web analytics

Author: C .T.

Categories
Racial right

Flaming

I’d like to say something about my friend Benjamin’s flaming response to Sebastian C. regarding the hypothesis that David Irving’s abuse caused his daughter to develop schizophrenia.

With a computer trick, I just checked and confirmed that the region Sebastian was is indeed the same region, Rio Grande do Sul, where a Brazilian troll started insulting us on The West’s Darkest Hour in 2018. If Sebastian is this troll who has been defaming the commenters of this site with accusations of homosexuality on other forums for eight years now (to the point of impersonating me), then Ben’s response is appropriate.

As for Irving, he himself confessed to having a “schizophrenic” daughter, using the term he himself employed in one of his interviews.

Since we here don’t subscribe to the medical model of mental disorders, but rather to the trauma model (see my trilogy of books in Spanish, totalling approximately 1,800 pages), we might assume that Irving mistreated his daughter. Of course, the evidence is merely circumstantial. For example, the last time I visited England, a respected figure in the racialist community told me that, of all the employees Irving had, he didn’t know a single one whom the renowned historian had treated well. If this were true, we can only imagine how Irving and/or his wife would have treated his/their daughter.

And this is the crux of the matter.

Until the age of 50, I focused solely on the trauma model. As we have stated here, my work is related to the fourteen words, insofar as if such notable figures in our cause as William Pierce, David Irving, and Don Black had treated their children well, those children would now be champions of their parents’ cause. Instead, we have Pierce and Black’s children becoming anti-racist as revenge for the mistreatment they suffered at home, and Irving’s daughter losing her mind altogether for the same reasons.

As long-time visitors to this site know, the American I admire most for his intelligence is William Pierce, and it pains and frustrates me greatly that his most important non-fiction book, Who We Are (which we could subtitle The Story of the White Race), hasn’t been published since Pierce’s death in 2002.

Kelvin, William Pierce’s son.

The trauma model of mental disorders is so relevant (Kelvin’s anti-racist rebellion is obviously a product of a troubled soul) that, had Pierce treated him well, the son would have taken up his father’s mantle, and Who We Are would have been a major bestseller in our community a quarter of a century ago. The fact that the exact opposite happened—that the son was seduced by the dark side of the force to the point of “denouncing his racist father” in the Jewish media—proves my point.

That’s why I’m tempted to start posting more in-depth articles about the trauma model than about racial issues, since the relationship between the two isn’t obvious to visitors. For example, Kelvin has confessed that his father used to beat him. It seems obvious to me that if Pierce had truly treated him well, a lie of this magnitude would be inconceivable from a psychological perspective. We are biologically predisposed to attach to and love our parents, and acts of rebellion such as becoming transgender (Don Black’s son), becoming an anti-racist sold out to MSM (Pierce’s son), or even losing one’s sanity (Irving’s daughter) can only occur as a result of a profound betrayal of one’s offspring by the parent during the child’s childhood or adolescence.

Given that Irving’s daughter ultimately committed suicide, had these people not been mistreated they would now be, as I said, champions of our cause.

Finally, I was deeply struck by what Pierce said at the end of Who We Are: that without a specific type of person (what we call here a “priest of the sacred words”), the organisation he wanted to create couldn’t flourish. This is so true that it is reflected in what I just said: the most important book ever written by an American, precisely the one mentioned in this paragraph, hasn’t been properly published.

It is my duty to educate the racialists who visit this site about the trauma model.

Categories
Correspondence

Hi Cesar,

Thanks for your latest article. I was mulling over what you said on your blog a few days ago about shifting the focus onto detailing dysfunctional family dynamics. Has that idea been curtailed now? It didn’t seem to last very long, or gain many responses from people.

I just got thinking today as I read the comment by Sebastian C. on David Irving. In general I can’t disagree, but what stimulated my mind was remembering also that as with William Pierce and his beaten anti-racist son Kelvin, and Stormfront’s Don Black and his ‘transgender’ offspring, David drove his daughter to schizophrenia. That part of his legacy never gets much mention. I feel it would make for a more realistic portrayal, taking the good with the bad autobiographically. It does not negate his bravery or passionate lifelong commitment to the cause, but it gives us pause for thought. There’s a difference after all between lauding the achievements of a great man and frankly kissing his ass come what may, the latter of which generally seems the right’s approach long-term.

What I was going to write about – and I’m sure you’ve had it your entire life with your famous father so can sympathise – is something on my father’s exemplary career, and how it was picked up by others and reported back to me my entire life, including, if you remember from my book, by at least one family therapist figure (there have been other psychiatrists equally impressed), and the effect this effective starry-eyed sycophancy had on me knowing what he was like to me in private, and the subsequent reduced possibility that I would be believed, as, in true Morales fashion, most people do go on credentialism (and their own knee-jerk wishful thinking in building up a persona) over private domestic character when evaluating someone (and how could they know the latter?). I’m not in a great state to be writing at the moment, but I’ll put some thought into it over the next few days.

I think, much as I still recognise his great contribution (and it certainly is great), my view of David Irving has been tarnished slightly by the knowledge that he was cruel (or neglectful) to at least one of his offspring. I am used to his ‘public persona’ as I’ve watched a great many of his presentations also, as with reading a fair few of his books (so far), and it hurts me to know he, as with all people, has a dark side. I hope that if a biography of him is ever written that it covers this fairly (although somehow I doubt it will).

What of his daughter? Is she thrown under the bus in all of this, to make more room for his fame in the limelight? His f**king reputation? I’d imagine it’s what racialists would want. She could have followed in his footsteps as a great historian, or whatever else would be more suited to her as woman (as with Kelvin Pierce, who could have been a profound white nationalist). It just seems a terrible waste. I know my own life has basically been ruined.

As far as I can see, someone can achieve the greatest possible personal glory in life, but if they can’t even protect their own biological heritage – their own family – what was it actually worth? In my eyes they have failed their sole sacred duty. That seems the Himmlerian position.

I know this is a controversial point to raise, and I do not wish it to be glibly rendered a pedantic one, but I just thought I’d run it by you as my brainstorm for the day.

Best regards,

Ben

Categories
David Irving

88 years

of real history

For nearly seven decades, David Irving has gone where other historians feared to tread—into the archives, into the primary sources, into the documents themselves. No intermediaries. No received wisdom. Just the unvarnished record.

“I don’t call it ‘my version of history’. I call it Real History. The difference is the documents.” —David Irving

On March 24th, we [this is an email I received today–Ed.] celebrate not only the man but the mission: a lifetime devoted to ensuring that history is written from the evidence, not from the consensus. From The Destruction of Dresden to Churchill’s War, David’s work has challenged readers to think harder, look closer, and never take the official version on trust.

This is what Real History looks like—and at 88, the work continues.

Categories
War!

Iran

has already won

by Hua Bin

As long as Iran keeps control of Hormuz, the US Empire’s
Last War will go from “shock and awe” to “shocking and awful.”

 

It is a spectacle to witness the complete mental meltdown of the “leader” of the “free world” and the world’s “sole” superpower.

Barely three weeks after his breathless claim of victory, Trump has gone total bananas beyond his usual incoherent self.

One wonders whether it is the fog of war that’s corroding his brain or Trump simply never has any idea what he is talking about –

  • A week ago, Trump claimed the war is “very complete, pretty much”. At the same time, he is sending Marine expeditionary forces from Japan and California to the Gulf, ostensibly for ground invasion.
  • On Friday he said that he wasn’t sending ground troops to Iran, but added: “If I were, I certainly wouldn’t tell you”.
  • Trump announced Iranian air defense is “100% obliterated” in the first week of the war, but a F-35 – the crown jewel of US air power – was shot down 2 days ago.
  • He claimed repeatedly the Iranian military is “gone” and “completely wiped out”, but drones and missiles are still striking targets in Israel and the Gulf region.
    As of yesterday, targets have extended as far as the joint US-UK base in Diego Garcia in the Indian ocean.
  • Trump also said opening the Strait of Hormuz is a “simple manoeuvre”, but refuses to send US warships to ensure safe passage.

He asked for others to help but vassals such as UK, France, Germany, Australia, and Japan all said no. Interestingly, Trump never asked Israel to send ships to open Hormuz. I guess he knows who is boss in that relationship.

____________

Read it all here.

Categories
Psychology

Definitions

Thomas told me something today that motivates me to define some terms.

As I’ve said, empathy is very different from compassion or sympathy for a person. We can feel sympathy for a friend, for example, because of their character.

We feel compassion for those who suffer. Perhaps it will surprise readers that I, the quintessential exterminationist, feel compassion when I see videos of both the Palestinians who suffered Israeli bombings—and the Israelis themselves who are mourning their dead from Iranian bombings!

Even Himmler, in the midst of the final solution to the Jewish problem, perfectly understood those soldiers who no longer wanted to work on that genocidal campaign and excused them from their duties, in addition to prohibiting gratuitous cruelty. (In a fictional context, recall a passage from The Turner Diaries. The omniscient narrator said that it was pointless to consider the morality of removing cancerous tissue; it was a task that simply had to be done to save the healthy tissue.)

I can feel compassion for the enemy, in the sense that while I want to exterminate them, I don’t want them to suffer (remember the four words: eliminate all unnecessary suffering). But empathy is something entirely different. According to Wikipedia:

Empathy is generally described as the ability to perceive another person’s perspective, to understand, feel, and possibly share and respond to their experience…

The ability to imagine oneself as another person is a sophisticated process. However, the basic capacity to recognize emotions in others may be innate and may be achieved unconsciously.

Innate? No. I believe that babies aren’t born with autistic impairments or genetic defects that prevent them from developing empathy as adults. It is the environment, frequently the abusive childrearing, that stunts their ability to develop empathy (see my Day of Wrath to understand the concept of “psychoclasses” and “psychogenesis”, the latter term understood as the development of empathy in the historical record). The article continues:

Empathy exists on a spectrum… The English word empathy is derived from the Ancient Greek ἐμπάθεια (empatheia, meaning “physical affection or passion”).That word derives from ἐν (en, “in, at”) and πάθος (pathos, “passion” or “suffering”). Theodor Lipps adapted the German aesthetic term Einfühlung (“feeling into”) to psychology in 1903, and Edward Titchener translated Einfühlung into English as “empathy” in 1909. In modern Greek εμπάθεια may mean depending on the context, prejudice, malevolence, malice or hatred.

In my post this morning, I alluded to a comment I made yesterday when I learned that my sister had lost her entire inheritance precisely because she is incapable of “reading” other people’s minds. Since it’s an important comment, I think it’s necessary to quote part of it so it appears in an article, not just in the comments section:

Empathy is neither sympathy for a person nor compassion for him or her.

Empathy means unconsciously detecting the vibe of the Other.
We can even have empathy for a serial killer (for example, the black guy in the Netflix series who detected Jeffrey Dahmer’s very negative psychic wavelength and ran away from his flat in time).

Genoveva has no empathy for scammers because she doesn’t even have it for her son or her brother (me). Since our mother treated Geno without empathy, she didn’t develop sufficient ego boundaries. With her diffuse ego, she has been unable to detect malice.

It’s a serious mental illness, and it all stems from the massive repression by Genoveva and millions of other humans regarding the mistreatment many of us have suffered.

My autobiographical project, if understood and practised, would cure these psychopathologies through excruciatingly painful introspections and flashbacks into how our parents murdered our souls, like surgery for the mind, but as necessary as removing cholesterol plaques from the coronary arteries during heart surgery.

But this type of literary project—a true surgery of the soul—doesn’t exist in the world except for what people like John Modrow (an American), Benjamin Power (an Englishman) and I have written.

So empathy isn’t bad, nor is an excess of it. From this perspective, there’s no such thing as toxic or ethno-suicidal empathy, as we recently saw Joel Webbon telling Nick Fuentes.

What exists is toxic compassion or ethno-suicidal sympathy for the Other, which on this site we’ve been calling neochristianity in the sense of exponentially exacerbating Christian morality to the point of self-immolation, which is what virtually every Westerner suffers from today.

But sensing the vibe of a friend or a foe—empathy—will always be good, whether to love the former or to be extremely wary of the latter.

Categories
Autobiography

New turn

I discovered white nationalism when I was living in Spain and was already fifty years old. I started writing at twenty-nine out of the most basic psychological need: I had suffered hell at home, which resulted in me not making a career, lack of a good job, lack of a partner and a terrible inner tormentor regarding the Christian doctrine of eternal damnation (a result of having internalised my father’s fierce Catholicism).

Although as a child I had wanted to be a film director, circumstances led me down a very different path: trying to understand my family’s tragedy.

I am the eldest of my siblings, followed by two sisters. One of them died ten years ago, and the surviving sister still lives with all the internal wounds caused by parental abuse.

Yesterday, I spoke about my sister’s tragedy in the comments section.

Imagine someone calling you, claiming to be your bank manager, with the alarming news that someone wants to hack your account and that you need to protect it by transferring all your funds to another account…

My sister isn’t mentally retarded, but as I said yesterday, she lacks even the most basic empathy because our mother treated us without empathy since our teenage years. And empathy is necessary to instinctively recognise that someone is trying to scam you.

I’ve already said everything essential I had to say regarding the reasons for the darkest hour for the white race, summarised in the PDFs of the featured article. But my family’s tragedy continues even years after my parents’ death, as the consequences are evident, for example, in what happened last week: a scam that took all the money (!) from my sister’s share of the proceeds from the sale of our parents’ mansion.

If I already had a Syssitia with at least three priests of the sacred words, myself included (and perhaps my sister babysitting an adopted Aryan baby, since now she cannot buy a flat), we could think about things like a daily podcast on racial issues. And if we could acquire the machinery to print books on demand, all the PDFs would be available in print and ready to be sold online.

But we don’t have the Syssitia yet…

What happened last week motivates me to do something drastic in parallel with the translation of my trilogy about family tragedy.

Why not start posting more articles about the trauma model of mental disorders? After all, it was a mental disorder that prevented my sister from detecting the scam. A year ago, before we sold the house, a woman offered to help her at the ATM; my sister agreed, the scammer switched her cards, and emptied her account. My sister didn’t learn her lesson because, as I said, she lacks empathy (see the big difference between compassion, sympathy and empathy in my yesterday’s comment). In the most extreme cases, this lack of empathy produces psychosis.

Last year, I wrote several articles about the case of Marco, whom I met half a century ago in a park where we played chess. Marco’s lack of empathy is much more serious than my sister’s, since Marco is already in a state of open psychosis, unable to return to the world of sanity.

Since discussing my family in blog posts would first require a careful reading of my trilogy, as the posts would only be corollaries of the essential points, it occurs to me to return to the subject of Marco to illustrate the trauma model of mental disorders.

I continue to see Marco because he allowed my parents’ furniture into his house (I live in a small studio apartment) without charging me. But every time I visit him or speak to him on the phone, I am shocked by the level of his mental deterioration.

Interspersing my findings in depth psychology with posts about the Aryan decline seems like a good idea because, as I said, the essential points on the racial issue have already been presented on this site.

On the other hand, the question of why there is so much psychosis in the world is vital to saving us. For example, the fact that the US Secretary of War, appointed by President Donald Trump, speaks of rebuilding the Jewish temple in Jerusalem is obviously a case of psychosis, not only on his part, but on the part of all Christian Zionists in that country. And that has profound implications for understanding things like the current American-Zionist war against Iran (and the eventual crash of the petrodollar).

Understanding why my sister was so incredibly foolish as to fall for such a blatant scam, or Marco’s psychosis, is a microcosm of the psychosis happening on a global scale (like Trump believing everything Bibi says). The only difference is that Donald Trump has political power, and my sister and Marco don’t.

So I feel like rereading everything I wrote last year about Marco and adding a few more things about his case. Ideally, I’d talk about my family, since I have much more information here. I’ll see where this leads. It’s infuriating that we still don’t have that Syssitia. But I have to do something with my time besides continuing to translate Hojas Susurrantes.

Postscript to Benjamin:

If you’re interested in writing articles about dysfunctions in your family, using pseudonyms so no one finds out (like I do with my sister’s name), you’re welcome to join this new chapter of The West’s Darkest Hour.

Categories
War!

Mossad

occupied the Pentagon

This is what Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson said a few days ago (YouTube clip here).

Categories
Autobiography Hojas Susurrantes (book) War!

Early days of spring

These past few days I’ve been rereading the third chapter of my Hojas Susurrantes (the first is already available as a separate book here, and the second here).

It had been years since I’d read that thick chapter—actually, a whole book. The revision is a preliminary step to the English translation.

I reiterate what I said last year: for those of us who have been extremely abused by our family and/or the System, nothing is more therapeutic than denouncing all those who harmed us, using their real names to send them to the annals of literature as jerks: a literary revenge.

My mental health has increased these past few days enormously, not only from rereading what I hadn’t read in years, but also because of the war that Israel and the US are suffering, thanks to the heroism of one nation: Iran.

Just look at what Scott Ritter just said: that Israel must be destroyed because it is the cancer of the planet. And he says the same about the United Arab Emirates (as a prostitute of the Great Satan, they too must get their just deserts).

A vindictive autobiography and a war in the Middle East that marks the beginning of the end for the petrodollar… What more could I want in these beautiful early days of spring? The only thing we need now is for a millionaire sponsor to appear so we can build a temple of Eros in the gardens of our Syssitia…

Categories
Tom Sunic

World War II

never really ended

 

by Tomislav Sunic

There’s no need to spin fantasies about World War III when World War II never really ended—it’s still alive and kicking. The ancient Roman diviners showed more wisdom in their predictions than all the self-proclaimed experts and think-tank savants fortune-telling the post-Mideast mess.

The silver lining to the chaos unfolding in the Mideast—thanks to the joint American-Israeli strike on Iran—is that it finally forces people to question the legitimacy of the post-WWII world order set up by the liberal-communist world-improvers. Time to revise the official communist WMDs (weapons of mass deception) and antifa victimhood scripts. No, even an atomic conflagration in the Gulf won’t augur the end of the world—it’ll just be the end of one world and the beginning of a new one.

Blaming only President Trump and his Jewish/Israeli handlers is way too simplistic for understanding the current Mideast mess. One must give Trump at least some credit for trying to dismantle the leftist mob rule strangling academia and the judiciary—that’s a far bigger deal than the US fawning over Israel.

Instead of lambasting Trump or Netanyahu, one must reject the servile White Christian Zionists and neocons, and their obsession with turning Europe and the USA into a “verus Israel” (true Israel).

Blaming Jews while hallucinating about the Second Coming of Christ has historically been a hallmark of Gentile neurosis. If the good Lord ever shows up again, it won’t be in some white Ozarks village or the Croatian hinterlands of Medjugorje—it’ll be in Semitic Jerusalem. Belief in a single savior—whether you call him Yahweh, Allah, or Christ—has been the greatest tragedy in human history, for every people on earth.

In the decades ahead, perpetually squabbling Whites won’t have much of a choice unless they ditch the monotheist mindset. Even if they manage to shake off the Mad Max-inspired Ayatollahs of rock’n’rolla, they’ll still have to settle accounts with the Liberal and Christian-Zionist clerics.

Categories
Aryan beauty Exterminationism

Architects

I’ve barely mentioned it on this site, but a discerning reader would have noticed that my priesthood of sacred words doesn’t apply to all white people, only to the most beautiful.

They are the ones the priest would like to preserve.

If, in the future, the social architects of a fourth Reich were to decree mandatory beauty on the planet, they would choose only the most beautiful specimens of Homo sapiens.

“For many genes are called, but few are chosen.”

In ancient Greece, before they committed the sin against the Holy Spirit (miscegenation), there was already something of this, and it is precisely for this reason that their art reflected that spirit.