The field of apologetics itself being intrinsically fraudulent, it is impossible to be an honest apologist. An honest apologist is, to me at least, an oxymoron.
I discovered this in the 1980s, reading theological heavyweights like Hans Küng (I mention him in my autobiography, which I recently resumed translating into English).
For editorial purposes, it was my only alteration of your text. Above, I rephrased you (“As Pocket locker 86, linked here”), linking it in the word ‘here’, while in your text you say ‘below’.
And this is the video from Mythvision that I am critiquing, where a comment of mine was deleted. Stephen Boyce, as of the time of this comment, is still being billed as a “doctor”.
It looks like your link is missing. But from your original text, I guess it’s this one.
Derek has also deleted one of my comments in another thread, where I said he’s a neo-Christian.
5 replies on “Myth vision”
I discovered this in the 1980s, reading theological heavyweights like Hans Küng (I mention him in my autobiography, which I recently resumed translating into English).
This is the blogpost by Hansen which questions Boyce’s credentials: Stephen Boyce and the Problem of the pseudo-credentialed apologist.
For editorial purposes, it was my only alteration of your text. Above, I rephrased you (“As Pocket locker 86, linked here”), linking it in the word ‘here’, while in your text you say ‘below’.
And this is the video from Mythvision that I am critiquing, where a comment of mine was deleted. Stephen Boyce, as of the time of this comment, is still being billed as a “doctor”.
It looks like your link is missing. But from your original text, I guess it’s this one.
Derek has also deleted one of my comments in another thread, where I said he’s a neo-Christian.