no debate.

What form that violence will, can, and should take, is up to discussion.

@ Ryckaert

Would you please call the Pentagon and ask them have U. S. troops stand-down, to discontinue their Rambo-like violent fantasies and to sit down with al-Qaeda and the Taliban and work this thing out peacefully and politically? Let us know what their response was.

No one will ever be permitted to peacefully remove the non-whites from the Whitelands. It can only be done violently.

You wrote:

As for “moderation”, the minimum stance should be stopping of all immigration (including of socalled “asylum seekers”) for reasons of retaining the national identity, no matter how “racist” or even “Nazi” you will be called.

Maintaining a ‘national identity’ is a racial goal and as such is not permitted.

What are you going to do when such positions are not permitted to be included in any alternative political organizations platform?

What are you going to do when such positions land you in jail.

You wrote:

“Ultimate aim should be the creation of an alternative media on the web containing : 1) News with comment, 2) Nationalist propaganda, 3) Culture, 4) Wholesome entertainment. Such a media need not be costly, costs could be met by membership fees and advertisement.”

No, it shouldn’t The ultimate aim is to get rid of all of the non-whites regardless of what that involve or how bloody it is and return the Whitelands to their all-White state. You want to compromise and negotiate with them. That will mean allowing them, or at least some of them, to remain inside of White living space. That’s unacceptable.

You wrote:

Fantasies about an “armed rebellion” are in vain, the state is simply too strong for that.

In pitched battles that may be so, but nobody is recommending that so don’t imply that anybody is—ok? You keep repeating that idea of going up against the U. S. military directly is what we are saying. We are not!

What about the overthrow of the French government in Algeria by guerrilla warriors? What about the overthrow of the military dictatorship in Brazil by guerrilla warriors?

The U. S. Government is very weak and getting weaker by the day. Guerrilla warfare over a sustained period will bring it down.

Violence is the only answer.

Violence is a blunt instrument and though useful must be used wisely. You cannot simply go out and slaughter or kill. Any act of violence must be deliberate and the target of such violence must be guilty of a crime tantamount to death such as murder. “Sic semper tyrranis” can be the only justification for the death of these politicians and a tenable one at best.

It is most foolhardy to appeal to the government for any sort of land set aside for white people. How can any be lead to believe it shall be done through some force of arms or vote when clearly any wishing for such a land are quite simply outmatched. Though more importantly how can such a government as such whites live under have the validity to grant such a request and if against all odds it is done how easy it could be revoked or invaded.

Why not simply secede entire communities, parcels of land, small hamlets and towns. This way any violence brought about could be clearly placed at the head of these despots. If the need should arise these independent and sovereign peoples could unite temporarily in defense against any aggresser. So the whites all over can live amongst there own and not lose any honor or valor sullied by mischievous deeds.

Comments are closed.