It seems that the beheaded babies story, despite Biden’s regurgitation of it, is fake news. But I wanted to add something to what I said yesterday about Greg Johnson. In his latest article, he responds to The Right Stuff’s (TRS) criticism of Johnson for his lukewarm stance on Israel. This is taken from the comments section of Counter-Currents:
______ 卐 ______
Teutonic Path said:
In this article [i.e., Johnson’s article] you said the exterminationist position is indefensible, yet unless I am mistaken everything after that did not say why. It would seem to me that if an ethnos dies out then the challenge of getting it into a single state also goes away. Are you saying it’s indefensible because it’s practically unworkable (potentially leading to bigger problems), or is it for a theoretical reason (e.g. ethics) that you don’t mention here?
Greg Johnson responded:
Mass murder is ethically indefensible.
Sherman McCoy said:
Perhaps the existence of my people matters more than your ethics.
Greg Johnson responded:
Good luck defending your people as a genocidal maniac.
Sherman McCoy said:
I’m sure the people in South Africa being butchered by feral negroids egged on by Yiddish Communists have the consolation, as they breathe their final pained and blood-soaked breaths, that at least they didn’t do anything unethical. Because the truly important thing for the future of white people is to make sure that we appear nice. Remember, fellow white nationalists: we’re working for a future where all the races join hands to sing Kumbaya together, presumably with Rabbi Shekelberg acting as conductor.
Greg Johnson responded:
If you think morality is just a matter of appearing nice, you might be a sociopath.
Max said:
A huge number of Jews and their shabbos goyim are openly exterminationists about Palestinians, at least in Gaza. And more than a few of them are exterminationists about Europeans and their diasporas. So I’m not quite sure why it’s “immoral” for us to advocate such a policy towards Jews. Perhaps it’s optically unwise to do so openly but you seem to be taking an absurd moralfagging position here, Greg. Perhaps a Kumbaya future where Jews renounce their supremacist ideology en masse and forever is possible, but that seems like an unlikely bet, knowing what we do about their history and their present behavior.
Greg Johnson responded:
Two wrongs don’t make a right. It is idiotic to use words like “moralfagging” unironically.
Sej said:
Agreed. Notice that people cheerleading mass murder of Israelis are the same that defend Russians’ mass murder of Ukrainians in Donbas and Crimea.
Norm said:
Jews do not share your anti-exterminationist sentiment, Greg. Go on Twitter and look at all the Jews gloating about the firebombing of Dresden. What Jews are doing to Gaza is what they’d do to Europe, and what they have done to Europe. Do you think you can co-exist with a people like that? Jews follow an ideology that commands them to wipe out all European people. You cannot defeat hate with reason.
Greg Johnson responded:
Two wrongs don’t make a right. Maybe you’d be more comfortable commenting at Jesse Dunstan’s site.
My two cents for this site:
It’s quite refreshing to listen in The Right Stuff podcast that they call Johnson a ‘traitor’.
This said, the problem with TRS is that, at least the guy who speaks after minute 15, is a Judeo-reductionist. He believes that from that little piece in the desert Israel controls the West: typical monocausal paranoia that ignores that it is whites who have been empowering Jewry because of their Judeo-Christian values. For example, when in 1:26 another TRS member said ‘fuck them’ to the exterminationists, he himself is unknowingly subscribing to Judeo-Christian standards of morality (exactly what Johnson does).
I don’t recognise well the voices but I think it was Mike who said, a few seconds after the hour, what I believe about the conflicts in both Ukraine and Palestine: Mike welcomes them because they create chaos. Just contrasts it with Johnson’s stance, who, as a good neochristian, simply wants peace and happiness for every party involved, including Jews (as Linder once said, Johnson is a de facto conservative).
4 replies on “TRS v. CC”
As I said before: for at least 3,000 years the Jews have stuck doggedly to “even the memory of Amelek [i.e. the white race] is to be obliterated.” It says this in the Old Testament. In this vein, Andrew Jackson is being replaced by Harriet Tubman on the thirty-dollar bill. As Alex Linder points out: for 3,000 years, the Jews have said that even the best of the Goyim should be killed; even the best of snakes should have their heads crushed. Guess what? The Jews are winning! Whites for 3,000 years have tried to reform Jews—several times!—whereas the Jews have simply tried to exterminate us once. Epiphanes and Pompey could have put a permanent end to the Jewish problem, but instead tried to reform and civilize the Jews. We tried that: it didn’t work. Only one solution to the Jewish problem hasn’t been tried yet.
With each Neochristian article, and with each pacifist comment, Greg Johnson makes himself a more worthy target for removal than a member of ADL.
Think of how much time would be saved if Greggy wasn’t around producing moralfag articles. Think of how many man-hours of reading and writing that could be reduced for every dissident and potential revolutionary out there, going around with moralfag values in their heads, searching for answers; searching for knowledge on how to harness and sharpen their hatred.
Instead they find kosher bullshit such as “If you think morality is just a matter of appearing nice, you might be a sociopath.”
Well Greggy, it’s the “socios” who will inherit the future. They will be the ones carving a path and spreading their seed, while you will be just faggot bones in the soil. And the sooner you get to that state, the better.
Perhaps it’s time for the readership to remember your 2021 article ‘Greg Johnson: racial traitor’…
As Aron Ra puts it: sociopathy and empathy are competing evolutionary strategies. Hence why we observe both in nature, and especially in man. My essay in César’s anthology, On Exterminationism, was about the problem of evil. I want to see a day when empathy reigns upon this planet… however, in my view, empathy can only reign on this planet after we win the race war. The Chinese and the Japanese, for one thing, have no empathy for wildlife. The Chinese starve tigers to death for tiger meat, and the Japanese eat live octopuses and kill cetaceans for fun. Jews swing chickens and engage in Kosher slaughter. Halal slaughter is likewise barbaric and an affront to decency and empathy. A world that is empathetic to wildlife has to be a white world.