Having briefly read ‘The Yoke of Woke’ I see Tobias Lang inadvertently echoes Orwell’s Notes on Nationalism. Much as he’s correct to notice postwar Jewish subversion, he’s still promoting these Jews to an all-powerful force, much as with the ‘transposition of colour’ where non-whites are innately superior in that they are dominant and thus somehow to blame for everything. I see, as you always write, and as Wagner said, that these commentators simply cannot turn their gaze onto themselves and process that it’s their neochristian morality that allows the Jews to do this [emphasis by Ed.], and which keeps them otherwise weak and focussed on loving their enemy out-group, and their capitalist system that facilitates this individualistic, atomised ‘soul-saving’. He puts out his counterargument, but I don’t see at any point him dwelling on Christianity and honestly critiquing it the same way, thus sidestepping addressing Cofnas adequately. I take it it’s simply beyond them, much as with dealing with their ancestors’ catastrophic failures in turning on Germany, and indeed their own anti-Nordic miscegenation. To be honest, I grow tired of reading the entire white nationalist right continually preach on and on about Jews (especially the ‘every single time…’ line) whilst gaslighting the other, more fundamental aspects of their long dissolution. To fight back, they must first be honest enough to recognise what they are, not just what they are subjected to. They might as well be whimpering leftists otherwise, made saintly in the role of the oppressed, these conservative reactionaries. They dig their own graves.
I should add that Tobias seems to suggest somehow that without criticising hostile Jews (as would be natural for them) like he is prepossessed to do, all his opponents/oppressors are Marxists. I’d say cultural Marxists, though they do exist, are rare outside of academia and student life. What about the vast group of normies, the white everyday people, the 90%+ of society? They’re not tied to cultural Marxism. Normies would be the clearest point for expressing that our society’s values are shaped by generations of Christianity. The everyday people aren’t schooled in any of these progressive theories, and they’re not activists regardless. Still, preternaturally, they radiate egalitarianism. And it’s the same with the right. It seems like conservatives have backed themselves into a corner over this and created yet another oppressor myth to make themselves feel better (although I do not deny Jewish subversion, obviously). I don’t understand why they have such reticence to examine their own side, and their own people (as a race, and not as a political faction). I certainly don’t think whites are, on the whole, innocent victims, passively absorbing outside abuses, much as their suffering is prominent to us. Surely there is something rather narcissistic about their mantra of dogged self-defence also, as they continue to gloss over the problem. Losing the warped metaphysics and suicidal doctrines of a ridiculous long-entrenched foreign religion does nothing to physically diminish our potential as a race. I simply don’t understand why they hang onto it (when I think to myself on it, it’s beyond me totally), were it not for cowardice and false pride narcissism. It makes no sense.
3 replies on “Commentators”
Benjamin posted the above text, slightly modified, in the comments section of The Occidental Observer so I have just linked to that comment above, in his name.
I’ve just seen my paired comment above finally published on TOO. I wonder if anyone will respond to it. I see the commenter below didn’t. My first thought when I saw that it had only just gone up was “did the site deliberately delay it so time would pass and psychologically people would move on, more drawn to the fresh articles?” but I couldn’t verify that. I’m not sure how long the usually taken.
I do predict that my comment’s wasted there though. It’s impossible talking to Christians and these pale, wet-willy Christian sympathisers. I grit my teeth when I read expressions like ‘Traditional Christian society’: oh, so centuries of internal white-on-white murder, torture, civil war, rampant miscegenation, cucking over foreigners, and the retardation of all science, art and higher learning (and the majority of continental Africans are staunch Christians). Anything good that occurred in Western countries during those former Christianized points occurred irrespective or, or indeed despite the presence of Christian worship. These people simply cannot face the Vlassis Rassias material either, or examine their plagiarism and the terrible inverted morality lessons of their ‘own’ holy books.
They’re too ignorant. They all talk like the reserved version of the alt-right in 2016, and, though they’re continuing to fill in tiny gaps in an increasingly uninspired dead horse thesis, they haven’t added anything helpful in literally years.
By the time they’ve stopped pooh-poohing this whole matter, much as most are bound to continue doing that indefinitely, they will have wasted too much precious time. I don’t know a solution bar to let calamity hit and to work irrespective of them, ignoring them totally and leaving them to their fate. I get the idea that most newbies to this are more drawn to strength of numbers and what is popular and non-taxing (and will thus render them popular and accepted in-group) than what is likely to be accurate and true. They do not have the fortitude to be independent. If I wanted current affairs analysis, which is all Unz/TOO, etc., seem to offer these days, given their likewise slant, I might as well just switch on the BBC. I’ve never been able to learn anything useful there or to be stimulated to any deeper analysis beyond the most superficial, endlessly repeated details on their irritating, lowbrow websites. Literally, like you said, just wait for them to die, and to fall into disarray.
Yes, they blame Jews (and I suppose non-Aryans), but they will never do anything about it (and, categorically, cannot think that sentiment beyond the politics of representational democracy), too quick to reserve that egalitarian politeness, a purely academic pacifism, moaning like set upon old ladies at their village tearoom meeting, calling for the manager to make another idle complaint, pinning it to the cluttered bulletins board for a fresh week. They are indeed the opposite of Heydrich.
I have yet to see one of these sites even dwell openly on the Bible, and of it being a Jewish creation, let alone where (and who) it may have come from or what it was been based on. As I said before, it’s the unquestioned dogmatic fundamentalism of a new equivalent to Muslims that we’re dealing with.
It’s been a dozen years since I started to become disillusioned with white nationalism, as they have never answered my question: If Jewry is responsible for all evils, how do you explain the almost complete genetic mixing of races in Latin America when the anti-Semitic Inquisition reigned in New Spain (now Mexico)?