web analytics

Author: C .T.

Categories
Newspeak

“Gender”

Gender is one of the most important words in contemporary Newspeak. Anyone who doesn’t understand this psyop won’t understand the psychosis that has been unleashed in the West to destroy the white race.

Benjamin to a penpal:

My perspective on the gender revolution? Well, I hope it doesn’t offend you—I’m very much not a progressive on it, though I think I’m more nuanced than your average conservative, i.e. right winger, at the same time:

I think ‘gender’ is a superfluous word; a creation no more than literary, that has no mapping to extraneous reality outside of the fantasies that invest so much in it. Like me inventing the word ‘feckewok’ and using it for advantageous purposes, making up a set of intrinsic properties from whole cloth to accompany this most abstract of ideas – perhaps whatever most appealed psychologically – like designing a ‘fun’, fan-made rule book update to Magic: The Gathering. Thus, I’d like the word ‘gender’ banned from the dictionary (unless one is dealing with the categorising of the nouns of foreign languages such as Latin, where you’d have masculine, feminine, and neuter; an entirely different—and valid—context).

I think the actual word we mean is ‘sex’, to describe the physical reality available on empirical evidence of there being males and females (and a handful of intersex, of which I really do mean a small handful legitimately, as the likes of Klinefelter Syndrome XXY’s are officially considered male; what I mean is, there’s very, very few genuine hermaphrodites).

I think it’s a trendy idea that has caught on because it effectively facilitates, promotes and normalises the cult of hyper-individuality that accompanies early 21st Century liberalism, mixed to the narcissism of the ‘lookit me!’ generations (millennials, and about half of zoomers).

As usual, I would say this destructive hyper-individual drive came about through the impact of historical Christianity on a race already primed to be fairly insular and non-cooperative at the best of times (where all must then be concerned in isolation with the saving of their individual soul; originally, only warped somewhat by the shift into godless postmodernism and secular ‘neo-Christianity’ post-French Revolution, the Enlightenment having been no more than a pseudo-apostasy).

Devastating to me, it also significantly lowers the bar on what can be considered evidence, and denies the physical world, at least as it can be objectively viewed. To remember Christopher Hitchens, positions put forward without evidence can be dismissed without evidence!

I don’t think it was a natural change. I think it was a calculated, civilisation-destroying move, of the Frankfurt School (etc.) variety, and generally, I think it is anti-white (in that in the long run it distracts from families and new life, instead pulling us into the cult of the self, a short circuit on fertility in historical conditions where we are under intergenerational population collapse—coupled to a morbid, materialistic, anti-natalist zeitgeist).

So yes, in a nutshell, I certainly do think they’re all deluded. Whether this comes about (at least in part) from child abuse or not is of great interest to me though, and I would like to know what percentage of cases that part is.

In general, when it comes to, just for example, transsexual individuals, I have a great deal of genuinely pity for them as I recognise them as trauma cases. If our society was not so stupid, ignorant, and pig-headed as to do nothing but encourage their increasingly legally-unfalsifiable (and unstoppable!) delusions, instead of digging beneath the surface a little (or actually, you know, asking them perhaps?!) it might be able to help them better.

Not help them to hoodwink the rest of society with obvious bullshit, under pain of draconian legislation; a sycophant’s most negative idealism. But help them to address where this bodily dissonance – this mental ‘dysphoria’ – comes from… what happened to them basically… it’s my personal theory that a great many were horrendously abused, and, as we know from the massive research contribution of independent psychologist César Tort, most abuse is parental.

Abuse victims need help, not persecution. I think the reason more do not come forward with this—true—understanding, is that they have repressed it to survive, and thus it has sunk into their subconscious, only to appear in other forms i.e. misdirected rage (at targets other than the perpetrators), thinking of the number of school shooter cases recently from this general ‘tranny’ demographic.

As for whether it was prevalent in the (Upper) Palaeolithic… I don’t think so (I can think of no fossil evidence that could verify this). I would suspect not. I think they had very firmly segregated gender (i.e. used in its strictest sense, as a synonym for sex, i.e. m or f) roles, and a real sexual dimorphism physically and culturally, particularly as the Levant populations (Skhul-Qafzeh) underwent to swift biological ‘revolution’ into becoming Cro-Magnon instigated by the predatory impact of the Neanderthals on them (i.e. females very female, males selected to be very, very masculine). The evolutionary biologist Danny Vendramini writes about this topic. It would basically have rendered them maladaptive to their environment to waste time on navel-gazing over whether their mental picture of their body matched the reality of their body.

Does this make sense? That last line kind of sums it up for me. Given that someone can be wrong, just on probability, I don’t automatically trust their self-reportage, no matter how vociferously they try and put it to me, or the meltdown they suffer in tantrum if I refuse to facilitate their lie. It’s a case of the emperor’s new clothes, if you remember that fable. I don’t think that has changed from the Palaeolithic right up until now.

I just don’t think its adherents and devotees want it to be empirically false, and would rather throw truth, empiricism, and biological reality out the window than be wrong—which does suggest severe malignant narcissism to me, or at least an infantile mindset with a psychopathology of some sort—and remember, I keep ‘mental health’ in the realms of the psychologically-imposed (the Trauma Model of Dr Colin Ross), and do not go in for dopamine/chemical imbalance bullshit-theories either.

As with the right on many of its issues, the left is equally dogmatic in my experience on this particular matter, so I wouldn’t usually expect anything more than doubling down. To me this just highlights how many people there are willing to self-delude in this country/planetary hemisphere, often simply in a fake act of being ‘nice’, or ‘tolerant’. I think I’d rather be honest.

Basically, if their mental picture doesn’t match the biological reality, why does it never occur to them that this could be because of a certain delusion? Surely that’s the basic definition of psychosis! And psychosis is the severest symptom of sustained environmental trauma.

I don’t think it’s kind of the corpus mentis crowds to mock psychotic patients. I don’t think it’s kind of them to validate them on their delusions either, if the want them to get better. I blame ignorant society very much as a whole for screwing up a sensible solution to this issue, which I think otherwise could have been nipped in the bud (an issue which I know does bring people some pronounced pain, if only behind their mask of proud frivolity).

In the future I’d hope for a more genuine trauma-based psychotherapy for anyone who came out with these ideas (currently unavailable as gender zealots and liberal ‘cultists’ have ruined the open-minded impartiality of clinical psychology in general).

Anyway, that’s my initial thoughts on the matter. Thank you for asking me.

Categories
Eschatology

Neutron

“It had to happen to someone. There is nothing exceptional about you, any more than there is about the first neutron that starts the chain reaction in an atomic bomb. It simply happens to be the first. Any other neutron would have served—just as Jeffrey might have been anybody in the world. We call it Total Breakthrough.”

― Arthur C. Clarke, Childhood’s End

I’d like to say something about my seemingly mysterious comment yesterday to Thomas (“if people like you and me could reactivate the Cro-Magnon teem…”).

I was inspired by the 1953 novel quoted above, where two mutant children unleash a chain reaction with apocalyptic consequences for the world.

Of course, the quote in Clarke’s fantastic novel refers to developing paranormal powers, and I’m referring to something quite different. But the metaphor is clear: two priests of the sacred words could potentially infect, with their newfound faith, dozens, hundreds or thousands of Aryan males in the future—a chain reaction—, and the consequences would also be eschatological.

For many years, Childhood’s End was my favourite novel. That ended when I awoke to the fact that the Aryan race is dying. But following the metaphor of the quote, it is possible to reactivate the Cro-Magnon teem (an exterminationist archetype): the goal of this site.

Regarding the person who developed teem theory, this morning I couldn’t let a comment criticising him because it’s clear he hasn’t read Them & Us. This commenter, who had already been banned, claimed that Neanderthals were capable of weaving clothes.

Let’s remember that just as neochristian anthropologists have massively projected their evolved selves in a quixotic undertaking to humanise their noble savages, many of whom were cannibalistic infanticides (cf. my book’s chapter here), neochristian paleoanthropologists do the same: they project their own psychoclass onto the prehistoric past so massively that it borders on psychosis: like putting diapers on a doll representing a supposed Neanderthal child in a museum. It’s crucial to understand how more serious scholars debunk things like Neanderthals weaving clothes or carrying flowers to their burials (a critic of that claim said that pollen found in a cave could have been carried there by an animal, not for ceremonial obituaries).

It’s a terrible mistake to believe that academics are lying about events like BLM (“the rioters cannot be infected by Covid viruses,” etc.), while believing that they are honest when writing their papers about the prehistoric past. They are the same usual suspects, and what motivates them is not objective science but anti-white hatred, the idealisation of non-whites and the defamation of the latter.

I’ve also received emails complaining about the author of the NP theory, which show that the correspondent hasn’t bothered to read Vendramini’s book. They remind me of another banned commenter who recently dismissed Tom Szasz’s critique of psychiatry because he had a Jewish ancestor, or Michel Foucault’s critique of the same profession because he was homosexual: perfect ad hominem arguments, very common in the racial right. One of the problems with the new generation of racialists is that they don’t read books, even though it’s impossible to think deeply about a subject without reading them. But all this is beside the point.

The point is creating a community of priests of the sacred words from where it’s possible to try to produce that chain reaction that would infect the white race with a Cro-Magnon-like exterminationist passion that ensures its survival.

In these communities we would have temples like the one pictured above and rituals to “baptize” newborns in the new faith that commemorate those who bravely, though unsuccessfully, tried to force the eschaton into history. Following Savitri Devi’s philosophy, Hitler was not the equivalent of Jeffrey Agnus Greggson in Clarke’s novel, only his precursor, although every ritual within the post-Christian temples would commemorate his official photograph and symbols.

Categories
Correspondence Neanderthalism

Hellish island

by Thomas 2

Children of men by anti-white Alfonso Cuarón was filmed in the UK.

Yes, it is terrible, being here. I deliberately walk around the quieter end of the village, and even then now and again, I encounter a non-white, usually in uniform (the port security employs many, ludicrously, plus all the new local takeaway outlets, plus all their Just Eat drivers: which historical nation until now trusted their direct ancestral enemies to prepare and deliver them their food? But we are this lazy!). Either that or a burqa-clad mother, with pushchair and accursed brat on her arm—always a very disconcerting sight to me. I notice they at least usually stick to the urban side of the village; these creatures have no natural interest in the wilds. I have never seen them among the trees, mercifully.

One Englishman cares (not that I always did enough—I’m not innocent either). Unfortunately, it seems I am alone here, adrift along the edges of horrible shores. Sometimes I wake up and step outside my front door, a scant metre past the flimsy mantle that is our house, staring at the sickly yellow sky, with a murky winter’s sun, a weird, suppurating light suitable for a lost seaside backwater (a locale where people disappear like albatrosses into a liminal fog), thinking about it all: ‘this place… this f**king place…’

Britain is lost everywhere; some foreign rock. I can only really shrug (knowing that snapping and flinging myself into the System headlong is off limits, so I shouldn’t go there – won’t ever) and then dig in, with my provisions around me for as long as I need them, perhaps cynically, or perhaps just in harsh, disappointed acceptance, and wait for their idiotic ‘remigration’ plans to fail and their ‘full proof’ shiny new election-friendly leaders to falter and prove useless at their word, and all orthodox political ‘resistance’ to crumble… and to re-evaluate the citizens then, (perhaps from far away, if I am fortunate), when we know every last inch of their bullshit and excuse-making capability has been stripped away from them, when they can (and as they are scum, it will take brute force!) no longer countenance contriving these lofty phantom escape-hatches for themselves: that endless imaginary ‘resource’ of easily-bought others doing their dirty work for them (and by the book); when reality is whipping them back, finally, when their oldest stance and possession – their cowardice – is denied them under pain of death (it shouldn’t have to take this long). I am aimed to hate my people. They have hurt my pride – my pride in my own race!

I hope the ‘Orcs’ will be driven from here, and from everywhere, with such brutality and with such steel hate. But in this meantime I’ve had to give up on the citizens of the UK. They’ve done their best so far (and it isn’t anywhere near good enough). Later most can die. I’m glad I have my garden and the (little) wilds I talk of and enjoy, and then all the expanse of woods and hills and fields as far down as Manningtree and beyond. That’s my pleasure in this country (and I’m so glad it doesn’t interest them – ‘friend’ or enemy nigh-on alike).

Maybe later I can find a sense of love for my own people again. For the moment I’m just indifferent. They’re not quite enemies, but they are just worthless. I keep this to myself most days—but I think a lifetime of dealing with the perennially irresponsible retinue the defines the scope of my interactions, from [***] and [***] to [***] (though I struggle to always include the later, as the best friend here I’ve got, damage notwithstanding)… of dealing with all these f**king fools, has encouraged me to see Aryan life—much as it’s the most vital of idealistic futures to preserve it (and so I know there are good people I cannot see here even now)—as temporarily expendable, and already somehow corpses prone on the soil of England. They should get up again all by themselves, if they do! Should I try to forgive them? I can’t think why! Still, darkly, I’d find it worthwhile to address them with a few of those planned podcasts, provided my/our timing is satisfactory for that.

I don’t really think I’m much better as a person. But I do care what happens here, to the conclusion of that line of thinking, in a big, grumbling sea of people who don’t. I’m like Mark Collett once remarked on (albeit disapprovingly): I’ve scowled so much at them I’ve altered my face.

Maybe that’s why—just for me—my woodland experiences exist. As something to fall back on that always lasts, even when the people are gone. It will always be a pleasure in itself, as I like nature. It will do I think, for now. It’s beautiful, and stark, and then more rounded as summer comes on. I’m glad you too have good scenery and intriguing animals. I fear for nature perhaps more than I fear for the citizens here though. I wish I did have just one other person here on my wavelength… so I didn’t give up on the island’s race. Already they feel a little cloudy to me—too many months of stifled misery analysing them. Only the muddy wilds feel real. I used to find Savitri’s ‘wingless bipeds’ expression a little risible in its ridiculousness. The ridiculous element isn’t funny though. Now, I share her abyssal contempt, and understand the sentiment emotionally.

Maybe it’s just the way it is that I never will have that though; maybe it’s best for me, to keep me on edge, or radical. I can’t imagine how hard your own life-time (!) of genuine solitude has been on you, and I hope I don’t patronise you saying that. At least I have—well…—some closely-placed bodies around me long-term, even if they don’t see me and I’m drained and irritated seeing them. I think it’s how you’ve come to your wisdom though, through all that pain and harrowing opportunity for self-reflection, as Solzhenitsyn reflects on regarding prisoners. I’m certainly glad I have you as a friend, long distance. It provides my life with a sense of an heroic mission, however much it’s as if ‘mission: impossible’ currently (and could just be tragedy)!

I’ll have to end this soon. I get so weary as I think of this country—I do best on a sort of grim autopilot. It’s something too… awful, to really be delved into cognitively for any length. I genuinely don’t like writing about it; it sends my head foggy.

Alas for your country indeed, in that ugly mud-pool of troll faces, too many by far (much as one would be too many also). Alas for ours… where the people are biologically pure and clean, on the whole, and yet so far empty; surrounded and subdued, quite happy on their knees.

Death to the traitors on the right who have eased the burden of their complacency over this! Death to the idiot left, for their petty roadblocks, and pampered favours and perversions! Something will happen here, I’m sure of it, or I wouldn’t waste these words.

As I shared to you briefly on WDH some while back (I think it disappeared), I am glad for the Orcs being here as only I can be, despite never having had a choice. Bring them, and more to these dead age killing grounds, and eviscerate them! Their hubris, their mistake! Torch their piled bodies from the whitest cliffs, as a small measure of our welcome to these alien beasts, these unsound f**king remains. That is our duty, no matter how distant or unrealistic it may seem. And it shall be a pleasure then, for as long as the enemy lasts to despise.

The situation, I gather, is naturally more complicated than my daydreams can accommodate for. But I hope to at least see carnage, in my own lifetime.

I will mourn not being here, if anything, which I think is understandable, and I will never get over the disappointment of that. However, I am realistic I think. As long as others do this and this happens, so what? I take your recent shared words of Adolf Hitler to heart here on the importance of the collective only.

That’s my thoughts reflecting on what is sacred in these lands, and on what will be again.

Categories
Miscegenation Nick Fuentes

Webbon’s

interview – 9

In the ninth episode, Joel Webbon is far more concerned that Vice President JD Vance married an Indian woman because of her Hindu religion, than because of her Indian blood.

Vance, of course, committed the sin against the holy spirit of life by procreating with her, but since neither Nick Fuentes nor Webbon are priests of the 14 words, they don’t see things our way.

Fuentes has a better view of the vice president than Webbon, pointing out that in his biography, Vance said he married the Indian because he wanted to marry as far away from his relatives as possible!: the quintessential racial traitor.

Why haven’t white nationalists rejected democracy, considering that it is the preferred system of the Jews, and that in 2024 the presidency could be won by someone who committed the unforgivable sin?

Categories
Racial studies

Pruned

“Civilisation must not exist to promote the development of culture, technology, luxury or comfort but to promote the development of man himself: the evolution of the genetic code. For civilisation depends on genes, not the other way round. It is ridiculous that civilisation turns against the genetic heritage that created it, like a snake that bites its tail.”

—Eduardo Velasco

As promised yesterday, I’ve pruned Eduardo Velasco and Valg’s article. I’ll now delete the PDF of the version of The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour that included the appendix with the minor changes I made on Friday. The updated PDF of The Fair Race is now linked to the featured article. I’ve also edited my explanatory note at the end of Velasco’s article:

The preceding article was originally published in Spanish by Eduardo Velasco on July 28, 2009. Many images, including a complex phylogenetic tree summarising the new racial classification, have not been included in this much abridged translation. Most of the endnotes from the original text have also been removed, although some have been merged into the main text.

Lack of funding prevented researchers Valg and Velasco from writing the second part of the new racial classification. It is impossible to evaluate their classification scientifically because physical anthropology has been corrupted since 1945. Had the Third Reich been allowed to flourish, there would now be a constellation of anthropologists, from the Atlantic to the Urals, who would have developed this science, and numerous articles would have been published in specialised journals.

After Valg and Velasco disappeared from the internet, following the censorship of the Evropa Soberana website, we believe that pondering the origins of the white race should be done taking into account Danny Vendramini’s Neanderthal predation theory.

The pruned article can be read here.

Categories
Racial studies

Postscript

to my previous post

As I begin rereading the appendix to The Fair Race this morning I realise that, due to the timeline, it’s impossible to reconcile Danny Vendramini’s findings with the study by Eduardo Velasco’s collaborator, Valg (not Varg, as I mistakenly wrote the previous days).

According to Vendramini, European Neanderthals began invading the Levant around 100,000 years ago and preyed on pre-humans for 50,000 years. During that time, the latter developed evolutionary defence mechanisms—in addition to natural selection, sexual selection and artificial selection—which eventually produced a completely different species.

Cro-Magnon would evolve into contemporary Homo sapiens but the topic at hand, the white race, is a product of this sexual and artificial selection that continued after the extermination of the Neanderthals by the Cro-Magnons. The distinctive features of Aryans, such as pale pink skin, yellow or red hair, and blue or green eyes, are very recent dating back ten to twenty thousand years.

Both Velasco and Valg, as well as Vendramini, published their essays in 2009. Valg followed the old paradigm of anthropologists who have not resolved why our primate species is the only one that “got naked,” lost its fur (cf. the title of Desmond Morris’s famous book, The Naked Ape, who, like his colleagues, was unable to solve the enigma).

Since I believe Vendramini is correct with his theory of Neanderthal predation, what I did in previous days proved insufficient: removing about a page and a half from Valg & Velasco’s very long article, who were under the impression that Neanderthals were human. The page and a half I removed is insufficient because of the dates Valg includes in his study, which assume that the naked ape was much older than the dates Vendramini suggests.

So, in the coming day(s), I will dedicate myself to seriously editing Valg & Velasco’s article and reducing it to its essentials: human physiognomy, Valg’s strong point.

Regarding physical anthropology, Valg followed orthodox academia. But academia is trapped in an anti-white ideology in which, like the Boasian anthropologists, physical anthropologists religiously idealise all wingless bipeds. Using the language of my Day of Wrath, anthropologists massively project their psychoclass onto the prehistoric past: an ideological pathology. This is symptomatic of what I call neochristianity and what Gaedhal calls atheistic hyper-Christianity.

The point is that objective physical anthropology will be impossible as long as these religious figures reign in academia. The reason for considerably shortening Valg & Velasco’s essay in the coming day(s) is that I believe their new racial classification has merit. But we need a Fourth Reich so that today’s pseudoscientists—who do grotesque things like displaying shaved Neanderthals in their museums—can be challenged by studies from non-neochristians.

In the coming edition of The Fair Race Valg & Velasco’s essay will thus be pruned to its essentials: human physiognomy, although those interested can consult it as it was published in Velasco’s website, Evropa Soberana here (in Spanish) and here (in English).

Categories
Fair Race’s Darkest Hour (book) Them and Us (book)

Consistency

Even in a conventional representation of Neanderthal physiognomy (decades ago my father acquired a large book with this illustration), the authors/artist portray them as they were: cannibals.

Last year I read Danny Vendramini’s Them & Us on Kindle. Now I’ve reread it in print.

Reading on Kindle should only be done with mediocre books. It’s astonishing how much information is lost in a screen-based read, unlike on paper where we can use a yellow highlighter and jot down numerous footnotes—a practice that helps us absorb the content.

The fact that Them & Us was one of the few books that greatly improved my worldview doesn’t mean it’s without flaws. Far from it! Vendramini is as liberal and anti-racist as other authors who revolutionized my way of thinking. I’m referring to Lloyd deMause and Alice Miller’s work on the mistreatment of children; how Richard Weikart demonstrated that Hitler was privately a pantheist highly critical of Christianity; and how historian Tom Holland showed that Christian values were transmuted into the ethno-suicidal ethics of contemporary Westerners.

It doesn’t matter that all these authors, including Vendramini, are archetypal liberals. What matters is that it’s perfectly possible to use their findings for the cause of 21st-century National Socialism.

Vendramini published his book in 2009, after Jorge Velasco and an associate of his, “Varg,” wrote their lengthy essay on the new racial classification. An abridged version of that essay appears as an appendix in The Fair Race’s Darkest Hour. But now that I’ve reread Vendramini’s book and better understood its content, I realise that Velasco and Varg relied on accepted wisdom about Neanderthals, who, according to Vendramini, have been anthropomorphised by naïve and politically-correct scholars to the point of being considered human.

František Kupka based his work on Marcellin Boule’s interpretation of the Neanderthal remains found in France. The simian appearance is closer to reality than the primitive humans in the first image.

I’m writing this post because our point of view must be consistent, especially in the texts linked in the featured article. So yesterday I removed a couple of pages from Velasco and Varg’s essay, where the authors failed to notice that prehistoric Neanderthals resembled apes, not humans.

The February 2026 edition of The Fair Race can be read here, and it’s the one now linked in the featured article. However, the PDF of that appendix without this recent censorship is still available on this site, here.

Categories
Aryan beauty Videos Vikings

Norse hygiene

See 24-minute video here.

Categories
Nick Fuentes Racial right

Webbon’s

interview – 8

This episode was about race. Fuentes calls himself a race realist, and he starts his interview well, as if he were a reader of Jared Taylor.

But after the ninth minute, Fuentes says that the biggest problem is individualism. Here begins the eternal blindness, since we have already said that individualism is an epiphenomenon of the “spiritual terror” (Hitler’s words) that Christianity introduced into the Aryan collective unconscious, especially in its Anglo-Saxon version. Not seeing the beam in one’s own eye is a leitmotif of Christians like Nick Fuentes and Joel Webbon.

Then Fuentes began to talk about black Americans. When Webbon intervened speaking about the various religions, he openly said that for him, “religion would trump race” and that the racial factor is not deterministic, although he is sympathetic to racial realism.

I think this dialogue shows why the Jared Taylor school of racialism has failed: it isn’t anti-Christian. In the real world, it’s impossible to expel people of colour with such a lukewarm philosophy. It’s no wonder that when I discovered white nationalism (I was living in Spain), a Swede said that this American movement was weak. Paradoxically, Webbon then said a great truth: that all contemporary whites are (1) suicidal, (2) suffer from toxic empathy, and (3) are cowards. He added that that’s why the West is falling apart. I couldn’t agree more!

Unfortunately, shortly after, Webbon, after saying that blacks are generally impulsive and lazy and Jews are subversive, states that as a Christian he shouldn’t hate them or deprive them of certain rights. And everything Fuentes says afterward in his dialogue with Webbon doesn’t suggest a National Socialist-type racism. It’s the same old timid crap we see throughout the American racial right. At 39:50, for example, Fuentes gives the example of a black family, albeit educated, moving nearby and asks the rhetorical question of whether any of us would have a problem with that. As a good Christian, Webbon answers no, and then Fuentes gives the same example with a Chinese, Indian, or Mexican family.

It couldn’t be clearer. Fuentes and Webbon are also suicidal, suffer from toxic empathy, and are cowards. Nick is somewhat aware of this, as he goes on to say that this dynamic ends up with 90% non-white people in a neighbourhood that was previously all-white. But he doesn’t seem to realise that Christian ethics caused the problem in the first place; that 10% is similar to not worrying about the first cancerous cells in your body and only starting to worry when metastasis takes hold.

Then I was surprised that when Webbon asked Nick how the races originated, Fuentes mentioned Adam, and that the various races arose from him. Is Nick a Catholic fundamentalist (liberal Catholics believe in Darwin)? The fact that they then talked about Cain, the Tower of Babel, and Noah’s offspring, as if all of that were historical, doesn’t even warrant a response from me.

Then, at this point, Fuentes says he is completely against racial hatred. Compare this to what we recently said about Cro-Magnons hating Neanderthals. (By the way, my next article will be about Vendramini’s book, which I’m about to finish reading for the second time.)

Categories
Chess Feminism

Queen?

Queen of Chess is a newly released documentary about chess grandmaster Judit Polgar. I understand the documentary focuses on her father’s efforts to train her and her two sisters to become grandmasters (GMs), and on her games against then world champion Garry Kasparov.

I haven’t seen the documentary because I don’t have a Netflix account, but I’m concerned that it was directed by Rory Kennedy, the youngest daughter of Senator Robert F. Kennedy. For example, the official Netflix trailer begins with a couple of lies: “Chess was a man-dominated sport” (reality check: chess is a male-dominated sport), and “Women were not allowed to play in male tournaments” (this is like claiming that women weren’t allowed to play American football against a team of males!).

Rory Kennedy has also made documentaries addressing topics such as the treatment of prisoners of war and the border wall policy with Mexico. She announced her support for Barack Obama as the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate and later endorsed Hillary Clinton. After Biden withdrew from the race, Kennedy endorsed the mulatta Kamala Harris.

Yesterday I learned of the existence of the documentary that Kennedy filmed about Polgar: the woman who has played chess the best in the history of the game. Although I haven’t seen the documentary, I’ve been hearing very favourable opinions about it. What’s most irritating is that some chess YouTubers parrot the claim that Polgar’s example will “close the gap” for future generations of female players who are inspired by the Hungarian GM. These YouTubers base their arguments not on facts, but on the ideology that has infected the Aryan collective unconscious: egalitarian liberalism, the doctrine of despising our biological realities.

It was precisely to expose such dishonesty that I included my sarcastic essay “On Beth’s Cute Tits” in the book that gave the anthology its title. My essay contains this passage:

Some media outlets publish articles with titles such as “Is The Queen’s Gambit a true story?” They claim that the series is inspired by the woman who has reached the highest level of competition in tournament chess: the Hungarian Judit Polgar, now retired from competition but still commentating on professional chess games. But Polgar’s life was very different from that of the fictional Beth Harmon. True, in real life Polgar once beat world chess champion, Garry Kasparov. But what Netflix fans ignore is the outcome of all their matches. In real life, Kasparov beat Judit Polgar 12-1, with 4 draws!

I think it is important to present the scores of the best female chess player in history, Polgar, in her games against male world champions (to date, no woman has ever been crowned world chess champion). The source for the list below is Chess Life, an American magazine that is mentioned several times in the Netflix miniseries:

Kasparov – Polgar: 12-1
Carlsen – Polgar: 10-1
Anand – Polgar: 28-10
Karpov – Polgar: 20-14
Topalov – Pogar: 16-15
Kramnik – Polgar: 23-1

As we can see, Polgar is at a disadvantage against all her contemporary world champions. The only champion with whom she kept an almost equal score was Topalov. Her score against Karpov was not bad, and although her disadvantage against Anand is wide, her results are noteworthy. But against Kasparov, Carlsen and especially Kramnik, Polgar took real beatings. These are the hard facts of real life that no more feminist HBO or Netflix series are going to change. They want us to believe that women are interchangeable with us when it comes to physical activity and, now, intellectual sport.

I confess that Polgar is a good person. Although she’s retired from formal competition, I’ve seen her comment on games in international tournaments with other GMs, and I enjoy her commentary. But Netflix’s use of her life is outrageous. And the saddest thing is that today’s Aryan men, whom I’ve dubbed “lobotomized eunuchs,” don’t rebel against this narrative.

For those visitors who haven’t read it, now’s a good time to check out our multi-author anthology, On Beth’s Cute Tits.