Categories Christendom Karlheinz Deschner Clarification Post author By C .T. Post date July 15, 2017 5 Comments on Clarification Note of 16 July 2018: This post has been merged within the book preface of my translation of Deschner’s book (here). ← Kriminalgeschichte, 8 → Julian, 8 5 replies on “Clarification” Deschner’s criticial history of the US, Der Moloch, is also worth a read. It is easy and convenient to demonize Christianity now. Try criticizing Islam. But a mullah or an imam might issue a fatwa calling for one’s beheading. Demonizing Islam is intimidating after all. Compared to the quite bloody and turbulent history of Islam, any history of criminality in Christianity pales in comparison. It took 4 centuries for Christianity to establish itself in Europe. It took one generation for Islam to conquer the vast space from Morocco and Andalusia to Afghanistan and Central Asia. Islam was like a thunderbolt which shattered what remained of the Ancient world and ushered in the Dark Ages. It was Islam which had the decisive role in making the Dark Ages possible. Islam began in a remote place in the Arabian Peninsula. In a cave in the desolation of the desert an angel spoke to a traveling merchant. And with the words from the angel, the traveling merchant and his companions conquered half the world. These early muslim conquerors Khalid ibn Al Walid, Saad ibn abi Waqqas, Amr ibn al Aas were ruthless men who brought Islam onto the unwilling by the sword and flame. They felt no remorse and no pity. Muslim clerics are quite honest about the more untidy actions of their predecessors and they even take pride in them. Christianity compared to the bloodthirsty muslim clerics is civilized. This site aims to understand the causes of white decline; it’s not about comparing Christianity with other religions. From the POV of understanding white decline, Christianity is an etiological factor of the brew that’s killing whites. See the articles in this site on the “Christian problem”. “It took 4 centuries for Christianity to establish itself in Europe. It took one generation for Islam to conquer the vast space from Morocco and Andalusia to Afghanistan and Central Asia. Islam was like a thunderbolt…” Four centuries to take over a continent is hardly anything to boast about. Do you not see how inverted your statement is? If we suppose Islam to be “the one true religion”, then it has already demonstrated it’s superiority over the Christian religion. It doesn’t even matter which of the two ideologies succeed, they’re both Jewish sects. Hitler himself said that the progress of the Christian religion was meager compared to Islam (Mein Kampf, Hitler-Bormann documents Feb. 7, 1945, Table Talk Feb. 27, 1942) You should read Hitler’s private talk to his generals and officers in May 26, 1944, Platterhof Hotel. He clearly indicates Christianity was inhumane in it’s approach, contrasting it from his movement: “Christendom destroyed other people, who did not wish to think in the prescribed way, just not so simply and quickly, as we do, but more slowly; we do it with a bullet, and there they did it using fire, they burned them.” In Mein Kampf, he quoted from Moltke, who said that the most humane method of fighting is to get a decision as quickly as possible (according to Speer, Hitler said a Gauleiter should be in a position to make irrevocable decisions) and to be most ruthless. He reiterates this in Table talk entry Jan. 23, 1942 and Political Testament. Thus, the progress of Islam can hardly be called bloodthirsty. from “Inside the Third Reich,” the memoirs of Albert Speer, Hitler’s architect and minister for armaments: Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. The German peoples would have become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire. Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking: ‘You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?’ Comments are closed.