Categories WDH radio show Revolutionary podcast – 1 Post author By C .T. Post date April 28, 2018 14 Comments on Revolutionary podcast – 1 Ex Gladio Libertas speech protected by Brandenburg v. Ohio — Listen to it here! — WDH host: Joseph Walsh Special guest: Norman Spear ← The Story of Philosophy, 4 → Julian, 32 14 replies on “Revolutionary podcast – 1” 1) What is the lovely music in the intro and outro? 2) Surprised that Norman Spear has an American accent. I always imagined him as having a strong Italian one. If he considers himself an American, why does he use an Italian flag on his Twitter account? 3) Spear says concerning the NWF Constitution: “I like it. I think it does a really good job of sticking to some of the very important, fundamental National Socialist principles. However, if you read it, it is not identical to the type of Government or system of Government that Hitler had in place… and balances them with other legislative aspects of the Government that are more appropriate for our times and for North America. That system of Government is the closest we could come in America today to an NS type of Government.” Double balls and bollocks. This is not the first time where I have mentioned this Constitution. How on Earth could you even compare NS Germany to a Racialist Democracy. That is what Covington’s ethno state will be: the US Constitution with some explicitly Racial elements thrown in. Have we really not learned this. How hard could it be to understand: Democracy is a disgusting, failed institution. Why are these people proposing that it be the White system of Governance. Democracy has always been just a sneaky way of keeping people within a slave mentality. It should be scrapped and pissed on. And this part makes me laugh: “… and balances them with other legislative aspects of the Government that are more appropriate for our times and for North America.” Ridiculous – Why are we concerned about being appropriate for North America when we are meant to be seceding from it? If we believe that America is the most evil thing there is, then why do we seek to appeal to its values? Covington proposes that the NW becomes Murka 2.0. In short, this child’s colouring book must be scrapped as soon as. That is all. Yes, I used to be a fan of the Butler Plan until I realised that if I moved there and gave my life in guerrilla war having Covington as commander in chief I’d only give my life not for a NS state, but for America II. One of the things that WNsts don’t understand is that this age demonstrates what Andrew Hamilton said (picked up at the beginning of The Fair Race): that people are not really good. In the case of whites, since they lack the ethnic cohesion of Jews, the only way is to impose a 4th Reich on them for a thousand years, while Aryans are exterminating non-whites around the world. Only after the last single non-white is exterminated could rules be relaxed a bit. Last week I participated in the discussion with Spear, but the recording was corrupted with no backup copy. I told Spear about my preoccupation with Covington’s feminism but I don’t know if he knows that I’ve written a post about it (here). I have not read the last draft of Covington’s constitution but let me state very plainly: Any empowerment of women to such level is doomed to failure. Would-be soldiers become immediately demoralised when realising that they are giving their lives for women to compose a ‘racist’ government in half of the New Republic’s seats, including the military. It is this sort of thing what makes me say that even the most radical voices in the movement, those who propose revolution, are committing racial suicide. Will Covington realise that feminism is ethnosuicide in what remains of his life? I doubt it. If he does he would have to repudiate his last novel and edit the previous four of the Northwest quintet. The music is the soundtrack of a film that you should watch: an interpretation of Pride and Prejudice already reviewed in this site. Precisely, precisely the kind of sexual mores that should reign in the New Republic! The exact opposite of Covington’s ethnosuicidal ways! Covington basically believes in Enlightenment principles: That people are fundamentally good and need complete freedom to achieve this supposed purity. But we know what this Yank freedom leads to, even if we rule out non White invasion: Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, Adam Lanza and many others. I don’t see such similar circumstances having an impossibility in Covington’s Corner (my term – Copyrighted). I think that such things were caused by Libertarianism and modern Western values. There are implicit Feminist messages in the NW Constitution. For example when it refers to the President as “him/her”, “he, she”. Do you remember when a character of his has a wife who basically frightens him into fighting in an invasion of Canada (it is in a post you made)? Such Matriarchalism is not uncommon among Covington’s generation, I have noticed. They take pride in strongly revering women. I am not referring to the veneration of Aryan female beauty, but a sick mummy’s boy mind set. It is enough to see this in my Father’s side of the family to see what I am saying. but I expect you to understand. I am by no means ruling out violence, but I think that our best bet is to actually just let civilisation collapse. The Siege Culture website basically proposes this. But as you say, we need a Dictatorship. That means no Freedom of Speech, no Freedom of the Press, no Freedom of Association, no Senators, no Legislative bullshit. If not that then whatever else works, but it can never be Democratic. Anyway, I will definitely watch that film, however, I will read the novel first, because I always do that before watching the adaptation. Just a habit. P.S. Is there something in Freedom’s Sons which tries to challenge the point of the Ethno state being nuked by having a sub plot about space lasers? Covington basically believes in Enlightenment principles: That people are fundamentally good and need complete freedom to achieve this supposed purity. Absolutely. I read the first four novels of the quintet with fiery interest, and only part of the last one (a failed novel IMO). In Covington’s Corner, IIRC in The Hill of the Ravens, there are no IDs for the New Republic’s citizens! They are supposed to behave as good individuals with no need of what, in today’s US, are driver licences: the way to identify a person. Just as naïve Alex Linder, Covington believes that once you remove the Jews form a society everything will be okay and run smoothly. They will never answer my point of what happened in the Americas even with the Inquisition targeting cryptos: mestization. I am not referring to the veneration of Aryan female beauty, but a sick mummy’s boy mind set. Spot on. My working hypothesis is that Covington is just pandering on women because his ‘iron dream’—our dream—unfortunately leaves us broke with no women. He did not learn the lesson of First Wave feminism that started in Wyoming. Our hunger of little reds riding hoods has to do with survival and reproduction. But such a tremendous impulse has a very dark side. Pandering to women in search for sex created the climate for universal suffrage in Wyoming. In 1869 the madness started. It was the first state that granted women the right to vote. There were six thousand Lycanthropes and only a thousand little reds. Bachelor wolves were feeling lonely. To attract delicious Caperucitas from other states they offered these creatures of long hair and short ideas the right to vote. The rest is history… Anyway, I will definitely watch that film, however, I will read the novel first, because I always do that before watching the adaptation. Just a habit. It’s on my list ten must-watch films. P.S. Is there something in Freedom’s Sons which tries to challenge the point of the Ethno state being nuked by having a sub plot about space lasers? Yes: a woman (!) saves the New White Republic by killing the US president just in the moment when he was about to order his generals to nuke the Republic… That’s funny, I thought he mentions lasers in space at some point. I have only read the Brigade so am not sure. In your MGTOW summary, there is a triangular diagram. I do not know the term, but when society collapses, the level of Patriarchy will be stronger. There is both the strong Patriarchy and soft Patriarchy. I do not know which we will see, but such Feminist notions proposed by Covington would be unthinkable in either cases. We do not realised how privileged we are in the modern West, the fact that we can entertain such ideas of women being so empowered. That is not good, of course. In our civilisation the mind has relaxed, and people have become dumb. In soft and hard patriarchies, whichever comes again, we will see this return to true Lycanthropy. But like I said before, I am not proposing for a wait for this to possibly happen, just that it definitely should not be ruled out and in my view is extremely likely. In the novel, the president’s plan to nuke the ethnostate happened after the blue-laser you mention shuts down the invading airplanes. can such a blue laser exist? If not, then Covington can keep on dreaming. It’s also a sci-fi novel, literally. Funny, because Harold Tweeted recently “”They’ll nuke us Hurold!” Well, here is an excerpt which deals with this.”” But if it is set in the future, then there is no real feasible plan to counteract nuclear bombardment. The whole idea of leaving the US government with nukes while you are expecting they won’t use them in Covington’s Non-nuclear Corner is a recipe for suicide. Well, this was a good podcast, and I am happy you and Joseph are getting this done. Your must-watch films: I have seen sleeping beauty but I did not like the story at all. I do love Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake, however and the animations were clearly brilliant for their time. I have seen every single Planet of the Apes film ever made, and the original 2 are the only I like. The depiction of the vegetarian Apes living extremely simple yet fulfilling lifestyles is actually something to look up to. Not only that but I begin to understand the hatred for the degenerated humans: According to the pompous Dr Zaius, they are a scourge and are like germs. I saw 2001 for the first time with my Father when I was about 8, and the part with the giant infant in space really made me go crazy at that age. It really stuck with me. I saw Andrei Rublev for the first time rather recently. I liked how in that film the scene with the ‘pagan’ lady trying to seduce a frightened and tied up Rublev, the camera work basically teases you with her naked form. It sort of shows you but also doesn’t at the same time, I know that is not the point of the film, just thought I would point it out. It is interesting because I am quite prudish when it comes to films and nudity. I saw Death in Venice for the second time a few weeks ago. When I first saw it I got homosexual vibes from it, however I do see that it is much more complicated than that and it is one of my favourite films. I will certainly watch the ones that I haven’t in due time. Women’s power doesn’t come from the ability to vote but from careers, money, and resources. It’s the universities and employers who give women power in society, in the West education is a gateway to higher paying jobs and the ability to delay marriage forever or impose unrealistic demands on the males in their community. When the law states university admissions must be over 90% male things will go back to normal, in countries where the standard of living is low, hypergamy is controlled, women have 5 children, and these problems don’t exist. It’s really not a question of political power but practical power and financial independence. Middle class, spoiled women leads to many unhappy men, and for every job taken by a woman means one less opportunity for a male. If we don’t curtail feminism/hypergamy, In 1000 years white people will be extinct, but nobody is talking about this. Harold Covington wants a society full of young men working for minimum wage, his worldview is incoherent and he has nothing to contribute, he’s little more than a racist liberal maintaining the status quo. 19:00 Being anti-Muslim is not exactly synonymous with being pro-White. And considering the rhetoric commonly used (female and homosexual “rights”), Islamophobes are explicitly anti-White. About NS being the only way of immunity, maybe (only existed for 12 years), but monarchies managed to expel Jews just fine, and Bogdan Khmelnitski succeeded in genociding them in an uprising. want to get rid of the tribe? build on the foundational law: no property ownership, by government or otherwise. (i’ve been reading john garland. i like his brave new world: a different projection.) and his stuff leads to melvin ezell gorham and the Sovereign Press. Comments are closed.