All Christians are Cucks, 3

From a literary standpoint, the Bible is undoubtedly the worst piece of garbage ever published. The Bible is a hodge-podge of ancient oral traditions, told, retold, written, rewritten, redacted, mistranslated, misinterpreted and misunderstood.
In short, the Bible is a typical work of Jewish literary dreck; verbose, mysterious, filled with exciting tales of murder and mayhem just like any modern Jewish murder mystery novel. This however is understandable, considering the book was never intended as historical narration, but instead as a series of descriptions and interpretations setting legal precedence for the Jew’s sacrificial law.
However, unlike most* other works of Jewish literary garbage, the Bible’s promoters have stirred this murderous and bloody religion’s arcane sacrificial dictates into a divine, mishmashed, morass of indecipherable nonsense serving only to vindicate their religious delusions.
(*Hallowedhoax stories are another notable example of this process couched in a secular framework.)
Bible stories jump around with no continuity, inexplicably changing times and scenes with no reason or explanation, only to return to the original narration chapters later, thus leaving readers confused as to what is supposed to have transpired.
A prime example of this is the description of Sodom’s precious water resources, forgotten by the time the reader arrives chapters later at Sodom’s destruction. And what part does Gomorrah have in the story? Is Gomorrah a suburb of Sodom? Are Gomorrahites supposed to be homos as well? If so, why are they left out of the standard interpretation of the story?

As God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah and the neighbour cities thereof, saith the LORD; so shall no man abide there, neither shall any son of man dwell therein. Jeremiah 50:40
Perhaps Gomorrah was the only other mentioned name of these otherwise unnamed “neighboring cities.” Apparently the lord god went on a killing spree that went much further than standard interpretation allows. This is the type of confusing narration running throughout the Bible. No wonder God works in mysterious ways, there can be no other explanation for this type of
“mysterious” nonsense.
Worse, by any standard the Hebrew language, in which the Bible was originally transmitted, can be at best, described as “primitive.” For Christ’s sake, one couldn’t even buy a vowel from the Jews.
The actual intent behind many Hebrew words often defies translation into more advanced languages. Written Hebrew is a derivative of Egyptian hieroglyph “logograms.” Here is the Jewish explanation for Hebrew, demonstrating its same linguistic heritage from the Egyptians. Note Hebrew’s Phoenician admixture. The Hyksos that divided Egypt were described by Egyptians as a “seafaring people,” a description that aligns perfectly with Phoenician seafaring heritage.
One must read the Bible very carefully, and even more importantly, objectively, to attempt piecing together the actual meaning behind these stories. What’s more, one must have good working knowledge of the culture and religion of the authors that made up this gobbledygook. I had to rewrite the stories before I began understanding their meanings and intent.
It was the writing and editing process that brought the actual meaning of these stories to light, as I had to research various aspects of the stories to put them in a cogent format understandable to modern readers. Simply reading these stories never sufficed to further my understanding of them.
Perhaps the most critical aspect of this undertaking was my objectivity. Since I was not a Christian, nor atheist, I had no ax to grind and nothing to prove one way or another. Of course Jews and Christians would now label me a virulent heretic for trying to discredit their “inerrant word” of a “god” narrating the “history” of the Jews. Even more crucial to my understanding of the Bible was my knowledge of the Jews’ religion and culture, not to mention (((their))) incredible chutzpah and hyperbole.
I began by studying the Bible with my wife, also neither Christian nor atheist. This in turn led to my studying the Jews, which in turn led back to applying the Jewish character to these stories. This eventually led to a process of enlightenment that prompted me to state, “If 10% of the population knew half of what I know about the Jew, there would not be one left on the planet by the end of the week.”