Woods

Dear Cesar,

I don’t know if you’re still taking comments. Here’s the article I think: LINK

His initial complaint seems to be:

“National Socialism was not a generic “pro-White” movement, but a German chauvinist movement bound up with Nordicist racial theory. Central to its project was the planned ethnic cleansing of tens of millions of Slavs, and the destruction of White countries like Poland, Ukraine and Russia. This is not some Hollywood meme history. Hitler expresses his desire to establish lebensraum in the East in Mein Kampf, in his unpublished Second Book, and in his Table Talks.”

I haven’t read the rest of the article yet so I’m just skimming. My initial thought is, ‘yes, Keith, but so what?’ – I think you’re right, it’s his craven neochristian programming over exterminationism (plus perhaps a certain dismissive envy common to anti-Nordicists; I mean, Keith hardly looks Aryan by any pure definition). He’s one of those dissident rightists enamoured of Ukraine and subhuman Slavs. As an Irishman, why does he give so much of a damn about Eastern Europe? Remarkably egalitarian. It’s not like it was planned destruction for its own sake and for all time; Hitler could have made these places better, in a glorious extended Reich.

To be fair to Joel Davis, he claims to speak only in an Anglosphere context, but there are others who make the same argument for all White countries.

– I hate this stupid Americanised word ‘White’ they use, as it’s always employed to equivocate.

The moral is that conquest/expansion doesn’t need ‘justifying’, the same as hatred of racial enemies doesn’t have to be merely retaliatory/defensive. I wish they could be all be less submissive over all this.

Of course, if you push National Socialists enough, you will often find this principle is what it’s really all about: their National Socialism typically serves as a kind of religion for them based on this principle of eternal struggle and Nordicist racial hierarchies, and they simply wish to proselytise their religion.

– again, I ask him, what’s wrong with that? He should read your site to understand the need for a founding myth. Paltry cynical Nationalism isn’t enough to do that.

All the political steps I see as necessary to save my people from erasure can be carried through the vehicle of a regular old ethnonationalist movement — one that actually speaks to my people’s history, heroes and heritage.

– yes, Keith’s people’s history, pah: I’m reminded of the damning article Gaedhal recently shared by Kenneth Humphreys on ancient Ireland.

I despise these dissident rightists, the entire wet-willy lot of them. It makes you wonder if someone pays him to write it, it’s so subversive.