Open thread

For those who want to ask questions or simply discuss any topic.

12 replies on “Open thread”

Japan in WWII: A Casualty of Usury?
By Dr. Ingrid R. Zundel on June 26, 2011
Was WWII Fought to make the World Safe for the Bankers?

Hitlers formal alliances with Japan and Italy were with two powers seeking to break into the established anglo-american spheres of influence in Africa and Asia, areas Germany and Hitler had NO aims in. These alliances hardened the old anglo-american oligarchy against Germany alongside the international jewry Hitler had already alienated.

Even worse two days after Pearl Harbour Hitler DECLARES war on USA alongside Japan! This made Roosevelts job of getting USA into the european war certain.

It is my opinion if Hitler had broken the alliance with Japan after Pearl Harbour it may have kept the USA out of the European war for a lot longer. The alliance with Japan had no advantages for Germany, and infact Japan attacking the US in 1941 allowed thousands of Soviet troops defending against the japanese in Manchuria to transfer back to europe to save Moscow…..the rest is as they say history!

I just started re-reading some of David Lane. I’m amazed. His words seem even more pertinent today than they did when I first read them, years ago.

It’s almost as if he’s still here with us today and commenting on the current sad state of the White Race. And to think, he wrote most of what he did while being tortured by our own government.

When I think of heroes of the white race I think of Hitler, Degrelle, Rockwell, Irving, Ben Klassen, David Lane and another I only found recently, Guy Sajer.

Oriana Fallaci and Brigitte Bardot have to be recognized for their ability to see reality and for their courage in the face of persecution to speak the truth in defense of the white race.

Indeed. Lane was extremely perceptive. Many WNsts don’t consider themselves priests of Lane’s 14 words because he was non-Xtian: He was a true Aryan internally.

Until there is a serious effort to eradicate Anglos from europe and possibly from world, there is no hope in revival of europe.

This is what british, american troops did to Julius streicher

“Two niggers undressed me and tore my shirt in two. I kept only my pants. Being handcuffed, I could not pull them up when they fell down. So now I was naked. Four days! On the fourth day, I was so cold that my body was numb. I couldn’t hear anything. Every 2 – 4 hours (even in the night!) Niggers came along under command of a White man and hammered at me. Cigarette burns on the nipples. Fingers gouged into eye-sockets. Eyebrows and chest hair pulled out. Genitals beaten with an oxwhip. Testicles very swollen. Spat at. “Mouth open” and was spat into. When I refused to open, my jaws were pried apart with a stick and my mouth spat into. Beaten with a whip – swollen, dark-blue whelps all over the body… Photographed naked! Jeered at wearing an old army greatcoat which they hung round me.

I dont think christian problem will ever be eradicated as there is no shortage of misfits,losers,and meek on this earth.

As long as untermenschen live on this earth,Christianity and Islam or some other Jewish variant ideology will not perish, there is always a demand for such ideologies and lower genetic stock will always gravitate towards such ideologies.

1. Torture. On and off for a few weeks have I been [fairly casually, mind you] thinking about torture. I believe, torturing your enemies that you hate is a healthy instinct. And yet, even though I do know hate, I cannot see the value in torture.

1) Torturing people before killing them makes no sense. Our business pales in death’s shadow, for we are all equal in death, and the offender turns into nothingness anyway. Torture only makes sense if you believe in afterlife (“he will remember not to mess with me!”), or if you want to make a point in public (this way, torturing journalists is a decent idea). But philosophically speaking, the dead and the living hold no grudges.

2) If you want to maximize suffering, you may lock somebody up and torture him for a long time. But then I would like to imagine that people do change, and you start torturing a new person that has little to do with the original offence, and that you have in part created.

So, I have come to the conclusion that a proper way of vengeance is just giving death. And from an animal Darwnist perspective, killing all of his relatives. I.e., a blood feud!

P.S. I have seen people express blind, unarticulated hate towards things that go beyond their culture (i.e., a feminist blindly hates a racist, or a pacifist considers Anders Breivik a monster), and I have no such hate. I just know that a Jew’s place is in the oven, but that’s nothing personal.

2. I’ve watched an RT documentary about Chechens (that the channel Blitz of the Reich has recommended). From what I saw, Chechnya seems like a fine (albeit ugly Armenid) country that values such virtues as manliness and honour, and they do kill their enemies with guns. But even there the ugly faith of Abraham has spread its roots, and the imams send forth the disgusting message of pacifism and forgiveness.

Also, Chechnya is a commendable little country (that Russia kind of subdued relying on traitors, but not really, and the Chechens are in no danger of dying out), but at the same time they’re so insignificant geopolitically, they’re dwarfed by the sheer magnitude of the Judeo-Aryan Man, his madness, and his nuclear missiles. Aryans at least have a chance of taking back the US.

3. I believe that all life is unnecessary. Not amor fati, but “amor vitae”. If you reject suicide, you accept life. You accept its unnecessary nature. And from this to the glorification of unnecessary violence is but a small step. Which I can’t see anyone not take. (Except for you, of course. That’s why I read you.)

Comments are closed.