…for the record, what Gaedhal calls ‘Atheistic Hyperchristianity’ is what we have been calling ‘Neo-Christianity’ on this site.
Categories
…for the record, what Gaedhal calls ‘Atheistic Hyperchristianity’ is what we have been calling ‘Neo-Christianity’ on this site.
2 replies on “Just…”
Today I received this email:
It is Christians and neo-Christians who indulge in evil by subscribing to NT values, and Jewish subversion is merely an opportunistic infection.
I recently used the metaphor of falling off a motorbike and getting a scraped arm infected. I blamed the accident (Xtian axiology) one hundred per cent for the infection (JQ).
The point is that neither the Chinese nor the Hindus nor the Islamic world have a clearly ethnosuicidal ideology to the extent of importing masses of blacks and announcing, as we see on the streets of London, English women marrying these apes!
We are the ones who have been causing this since Constantine (before imperial Rome, the Mediterranean was once a place dominated entirely by Aryans). The Jews have only been taking advantage of our axiological madness.
I understand what you meant, Cesar, I simply wished to point out that the jews do not slack in subverting others as they do us. I erred in forgetting to mention that their subversion of others, is ultimately in service to their ultimate goal of the extermination of the Aryan people, because it is we and we alone who have the necessary balance of the powers of creation and destruction and the inherent will to oppose their domination.
It should be noted, I think, that the only reason the other races, similarly infected by jews, aren’t as ethnosuicidal, is because they have different kin structures than we do, are already miscegenated, and that Christian/Neochristian ethics has had far less time to work on them and been pushed far less fanatically on their Nations. In some cases similar, but less virulent, ideologies had already supplanted and provided some small measure of resistance to it. In some, it has been pushed in an already diluted form, perhaps taking the edge off of the ideology. These actually apply to all of the mentioned peoples in different ways.
All three could easily be called, and pointed out correctly as horribly miscegenated. The Chinese have been dominated in every imaginable way for the last 1500 years or more, by one conqueror after another, not the least of which is Genghis Khan. The root of the name Arab means mixed in some contexts, and for the Indians it’s blindingly obvious.
Of course, the particular virology of Christianity is targeted towards the Aryan above all else, it is the values of Aryans, undiluted, that it was designed to overturn, reverse, and corrupt. I simply like to see the whole picture, to see if any element one may otherwise overlook can reveal some truth that would otherwise remain hidden.