explainers
The first books I read decades ago by the most popular science explainers were those by Isaac Asimov, who disappointed me when I read in one of them that he endorsed the medical model of mental disorders. (I would later learn that virtually all scientists are incapable of questioning biological psychiatry, even sceptics of the paranormal, as I discuss in the middle section of my Hojas Susurrantes.) Later, I was captivated by Jacob Bronowski and Carl Sagan with their television series, The Ascent of Man and Cosmos. But over time both Jews, whose books based on those series I read, disappointed me. Bronowski used Auschwitz for propaganda purposes in one of his Ascent of Man programs, and Sagan appears on a Cosmos program in a classroom with white and black children, treating them as equals (you can imagine niglets in a European classroom if Hitler had won the war!).
Virtually all scientists behave like pseudoscientists on topics like the real aetiology of mental disorders, and what Jared Taylor calls race realism. So I lost interest in science after an important period in my life (late 1989 to mid-1995), when paranormal sceptics educated me to distinguish between science and pseudoscience.
I rarely read science books these days, though one exception was one by Roger Penrose that I briefly reviewed on this site. It’s nice to see Penrose on YouTube. But it’s very unpleasant to watch other science educators’ videos, where the editors aggressively inundate us with strident images. But today I saw a video that, without images of that strident and degenerate culture, shows Brian Cox speaking directly to us.
In the first part, Cox said something I didn’t know about black holes: that holographically, what’s at their centre seems to be encoded outside, on their horizon! I didn’t know that.
In the second part, Cox talks about the Fermi paradox, and that’s what caught my attention the most. He said that one possibility for resolving the paradox is that emerging extra-terrestrial civilisations self-destruct because their technology develops much faster than their wisdom. Those who have followed this blog know that I’ve used the metaphor of Bran the Broken, a sort of philosopher-king from Plato’s Republic, as the only wise non-stupid form of government I can imagine (cf. what Savitri Devi wrote about Hitler).
Cox lives in Manchester, where I lived for a year. It’s obvious that this modern-day science communicator, like the very popular communicators of the past, is incapable of seeing the malignant ethnocidal psychosis afflicting the West, and especially the United Kingdom with its public billboards of English roses with Negroes—the sin against the holy ghost! Cox can show us, in understandable language, the cutting-edge science of black holes and their importance for understanding the universe, but he is incapable of seeing the malignant psychosis of his fellow citizens right in front of his nose. To my mind he himself, like the rest of the normies, resolves the Fermi paradox because scientists themselves fail to see their own stupidity: the stupidity that causes the West’s darkest hour.
Even so, instead of being distracted by a movie with clear anti-white messages like the latest Jurassic Park, anyone who wants to get a little distracted while simultaneously educating himself on a topic I now consider marginal—science, as my focus is Aryan stupidity—, can watch the video linked above.
5 replies on “On science”
It’s coincidental you mention the majority of scientists these days being partial pseudoscientists in some ways. I was reading a book by the cognitive ecologist Marc Bekoff last week titled The Emotional Lives of Animals (which I heartily recommend by the way as, beyond being very moving and providing a myriad fascinating anecdotal examples from him and his colleagues’ research careers, it delves into the hard neurobiology of animal consciousness and thoroughly refutes the common ‘anthropomorphism’ slander) and still, even he managed to put his foot in it by referencing ‘mental disorders’ and the use of psychiatric drugs, operating under the medical model paradigm. It was the same for me with the neuroscience researcher Christof Koch in his book The Feeling of Life itself: Why Consciousness is Widespread But Can’t be Computed – these assumptive academics always disappoint me when, as you say, seemingly inevitably they fecklessly back up mainstream psychiatry. It just goes to show how insidious Big Pharma propaganda is, and how strenuously well-established the bio-medical institution remains under its public veneer of legitimacy. One could blame the universities also, for training people with this shite.
I like Roger Penrose myself. I find Paul Davies, Michael Lockwood, and Ilya Prigogine very readable also though, and always recommend them when discussing science. I take it in general they’re just devoted to their disciplines, and, by professional reputation (at least with the old-school breed of Oxbridge scientist), known to be somewhat naïve, living a very cloistered lifestyle, and thus unable to perceive, for example, the ethnic masochism and anarcho-tyranny around them. Most people are neochristian normies, I wouldn’t expect scientists to be any different. I’d imagine it’s the same with modern philosophers. There are no real motivated firebrands in academia (bar the likes of Douglas Murray, John Gray, or Roger Scruton, who naturally fall/fell very short).
I’ll watch the presentation now, thank you. Curiously, I’ve always tended to avoid Brain Cox, put off by his ‘trendy BBC pop educator’ persona, and haven’t read any of his books. I’d be interested in what he says though – quantum gravity is always fascinating. Incidentally, I think the best physicist I know on black holes is Kip S. Thorne. I’ll be starting his book on the Membrane Paradigm soon. Personally, I’m slightly more fond of astrophysics than cosmology, but both are certainly profoundly interesting to review.
PS. I think my favourite part so far is when he discussing space-time and the manifold we are familiar with as an emergent property of something more fundamental. That kind of blew my mind to consider! I notice the principle of emergence more and more cropping up in the consciousness/philosophy of mind research also.
Incidentally, I wasn’t sure if you were interested, but I think loop quantum gravity proposes a solution to the black hole information paradox describes the final phases of black hole evaporation, where information can then escape (alternatively that it depends on scaling and that at Planck scale evaporation ceases to occur). The alternative to all this – and to the holographic principle – is the Quantum Memory Matrix paradox, where, according to Florian Neukart in a 2024 article:
So basically space-time itself stores quantum information. It’s an interesting article. I work through it very slowly!
The topic is trendy. But the fundamental problem I see was already recognized by the ancient Greeks, who mocked the astronomer who fell into a well: a story that has Thales of Miletus as its protagonist. Currently, all Western scientists are falling into the well of ethnosuicide precisely because of what resolves the Fermi paradox.
The fact is that all of this is “premature science” so to speak. Only after a Hitler-inspired Reich conquers the Earth, and there is no longer any danger of extinction, could we afford to think about stars, including the mysterious black stars. (Interestingly, before black holes became fashionable, pagans associated with Himmler and Hess created The Black Sun—in German: Schwarze Sonne—a type of sun wheel symbol that first appeared in Nazi Germany as a design element in a castle at Wewelsburg.)
It’s premature science because, if the Aryan becomes extinct, everything on the planet will collapse. The surviving Neanderthals will torment animals and children until they technologically self-destruct. That’s why Savitri was alarmed by the fact that Hitler’s Germany was highly technological, although, given the competition between states (think of John Mearsheimer), it was an inevitable process.
Also, that’s why I advocate the extermination of the “Neanderthals” (just as the Cro-Magnons exterminated their Neanderthal competitors)! Only after not a single one of them remains will we be worthy of Prometheus’s fire: developing science and technology. Not before. In fact, I believe that during the apocalyptic energy devolution that all of humanity will suffer, many will return to the Shire, so to speak; repudiating the world of scorched trees created by Saruman and his orcs.
In short, this is not the time to become astronomers or cosmologists! It is time to have the symbol of the black sun as an emblem in the bloody Kalki revolution that aspires to the Fourth Reich.
I’ve read and listened to alot of material regarding the Fermi Paradox and reached similar conclusions to you CT. There are only two racial groups on the planet that can spearhead humanity to the stars: Europeans and North East Asians. Currently, Europeans are committing ethno-genocide. What the fate of the North East Asians will be in a post White world is anyone’s guess. And if Europeans do disappear from the Earth, its a deep question whether or not the Chinese will be able to keep advanced civilization alive let alone advance it. I just don’t see humanity advancing unless there is some form of eugenics implemented. Blacks and Browns are a bio-hazard. Unless removed or improved, they look to be the death of the human race.
Which brings me to the thing about this blog post that hit me. Its something I’ve been thinking about since I became a race realist back in the Larry Auster days. “Race Realism” is applied biology. Its hereditarianism applied to humans. It recognizes a core Darwinian fact; namely that there has been divergent evolution due to differing selection pressures resulting from different geographical conditions. You have the north / south IQ divide, r vs K sexual selection, different time preferences and different dispositions towards crime and impulsiveness. All of this is genetic.
Now here is the fascinating phenomenon I’m seeing. We have our intellectual elites that are supposedly committed to all things science. They want to create an Orwellian world bureaucratic state run by technocrats all using “science”. Mandated vaccines, vaccine passports, carbon credits, digitally monitored carbon footprints, digital currencies managed by financial bureaucratic czars, etc, etc.
However…
The one area where the refuse to use “science” is in the area of racial differences. There they have an army of ideologues in the universities that tell us that race is a social construct and that there are no meaningful difference between the races and that the reason for low black and brown socio-economic outcomes is because of white racism. It boggles the mind.
The conclusion I’ve drawn is that philosophy / religion trumps science. Or more accurately, the philosophic foundation of a society will determine what science will be accepted. Currently, the West is dominated by Neo-Christianity and its egalitarian premises. Those egalitarian premises are embedded in the European psyche because of 2000 years of Christianity. Legitimate science (ie race realism) will not be allowed to overturn those egalitarian biases without a fight (ie major violence).
So I come out the same place you do. Fermi Paradox and futurist discussions are premature until the racial question is answered once and for all. An all white humanity could legitimately turn its attention to conquering the galaxy if that’s possible. A browning Euro-American world needs to fight for racial survival first and foremost. Everything else is irrelevant.
It’s a shame YouTube deplatformed entire channels, but about ten years ago I saw a video in which Tom Sunic, at a conference, said something that went against what Jared Taylor preaches: that white people would get it with mere racial realism.
Sunic said that wasn’t possible in a world where religions, culture, universities, and laws (in a word, the entire zeitgeist) run counter to that. Taylor and company on this side of the pond don’t seem to see this, given that, unlike Sunic, they are Christian sympathisers.
So the first step to saving the Aryans is a kind of racial Nietzscheanism: something we don’t see in the US these days except in some texts by Kevin Alfred Strom.