web analytics
Categories
American civil war Film Patriarchy

Gone with the Wind

I have already written on several occasions about this 1939 film, the third on my list of 50, and here I would just like to copy and paste what I have said in past years.

Above, we can see the image of the carpetbagger scene in Gone with the Wind, a war that freed the Negroes and occurred at a time when there were no Jewish-owned mass media and even before mass Jewish immigration began. (Oh, Judeo-reductionist racialists who don’t want to see that, in addition to the JQ, we have a Christian problem…!)

In a couple of those opera-type theatres, I saw Gone with the Wind as a kid and then as a teenager. Many scenes of Rhett Butler (Clark Gable) with Scarlett O’Hara (Vivien Leigh) made a deep impression on my youthful mind:

– Throughout the film, from the opening scenes in Georgia, women’s outfits duly concealed the sexual appeal of their bodies, especially the dresses of the Southern beauties; and I don’t just mean Scarlett and the feminine elements of her family, but Ashley’s fiancée and the other society women. Melanie Hamilton, who eventually married Ashley, is the perfect model of how women should behave again in the future ethnostate! (the actress who played Melanie died three years ago at the age of 104!).

– At the Twelve Oaks party, before the barbecue is interrupted by the declaration of war, all the women are taking the obligatory nap (except Scarlett, who escapes to the upstairs bedroom) while the men discuss serious matters. It was unthinkable that a woman would have a say in such matters.

– Even after she is widowed, Scarlett is called ‘Mrs Charles Hamilton’, in the sense that her reputation remains in the shadow of a man who died in uniform.

– Similarly, following the Entr’acte Frank (Scarlett’s second husband), Ashley, Rhett and several other accomplices carry out a night-time raid on a shanty town after Scarlett, driving alone, is attacked by Negroes resulting in Frank’s death. Needless to say, on this night the wives of these brave men stayed at home sewing and reading decent literature.

– Once married to Rhett Butler, ‘Captain Butler’ was always greeted first by pedestrians in the street as he strolled with Scarlett. She, faithfully at her husband’s side on these street strolls, was only mentioned after pedestrians greeted Rhett.

– Let us never forget Scarlett’s marital rape when Rhett lifted her in his arms and said, ‘This is the one night you’re not going to throw me out’.

In those luxurious cinemas of yesteryear, when I was young, the film depicted wholesome Western mores, before values were corrupted and completely reversed in our darkest hour. I even remember that my mother, who wasn’t racist at all, felt compassion for the Southerners in the scene where the carpetbagger we see in the image above appears, and we both resented the presence of the black singer who took advantage of the situation. That must have happened about forty-five years ago in one of those theatres.

12 replies on “Gone with the Wind”

You want to study the career of this man, August Belmont?

link
Also, the Confederacy had a poisonous Jew at the heart of its government, and one’s whose statue Mitch Landrieu didn’t dare to remove in New Orleans.

The Confederates were Christians, as were the Yankees. Both are responsible for what happened to the Negroes in the neighbouring country to the north. Even so, I have the strong impression that the Puritans who commanded the bluecoats were, by all accounts, even worse than those who wore the gray uniform.

As far as the Jew you mention is concerned, it is nothing compared to the influence of Christian morality in those times, as Tom Holland clearly showed in one of the most notable PDFs on this site.

Even back then, the southerners had some sort of “love” for their negro slaves that they were willing to wage a war they couldn’t win for them.

Wouldn’t have been better to just get rid of them somehow and avoid a pointless, bloody war?

Well, of course not, for both sides, the negroes were some sort of “holy black gold” that was worth fighting for, and this had become the quintessence of American culture.

Wherever it goes, the negro is always mentioned and elevated as some sort of folkloric creature that must always appear in every piece of advertisement. The message is “we are not racists and we love our negroes!”.

Americans can deny that assessment all they want, but it is a quintessential part of the culture on this country, and anyone who embraces it will also become a nigger lover, wherever he notices it or not.

This is why National Socialism and the Nordic ideal are complete opposites to anything that America represents.

I think it’s more than just America that has “love” for their pets. I think it’s more of an anglosphere phenomenon. Look at Rhodesia and South Africa and how the Whites there have been repaid their kindnesses. It’ll be the same in America in the near future. The English can’t get enough of their black pets either if you go by their advertising.

I don’t think this is a peculiarity of the anglos. Look at what the french did in Haiti in the XVIII century, for example. And they also, well, “embraced” their colored pets in France proper a long time ago (the nazis described France jokingly as the first African colony in Europe). Not to mention Portugal and it’s colony in south America…

Even more serious was that the Portuguese mixed their blood with Negroes in the Iberian peninsula. Haven’t you read The Fair Race article on the subject?

I did. And it was kind of big surprise, I mean, to discover that the Portuguese engaged in bestiality, in Portugal, so early, and to such and extent. And it wasn’t for a lack of women (or men), obviously. And I don’t think Christianity was the only reason either. The Aryans in India did basically the same, and even earlier, right? At home and, even worse, without the influence of some alien creed messing up with their heads. They gave up their “apartheid” willingly.

The Aryans in India did basically the same, and even earlier, right?

Not exactly. Have you read my abridgement of Pierce’s book in The Fair Race?

I read it. But, in the end, despiite an initial effort that remained effective for centuries, they failed to maintain their racial purity. And they even came up with a homegrown religion that helped to bring this racial decomposition. There are, of course, obvious differences between what happened there and what happened in Portugal (and in the west in general), but the results are basically the same.

But even so, what the Portuguese did, mixing with blacks in a couple of generations, cannot be compared to the centuries-long deterioration of the Aryans in India despite their Code of Manu, which was a kind of Nuremberg laws of the ancient world. It is obvious that with Christianity this gradual process towards racial decline is greatly accelerated.

Agreed.
In any case, they were outnumbered by the darkies from the start. And their answer to that problem was, I believe, “well, perhaps we can make good use of these creatures to our own economic benefit. We only need to maintain the beasts segregated from us by a strict code of conduct and a caste system, and everything will be alright”. And we know how well this idea worked out in the long run, and similar things happened with Aryans elsewhere. And that knowledge makes us understand the fact that, if Aryans managed to survive (AND erase Christianity) and reclaim their position as the dominant race in the world, they will have to accept a, shall I say, more “Himmlerian” view of any new areas and peoples eventually conquered (and I have to thank you for making me understand this).

Obviously. This is from page 219 of my compilation The Fair Race (a passage from Pierce’s history of the race):

Extermination or Expulsion. This catastrophic mixing of bloods has occurred over and over again in the history and prehistory of our race, and each time it has been lethal. The knowledge of this has been with us a long time, but it has always failed us in the end. The Hellenes of Sparta and Athens both strove to keep their blood pure, but both ultimately perished. The only way they could have survived would have been to eliminate the entire indigenous population, either through expulsion or extermination, from the areas of the Mediterranean world in which they settled.

The Hellenes always possessed a certain feeling of racial unity, distinguishing themselves sharply from all those not of their blood, but this racial feeling was, unfortunately, usually overshadowed by intraracial conflicts. The rivalries between Hellenic city-states were so fierce and so pervasive, that the Mediterranean natives were more often looked upon as a resource to be used against other Hellenes than as a biological menace to be eliminated.
 

Indo-Europeans Conquered Middle East, Perished through Racemixing.
Mighty Hittite Empire Was Built by Nordics, Destroyed by Nordics.
Aryan Warriors Ruled Persian Empire, India.
Only Total Separation Can Preserve Racial Quality.

Before we deal with the next Indo-European peoples of the Classical Age—the Macedonians and the Romans—let us review briefly the history of our race to this point, and let us also look at the fate of some Indo-Europeans who, unlike those we have already studied, invaded Asia instead of Europe.

Around the middle of the fifth millennium B.C., a new racial type made its first impact on Old Europe…

Comments are closed.