In my stats page I am seeing that my previous post, which reproduced Kevin MacDonald’s most recent article, has been receiving at least some traffic from The Occidental Observer.
In the Addendum I have reproduced Lawrence Auster’s 1998 unpublished chapter that inspired MacDonald to write his positive recapitulation of it.
I have just read Auster’s piece, which is over eleven thousand words, and the following phrase caught my attention.
“The problem is that the Jews, in the absence of healthy majority resistance, have virtually made their sensibility the ruling sensibility of America…” [my emphasis]
Of course! The “monocausalists” who don’t see absolutely anything wrong with the white psyche ought to take heed how, in the last centuries, Muslims have indeed showed healthy majority resistances with regard to the subversive tribe within their Islamic nations.
Judeo reductionism aside, Larry Auster’s revelation is stunning insofar as it demonstrates that he has been conscious of the Jewish Problem all of these years of his blogging career since he wrote that unpublished book.
I hope that visitors of this blog find the time during this weekend to read the articles by MacDonald and Auster. Since it is practically impossible to comment in either of their sites, visitors are welcome to comment either here or in the Addendum.
Ex Gladio Libertas!
68 Anno Nostri Hitlerum
3 replies on “Auster / MacDonald”
Thanks so much for this intro to Larry Auster and I will now read the article below. Kevin MacDonald did a wonderful job when he last appeared on the David Duke Show, but sometimes I find his approach to the jewish problem, too anemic..
Chechar,
The way you use the word monocausalist reminds me of how Hunter Wallace liked to divide the WN scene between the vanguardists and the mainstreamers.
Auster: “The problem is that the Jews have virtually made their sensibility the ruling sensibility of America…”
The problem is they have taken over the media (newspapers, radio, cinema, books) and infiltrated most institutions. What’s difficult to resist is not the great Jewish intellect (they usually talk rubbish), but their infiltration tactics.
Chechar: “Muslims have indeed showed healthy majority resistances”
Muslim society wasn’t built like ours. It didn’t have those open, democratic institutions. But I think the Australian Aborigines and the Congolese Pygmies would have been even better than the Muslims at resisting Jewish influence.
It’s true that Jewish tactics are hard to resist for us. They try to marry white women who come from powerful families so as to facilitate Jewish infiltration in the following generations. Having mixed blood makes them physically less conspicuous. They proceed in the same way as freemasons, and their tactics only become noticeable once they start to overdo it. Then, it can provoke a reaction from White people.
In a European society with open institutions, the way secret alliances work is that members of a secret subgroup promise to help one another to get to the top positions. Members will only support fellow members but will still get support from non-members who don’t know about the secret alliance. It means that over a few years, the secret alliance members will tend to rise to the top. So, in fact, it is more a problem with how common institutions work than with how the White mind works.
Now of course, if White people were naturally as aggressive and prone to violence as the Arabs, their society would be harder to penetrate for the Jews. It would also be less pleasant to live in.
It’s because, perhaps, I have not been clear enough:
1.- Monocausalists – Most of the commenters at Age of Treason and people like Dave Duke whom I deeply respect. These people believe that there’s but one cause of our woes: the subversive Jews.
2.- Bicausalists Type A – Those who, like Alex Linder and Greg Johnson, believe that Jews are the main cause of our woes, though there are other important factors as well (Greg recently commented against Christianity at CC and last Saturday Linder briefly discussed with Carolyn Yeager the role of Christianity in debilitating the Aryan mind when dealing with the subversive tribe).
3.- Bicausalists Type B – Those who, like Sunic, I and perhaps Brad Griffin (“Hunter Wallace”), believe that whites’ mental issues, including a specific form of Old Testament Christianity that conquered NorthAm, are the main infection and the Judaization of the West a secondary infection (like AIDS/pneumonia, etc).
But ethnically we were even more aggressive and prone to violence than the Arabs (who became sand-niggers with time). I trust you have read my controversial entry on Portugal, where several of my sources (Pierce, Kemp and Smith) agreed on the fact that in the first centuries of our era the Iberian Goths were even more aggressive than the Semites to the point of burning at the stake the Aryans who miscegenated.
Pace Duke, James Edwards, Yeager and so many WN Christians who have been saying “Happy Easter” in the white blogosphere these days, Christianity changed all that, and not only in Iberia: something that they’ll never acknowledge.
We need a new generation of WNsts who, unlike the conservative Spaniards of today (whom I find intolerable by the way) leave universal Christianity behind.
Hope this will clarify my views and show that they are a little more sophisticated than the dichotomy between “mainstreamers” and “vanguardists”.